兒少表意權在安置機構的實踐與挑戰

＂The Right of the Child to Be Heard＂: The Experience and Challenges in a Residential Care Facility

10.6171/ntuswr.202212_(46).0002

王思淳(Si-Chun Wang)；胡中宜(Chung-Yi Hu)

兒少意見被傾聽權利 ； 兒童權利公約 ； 兒童參與 ； 安置機構 ； 增強權能 ； child's participation ； Convention on the Rights of the Child ； empowerment ； residential care ； The Right of the Child to Be Heard

臺大社會工作學刊

46期（2022 / 12 / 01）

33 - 81

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在探討安置機構兒少表意權之實踐與挑戰，選取北部某家中長期兒少安置機構為研究對象，深入探討其運作及困境。運用深度訪談法選取6位工作員及7位安置兒少，研究結果以三種情境（外出申請、手機使用、活動參與）為例，歸納落實兒少表意權之執行原則包括：傾聽尊重、主動溝通、增強權能、個別化、團隊共識等。執行行動包含：（1）增加違規處理方式，提升負責能力；（2）透過討論對話，尋求家規合理調整；（3）設計多元參與機制，修訂家規政策；（4）共同討論生活議題，朝向平權關係；（5）提供多項選擇，增加自主決策；（6）協助兒少與關鍵成人反映意見。最後，研究建議：（1）定期規劃兒少表意主題之督導與培力；（2）調整照顧者及兒少間的關係與溝通；（3）創造以兒少為主體之對話空間；（4）辨識造成權利落實的侷限因素。

The purpose of this study was to explore the practice and challenges of ＂The Right of the Child to Be Heard＂ in children residential care. The in-depth interview method was conducted with 6 care givers and 7 adolescents from a residential care facility. The research results applied to three situations: application for going out, mobile phone use, and activity participation. The principles of ＂the Right of Child to be Heard＂ were summarized, including: listening and respecting, active communication, empowerment, individualization, and team consensus. In addition, the practical actions include: (1) enhancing children's ability to deal with violations by different methods; (2) seeking reasonable adjustments to the family rules via discussion and dialogue; (3) designing multiple participation mechanisms to adjust the family rules; (4) discussing the issues of daily living; (5) providing different choices to increase the opportunities of decision-making; (6) enhancing children to reflect their opinions to key person. Based on these finding, suggestions for future practice include: (1) planning a regular supervision and training system to create a friendly space for dialogue; (2) continuing to adjust the relationship and communication between caregivers and children; (3) creating a child-based dialogue space; (4) identifying the factors that may limit the implementation of rights.

