题名

條約衝突的類型、解釋、與制度性限制－國際投資仲裁之例

并列篇名

Treaty Conflict through the Lens of International Investment Arbitration-Typology, Interpretation, and Judicial Decision-Making

作者

王自雄(Tzu-Hsiung Wang)

关键词

條約衝突 ； 國際投資仲裁 ； 國際人權法 ； 條約解釋 ； 司法決策 ； 司法最小主義 ； Treaty Conflict ； International Investment Arbitration ； International Human Rights Law ； Treaty Interpretation ； Judicial Decision-making ； Judicial Minimalism

期刊名称

臺北大學法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

94期（2015 / 06 / 01）

页次

209 - 292

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

在一系列與能源及天然資源投資相關的仲裁案中，地主國阿根廷提出外人投資保護與人權保障間之衝突，並請求仲裁庭優先適用人權規範。然而均無法如其所願。本文於從法理上分析條約衝突在古典國際法下的定義與目前通說的利弊之後，發現問題核心－系爭條約之解釋，在投資仲裁庭普遍於決策時採取司法最小主義的情況下，幾無機會被用以證立人權義務的優位性。除此之外，不論從管轄權與準據法，或是裁定的撤銷與判決先例的存否，人權義務同樣沒有破繭而出的可能。最後，基於以上結論，本文指出，投資與人權間不該是零和賽局式的規範衝突，而應當是非零和賽局的，兩項規範彼此間對於實踐資源與空間的競逐。承擔國際人權義務的地主國，自當於簽訂投資保障條約及相關自由貿易協定的前後，調整既有的人權政策與法規環境，使其能夠適於國家整體發展的進程，進而達到人權與投資間的規範調和。
英文摘要

