障礙者以權利協商主體－在汙名下繪製「常與異」光譜的法意識

Revisualizing ＂Normal and Abnormal＂ as a Continuum: Rights, Stigma, and Legal Consciousness of People with Disability

李采俞(Cai-Yu Li)；王曉丹(Hsiao-Tan Wang)

障礙者 ； 法意識 ； 汙名 ； 常與異 ； 關係 ； 權利主張 ； 就業 ； 身分認同 ； People with Disabilities ； Legal Consciousness ； Stigma ； Normal and Abnormal ； Relationships ； Claims ； Employment ； Identity

臺北大學法學論叢

121期（2022 / 03 / 01）

1 - 53

繁體中文

障礙者遭受就業歧視時，經常面臨是否以及如何主張權利的困境。權利究竟對障礙者產生何種意義？「權利－身分遞迴理論」著眼於障礙者主張權利與身分認同之間不斷相互建構的法意識，但仍需要深究在此過程中，障礙者在對抗社會汙名時與權利產生何種關聯，以及權利對於障礙者建構身分主體產生何種作用。本研究訪談11位障礙者，分析在面臨工作歧視時，他們的法意識社會建構過程，包括如何回應他人對其障礙身分的感知，以及決定是否主張權利的關鍵。本研究發現，對障礙者而言，每一次權利與身分認同的具體情境都是在協商其汙名，透過重新詮釋「常與異」的過程，決定其是否現身、如何現身的主體建構。最後進一步指出，權利有助於障礙者發展協商主體，當在互動中得以將「常與異」的二分框架轉變為概念光譜時，他們藉由調整自己在光譜中的位置，繪製出各自感到適當的法意識軌跡圖像。

When people with disabilities suffer from employment discrimination, they are often faced with the dilemma of whether and how to claim their rights. What is the meaning of rights for people with disabilities? The recursive theory of rights and identity focuses on the legal consciousness and mutual construction of the identity and rights of a person with disabilities, however, less is known about how this process and subject construction are affected when people with disabilities struggle for combating social stigma and develop their way of relating to law. By interviewing 11 people with disabilities who experienced employment discrimination, this research analyzes the social process in which legal consciousness and identity are constructed, and explores further the decision-making process involved in choosing whether or not to claim one's rights. The findings implicate that this choice often relies on a discriminated partie's willingness to ＂appear＂ as different, which involves a stigma and the measurement of the boundary between normal and abnormal. For these people, each instance in which their rights and identity are questioned entails a process of reinterpreting the concepts of normal and abnormal, while they decide whether or not to ＂appear＂, and to what extent to ＂appear＂. This article further posits that by considering normal and abnormal as two ends of a continuum, as opposed to a binary concept, people with disabilities are better equipped to negotiate a position that suits their personhood.

