數位性別暴力盛行率研究初探

Preliminary research on the prevalence of digital gender-based violence in Taiwan

10.6171/ntuswr.202306_(47).0004

王珮玲(Pei-Ling Wang)；陳怡青(Yi-Ching Chen)；方念萱(Nien-Hsuan Fang)

數位性別暴力 ； 性別暴力 ； 影像性暴力 ； 騷擾 ； 盛行率 ； digital gender-based violence ； image-based sexual abuse ； harassment ； prevalence

臺大社會工作學刊

47期（2023 / 06 / 01）

149 - 199

繁體中文;英文

數位性別暴力問題日趨嚴重，案例層出不窮，對性別暴力防治工作帶來莫大的挑戰，但至今尚無法掌握其樣態與發生狀況。本研究係屬一探索性的前導研究，希冀探討我國數位性別暴力的盛行率以及不同個人特性的發生狀況。本研究經由編制數位性別暴力調查問卷，以網路調查方式，對18至74歲的民眾進行被害經驗調查，分析樣本為3,203位。本研究調查11項性別暴力類型，發現就終生盛行率來看，約七成的民眾經歷過數位性別暴力被害經驗，其中最多者為騷擾行為，高達67.5%、其次為基於性別的羞辱與攻擊（16.1%）、第三則為控制或限制表意（6.2%），而深受各界關注的影像性暴力問題，終生盛行率為4.6%，占第四位。年輕族群受害比例高於中壯年與老年族群，而性傾向是數位性別暴力受害比率的重要關係變項，非異性戀者相較異性戀面臨更高的被害風險。異性戀中，女性是數位性暴力之主要受害者，男性易因支持性別平權、多元性別而遭到數位性別暴力。最後根據調查結果，建議擴大現行官方版對於數位性別暴力的範疇與類型以及未來研究方向。

Digital gender-based violence is a serious issue for society. More and more incidents are happening and are reported asking for help. This pilot study aims to explore the prevalence of digital gender-based violence and the relationships among individual characteristics. The survey instrument was established based on victims' experiences, suggestions from frontline practitioners, and related studies. Adopting the online survey method, the sample is 3203 persons between 18-74 years old. This study contains 11 categories of digital gender-based violence behaviors. The results showed that the lifetime prevalence of gender-based violence is about 70%. The most popular violence is online harassment (67.5%), followed by dehumanization and assault based on gender (16.1%), and control and inhibition (6.2%). The lifetime prevalence of image-based sexual violence, which has recently gotten serious attention in our society is 4.6% and is ranked as fourth. Young people have a higher prevalence than middle-aged and older people. Sexuality is one of the most important factors, and sexual minority has a higher risk than heterosexuals. Among heterosexuals, females are the major victims of sexual violence, and males experience digital gender-based violence largely due to their support of gender equality or showing pro-attitude towards LGBTQ. According to the findings, this study suggests examining the definition, scope, and categories of digital gender-based violence, and indicates the future research direction.