In recent years, one of the most prominent and urgent problems in investment treaty arbitration is how the different branches and norms of international law interact, especially between human rights and foreign investment protection. What is contested, and the so-called ＂legitimacy crisis＂ and democratic deficit, is how much confidence and reliance should be placed on these arbitrators, officials and entities, particularly when exercising international public authority. Many human rights advocates, environmentalists, and anti-globalization activists decry the ＂faceless bureaucrats＂ at the investment tribunals, whom they see as undermining host states' sovereignty, democracy, and regulatory autonomy to protect their citizens' human rights. In all these investment arbitration awards, the claim of treaty conflict between human rights and foreign investment protection was made by Argentina in order to justify the violations of investment treaty obligations. Unfortunately, tribunals tended to prevent having to decide serious treaty conflicts. In this article, part I begins introducing the prerequisite and definition of treaty conflict under classic international law, especially the narrow-meaning approach took by most of international courts and tribunals. In Part II, I take a step forward to elaborate the Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which suggests that interpreters of a treaty should take into account ＂any relevant rules of international law applicable in the relations between the parties.＂ In part III, the alternatives beyond treaty conflict, including jurisdiction, revocation of awards, and ＂precedent,＂ will be examined. This article concludes that conflict of norms represents a zero-sum game between human rights and investment protection. This oversimplifies the choices presented by any host state's decision permitted under international law. It erroneously suggests that we must sacrifice one set of goals entirely to the other because the two sets are fundamentally incompatible. I maintain that we might find ways to reconceptualize and develop investment treatment standards that allow us to have some of each.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 王自雄(2010)。實證法與主觀價值─國際法典範下以人權為基礎之憲政功能行使。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，39(3)
    連結：
  2. 王自雄(2010)。「事前立法」對國家履行人權義務之必要性－以國家規制權與國家契約中之穩定條款為核心。東吳法律學報，22(2)
    連結：
  3. Holmes, O. W., The path of the law, 10 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 457-478 (1897).
  4. (1988).TRANSNATIONAL CONTRACTS - APPLICABLE LAW AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES: LAW AND PRACTICE.
  5. International Law Commission, Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with commentaries (U.N. Doc. A/6309/Rev.1) (1966), at http://untreaty.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/1_1_1966.pdf, last visited 06/15/2015
  6. Merced, M. J. De La & Krauss, C., Kinder Morgan to buy El Paso for $ 21.1 billion. New York Times (2011, October 16), at http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/kinder-morgan-to-buy-el-paso, last visited 06/15/2015
  7. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human rights, trade and investment (E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/9) (2003), at http://www.unhchr.ch/Huridocda/Huridoca.nsf/e06a5300f90fa0238025668700518ca4/9b2b4fed82c88ee2c1256d7b002e47da/$FILE/G0314847.pdf, last visited 06/15/2015
  8. Morgenthau, H. J., Positivism, functionalism, and international Law, 34 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 260-284 (1940)
  9. KELSEN, H., GENERAL THEORY OF LAW AND STATE, CAMBRIDGE 374-75 (WEDBERG, A. TRANS. 1949).
  10. Amnesty International, Human rights, trade and investment matters (2006), at http://www.amnestyusa.org/business/HRTradeInvestmentMatters.pdf, last visited 06/15/2015
  11. Lauterpacht, H., The Covenant as the "higher law", 17 BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 54-65 (1936)
  12. Droits et Démocratie, Reconciling foreign direct investment and human rights. Report of the Rights & Democracy Think Tank (2003), at http://www.dd-rd.ca/site/_PDF/publications/globalization/thinkTank2003/reportTTeng2003.pdf, last visited 06/15/2015
  13. Hohfeld, W. N., Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning, 23 YALE LAW JOURNAL 16-59 (1913)
  14. Akehurst, M.(1975).The hierarchy of the sources of international law.BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,47,273-285.