1. 王曉丹(2018)。法意識探索：關係自我的情感衡平。政治與社會哲學評論，67
   連結：
2. 邱大昕(2018)。慈善」與「權利」之間－身心障礙者車船半價優待的爭取過程（1950-1980）。臺灣社會學，36
   連結：
3. 唐宜楨,陳心怡(2008)。從《身心障礙者權利公約》來探討身心障礙概念的新轉向。身心障礙研究季刊，6(4)
   連結：
4. 孫迺翊(2016)。無障礙／可及性、合理調整與平等不歧視原則：從身心障礙者權利公約檢視我國憲法及身心障礙者權益保障法之平等原則內涵。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，45(特刊)
   連結：
5. 張恒豪,王靜儀(2016)。從「殘障」到「身心障礙」：障礙標籤與論述的新聞內容分析。臺灣社會學，31
   連結：
6. 郭峰誠,張恒豪(2011)。保障還是限制？定額進用政策與視障者的就業困境。台灣社會研究季刊，83
   連結：
7. Abrego, Leisy J.(2019).Relational Legal Consciousness of U.S. Citizenship: Privilege, Responsibility, Guilt, and Love in Latino Mixed‐Status Families.LAW & SOC’Y REV.,53,641-670.
8. Abrego, Leisy J.(2008).Legitimacy, Social Identity, and the Mobilization of Law: The Effects of Assembly Bill 540 on Undocumented Students in California.LAW & SOC. INQUIRY,33,709-734.
9. Berger, Ronald J.(2008).Agency, Structure, and the Transition to Disability: A Case Study with Implications for Life History Research.SOCIOL. Q.,49,309-333.
10. BOURDIEU, PIERRE(1977).OUTLINE OF ATHEORY OF PRACTICE.
11. Chua, Lynette J.,Engel, David M.(2019).Legal Consciousness Reconsidered.ANNU. REV. LAW SOC. SCI.,15,335-353.
12. Creswell, John W.,Poth, Cheryl N.,李政賢（譯）(2018).質性研究的五種取徑.五南圖書出版股份有限公司.
13. Dorfman, Doron(2017).Re-Claiming Disability: Identity, Procedural Justice, and the Disability Determination Process.LAW & SOC. INQUIRY,42,195-231.
14. ENGEL, DAVID M.,MUNGER, FRANK W.(2003).RIGHTS OF INCLUSION: LAW AND IDENTITY IN THE LIFE STORIES OF AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES.
15. GOFFMAN, ERVING(1963).STIGMA: NOTES ON THE MANAGEMENT OF SPOILED IDENTITY.
16. Goffman, Erving,曾凡慈（譯）(2010).汙名：管理受損身分的筆記.群學出版有限公司.
17. Heyer, Katharina(2007).A Disability Lens on Sociolegal Research: Reading Rights of Inclusion from a Disability Studies Perspective.LAW & SOC. INQUIRY,32,261-293.
18. Kirkland, Anna(2008).Think of the Hippopotamus: Rights Consciousness in the Fat Acceptance Movement.LAW & SOC’Y REV.,42,397-432.
19. Lyons, Brent J.(2016).To Say or not to Say: Different Strategies of Acknowledging a Visible Disability.J. MANAG.,44,1980-2007.
20. MERLEAU-PONTY, MAURICE(2012).PHENOMENOLOGY OF PERCEPTION.
21. OLIVER, MICHAEL(1990).THE POLITICS OF DISABLEMENT.
22. Revillard, Anne(2017).Social Movements and the Politics of Bureaucratic Rights Enforcement: Insights from the Allocation of Disability Rights in France.LAW & SOC. INQUIRY,42,450-478.
23. Roberts, Laura Morgan(2005).Changing Faces: Professional Image Construction in Diverse Organizational Settings.ACAD. MANAG. REV.,30,685-711.
24. Sarat, Austin(1990)."... The Law Is All Over": Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor.YALE J. L. & HUMAN.,2,343-380.
25. Sarat, Austin(ed.),Kearns, Thomas R.(ed.)(1993).LAW IN EVERYDAY LIFE.
26. Tan, Catherine D.(2018)."I’m a Normal Autistic Person, not an Abnormal Neurotypical": Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis as Biographical Illumination.SOC. SCI. MED.,197,161-167.
27. Wang, Hsiao‐Tan(2019).Justice, Emotion, and Belonging: Legal Consciousness in a Taiwanese Family Conflict.LAW & SOC’Y REV.,53,764-790.
28. Weber, Max,黃振華（譯）,張與健（譯）(1991).社會科學方法論.時報文化出版企業股份有限公司.
29. Woodward, Kathryn,林文琪（譯）(2006).認同與差異.韋伯文化國際出版有限公司.
30. 王育瑜,謝儒賢(2015)。需求評估的假象，社會控制的事實：身心障礙鑑定評估新制的批判。社區發展季刊，150
31. 王國羽(2008)。聯合國身心障礙者權利公約對我國的啟示。社區發展季刊，123
32. 周月清,朱貽莊(2011)。檢視台灣身心障礙福利政策與法案之歷史進程與變革。2011 年兩岸社會福利學術論壇－社會福利模式－從傳承到創新研討會，:
33. 張恒豪,顏詩耕(2011)。從慈善邁向權利：臺灣身心障礙福利的發展與挑戰。社區發展季刊，133
34. 陳惠萍(2003)。東海大學社會學研究所。
35. 游詠馨(2020)。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所。
36. 廖福特(2008)。從「醫療」、「福利」到「權利」－身心障礙者權利保障之新發展。中研院法學期刊，2

1. (2022)。法意識研究—— 不平等權力結構中，法律實踐的局限與能動。政大法學評論，特刊，55-96。