题名

視框反省與政策機會窗

并列篇名

Frame Reflection and Opportunity Window of Policy

DOI

10.7070/PR.201107.0001

作者

林水波(Shoei-Po Lin)

关键词

視框反省 ; 政策機會窗 ; 政策僵局 ; 政策赤字及學習之旅 ; Frame reflection ; opportunity window of policy ; policy stalemate ; policy deficit ; and learning journey

期刊名称

政策研究學報

卷期/出版年月

11期(2011 / 07 / 01)

页次

1 - 26

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

政策倡導團體之間向來基於自己的政策視框建構政策要素,冀以爭取最終的政策合法化機會。不過,各個倡導團體如若堅持自己的視框,不能藉機與藉勢進行視框的交流、互動與反省,而由單一視框主導政策的形成,每會因視框程度不一的注意赤字,而造成多元不同的政策赤字,導致原本冀圖的政策效應無由滋生。本文鑑於視框衝突的破壞性,視框反省的迫切性,掌握政策機會窗開啟的時機,乃深度論述視框反省的內涵,以洞視框反省的重要性,提出視框反省的確切作為,以及視框反省所能開啟的建設性機會。

英文摘要

In order to pursue policy legitimation, multiple policy advocacy groups always utilize their policy frames to construct policy elements and attempt to build majority coalitions. However, if each group persists its policy frame and cannot find a way to interact, communicate and reflect, policy deficits will be resulted from this policy making process. The desired policy efficacy has no way to produce.This article seeks to examine the values of frame reflection and discuss the destruction of frame conflict. For the purpose of seizing the opportunity window of policy, the deep examination and discussion is to search the implication, strategy and utility of frame reflection.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
参考文献
  1. 林水波(2009)。議事多數決的隱憂。政策研究學報,9,1-20。
    連結:
  2. Binder, S. A.(2003).Stalemate: Causes & Consequences of Legislative Gridlock.Washington, D.C.:Brookings Institution Press.
  3. Binder, S. A.(1997).Minority Rights, Majority Rule.Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
  4. Bozeman, B.(2007).Public Values and Public Interest.Washington, D. C.:Georgetown Univ. Press.
  5. Cobb R. W.(ed.),Ross, M. H.(ed.)(1997).Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial.Lawrence, KA:Univ. Press of Kansas.
  6. Dunn, W. N.(2007).Public Policy Analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
  7. Hart, P.,Kleiboer, M.(1995).Policy Controversies in the Negotiatory State.Knowledge & Policy,8(4),5-25.
  8. Janis, I. H.(1982).Groupthink.Boston:Houghton Mifflin Co..
  9. Kingdon, J. W.(2003).Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies.NY:Longman.
  10. Mayhew, D. R.(2005).Divided We Govern.New Haven,CT:Yale Univ. Press.
  11. Murphy, E. C.(2007).Talent IQ.Avon, MA:Platinum Press.
  12. O''Leary, K.(2006).Saving Democracy.Stanford, CA:Stanford Univ. Press.
  13. Rein. M.,Schön, D.(1996).Frame-Critical Policy Analysis and Frame-Reflective Policy Practice.Knowledge & Policy,9(1),85-104.
  14. Scharmer, C. O.(2007).Theory U.Cambridge, MA:Society for Organizational Learning.
  15. Schön, D.,Rein, M.(1994).Frame Reflection.NY:Basic Books.
  16. Schuck, P. H.,Zeckhauser, R. J.(2006).Targeting in Social Programs.Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution Press.
  17. Senge. P.,Smith, B.,Kruschwitz, N.,Laur, J.,Schley, S.(2008).The Necessary Revolution.NY:Doubleday.
  18. Shah, A.(ed.)(2007).Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption.Washington, D. C.:The World Bank.
  19. Sulkin, T.(2005).Issue Politics in Congress.Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
  20. Yankelovich. D.(1997).The Magic of Dialogue.NY:Simon & Schuster.
被引用次数
  1. 黎秀梅、石振國(2018)。我國積欠工資墊償基金新制之政策形成研究:多元流觀點。中華行政學報,22,19-38。
  2. 劉皓仁、陳芙萱(2013)。「幸福保衛戰」政策創新之研究。中華行政學報,13,71-85。
  3. 詹立煒(2015)。臺灣國會制度中的遊說操控—地方制度法第四條「準用直轄市」修正案歷程剖析。臺灣民主季刊,12(1),55-114。
  4. (2023)。公私協力的實踐-準公共幼兒園政策的影響與反思。臺東大學教育學報,34(2),1-33。