  15. AUST, A.(2007).MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE.
  16. Baetens, F.(ed.)(2013).INVESTMENT LAW WITHIN INTERNATIONAL LAW: INTEGRATIONIST PERSPECTIVES.
  17. BAKAN, J.(2004).THE CORPORATION: THE PATHOLOGICAL PURSUIT OF PROFIT AND POWER.
  18. BARKUN, M.(1968).LAW WITHOUT SANCTIONS: ORDER IN PRIMITIVE SOCIETIES AND THE WORLD COMMUNITY.
  19. BARNET, R. J.,MÜLLER, R. E.(1974).GLOBAL REACH: THE POWER OF THE MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS.
  20. BICKEL, A. M.(1986).THE LEAST DANGEROUS BRANCH: THE SUPREME COURT AT THE BAR OF POLITICS.
  21. Binder, G.(1985).The dialectic of duplicity: Treaty conflict and political contradiction.BUFFALO LAW REVIEW,34,329-549.
  22. Blyschak, P.(2011).State-owned enterprises and international investment treaties: When are state-owned entities and their investments protected?.JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS,6,1-52.
  23. Borgen, C. J.(2005).Resolving treaty conflicts.GEORGE WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW,37,573-648.
  24. BOURQUAIN, K.(2008).FRESHWATER ACCESS FROM A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE: A CHALLENGE TO INTERNATIONAL WATER AND HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.
  25. BROWNLIE, I.(2008).PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  26. Cannizzaro, E.(ed.)(2011).THE LAW OF TREATIES BEYOND THE VIENNA CONVENTION.
  27. Chase, C.(2012).Norm conflict between WTO covered agreements-Real, apparent or avoided?.INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY,61,791-821.
  28. Choudhury, B.(2008).Recapturing Public Power: Is Investment Arbitration's Engagement of the Public Interest Contributing to the Democratic Deficit?.VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW,41,775-832.
  29. Coleman, J.(ed.),Shapiro S.(ed.)(2004).THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF JURISPRUDENCE AND PHILOSOPHY OF LAW.
  30. COLLIER, J.,LOWE, V.(2000).THE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: INSTITUTIONS AND PROCEDURES.
  31. Corten, Olivier(ed.),Klein, Pierre(ed.)(2011).THE VIENNA CONVENTIONS ON THE LAW OF TREATIES: A COMMENTARY.
  32. Czapliński, W.,Danilenko, G.(1991).Conflicts of norms in international law.NETHERLANDS YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,1990,3-42.
  33. Diehl, A. N.(2008).Tracing a success story or "the baby boom of BITs".INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW IN CONTEXT
  34. DUMMETT, M.(1994).ORIGINS OF ANALYTICAL PHILOSOPHY.
  35. Dupuy, P.-M.(ed.),Francioni, F.(ed.),Petersmann, E.-U.(ed.)(2009).HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ARBITRATION.
  36. Dworkin, M.(ed.),Lilla, R.(ed.),Silvers, R. B.(ed.)(2001).THE LEGACY OF ISAIAH BERLIN.
  37. Evans, M. D.(ed.)(2006).INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  38. Felipe, M. B. de,Martín, A. N.(2012).Post 9/11 trends in international judicial cooperation: Human rights as a constraint on extradition in death penalty cases.JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE,10,581-604.
  39. Fox, G. H.(ed.),Roth, B. R.(ed.)(2000).DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  40. Francioni, P.-M.(ed.),Dupuy, F.(ed.),Petersmann, E.-U.(ed.)(2009).HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ARBITRATION.
  41. Franck, S. D.(2009).Development and outcomes of investment treaty arbitration.HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL,50,435-490.
  42. FRANCK, T. M.(1995).FAIRNESS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INSTITUTIONS.
  43. FRIEDMAN, L. M.(2011).THE HUMAN RIGHTS CULTURE: A STUDY IN HISTORY AND CONTEXT.
  44. Fry, J. D.(2007).International human rights law in investment arbitration: Evidence of international law's unity.DUKE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW,18,77-149.
  45. FULLER, L. L.(1969).THE MORALITY OF LAW.
  46. Gal-Or, N.(2008).The concept of appeal in international dispute settlement.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,19,43-65.
  47. GARDINER, R.(2008).TREATY INTERPRETATION.
  48. Ghouri, A. A.(2012).Determining hierarchy between conflicting treaties: Are there vertical rules in the horizontal system?.ASIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,2,235-266.
  49. GOLDSMITH, J. L.,POSNER, E. A.(2005).THE LIMITS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  50. Goodman, R.,Jinks, D.(2003).Measuring the effects of human rights treaties.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,14,171-183.
