海峽兩岸商事仲裁裁決的相互認可與執行－現狀與前瞻

Mutual Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Award between Mainland China and Taiwan

10.6774/TULR.201206.0313

陳力(Li Chen)

海峽兩岸 ； 仲裁裁決 ； 相互認可與執行 ； Cross straight ； Arbitral award ； Mutual recognition and enforcement

臺北大學法學論叢

82期（2012 / 06 / 01）

313 - 343

繁體中文

隨著兩岸經貿往來的迅猛發展，涉兩岸商事糾紛不斷發生。但作為一種有效的爭議解決手段，仲裁並未成為解決兩岸互涉糾紛的主要手段，究其原因，除了兩岸仲裁立法差異導致的認知障礙、當事人對仲裁制度缺乏瞭解與信任等以外，更為重要的是兩岸在仲裁裁決的相互認可與執行方面仍存在一定的法律障礙，已有的司法實踐也因兩岸相關立法的缺失或不足而存在諸多問題。在海峽兩岸尚難以就仲裁裁決的相互認可與執行達成共識的情況下，通過借鑒港澳模式，兩岸分別儘快修改和細化相關立法應成為解決該法律困境的主要方法。

More and more commercial disputes occurred with the rapid development of economics and trade cross the Strait. As one of the effective disputes resolution measures, arbitration has not been selected as the main means to resolve commercial disputes by the private parties of the Mainland and Taiwan, the differences of the arbitration laws of the two Sides as well as the absence of knowledge and trust to arbitration of the disputing parties are two main reasons, but the most important reason is the existence of legal impediment on the mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral award between the Mainland and Taiwan. To revise the relative laws respectively for reference of the Hong Kong/Mainland Model on mutual recognition and enforcement of arbitral award shall be an effective way to overcome the legal impediments under the current cross Strait relationship.

1. 福建日報，廈門中院審結祖國大陸首例認可臺灣地區仲裁機構裁決案，2004 年 8 月 11 日第 5 版。Fu Jian Daily (fu jian ri bao), First case concerning recognition of arbitral award made in Tai Wan area was concluded by Xia Men Intermediate Court. (Xia Men Zhong Yuan Shen Jie Zu Guo Da Lu Shou Li Ren Ke Tai Wan Di Qu Zhong Cai Ji Gou Cai Jue An), Page 5, August, 11, 2004.
2. 大陸人民法院網，最高人民法院公佈涉台民事訴訟文書送達司法解釋http://www.chinacourt.org，2011 年 2 月 10 日。Website of People's Court of China (da lu ren min fa yuan wang), The Supreme People's Court issues the Judicial Interpretation concerning the service of documents relating to Taiwan (zui gao ren min fa yuan gong bu she tai min shi su song wen shu song da si fa jie shi), available at http://www.chinacourt.org, last visited 02/10/2011.
3. 法制日報，兩岸仲裁機構合作共促發展 http://www.legaldaily.com，2009 年 12 月 1 日。Legal Daily (fa zhi ri bao), Promoting development through cooperation between the arbitration institutions across the Strait (liang an zhong cai ji gou he zuo gong cu fa zhan), available at http://www.legaldaily.com, last visited 12/01/2009.
4. 于健龍(2008)。台商投資企業運用仲裁方式解決經貿糾紛之現狀。中國國際私法年會論文集
5. 王利明(2004)。海峽兩岸仲裁立法的比較研究。法學評論，2004(1)
6. 王志文(1999)。臺灣與香港、大陸間之民事司法協助問題。一國兩制下的司法合作研討會
7. 林俊益編(2008)。大陸與香港仲裁判斷在臺灣之認可裁判輯。中華仲裁協會=China Arbitration Association Tai Bei=zhong hua zhong cai xie hui。
8. 張友漁編(1984)。中國大百科全書。中國大百科全書出版社=Encyclopedia of China=zhong guo da bai ke quan shu chu ban she。
9. 曹發貴(2009)。廈門市中級人民法院關於認可臺灣地區民事判決、仲裁裁決等的經驗和做法。海峽兩岸民生與經貿往來中的法律問題
10. 楊崇森(2008)。仲裁法新論。中華仲裁協會=China Arbitration Association=zhong hua zhong cai xie hui。
11. 趙生祥(2007)。海峽兩岸可仲裁事項比較研究。現代法學，2007(2)
12. 齊樹潔、蔡從燕(1999)。海峽兩岸商事仲裁法律制度比較研究。臺灣研究集刊，1999(2)