再思生態觀點：原住民族社會工作中人與非人交織的關係網絡

Rethinking Ecological Perspectives: The Relational Network between Human and Non-human in Indigenous Social Work in Taiwan

10.6171/ntuswr.202212_(46).0001

鄧湘漪(Hsiang-I Teng)

原住民族 ； 生態觀點 ； 文化照顧 ； 綠色社會工作 ； indigenous peoples ； ecological perspectives ； cultural care ； green social work

臺大社會工作學刊

46期（2022 / 12 / 01）

1 - 32

繁體中文

這篇文章聚焦於原住民族社會工作理論的思考，以文化照顧相關論述如文化能力、文化安全、文化轉譯、文化主權和歷史創傷為討論起點，將這些論及跨文化照顧的精神、內涵與社會工作生態觀點論述交互參照並對話。社會工作專業介入跨族群工作並試圖解決問題的過程，多著眼於人與人之間的關係理解和認識，或著重氣候變遷下的環境創傷。這篇文章則在此基礎之上，進一步關注原住民族世界觀中，與自然、物種、非人之間的關係網絡。希冀透過探究人與非人間跨物種的關懷和協作，達成生態體系內物種共生的照顧哲學。並以民族植物小米為例證，細究當今原住民族社會工作實務現場，以小米此一非人物種作為關係與照顧體系中重要的環節，透過非人的物種，重建人與人之間的關係修復和連結，以建立具備原住民族觀點的生態系統論述，不僅深化生態觀點論述，同時發展跨物種共生照顧之議題。

The article is concerned the development of Indigenous Social Work theory related to Cultural Care in Taiwan. Based on discourses on the starting point, such as cultural competence, cultural safety, cultural translation, cultural sovereignty and historical trauma, this abstract aims at creating a dialogue with an ecological approach and social work perspective while dealing with problem solving. Currently, social workers seeking an understanding of persons' situations are focusing on the relationship between human and human, or with an interest in environmental trauma affected by climate change. This paper is rises above these concerns to explore the relationship network between human and non-human via an indigenous worldview, and also aims to achieve a coexistence ecological system approach to cross-species care and co-work. The practical field example is millet as a non-human species to create a relational recovery and connection from the indigenous point of view of ecological perspective discourse. The purposes of the theoretical thinking are to enhance the indigenous cultural logic and life value in the process of social work practice, as well as to explore cross-species care by rethinking ecological perspectives.