1. 陳旺德, W.-D.,陳伯偉, B.-W.,林昱瑄, Y.-H.(2020)。培力還是侷限？：兒少安置機構、慣習形塑與階級效應。臺大社會工作學刊，42，1-55。
   連結：
2. 陳柯玫, K.-M.,王舒芸, S.-Y.(2017)。兒童及少年參與困境之初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，18，63-112。
   連結：
3. 彭淑華, S.-H.(2006)。保護為名，權控為實？：少年安置機構工作人員的觀點分析。東吳社會工作學報，15，1-36。
   連結：
4. Arnstein, S. R.(1969).A ladder of citizen participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planners,35(4),216-224.
5. Barber, T.(2007).Young people and civic participation: A conceptual review.Youth and Policy,96,19-39.
6. Bruce, M.(2014).The voice of the child in child protection: Whose voice?.Social Sciences,3(3),514-526.
7. Department of Children and Youth Affairs(2015).National strategy on children and young people’s participation in decision making.Government Publications.
8. Hart, R. A.(2013).Children’s participation: From tokenism to citizenship.UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.
9. Havlicek, J.,Curry, A.,Villalpando, F.(2018).Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators.Children and Youth Services Review,84,255-270.
10. Havlicek, J.,Lin, C.-H.,Braun, M. T.(2016).Cultivating youth voice through participation in a foster youth advisory board: Perspectives of facilitators.Children and Youth Services Review,69,1-10.
11. Kilkelly, U.,Donnelly, M.(2011).Participation in healthcare: The views and experiences of children and young people.The International Journal of Children’s Rights,19(1),107-125.
12. Lundy, L.(2007).‘Voice’ is not enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.British Educational Research Journal,33(6),927-942.
13. Lundy, L.,McEvoy, L.(2012).Children’s rights and research processes: Assisting children to (in)formed views.Childhood,19(1),129-144.
14. McCafferty, P.(2017).Implementing article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child in child protection decision-making: A critical analysis of the challenges and opportunities for social work.Child Care in Practice,23(4),327-341.
15. McLeod, A.(2007).Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people.Child & Family Social Work,12(3),278-286.
16. Parkes, A.(2017).Children and international human rights law: The Right of the Child to Be Heard.Routledge.
17. Sanders, R.,Mace, S.(2006).Agency policy and the participation of children and young people in the child protection process.Child Abuse Review,15(2),89-109.
18. Shier, H.(2001).Pathways to participation: Openings, opportunities and obligations.Children & Society,15(2),107-117.
19. Sinclair, R.(2004).Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable.Children & Society,18(2),106-118.
20. ten Brummelaar, M. D.,Harder, A. T.,Kalverboer, M. E.,Post, W. J.,Knorth, E. J.(2018).Participation of youth in decision‐making procedures during residential care: A narrative review.Child & Family Social Work,23(1),33-44.
21. van Bijleveld, G. G.,Dedding, C. W. M.,Bunders‐Aelen, J. F. G.(2015).Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state‐of‐the‐art review.Child & Family Social Work,20(2),129-138.
22. 立法院（2014）。《兒童權利公約施行法草案關係文書》。https://misq.ly.gov.tw/MISQ/IQuery/misq5000QueryBillDetail.action?BillNo=1030310070200200# 【Legislative Yuan. (2014). Agenda related documents for implementation act of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://misq.ly.gov.tw/MISQ/IQuery/misq5000QueryBillDetail.action?BillNo=1030310070200200#
23. 吳思華, S.-H.(2000).策略九說：策略思考的本質.臉譜=Faces Publishing LTD.
24. 李淑沛, S.-P.,王筱汶, X.-W.,黃韻蓉, Y.-J.,陳怡芳, Y.-F.,胡中宜, C.-Y.(2018)。兒童權利公約之在地實踐：提升安置機構少女表意權。社區發展季刊，162，35-49。
25. 林沛君, P.-C.(2017)。兒少「表意權」實質意涵的初探：以被安置兒少發聲的權利為中心。台灣人權學刊，4(1)，73-96。
26. 胡中宜, C.-Y.(2017)。聯合國《兒童權利公約》對我國家外安置照顧之意涵：歐洲國家的經驗。社區發展季刊，157，113-124。
27. 翁毓秀, Y.-S.(2011)。臺灣地區兒童少年安置照顧的發展與未來。社區發展季刊，133，293-308。
28. 高玉泉, Y.-C.,蔡沛倫, P.-L.(2016).兒童權利公約逐條要義.衛生福利部社會及家庭署=Social and Family Affairs Administration.
29. 高淑清, S.-C.(2008).質性研究的 18 堂課：首航初探之旅.麗文=Li-Wen.
30. 黃貞容, C.-J.(2002)。國立暨南大學=National Chi-Nan University。
31. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（2009）。《聯合國兒童權利公約第 12 號一般性意見書》。https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/144【UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2011). General Comment No. 12. https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/144】
32. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（2003）。《聯合國兒童權利公約第 5 號一般性意見書》。https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/134 【UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2003). General Comment No. 5. https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/134】
33. 聯合國兒童權利委員會（2013）。《聯合國兒童權利公約第 14 號一般性意見書》。https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/140 【UN Committee on the Rights of the Child. (2013). General Comment No. 14. https://www.cylaw.org.tw/about/crc/28/140】

1. (2023)。獨立協奏曲──安置機構少女自立培力行動實踐與反思。社區發展季刊，183，283-300。
2. (2023)。社會保護性系統的範式建立行動──家外安置強化資源平臺對困難安置兒童的發展性系統建構契機。社區發展季刊，183，31-54。
3. (2023)。替代性照顧政策下機構服務深化經驗初探──以家扶花蓮希望學園為例。社區發展季刊，183，123-139。