题名

美國內線交易法制的方法與價值

并列篇名

The Insider Trading Law of the United States: Method and Value

作者

賴英照(In-Jaw Lai)

关键词

內線交易 ； 法律解釋與價值判斷 ； 資訊平等理論 ； 信賴關係理論 ； 私取理論 ； Insider Trading ； Statutory Interpretation and Value Judgement ； Parity-of-Information Theory ； Fiduciary Duty Theory ； Misappropriation Theory

期刊名称

臺北大學法學論叢

卷期/出版年月

99期（2016 / 09 / 01）

页次

1 - 95

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

美國處罰內線交易的法制，是以禁止欺騙的條文為基礎。何謂欺騙？由於法條文義頗富彈性，過去數十年間，美國法院判決從資訊平等理論，到信賴關係理論，到私取理論，法律雖未修正，但「欺騙」的意涵卻有重大的變化這種變化和法官使用的法律解釋方法，及其對內線交易的道德評價息息相關。研讀美國法院判決時，要同時注意判決的主旨和理由，及不同意見書的見解，更要透視多數意見和不同意見所運用的解釋方法及方法背後的價值觀。從這樣的高度觀察，便會清楚認識判決的結果其實是一種價值選擇，而且是經常分歧變動的選擇。
英文摘要

The prohibition of insider trading in the United States is based on the anti-fraud provision. The definition of ＂fraud＂ or ＂deception＂ is broad and vague, providing a board playing field for different interpretations. A variety of theories, including parity-of-information theory, fiduciary duty theory, and misappropriation theory, have been applied in cases by the court over the pa t decades. While the text of the law as enacted by the Congress remains intact, the meaning of ＂fraud＂ or ＂deception＂ has changed significantly. The change is largely a product of differences in the method of statutory interpretation as employed by the courts, and variation in judges' value judgement on the insider trading. To gain an insight into the U.S. insider trading law, one should read both dissenting and majority opinions of the decisions, with special attention to the statutory interpretation methods and value judgement underlying the holdings and reasons thereof. The holdings are not given, but merely a choice of value among judges, and often changing and conflicting.
主题分类 社會科學 > 法律學
参考文献
  1. 張心悌(2008)。從法律經濟學與資訊財產權探討內線交易理論：兼論內線交易內部人之範圍。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，37(3)
    連結：
  2. 黃朝琮(2016)。內線消息傳遞責任之探討。法令月刊，67(6)
    連結：
  3. Apolinsky, Joanna B.(2011).Insider Trading as Misfeasance: The Yielding of the Fiduciary Requirement.U. Kan. L. Rev.,59,493-539.
  4. Apolinsky, Joanna B.(2014).The Boundaries of Fraud under the Insider Trading Rules.Fla. St. U. Bus. Rev.,13,1-35.
  5. Austin, Danielle A.(2013).We the People or We the Legislature?: The STOCK Act's Compromise Between Politically-Motivated Accountability and Keeping Congress above the Law.Hofstra L. Rev.,42,267-301.
  6. Bailey, Robert, Jr.(2010).SEC v. Cuban: the Misapropriation Theory and Its Application to Confidentiality Agreements Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b5-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Del. J. of Corp. L.,35,539-561.
  7. Bainbridge, Stephen M.(1999).Insider Trading Regulation: The Path Dependent Choice Between Property Rights and Fraud.SMU L. Rev.,52,1589-1651.
  8. Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2011).Insider Trading Inside the Beltway.J. Corp. L.,36,281-307.
  9. Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2009).Ruling On Hackers As Inside Traders: Right in Theory.Wrong on the Law,24(32),1-4.
