题名

離婚過後、親職仍在:建構判決離婚親職教育方案的模式初探

并列篇名

After Divorce, We are still Parents: Establishing Parenting Education Programs for Judicial Divorce

DOI

10.6171/ntuswr2017.35.03

作者

沈瓊桃(April Chiung-Tao Shen)

关键词

判決離婚 ; 兒童權利公約 ; 家事法院 ; 親職教育 ; 親權 ; judicial divorce ; Convention on the Rights of the Child ; family court ; parenting education programs ; custody

期刊名称

臺大社會工作學刊

卷期/出版年月

35期(2017 / 06 / 01)

页次

93 - 136

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在檢視父母在離婚訴訟過程中,造成子女適應困難的作為為何,並探討在臺灣實施判決離婚親職教育方案的可能模式。本研究以焦點團體方式蒐集質性資料;研究參與者為14位法官和九位父母離異的成年子女。研究結果顯示,在離婚訴訟過程中,造成子女適應困難的父母作為包括:要求小孩選邊站、父母離間、禁止會面交往、搶奪及拐帶子女、扶養費之爭執、情緒移轉、父母因離婚打擊對子女照顧異常、父母因互相猜忌而放大檢視子女照顧議題。離婚父母親職教育方案可能的實施模式包括普同式的強制性親職教育和個別式的強制性親職教育。配套措施需包括建立法源基礎、主管機關的協調合作和穩定的人力經費。個別式的強制性親職教育的配套措施需另包括評估機制、父母和子女的創傷修復,以及社區資源的連結。本研究對推行判決離婚父母親職教育的制度提出以下建議:修法是當務之急、實施多元的親職教育模式、建立本土化的親職教育課程和人力培訓、對婚暴案件應有特別的考量。