  51. HAMPSON, F. O.,HART, M.(1999).MULTILATERAL NEGOTIATIONS: LESSONS FROM ARMS CONTROL, TRADE, AND THE ENVIRONMENT.
  52. HART, H. L. A.(1997).THE CONCEPT OF LAW.
  53. Hathaway, O. A.(2002).Do human rights treaties make a difference?.YALE LAW JOURNAL,111,1935-2042.
  54. He, L. L.,Sappideen, R.(2013).Investor-State arbitration under bilateral trade and investment agreements: Finding rhythm in inconsistent drumbeats.JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE,47,215-241.
  55. HENKIN, L.(1995).INTERNATIONAL LAW: POLITICS AND VALUES.
  56. Henkin, L.(1992).Human rights and competing ideas.ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF JUDGE TASLIM OLAWALE ELIAS: CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
  57. Hirsch, M.(2005).The sociology of international law.UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LAW JOURNAL,55,891-939.
  58. Hirsch, M.(2008).Conflicting obligations in international investment law: Investment tribunals' perspective.THE SHIFTING ALLOCATION OF AUTHORITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: CONSIDERING SOVEREIGNTY, SUPREMACY AND SUBSIDIARITY
  59. Hollis, D. B.(ed.)(2014).THE OXFORD GUIDE TO TREATIES.
  60. Houtven, L. Van(2002).Governance of the IMF: Decision making, institutional oversight, transparency, and accountability.
  61. Jenks, C. W.(1953).The conflict of law-making treaties.BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,30,401-453.
  62. Kaufmann-Kohler, G.(2007).Arbitral precedent: Dream, necessity or excuse?.ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL,23,357-378.
  63. KELSEN, H.(1962).Derogation, in Essays in JURISPRUDENCE IN HONOR OF ROSCOE POUND.Essays in JURISPRUDENCE IN HONOR OF ROSCOE POUND
  64. KLABBERS, J.(2009).TREATY CONFLICT AND THE EUROPEAN UNION.
  65. Kontorovich, E.(2008).The inefficiency of universal jurisdiction.UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW,2008,389-418.
  66. KOSKENNIEMI, M.(2005).FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA: THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT.
  67. KOSKENNIEMI, M.,Leino, P.(2002).Fragmentation of international law? Postmodern anxieties.LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,15,553-579.
  68. KRAMER, M. H(2007).OBJECTIVITY AND THE RULE OF LAW.
  69. Kreindler, R. H.(2006).Fair and equitable treatment: A comparative international law approach.TRANSNATIONAL DISPUTE MANAGEMENT,3,1-14.
  70. KULICK, A.(2012).GLOBAL PUBLIC INTEREST IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW.
  71. Kuusela, O.(ed.),McGinn, M.(ed.)(2011).The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein.
  72. LAUTERPACHT, H.(2000).THE FUNCTION OF LAW IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY.
  73. Linderfalk, U.(2007).The effect of jus cogens norms: Whoever opened Pandora's Box, did you ever think about the consequences?.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,18,853-871.
  74. Marceau, G.(2001).Conflicts of norms and conflicts of jurisdictions: The relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other treaties.JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE,35,1081-1131.
  75. McLachlan, C.(2005).The principle of systemic integration and article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention.INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY,54,279-319.
  76. MERKOURIS, P.(2015).ARTICLE 31(3)(C) VCLT AND THE PRINCIPLE OF SYSTEMIC INTEGRATION: NORMATIVE SHADOWS IN PLATO'S CAVE.
  77. Moon, W. J.(2012).Essential security interests in international investment agreements.JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW,15,481-502.
  78. MUCHLINSKI, P. T.(2007).MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND THE LAW.
  79. Murphy, S. D.(1999).Democratic legitimacy and the recognition of States and Governments.INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY,48,545-581.
  80. Mus, J. B.(1998).Conflicts between treaties in international law.NETHERLANDS INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW,45,208-232.
  81. NEWCOMBE, A.,PARADELL, L.(2009).LAW AND PRACTICE OF INVESTMENT TREATIES: STANDARDS OF TREATMENT.
  82. NOZICK, R.(1974).ANARCHY, STATE, AND UTOPIA.
  83. Ortino, P.(ed.),Muchlinski, F.(ed.),Schreuer, C.(ed.)(2008).THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW.
  84. Paasivirta, E.(1989).Internationalization and stabilization of contracts versus state sovereignty.BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,60,315-350.
