题名

Consulting Students about Their Learning: Consumer Voices, Social Inequalities and Pedagogic Democratic Rights

并列篇名

與學生商議教育方式:消費者權益、社會不平等以及教學民主權利觀

DOI

10.6171/ntuswr2008.18.01

作者

Madeleine Arnot;Diane Reay

关键词

民主教育權 ; 性別 ; 教育 ; Democratic pedagogic rights ; gender ; education

期刊名称

臺大社會工作學刊

卷期/出版年月

18期(2008 / 12 / 01)

页次

1 - 42

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

此文概述在英國有關學生意見與選擇的一項爭論,探討與學生商議教學的重要性。文章提出有別於以往對於學生意見和教學法之論述,並詳盡闡述Basil Bernstein 關於教學上的民主權利以及評斷民主教育的標準。其又略述一項針對兩所使用此教學概念之高中的研究計畫,向校內來自不同社經背景的男女同學詢問他們與教師之間的溝通經驗,亦即在教育中的權力關係和代理的可能性。文末結以與學生商議有關自身教育,需考慮不同的說話方式,不同引導學生表達意見,以及察覺社會不平等下,如何鞏固新自由主義者對於意見與選擇的關注。

英文摘要

This article outlines the debate in the UK about student voice and choice, the interest in consulting students about their learning. It argues for a different approach to student voice and pedagogy which develops the theory of Basil Bernstein about pedagogic democratic rights and as the criteria with which to judge democratic educational provision. It outlines a research project in two secondary (high) schools which employed these notions of rights to ask male and female students for different socio-economic backgrounds how they experienced teacher-student communication, the power relations within education and the possibilities of agency. The article concludes with the view that student consultation processes need to consider different types of talk, different mechanisms for the elicitation of student voice, and an awareness of how social inequalities can be aggravated by neo-liberal interests in voice and choice.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. Arnot, M.(2008).Educating the gendered citizen: Sociological engagements with national and global political agendas.London:Routledge.
  2. Arnot, M.,B. Skelton,B. Francis,L. Smulyan (Eds.)(2006).Sage handbook on gender and education.London:Sage.
  3. Arnot, M.,McIntyre, D.,Peddar, D.,Reay, R.(2003).Consultation in the classroom: Student perspectives on teaching and learning.Cambridge:Pearson.
  4. Arnot, M.,Reay, D.(2007).A sociology of pedagogic voice: Power, inequality and pupil consultation.Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education,28,311-325.
  5. Arnot, M.,Reay, D.,H. Lauder,P. Brown,J. Dillabough,A. H. Halsey (Eds.)(2006).Education, globalisation and social change.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  6. Arnot, M.,Reay, D.,J. Muller,B. Davies,A. Morais (Eds.)(2004).Reading Bernstein, researching Bernstein.London:Routledge Falmer.
  7. Arnot, M.,Reay, D.,R. Moore,M. Aroot,J. Beck,H. Daniels (Eds.)(2006).Knowledge, power and educational reform: Applying the sociology of Basil Bernstein.London:Routledge.
  8. Bernstein, B.(1977).Class, codes and control: Towards a theory of educational transmissions.London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  9. Bernstein, B.(1996).Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research and critique.London:Taylor and Francis.
  10. Bernstein, B.,A. Morais,I. Neves,B. Davies,H. Daniels (Eds.)(2001).Towards a sociology of pedagogy: The contribution of Basil Bernstein to research.New York:Peter Lang.
  11. Cruddas, L.(2001).Rehearsing for reality: Young women's voices and agendas for change.Forum,43,62-66.
  12. Cruddas, L.,Haddock, L.(2003).Girls voices: Supporting girls; Learning and emotional development.Stoke on Trent:Trentham Books.
  13. Fielding, M.(2004).Transformative approaches to student voice: Theoretical underpinnings, recalcitrant realities.British Educational Research Journal,30(2),295-311.
  14. Hirschman, A. O.(1970).Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organisations and states.Cambridge Massachusetts:Harvard University Press.
  15. Holdsworth, R.,Thomson, P.(2002).Options with the regulation and containment of student voice and/or students research and acting for change: Australian experiences.Paper presented at the American Education Research Association (AERA) symposium
  16. World Wide Web
  17. Personalising Education, the Future of the Public Sector Reform Web
  18. Rudduck, J.,Flutter, J.(2004).How to improve your school.London:Continuum.
  19. Silva, E.(2001).Squeaky wheels and flat tires: A ease study of students as reform participants.Forum,43(2),95-99.
  20. World Wide Web