兒童及少年安置及教養機構評鑑制度之現況檢視與未來發展取向之省思

Government Inspections of Children's Welfare Institutions: An Examination of the Current Practice and Future Outlooks

10.6171/ntuswr.202106_(43).0003

林沛君(Pei-Chun Lin)

兒少安置及教養機構 ； 機構評鑑 ； 安置機構 ； children's home ； inspection of children's home ； residential care

臺大社會工作學刊

43期（2021 / 06 / 01）

107 - 148

繁體中文

由於近年來國內兒少安置機構相繼發生性侵與霸凌之重大傷害事件，遂使兒少安置機構評鑑的成效成為各方關注的議題。本文係借鑑〈兒童權利公約〉所揭示之原則及英國「透過孩子眼睛」的評鑑思維，同時透過實地走訪全台兒少安置機構與第一線工作者進行深入訪談，針對中央主管機關舉辦之兒少安置機構聯合評鑑之現行制度進行檢視，建議政府以短期、中期及長期之制度改革進行思考：（一）現階段可藉由強化評鑑人員評鑑前訓練及評鑑標準共識之凝聚以提升評鑑人員專業度及評鑑標準之一致性，採行兒少友善之措施讓被安置兒少於評鑑過程中有更多的參與及意見表達，以使被安置兒少的聲音能獲得實質傾聽，然後再以透明而合宜之方式公開評鑑結果以之取信於社會大眾；（二）就中期而言，則應重新檢視評鑑實施計畫及評鑑指標，嘗試以孩子的視角來看待社工人員的服務內涵及機構特色，將重點放在安置的這段歷程及專注在那些對孩子生活帶來改變的服務，並應建置相關平台以促進評鑑人員、受評機構、被安置兒少及其父母等多方間之溝通；（三）在長期規劃上則應審慎評估未來以獨立專責機關負責評鑑之可行性，讓評鑑能更佳發揮其區分機構優劣、強化並支持實務工作者學習與轉變的功能。

This article examines the current practice regarding government inspections of children's welfare institutions in Taiwan and raises issues for consideration by the government. In so doing, this article refers to the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the inspection framework adopted by England, in order to demonstrate that the purpose of inspections is not merely for the government to check that institutions are meeting their legal compliance requirements, but also to drive improvements and enhance outcomes for children and young people. In addition, the article draws on observations gathered during in-depth interviews with workers in children's welfare institutions throughout Taiwan, and with academics working in this field. The aim is to raise the following considerations for future policy or law reforms: (1) in the short-term, introducing a mandatory requirement for inspectors to receive training before they conduct inspections, in order to enhance their understanding of child welfare practices. There is also a need re-think and design a more articulated way for children to participate in these inspections; (2) in the medium term, further government guidance is required, in the form of regulations and directives, concerning the core principles that should inform inspections of children's welfare institutions. There is also a need to enhance the dialogue between inspectors and children's institutions, as well as platforms to enable experiences and good practices to be shared among institutions; and (3) in the longer-term, the government should consider establishing an independent institution to be responsible for inspections of children's welfare institutions.