  85. PAUWELYN, J.(2003).CONFLICT OF NORMS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW: HOW WTO LAW RELATES TO OTHER RULES OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  86. PAUWELYN, J.(2003).A typology of multilateral treaty obligations: Are WTO obligations bilateral or collective in nature?.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,14,907-951.
  87. Pérez, V. J. T.(2012).Diplomatic protection revival for failure to comply with investment arbitration awards.JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT,3,445-475.
  88. Peters, A.(2003).International dispute settlement: A network of cooperational duties.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,14,1-34.
  89. PETERSMANN, E.-U.(2012).INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW IN THE 21ST CENTURY: CONSTITUTIONAL PLURALISM AND MULTILEVEL GOVERNANCE OF INTERDEPENDENT PUBLIC GOODS.
  90. Peterson, L. E.,Gray K. R.(2003).Research paper by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) for the Swiss Department of Foreign AffairsResearch paper by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) for the Swiss Department of Foreign Affairs,未出版
  91. POSNER, R. A.(1993).THE PROBLEMS OF JURISPRUDENCE.
  92. POSNER, R. A.(1998).LAW AND LITERATURE.
  93. PULKOWSKI, D.(2014).THE LAW AND POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL REGIME CONFLICT.
  94. Rajput, T.(2013).The management of normative conflict within the WTO: A critical analysis of the implications of other regimes.MANCHESTER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW,10,78-107.
  95. Ramcharan, B. G.(1982).The good offices of the United Nations Secretary-General in the field of human rights.AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,76,130-141.
  96. Ranganathan, S.(2013).Between philosophy and anxiety? The early International Law Commission, treaty conflict and the project of international law.BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,83,82-114.
  97. Ratner, S. R.(2008).Regulatory takings in institutional context: Beyond the fear of fragmented international law.AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,102,475-528.
  98. RAWLS, J.,KELLY, E.(ED.)(2001).JUSTICE AS FAIRNESS: A RESTATEMENT.
  99. Reinisch, A.(2012).Articles 30 and 59 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties in action: The decisions on jurisdiction in the Eastern Sugar and Eureko investment arbitration.LEGAL ISSUES OF ECON. INTEGRATION,39,157-177.
  100. Reinisch, A.(ed.),Kriebaum U.(ed.)(2007).THE LAW OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: LIBER AMICORUM HANSPETER NEUHOLD.
  101. Reisman, W. M.(1989).The breakdown of the control mechanism in ICSID arbitration.DUKE LAW JOURNAL,1989,739-807.
  102. Reisman, W. M.(1981).International lawmaking: A process of communication.AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW'S PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING,75,101-120.
  103. Renshaw, C. S.(2012).National human rights institutions and civil society organizations: New dynamics of engagement at domestic, regional, and international levels.GLOBAL GOVERNANCE: A REVIEW OF MULTILATERALISM AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS,18,299-316.
  104. REUTER, P.,MICO J.(TRANS.),HAGGENMACHER P.(TRANS.)(1995).INTRODUCTION TO THE LAW OF TREATIES.
  105. Rosenne, S.(1972).Bilateralism and community interest in the codified law of treaties.TRANSNATIONAL LAW IN A CHANGING SOCIETY: ESSAYS IN HONOR OF PHILIP C. JESSUP
  106. SADAT-AKHAVI, S. A.(2003).METHODS OF RESOLVING CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREATIES.
  107. Salacuse, J. W.(2007).The treatification of international investment law.LAW AND BUSINESS REVIEW OF THE AMERICAS,13,155-166.
  108. Schachter, O.(1989).Entangled treaty and custom.INTERNATIONAL LAW AT A TIME OF PERPLEXITY
  109. SCHILL, S. W.(2009).THE MULTILATERALIZATION OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW.
  110. SCHREUER, C. H.(2001).THE ICSID CONVENTION: A COMMENTARY.
  111. SHANY, Y.(2005).Contract claims vs. treaty claims: Mapping conflicts between ICSID decisions on multisourced investment claims.AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,99,835-851.
  112. SHANY, Y.(2003).THE COMPETING JURISDICTIONS OF INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS.
  113. Shihata, I. F. I.(1986).Towards a greater depoliticization of investment disputes: The roles of ICSID and MIGA.ICSID REVIEW,1,1-25.