英文摘要

The purpose of this study is to examine the parental actions affecting children's adjustment during the divorce process, in order to establish parenting education programs for couples filing for divorce in Taiwan. The present study collected qualitative data from 9 adult children of divorced parents and 14 judges who had attended focus groups. The research results show that children may suffer from divorcing parents' actions which damage parental connections and entail improper care, including: asking children to choose between parents; parental alienation; prohibiting children from seeing one of their parents; snatching or abducting children; arguing over child financial support; emotion transference; improper care by parents who have mental illness symptoms due to divorce; and improper care due to inter-parental opposition and suspicion. The possible implementation models for parenting education programs include: universal requirements for filing for divorce and individualized implementation for special cases. The supporting measures for implementing mandatory parenting education programs for all divorcing parents include: establishing relevant laws and regulations, and cooperation between authorities to secure funding and manpower. Additional supporting measures for implementing individualized parenting education program include assessment, trauma therapy for parents and children, and community resources referrals. The suggestions for practice include: establishing laws and regulations, implementing diverse programs, establishing culturally appropriate materials for parenting education programs for divorcing parents, and giving special consideration to cases involving domestic violence.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 簡文英、卓紋君(2003)。國內親職教育團體研究的回顧與分析。諮商與輔導,211,2-10。
    連結:
  2. 內政部戶政司(2016)。〈離婚對數按離婚方式分〉。取自http://www.ris.gov.tw/346【Department of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior. (2016). Couples divorced by the divorce system. Retrieved from http://www.ris.gov.tw/346】
  3. 司法院(2013)。〈地方法院終結離婚事件一按機關別分〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/year102/09/024.pdf【Judicial Yuan, R.O.C. (2013). Divorce cases terminated by the district courts-by organ. Retrieved from http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/year102/09/024.pdf】
  4. 兒童福利聯盟(2011)。〈我有兩個家─離婚之子的內心路〉。取自http://www.children.org.tw/epaper/detail/498【Child Welfare League Foundation. (2011). I have two homes- The inner road of children with divorced parents. Retrieved from http://www.children.org.tw/epaper/detail/498】
  5. 司法院統計處(2016)。〈地方法院離婚事件附帶子女監護權歸屬〉。取自http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/report/sf-18r3.htm【Judicial Statistics, R.O.C. (2016). Supplemental child custody attribution to divorce cases in district courts. Retrieved from http://www.judicial.gov.tw/juds/report/eg-16.htm】
  6. 賴岳炫(2015)。〈兒少權益認知問卷分析報告〉。取自http://www.兒少權法e 點通.tw/link4_view.asp?id=21&re=%2Flink4%2Easp%3Fid%3D1【Lai, Y.-S. (2015). The report on the knowledge of children's rights. Retrieved from http://www.兒少權法e 點通.tw/link4_view.asp?id=21&re=%2Flink4%2Easp% 3Fid%3D1】
  7. 內政部(1991)。〈表27.臺灣地區歷年人口之結婚、離婚對數、粗結婚及粗離婚率〉。取自http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/DisplayStatisticFile.aspx?d=5891【Ministry of the Interior. (1991). Table 27. Marriages, divorces, crude marriage and divorce rates for Taiwan area. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/DisplayStatisticFile.?d=5891】
  8. 中華民國統計資訊網(2016)。〈1.2-現住人口出生、死亡、結婚、離婚登記〉。取自http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=3622&mp=4【National Statistics, R.O.C. (2016). 1.2-Number and rates of birth, death, marriage and divorce. Retrieved from http://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=15409&CtNode=3622&mp=4】
  9. Arbuthnot, J.,Gordon, D. A.(1996).Does mandatory divorce education for parents work? A six-month outcome evaluation.Family and Conciliation Courts Review,34(1),60-81.
  10. Bowers, J. R.,Mitchell, E. T.,Hardesty, J. L.,Hughes, R., Jr.(2011).A review of online divorce education programs.Family Court Review,49(4),776-787.
  11. Cookston, J. T.,Braver, S. L.,Sandler, I.,Genalo, M. T.(2002).Prospects for expanded parent education services for divorcing families with children.Family Court Review,40(2),190-203.
  12. Fackrell, T. A.,Hawkins, A. J.,Kay, N. M.(2011).How effective are court-affiliated divorcing parents education programs? A meta-analysis study.Family Court Review,49(1),107-119.
  13. Johnston, J.,Roseby, V.,Kuehnle, K.(2009).In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children of conflicted and violent divorce.New York, NY:Springer.
  14. Kelly, J. B.(2007).Children's living arrangements following separation and di vorce: Insights from empirical and clinical research.Family Process,46(1),35-52.
  15. Kelly, J. B.,Emery, R. E.(2003).Children's adjustment following divorce: Risk and resilience perspectives.Family Relations,52(4),352-362.
  16. McIntosh, J.,Deacon-Wood, H. B.(2003).Group interventions for separated parents in entrenched conflict: An exploration of evidence-based frameworks.Journal of Family Studies,9(2),187-199.
  17. Nielsen, L.(2014).Shared physical custody: Summary of 40 studies on outcomes for children.Journal of Divorce & Remarriage,55(8),613-635.
  18. Pollet, S. L.,Lombreglia, M.(2008).A nationwide survey of mandatory parent education.Family Court Review,46(2),375-394.
  19. Swedish Government(2011).Continuous parenthood: Responsibilities, economy and cooperation for the sake of the child.Stockholm, Sweden:Swedish Government Statistics.
  20. Ver Steegh, N.(2005).Differentiating types of domestic violence: Implications for child custody.Louisiana Law Review,65,1379-1431.
  21. Ver Steegh, N.,Erickson, S.(2001).Mandatory divorce education: What do the parents say?.William Mitchell Law Review,28,889-909.
  22. 李姎凌(2010)。Taipei, Taiwan,銘傳大學法律學系=Ming Chuan University。
  23. 施慧玲(2004)。家庭法律社會學論文集,台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
  24. 唐欣怡(2011)。Taipei, Taiwan,國立臺北教育大學心理與諮商學系=National Taipei University。
  25. 高鳳仙(2016)。親屬法:理論與實務。台北=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan Book。
  26. 張以岳、周家穎(2016)。屏東地院實施親子事件調解前父母親教育課程之三個月短期成效評估。萬國法律,205,65-77。
  27. 陳丹(2013)。從離婚角度看中美文化差異。科教導刊,5,121。
  28. 陳竹上(2013)。台灣社會離兒童權利公約還有多遠?一位家事調解委員的近身觀察。新世紀智庫論壇,64,42-58。
  29. 劉宏恩(2012)。台灣離婚調解制度的演變─兼論家事事件法關於調解程序的若干疑問。台灣法學雜誌,202,35-46。
  30. 劉宏恩(2014)。離婚後子女監護案件[子女最佳利益原則]的再檢視─試評析2013 年12 月修正之民法1055 條之1規定。月旦法學,234,193-207。
  31. 薛承泰(2015)。國家發展委員會委託報告國家發展委員會委託報告,國家發展委員會=National Development Council。
被引用次数
  1. 程芷妍,沈瓊桃(2022)。影響離婚父母共親職品質之因子。臺大社會工作學刊,45,89-132。
  2. 洪小雯(2020)。從單親子女的困境談離異配偶共親職之重要性。諮商與輔導,416,30-33。
  3. 童伊迪,沈瓊桃(2018)。婚暴併兒虐家庭之多元模式與發生情境。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊,14(2),73-104。
  4. 鍾菩璿,雷亞潔,郭倩惠,朱惠英(2020)。看不見的傷-漫談兒童虐待中的精神虐待。輔導季刊,56(2),73-81。
  5. (2018)。家事專辦調解法官之效能-以臺灣臺北地方法院為例/以親權相關事件為焦點。法學叢刊,63(3),41-85。
  6. (2019)。減低未成年子女面對高衝突父母離婚之傷害。社區發展季刊,166,208-216。
  7. (2019)。萬靈丹或安慰劑?多元社會下親職教育設計的再思考。社區發展季刊,167,140-161。
  8. (2020)。單親家庭學生之輔導效果:完形心理學觀點。教育與心理研究,43(4),65-93。
  9. (2022)。家庭法律社會學的臺灣拼圖——分享一個行腳讀書人的攝像本。政大法學評論,特刊,137-177。