1. 王光旭, G.-X.,洪凱龍, K-L.(2019)。公私合夥下評鑑制度運作的風險：老人福利機構觀點之探析。國家發展研究，19(1)，97-143。
   連結：
2. 陳毓文, Y.-W.(2008)。國內接受機構安置少年憂鬱情緒之探究：問題陳顯與解釋因素。中華心理衛生學刊，21(1)，75-101。
   連結：
3. 彭淑華, S.-H.(2007)。機構安置：保護他（她）？傷害他（她）？─兒童少年保護工作人員眼中之機構虐待圖像。東吳社會工作學報，16，1-36。
   連結：
4. 彭淑華, S.-H.(2007)。“寧缺毋濫”？“寧濫毋缺”？兒童少年保護工作人員機構安置決策困境之研究。中華心理衛生學刊，20(2)，127-154。
   連結：
5. 劉淑瓊, J. S.-C.(2005)。績效、品質與消費者權益保障：論社會服務契約委託的責信課題。社會政策與社會工作學刊，9(2)，31-93。
   連結：
6. 劉淑瓊, J. S.-C.,彭惠, H.(2007)。專業自主？組織自利？—論少年安置機構契約委託的篩案問題。臺大社會工作學刊，14，61-121。
   連結：
7. Brayne, H.,Carr, H.(2013).Law for social workers.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
8. Cantwell, N.,Davidson, J.,Elsley, S.,Milligan, I.,Quinn, N.(2012).Moving forward: Implementing the ‘Guidelines for the Alternative Care of Children’.UK:Centre for Excellence for Looked After Children in Scotland.
9. Children & Young People Now, Opinion(2009).Children & Young People Now, Opinion (2009, October 20). Should Ofsted use seconded social workers as inspectors? Children & Young People Now (Haymarket Business Publications Ltd)..
10. Clough, R.,Bullock, R.,Ward, A.(2006).What Works in Residential Child Care: A review of research evidence and the practical considerations.London:National Children’s Bureau.
11. Ferguson, H.(2017).How children become invisible in child protection work: Findings from research into day-to-day social work practice.The British Journal of Social Work,47(4),1007-1023.
12. Giliker, P.(2018).Analysing institutional liability for child sexual abuse in England and Wales and Australia: Vicarious liability, non-delegable duties and statutory intervention.Cambridge Law Journal,77(3),506-535.
13. Hood, R.,Nilsson, D.,Habibi, R.(2019).An analysis of Ofsted inspection reports for children’s social care services in England.Child & Family Social Work,24(2),227-237.
14. Katz, I.,Cortis, N.,Shlonsky, A.,Mildon, R.(2016).,未出版
15. Lanskey C.(2019).Youth voice and participation in secure settings for young people.Children and their education in secure accommodation: Interdisciplinary perspectives of education, health and youth justice,London:
16. Munro, E. (2011). Munro review of child protection: Final report – A child-centred system (Cm. 8062). Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ munro-review-of-child-protection-final-report-a-child-centred-system.
17. Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills [Ofsted]. (2011). Outstanding Children’s homes (Reference no: 100228). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/419160/Outstanding_children_s_homes.pdf.
18. Ofsted(2020).,未出版
19. Ofsted. (2018). Introduction to children’s homes: A children’s social care guide to registration (Reference no: 090155). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/4161417.pdf.
20. Ofsted. (2019). Social care common inspection framework (SCCIF): children’s homes(Reference no: 170005). Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5c9b837040f0b633fc95f7a9/SCCIF_children_s_homes.pdf.
21. Shannon, G.,Concubhair, Cian Ó(2016).The role of policing in contemporary child protection.Irish Jurist,56,66-102.
22. Spratt, T.,Nett, J.,Bromfield, L.,Hietamäki, J.,Kindler, H.,Ponnert, L.(2013).The Swiss Project Fund for Child ProtectionThe Swiss Project Fund for Child Protection,未出版
23. The Local Government Association, iMPower Consulting (2015). A brave new world: is inspection improving children’s services?. Retrieved from www.impower.co.uk/reports/a-brave-new-world-is-inspection-improving-childrens-services.
24. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General Comment No. 14, on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration, CRC/C/GC14 (art. 3. para. 1). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/crc/pages/crcindex.aspx.
25. United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2009). General Comment No. 12, The right of the child to be heard, CRC/C/GC12. Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/hrbodies/crc/pages/crcindex.aspx.
26. Wilkins, D.,Antonopoulou, V.(2020).Do performance indictors predict Ofsted ratings? An exploratory study of children’s services in England.Journal of Children’s Services,15(2),45-59.
27. 吳佳玲, J.-L.(2011)。機構評鑑制度簡介。春暉，70，15-16。
28. 李怡娟, I-C.,王潔媛, C.-Y.,唐久雯, C.-W.,郭懷婷, H.-T.,尹祚芊, T. J. C.(2006)。從機構負責人及專家的觀點來探討社區型態安養護機構評鑑項目。實證護理，2(3)，201-209。
29. 林麗嬋, L.-C.,吳婉翎, W.-L.,翟文英, W.-Y.(2010)。住民照顧衝擊：長期照護機構評鑑決策模式發展基礎。長期照護雜誌，14(2)，125-135。
30. 張銀旭, Y.-X.(2014)。臺灣兒少機構安置服務現況與未來發展。2014 年兩岸社會福利學術研討會—劇變時代的社會福利政策，台北=Taipei, Taiwan:
31. 梁亞文, Y.-W.,蔡淑鳳, S.-F.,鄭瑛琳, Y.-L.,林育秀, Y.-H.(2012)。高估或低估？自我評核與評鑑委員評核結果的一致性探討：以 2009 年護理之家評鑑資料庫為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌，31(6)，545-555。
32. 陳毓文, Y.-W.(2002)。安置機構處遇計畫的轉銜。折翼天使的另類天堂─兒少安置機構現況與展望研討會
33. 單鴻昇, H.-S.(2015)。公設民營模式下老人照護機構品質監督之研究。憲政時代，41(1)，145-179。
34. 黃松林, S.-L.,黃怡慧, Y.-H.,郭銀漢, Y.-H.(2013)。大者愈優？兒少安置及教養機構大小與評鑑績效相關因素研究。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊，3(3)，135-157。
35. 監察院, Republic of China (Taiwan)(2019)。監察院（2019）。《糾正案文》（字號：107 內正 0020）。取自 https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n。https://www.cy.gov.tw/CyBsBoxContent.aspx?n=134&s=6208
36. 劉家勇, H. C.-Y.(2013)。老人長期照顧機構評鑑的現況、未來及挑戰：社工觀點的分析。台灣高齡服務管理學刊，2(1)，1-21。

1. (2023)。社會保護性系統的範式建立行動──家外安置強化資源平臺對困難安置兒童的發展性系統建構契機。社區發展季刊，183，31-54。