  114. Simma, B.(2009).Universality of international law from the perspective of a practitioner.EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,20,265-297.
  115. Simma, B.,Kill, T.(2009).Harmonizing investment protection and international human rights: First steps towards a methodology.INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF CHRISTOPH SCHREUER
  116. SIMMONS, B. A.(2009).MOBILIZING FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN DOMESTIC POLITICS.
  117. SORNARAJAH, M.(2010).THE INTERNATIONAL LAW ON FOREIGN INVESTMENT.
  118. SUNSTEIN, C. R.(1996).LEGAL REASONING AND POLITICAL CONFLICT.
  119. SUNSTEIN, C. R.(1999).ONE CASE AT A TIME: JUDICIAL MINIMALISM ON THE SUPREME COURT.
  120. Sunstein, Cass R.、商千儀譯、高忠義譯(2001)。司法極簡主義：一次一案的精神與民主政治。商周出版股份有限公司=Business Weekly Publications, Inc.=shang zhou chu ban gu fen you xian gong si。
  121. TEITEL, R. G.(2011).HUMANITY'S LAW.
  122. Thirlway, H.(1991).The law and procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960-1989 (part three).BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,62,1-76.
  123. TRACHTMAN, J. P.(2008).THE ECONOMIC STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  124. TUDOR, I.(2008).THE FAIR AND EQUITABLE TREATMENT STANDARD IN THE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF FOREIGN INVESTMENT.
  125. UNGER, R. M.(1996).WHAT SHOULD LEGAL ANALYSIS BECOME?.
  126. UNGER, R. M.(1977).LAW IN MODERN SOCIETY: TOWARD A CRITICISM OF SOCIAL THEORY.
  127. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE & DEVELOPMENT(2014).WORLD INVESTMENT REPORT 2014: INVESTING IN THE SDGS: AN ACTION PLAN.
  128. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE & DEVELOPMENT(2005).WORLD INVESTMENT REPORT 2005: TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS AND THE INTERNATIONALIZATION OF R & D.
  129. UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE & DEVELOPMENT(2011).WORLD INVESTMENT REPORT 2011: NON-EQUITY MODES OF INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT.
  130. URUEÑA, R.(2012).NO CITIZENS HERE: GLOBAL SUBJECTS AND PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW.
  131. VADI, V.(2014).PUBLIC HEALTH IN INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW AND ARBITRATION.
  132. VANDEVELDE, K. J.(2010).BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES: HISTORY, POLICY, AND INTERPRETATION.
  133. Vierdag, E. W.(1988).The time of the 'conclusion' of a multilateral treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and related provisions.BRITISH YEAR BOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW,59,75-112.
  134. VILLIGER, M. E.(1997).CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW AND TREATIES: A MANUAL ON THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF THE INTERRELATION OF SOURCES.
  135. Vranes, E.(2005).Lex superior, lex specialis, lex posterior-Zur Rechtsnatur der "Konfliktlösungsregeln".ZEITSCHRIFT FÜR AUSLÄNDISCHES ÖFFENTLICHES RECHT UND VÖLKERRECHT,65,391-405.
  136. Wälde, T. W.(2009).Interpreting investment treaties: Experiences and examples.INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW FOR THE 21ST CENTURY: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF CHRISTOPH SCHREUER
  137. Wolfrum, R.(ed.),Röben, V.(ed.)(2005).DEVELOPMENT OF INTERNATIONAL LAW IN TREATY MAKINg.
  138. WOLFRUM, R.,MATZ, N.(2010).CONFLICTS IN INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.
  139. Zia-Zarifi, S.(2001).Protection without Protectionism. Linking a Multilateral Investment Treaty and Human Rights.MULTILATERAL REGULATION OF INVESTMENT
  140. 王自雄(2009)。金錢、權力與秩序─國際貨幣基金監督職能之研究（上）。台灣國際法季刊，6(4)
  141. 宋鴻兵、楊照導讀(2009)。貨幣戰爭 2－金權天下。遠流出版事業股份有限公司=Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd.=yuan liu chu ban shi ye gu fen you xian gong si。
  142. 李浩培(2003)。條約法概論。法律出版社=Law Press=fa lu chu ban she。
  143. 李貴英(2005)。從契約義務到條約義務─論 Salini Costruttori S.p.A. and Italstrade S.p.A. v. the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan 一案管轄權裁定。台灣國際法季刊，2(2)
  144. 李貴英(2004)。國際投資爭端解決中心 Compañia de Aguas del Aconquija S.A. & Vivendi Universal (ex Compagnie Générale des Eaux) v. Argentine Republic 一案之評析。經社法制論叢，34
  145. 黃居正(2013)。判例國際公法 I。自版=self publication。
  146. 葉俊榮(1995)。國家責任的溢流：國家賠償法施行現況的檢討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，24(2)
  147. 羅昌發(1998)。貿易關係之法律問題：國際經貿法研究（二）。月旦出版社股份有限公司=Angle Publishing Co., Ltd.=yue dan chu ban she gu fen you xian gong si。
被引用次数
  1. 陳仟萬(2020)。被害人訴訟參與結合修復式司法的應用－安全理念的建構。軍法專刊，66(5)，38-66。
print cancel