1. 王大維, D.-W.,陳珮甄, P.-C.,王宣賀, H.-H.,李定穎, D.-Y.(2018)。女同志大學生遭受性傾向微型侵略經驗與因應之初探。輔導與諮商學報，40(1)，69-94。
   連結：
2. 邱誌勇, C.-Y.,許夢芸, M.-Y.(2007)。從 Cyberspace 到 Cyberworld：科技空間作為每日生活世界的再思考。資訊社會研究，12，109-141。
   連結：
3. 曾秀雲, H.-Y.,謝文宜, W.-Y.(2019)。同志分手調適：外在壓力源與身分認同的影響。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，45，93-142。
   連結：
4. 葉德蘭, D.-L.(2018)。防治基於性別的暴力：淺析 CEDAW 第 35 號一般性建議。婦研縱橫，108，44-53。
   連結：
5. Afrouz, R.(2021).The nature, patterns and consequences of technology-facilitated-domestic abuse: A scoping review.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,24(2)
6. Anitha, S.,Lewis, R.(2018).Introduction: Some reflections in these promissing and challenging times.Gender based violence in university communities: Policy, prevention and educational initiatives
7. Batha, E. (2020, October 5). Social media abuse dives girls off Facebook, Instagram, Twitter-poll. Reuters. https://jp.reuters.com/article/socialmedia-girls-abuse-idAFL8N2GP4RG
8. Borrajo, E.,Gámez-Guadix, M.,Pereda, N.,Calvete, E.(2015).The development and validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples.Computers in Human Behavior,48,358-365.
9. Brown, C.,Hegarty, K.(2021).Development and validation of the TAR Scale: A measure of technology-facilitated abuse in relationships.Computers in Human Behavior Reports,3,100059.
10. Citron, D. K.(2009).Law’s expressive value in combating cyber gender harassment.Michigan Law Review,108(3),373-415.
11. Coombs, E.(2021).Human rights, privacy rights, and technology-facilitated violence.The emerald international handbook of technology-facilitated violence and abuse
12. Cotter, A., & Savage, L. (2019). Gender-based violence and unwanted sexual behaviour in Canada, 2018: Initial findings from the Survey of Safety in Public and Private Spaces. Juristat: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics, 1-49.
13. Dragiewicz, M.,Burgess, J.,Matamoros-Fernández, A.,Salter, M.,Suzor, N. P.,Woodlock, D.,Harris, B.(2018).Technology facilitated coercive control: Domestic violence and the competing roles of digital media platforms.Feminist Media Studies,18(4),609-625.
14. Dunn, S.(2020).Centre for International Governance Innovation: Supporting a Safer Internet PaperCentre for International Governance Innovation: Supporting a Safer Internet Paper,未出版
15. Eaton, A. A.,Jacobs, H.,Ruvalcaba, Y.(2017).,Cyber Civil Rights Initiative.
16. Eckstein, J. J.(2020).What is violence now?: A grounded theory approach to conceptualizing technology-mediated abuse (TMA) as spatial and participatory.The Electronic Journal of Communication,29(3-4)
17. Eisinga, R.,Grotenhuis, M. t.,Pelzer, B.(2013).The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?.International Journal of Public Health,58(4),637-642.
18. eSafety Commissioner. (2020). Adults’ negative online experiences. https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-07/Adults%27%20negative%20online%20experiences.pdf
19. European Institute for Gender Equality(2017).Cyber violence against women and girls.
20. European Parliament(2018).Cyber violence and hate speech online against women.
21. European Union Agency For Fundamental Rights(2014).Violence against women: An EU-wide survey.
22. Gámez-Guadix, M.,Incera, D.(2021).Homophobia is online: Sexual victimization and risks on the internet and mental health among bisexual, homosexual, pansexual, asexual, and queer adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior,119,106728.
23. Gilbar, O.,Charak, R.,Trujillo, O.,Cantu, J. I.,Cavazos, V.,Lavi, I.(2022).Meta-analysis of cyber intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: Different types and their associations with face-to-face IPV among men and women.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
24. Harris, B.,Vitis, L.(2020).Digital intrusions: Technology, spatiality and violence against women.Journal of Gender-Based Violence,4(3),325-341.
25. Henry, N.,Flynn, A.(2019).Image-based sexual abuse: Online distribution channels and illicit communities of support.Violence Against Women,25(16),1932-1955.
26. Henry, N.,Flynn, A.,Powell, A.(2020).Technology-facilitated domestic and sexual violence: A review.Violence Against Women,26(15-16),1828-1854.
27. Henry, N.,McGlynn, C.,Flynn, A.,Johnson, K.,Powell, A.,Scot, A. J.(2021).Image-based sexual abuse: A study on the causes and consequences of non-consensual nude or sexual imagery.Routledge.
28. Henry, N.,Powell, A.(2018).Technology-facilitated sexual violence: A literature review of empirical research.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,19(2),195-208.
29. Hinson, L.,Mueller, J.,O’Brien-Milne, L.,Wandera, N.(2018).,International Center for Research on Women.
30. Kelly, L.(1987).The continuum of sexual violence.Women, violence and social control