  10. Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2014).Insider Trading Law and Policy.
  11. Bainbridge, Stephen M.(2009).Financial Services & E-Commerce: The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act.Engage,10,59-65.
  12. Barbarbella, Matthew(2009).Insider Trading in Congress: The Need for Regulation.J. Bus. & Sec. L.,9,199-237.
  13. Bebel, Christopher J.(1998).A Detailed Analysis of United States v. O'Hagan: Onward Through the Evolution of the Federal Securities Laws.La. L. L. Rev.,59,1-61.
  14. Bloomenthal, Harold S.,Wolff, Samuel(2002).Securities and Federal Corporate Law.
  15. Breyer, Stephen(2005).Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution.
  16. Brick, Joshua Michael(2013).The STOCK Act: Is It Necessary and If So Is It a Sufficient Solution?.Duq. Bus. L. J.,15,179-197.
  17. Brickey, Kathleen F.(2006).Corporate and White Collar Crime, Cases & Materials.
  18. Brudney, Victor(1997).O'Hagan Problems.Sup. Ct. Rev.,1997,249-269.
  19. Brudney, Victor(1979).Insiders, Outsiders, and Informational Advantages Under the Federal Securities Laws.Harv. L. Rev.,93,322-376.
  20. Burke, Kerry,Kelner, Robert,Parks, Zachary(2013).When Talking Politics Leads to Prison: Political Intelligence & the STOCK Act.The Banking Law Journal,2013,784-793.
  21. Choper, Jesse H.,Coffee, John C., Jr.,Gilson, Ronald J.(2008).Cases & Materials on Corporations.
  22. Coffee, John C., Jr.(2013).Introduction: Mapping the Future of Insider Trading Law: of Boundaries, Gaps, and Strategies.Colum. Bus. L. Rev.,2013,281-317.
  23. Coffee, John C., Jr.,Sale, Hillary A.(2012).Securities Regulation: Cases and Materials.
  24. Coffee, John C., Jr.,Seligman, Joel,Sale, Hillary A.(2007).Securities Regulation, Cases & Materials.
  25. Coles, Kathleen(2006).The Dilemma of the Remote Tippee.Gonz. L. Rev.,41,181-236.
  26. Cox, James D.,Hillman, Robert W.,Langevoort, Donald C.(2009).Securities Regulation, Cases and Materials.
  27. Cross, Frank B.(2009).The Theory and Practice of Statutory Interpretation.
  28. Dauenhauer, Carlyle H.(2015).Justice in Equity: Newman and Egalitarian Reconciliation for Insider-Trading.Rutgers Bus. L. J.,12,39-96.
  29. Davis, Ryan M.(2010).Trimming the "Judicial Oak": Rule 10b 5-2(b)(1), Confidentiality Agreements, and the Proper Scope of Insider Trading Liability.Vand. L. Rev.,63,1469-1506.
  30. De Soto, Starkey(2012)."Well, Now I'm Screwed": The Ever-Expanding Liability for Outsider Tradings.Whittier L. Rev.,33,275-310.
  31. DiGiovanni, Mark F.(2012).Weeding Out a New Theory of Insider Trading Liability and Cultivating an Heirloom Variety: A Proposed Response to SEC v. Dorozhko.Geo. Mason L. Rev.,19,593-627.
  32. Doyle, Sean F.(2010).Simplifying the Analysis: The Second Circuit Lays Out a Straightforward Theory of Fraud in SEC v. Dorozhko.N. C. L. Rev.,89,357-386.
  33. Fedderke, Johannes W.,Ventoruzzo, Marco(2015).Do Conservative Justices Favor Wall Street? Ideology and the Supreme Court's Securities Regulation Decisions.Fla. L. Rev.,67,1211-1280.
  34. Fodor, Anna(2014).Congressional Arbitrage at the Executive's Expense: The Speech or Debate Clause and the Unenforceable STOCK Act.Nw. U. L. Rev.,108,607-638.