1. 日宏煜, H.-Y.(2018)。台灣原住民族長期照顧政策中的文化安全議題。台灣社會研究季刊，109，199-214。
   連結：
2. 余桂榕, K.-J.(2008)。小米文化與原鄉婦女的生命力：布農族部落中的一對母女在小米中的對話。文化研究，7，149-177。
   連結：
3. 阿布娪=Apu’u Kaaviana(2015)。自己的老人自己顧：原住民族的文化照顧─高雄達卡努瓦部落的 To’ona tamu（有老人在的地方／耆老智慧屋）。台灣社會研究季刊，101，247-257。
   連結：
4. 胡中宜, C.-Y.(2013)。學校社工員在生態系統中工作的目標與策略：衝突解決系統取向之初探。臺大社會工作學刊，27，93-132。
   連結：
5. 張君玫, C.-M.(2020)。人類世中的女性主義：立足點、地方與實踐。中外文學，49(1)，13-60。
   連結：
6. 張瀠之, Y.-T.,鄧湘漪, H.-I.(2019)。原住民族部落健康與文化主權：磯崎村復健站的自主性發展歷程。人文及社會科學集刊，31(2)，301-327。
   連結：
7. 莊秀雯, H.-W.,黃筱珊, H.-S.,南玉芬, Y.-F.,龍紀萱, C.-H.(2016)。一位受暴婦女生活重建之路：生態系統觀點及個案管理方法之運用。社會工作實務與研究學刊，3，1-22。
   連結：
8. 莊曉霞, H.-H.(2012)。原住民社會工作文化能力內涵之初探：以花蓮縣為例。社會政策與社會工作學刊，16(1)，133-182。
   連結：
9. 彭仁郁, J.-Y.(2012)。進入公共空間的私密創傷：台灣「慰安婦」的見證敘事作為療癒場景。文化研究，14，139-196。
   連結：
10. 黃彥宜, Y.-Y.(2014)。環境議題在社會工作觀點的移轉：對社會工作教育的意含。社會政策與社會工作學刊，18(2)，1-35。
    連結：
11. 蔡友月, Y.-Y.(2012)。真的有精神病嗎？一個跨文化、跨領域精神醫療研究取徑的定位與反省。科技、醫療與社會，15，11-64。
    連結：
12. 蔡友月, Y.-Y.(2013)。遵／不遵醫囑？國家偏遠醫療治理與達悟族精神失序者的「混亂敘事」。台灣社會研究季刊，92，73-140。
    連結：
13. 鄧湘漪, H.-I.(2020)。部落職：朝向集體權利的原住民族社會工作。社會政策與社會工作學刊，24(1)，1-34。
    連結：
14. Abrams, L. S.,Moio, J. A.(2009).Critical race theory and the cultural competence dilemma in social work education.Journal of Social Work Education,45(2),245-261.
15. Barker, J.(Ed.)(2005).Sovereignty matters: Locations of contestation and possibility in indigenous struggles for self-determination.University of Nebraska Press.
16. Bartlett, H. M.,Saunders, B. N.(1970).The common base of social work practice.National Association of Social Workers.
17. Betancourt, J. R.,Green, A. R.,Carrillo, J. E.,Park, E. R.(2005).Cultural competence and health care disparities: Key perspectives and trends.Health Affairs,24(2),499-505.
18. Brascoupé, S.,Waters, C.(2009).Cultural safety: Exploring the applicability of the concept of cultural safety to aboriginal health and community wellness.International Journal of Indigenous Health,5(2),6-41.
19. Campinha-Bacote, J.(1999).A model and instrument for addressing cultural competence in health care.Journal of Nursing Education,38(5),203-207.
20. Chau, K. L.(1990).A model for teaching cross-cultural practice in social work.Journal of Social Work Education,26(2),124-133.
21. Coffey, W.,Tsosie, R.(2001).Rethinking the tribal sovereignty doctrine: Cultural sovereignty and the collective future of Indian nations.Stanford Law & Policy Review,12(2),191-221.
22. Dominelli, L.(2012).Green social work: From environmental crisis to environmental justice.Polity Press.
23. Evans-Campbell, T.,Walters, K. L.,Pearson, C. R.,Campbell, C. D.(2012).Indian boarding school experience, substance use, and mental health among urban two-spirit American Indian/Alaska Natives.The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse,38(5),421-427.
24. Germain, C. B.(1991).Human behavior in the social environment: An ecological view.Columbia University Press.
25. Germain, C. B.(Ed.)(1979).Social work practice: People and environments, an ecological perspective.Columbia University Press.
26. Germain, C. B.,Gitterman, A.(2008).The life model of social work practice: Advances in theory and practice.Columbia University Press.
27. Goldstein, H.(1973).Social work practice: A unitary approach.Michigan:University of South Carolina Press.
28. Green, J. W.(1982).Cultural awareness in the human service: A multi-ethnic approach.Allyn and Bacon.
29. Green, S.,Baldry, E.(2008).Building indigenous Australian social work.Australian Social Work,61(4),389-402.
30. Huygens, I.(2006).Discourses for decolonization: Affirming Maori authority in New Zealand workplaces.Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,16(5),363-378.
31. Latour, B.,Porter, C.(Trans.)(2017).Facing gaia: Eight lectures on the new climate regime.Polity.
32. Latour、 B.,陳榮泰（譯）, R.-T.(Trans.),伍啟鴻（譯）, K.-H.(Trans.)(2019).面對蓋婭：新氣候體制八講.群學=Socio Publishing.
33. Leininger, M.(2002).Culture care theory: A major contribution to advance transcultural nursing knowledge and practice.Journal of Transcultural Nursing,13(3),189-192.