31. Kerlinger, F. N.,Lee, H. B.(2000).Foundations of behavioral research.Thomson Learning.
32. Kolysh, S.(2021).Everyday violence: The public harassment of women and LGBTQ people.Rutgers University Press.
33. Lenhart, A., Ybarra, M., Zickuhr, K., & Price-Feeney, M. (2016). Online harassment, digital abuse, and cyberstalking in America. Data and Society Research Institute. https://www.datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Online_Harassment_2016.pdf
34. López-Cepero, J.,Vallejos-Saldarriaga, J.,Merino-García, M.(2018).Digital intimate partner violence among Peruvian youths: Validation of an instrument and a theoretical proposal.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,36(11-12),0886260518803610.
35. McGlynn, C.,Johnson, K.,Rackley, E.,Henry, N.,Gavey, N.,Flynn, A.,Powell, A.(2021).‘It’s torture for the soul’: The harms of image-based sexual abuse.Social & Legal Studies,30(4),541-562.
36. McGlynn, C.,Rackley, E.,Houghton, R.(2017).Beyond ‘revenge porn’: The continuum of image-based sexual abuse.Feminist Legal Studies,25(1),25-46.
37. O’Malley, R. L.,Holt, K. M.(2022).Cyber sextortion: An exploratory analysis of different perpetrators engaging in a similar crime.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,37(1-2),258-283.
38. Patel, U.,Roesch, R.(2020).The prevalence of technology-facilitated sexual violence: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Trauma, Violence, & Abuse,23(2),1524838020958057.
39. Perreault, S.(2020).Gender-based violence: Unwanted sexual behaviours in Canada’s territories, 2018.Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics,1-26.
40. Pew Research Center. (2021). The state of online harassment. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
41. Powell, A.,Flynn, A.,Hindes, S.(2022).,ANROWS.
42. Powell, A.,Henry, N.(2017).Sexual violence in a digital age.Palgrave Macmillan.
43. Powell, A.,Henry, N.(2019).Technology-facilitated sexual violence victimization: Results from an online survey of Australian adults.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,34(17),3637-3665.
44. Rackley, E.,McGlynn, C.,Johnson, K.,Henry, N.,Gavey, N.,Flynn, A.,Powell, A.(2021).Seeking justice and redress for victim-survivors of image-based sexual abuse.Feminist Legal Studies,29(3),293-322.
45. Russo, N. F.,Pirlott, A.(2006).Gender-based violence.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,1087(1),178-205.
46. Suler, J.(2005).The online disinhibition effect.International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies,2(2),184-188.
47. United Nations. (2018). Report of the Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences on online violence against women and girls from a human rights perspective (A/HRC/38/47). https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/thematic-reports/ahrc3847-report-special-rapporteur-violence-against-women-its-causes-and
48. University of Ljubljana(2020).,European Union’s Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme.
49. Watkins, L. E.,Maldonado, R. C.,DiLillo, D.(2018).The cyber aggression in relationships scale: A new multidimensional measure of technology-based intimate partner aggression.Assessment,25(5),608-626.
50. White, W. E.,Carmody, D.(2018).Preventing online victimization: College students’ views on intervention and prevention.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,33(14),2291-2307.
51. Wolford-Clevenger, C.,Zapor, H.,Brasfield, H.,Febres, J.,Elmquist, J.,Brem, M.,Shorey, R. C.,Stuart, G. L.(2016).An examination of the Partner Cyber Abuse Questionnaire in a college student sample.Psychology of Violence,6(1),156-162.
52. Ybarra, M. L.,Mitchell, K. J.(2016).A national study of lesbian, gay, bisexual (LGB), and non-LGB youth sexual behavior online and in-person.Archives of Sexual Behavior,45(6),1357-1372.
53. Ybarra, M. L., Price-Feeney, M., Lenhart, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2017). Intimate partner digital abuse. Data and Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/pubs/oh/Intimate_Partner_Digital_Abuse_2017.pdf
54. 王曉丹（編）, S.-D.(Ed.)(2019).這是愛女,也是厭女：如何看穿這世界拉攏與懲戒女人的兩手策略？.大家出版=Common Master Press.
55. 李奇紘, C.-H.(2021)。男同志的網路交友文化及其潛在的數位性暴力。性別平等教育季刊，93，31-37。
56. 周文賢, W.-S.(2004).多變量統計分析：SAS/STAT 使用方法.智勝=Best-Wise.
57. 數位女力聯盟（2021）。〈數位女力聯盟 WIDI 版本的數位性別暴力〉［動態貼文］。Facebook。https://www.facebook.com/women.in.digital.initiative/posts/【Women In Digital Initiative. (2021). Digital Sexual Violence category: Women In Digital Initiative (WIDI) edition. [Status update]. Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/women.in.digital.initiative/posts/】
58. 邊邊女力協會=Feminist Leadership and Mobilization on the Edge(2020).解碼數位性別暴力手冊.邊邊女力協會=Feminist Leadership and Mobilization on the Edge.