  35. Freeman, Milton(1967).Conference on Codification of the Federal Securities Laws.Business Law,22,793-955.
  36. Fritz, Kevin W.(2013).The STOCK Act Is Inadequate: U.S. Index Funds Are the Solution to Political Insider Trading.LIBERTY U. L. Rev.,7,275-316.
  37. George, Andrew(2008).Public (Self)-Service: Illegal Trading on Confidential Congressional Information.Harv. L. Pol'y Rev.,2,161-172.
  38. Gerla, Harry S.(2015).Confidentiality Agreements and the Misappropriation Theory of Insider Trading: Avoiding the Fiduciary Duty Fetish.U. Dayton L. Rev.,39,331-351.
  39. Hazen, Thomas L.(2006).The Law Of Securities Regulation.
  40. Hazen, Thomas Lee(2010).Identifying the Duty Prohibiting Outsider Trading on Material Nonpublic Information.Hastings L. J.,61,881-916.
  41. Hoffer, Douglas J.(2011).Quagmire: Is the SEC Stuck in a Misguided War Against PIPE Financing?.Transactions,12,9-36.
  42. Ippoliti, Christopher(2015).Governing the Corporate Insiders: Improving Regulation Fair Disclosure with More Robust Guidance and Stronger Penalties for Individual Executive.J. Bus. Entrepreneurship & L.,8,13-57.
  43. Karmel, Roberta S.(1998).Outsider Trading on Confidential Information-A Breach in Search of a Duty.Cardozo L. Rev.,20,83-134.
  44. Karol, Brain A.(2011).Deception Absent Duty: Computer Hackers & Section 10(b) Liability.U. Miami Bus. L. Rev.,19,185-218.
  45. Kim, Sung Hui(2013).The Last Temptation of Congress: Legislator Insider Trading and the Fiduciary Norm Against Corruption.Cornell L. Rev.,98,845-920.
  46. Langevoort, Donald C.(1999).Rereading Cady, Roberts: The Ideology and Practice of Insider Trading Regulation.Colum. L. Rev.,99,1319-1343.
  47. Langevoort, Donald C.(2013)."Fine Distinctions" in the Contemporary Law of Insider Trading.Colum. Bus. L. Rev.,2013,429-460.
  48. Langevoort, Donald C.(2015).Insider Trading: Regulation, Enforcement and Prevention.
  49. Loewenstein, Mark J.,Wang, William K. S.(2005).The Corporation as Insider Trader.Del. J. Corp. L.,30,45-78.
  50. Loss, Louis,Seligman, Joel,Paredes, Troy(2011).Fundamentals of Securities Regulation.
  51. Macey, Jonathan R.,O'Hara, Maureen(2009).Essay, Regulation and Scholarship: Constant Companions or Occasional Bedfellows?.Yale J. on Reg.,26,89-116.
  52. McNamara, Steven(2015).Insider Trading and Evolutionary Psychology: Strong Reciprocity, Cheater Detection, and the Expanding Boundaries of the Law.Va. J. Soc. Pol'y & L.,22,241-305.
  53. Nagy, Donna M.(2009).Insider trading and the gradual demise of fiduciary principles.Iowa L. Rev.,94,1315-1379.
  54. Nagy, Donna M.(2011).Insider Trading, Congressional Officials, and Duties of Entrustment.B. U. L. Rev.,91,1105-1163.
  55. Nagy, Donna M.(1998).Reframing the Misapproprivation Theory of Insider Trading Liability: A Post-O'Hagan Suggestion.Ohio St. L. J.,59,1223-1310.
  56. Nelson, Adam R.(2012).Extending Outsider Trading Liability to Thieves.Fordham L. Rev.,80,2157-2197.
  57. Odian, Elizabeth A.(2011).SEC v. Dorozhko's Affirmative Misrepresentation Theory of Insider Trading: Improper Means to a Proper End.Marq. L. Rev.,94,1313-1349.