34. Leininger, M. (2008). Overview of Leininger’s theory of culture care diversity and universality. http://www.madeleine-leininger.com/cc/overview.pdf
35. Lin, Y-R.,Tomi, P.,Huang, H.,Lin, C. H.,Chen, Y.(2020).Situating indigenous resilience: Climate change and Tayal’s "Millet Ark" action in Taiwan.Sustainability,12(24),10676.
36. Lum, D.(Ed.)(2011).Culturally competent practice: A framework for understanding diverse groups and justice issue.Brooks Cole.
37. Lysack, M.(2010).Environmental decline, loss, and biophilia: Fostering commitment in environmental citizenship.Critical Social Work,11(3),48-66.
38. Mackean T.,Fisher, M.,Friel, S.,Baum, F.(2020).A framework to assess cultural safety in Australian public policy.Health Promotion International,35(2),340-351.
39. Munford, R.,Sanders, J.(2011).Embracing the diversity of practice: Indigenous knowledge and mainstream social work practice.Journal of Social Work Practice,25(1),63-77.
40. Naess, A.(1973).The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary.Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy,16(1-4),95-100.
41. NAHO. (2006). Fact sheet: Cultural safety. National Aboriginal Health Organization. https://fnim.sehc.com/getmedia/c1ef783b-520a-44cf-a7b8-d40df5e406e7/Cultural-Safety-Fact-Sheet.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
42. NASW(2001).NASW. (2001). Standards and indicators for cultural competence in social work practice. National Association of Social Workers..
43. Noble, C.(2016).Green social work-The next frontier for action.Social Alternatives,35(4),14-19.
44. Norton, C. L.(2012).Social work and the environment: An ecosocial approach.International Journal of Social Welfare,21(3),299-308.
45. Peeters, J.(2012).The place of social work in sustainable development: Towards ecosocial practice.International Journal of Social Welfare,21(3),287-298.
46. Rose, D.(2000).Dingo makes us human: Life and land in an Australian aboriginal culture.Cambridge University Press.
47. Rose, D.(2017).Connectivity thinking, animism, and the pursuit of liveliness.Educational Theory,67(4),491-508.
48. Rose、 D.,黃懿翎（譯）, Y.-L.(Trans.)(2019).野犬傳命：在澳洲原住民的智慧中尋找生態共存的出路.紅桌文化=UnderTable Press.
49. Seed、 J.,Macy, J.,Fleming, P.,Naess, A.,黃懿翎（譯）, Y.-L.(Trans.)(2015).像山一樣思考.紅桌文化=UnderTable Press.
50. Wallace, I.(2006).Trauma as representation: A meditation on Manet and Johns.Trauma and visuality in modernity
51. Watson, J.(2019).Lo-TEK design by radical indigenism.Taschen America Llc.
52. Weaver, H. N.(1999).Indigenous people and the social work profession: Defining culturally competent service.Social Work,44(3),217-225.
53. Yellow Horse Brave Heart, M.(2003).The historical trauma response among natives and its relationship with substance abuse: A Lakota illustration.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,35,7-13.
54. Yellow Horse Brave Heart, M.,Chase, J.,Elkins, J.,Altschul, D.B.(2011).Historical trauma among indigenous peoples of the Americas: Concepts, research, and clinical consideration.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,43(4),282-290.
55. Zapf, M. K.(2009).Social work and the environment: Understanding people and place.Canadian Scholars’ Press.
56. 王玉女, Y.-N.(1998)。Leininger 文化照顧理論。長庚護理，9(4)，70-77。
57. 王增勇, T.-Y.,郭孟佳, M.-C.(2020)。歷史創傷與原住民族社工的實踐：如何以故事解讀原住民族家庭暴力？。社區發展季刊，169，271-284。
58. 余桂榕, K.-J.(2020).台灣布農族部落婦女研究.蘭臺=Learning Tide.
59. 李明政（編）, M.-C.(Ed.)(2011).多元文化社會工作.Taipei, Taiwan:松慧文化=Song-Hui.
60. 李明政, M.-C.(2003).文化福利權：台灣原住民族社會福利政策之研究.松慧文化=Song-Hui.
61. 浦忠勇, C.-Y.(2014)。阿里山鄒族小米文化的知識典範及其變遷。台灣原住民族研究學報，4(3)，21-44。
62. 黃應貴, Y.-K.(2004)。物的認識與創新：以東埔社布農人的新作物為例。物與物質文化
63. 黃應貴, Y.-K.(2005)。作物、經濟與社會：東埔社布農人的例子。廣西民族學院學報，27(6)，13-28。
64. 蔡友月, Y.-Y.(2009).達悟族的精神失序：現代性、變遷與受苦的社會根源.聯經=Linking Publishing.
65. 羅素玫, S.-M.(2005)。性別區辨、階序與社會：都蘭阿美族的小米週期儀式。臺灣人類學刊，3(1)，143-183。
66. 蘇美琅=Savi Takisvilainan(2017).成為 Bunun：布農族的童年及養育.一串小米族語獨立出版工作室=Tastubuqul tu maduq i malas-Bunun tu papatasanan.