  58. Pahl, Joseph(2012).A Heart as Far From Fraud as Heaven from Earth: SEC v. Cuban and Fiduciary Duties Under Rule 10b5-2.Nw. U. L. Rev.,106,1849-1881.
  59. Painter, Richard W.(2009).Getting the Government America Deserves: How Ethics Reform Can Make A Difference.
  60. Painter, Richard W.,Krawiec, Kimberly D.,Williams, Cynthia A.(1998).Don't Ask, Just Tell: Insider Trading after United States v. O'Hagan.Va. L. Rev.,84,153-228.
  61. Pesok, Jorge(2015).Insider Trading: No Longer Reserved for Insiders.Fla. St. U. Bus. Rev.,14,109-142.
  62. Prakash, Saikrishna(1999).Our Dysfunctional Insider Trading Regime.Colum. L. Rev.,99,1491-1550.
  63. Prentice, Robert A.(1999).The Internet and Its Challenges for the Future of Insider Trading Regulation.Harv. J. L. & Tech.,12,263-364.
  64. Pritchard, Adam C.(1998).United States v. O'Hagan: Agency Law and Justice Powell's Legacy for the Law of Insider Trading.B. U. L. Rev.,78,13-58.
  65. Pritchard, Adam C.(2015).Dirks and Genesis of Personal Benefit.Smu L. Rev.,68,857-875.
  66. Pritchard, Adam C.(2011).Securities law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or indifference?.J. Corp. L.,37,105-145.
  67. Pritchard, Adam C.(2003).Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr., and the Counterrevolution in the Federal Securities Laws.Duke L. J.,52,841-949.
  68. Scalia, Antonin(1997).A Matter of Interpretation.
  69. Schroeder, Jeanne L.(2014).Taking Stock: Insider and Outsider Trading by Congress.Wm. & Mary Bus. L. Rev.,5,159-239.
  70. Seligman, Joel(1998).A Mature Synthesis: O'Hagan Resolves "Insider" Trading's Most Vexing Problems.Del. J. Corp. L.,23,1-28.
  71. Seligman, Joel(2003).The Transformation of Wall Street.
  72. Strudler, Alan,Orts, Eric W.(1999).Moral Principle in the Law of Insider Trading.Tex. L. Rev.,78,375-438.
  73. Thel, Steve(1990).The Original Conception of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act.Stan. L. Rev.,42,385-464.
  74. Wang, William K. S.,Steinberg, Marc(2010).Insider Trading.
  75. Weiss, Elliott J.(1998).United States v. O'Hagan: Pragmatism Returns to the Law of Insider Trading.J. Corp. L.,23,429-437.
  76. Wheatley, Michael D.(2010).Apologia for the Second Circuit's Opinion in SEC v. Dorozhko.J.L. Econ. & Pol'y,7,25-60.
  77. Ziobrowski, Alan J.,Cheng, Ping,Boyd, James W.,Ziobrowski, Brigitte J.(2004).Abnormal Returns from the Common Stock Investments of the U. S. Senate.Journal Financial & Quantitative Analysis,39,661-676.
  78. 江朝聖(2016)。國會議員與內線交易─兼論證券交易法「基於職業關係獲悉消息之人」之範圍。興大法學，19
  79. 余雪明(2016)。證券交易法─比較證券法。自版。
  80. 林志潔(2014)。財經正義的刑法觀點。元照出版有限公司。
  81. 曾宛如(2011)。公司法制基礎理論之再建構。承法數位文化有限公司。
  82. 黃朝琮(2013)。美國案例法上內線交易責任主體範圍之變遷與啟示。中華國際法與超國界法評論，9(2)
  83. 劉連煜(2012)。内線交易構成要件。元照出版有限公司。
  84. 賴英照(2016)。內線交易的紅線─重大消息何時明確？。中原財經法學，36
被引用次数
  1. 洪令家(2017)。內線交易再進化：談衍生性金融商品之內線交易。東吳法律學報，29(2)，117-155。
  2. 江朝聖(2020)。偶然聽聞重大消息可成為內線交易的內部人？－兼評我國相關司法判決。臺北大學法學論叢，114，63-127。
  3. 賴英照(2017)。關聯股票的內線交易。臺北大學法學論叢，102，1-27。
  4. (2022)。駭客、炸彈客與內線交易。中央警察大學法學論集，42，135-182。
print cancel