Open Access文獻之資訊組織及取用管道分析

On Information Organization and Access Means on Open Access

10.6146/univj.2008.12-2.05

吳紹群(Shao-Chun Wu)

開放取用 ； 資訊組織 ； 取用 ； Google ； OAI-PMH ； Open Access ； Information Organization ； Access ； Google ； OAI-PMH

大學圖書館

12卷2期（2008 / 09 / 01）

106 - 129

繁體中文

開放取用(Open Access)運動近年來獲得相當大的矚目，但所產生的討論多集中於出版模式、作者態度、成本分析等方面，對於圖書館如何對Open Access文獻進行資訊組織及提供讀者取用管道方面，相關的探討仍頗得相對較少。本文首先針對Open Access的發展及其文獻類型作一概述；其次分析目前主要的Open Access資訊組織方式和檢索管道並探討其優缺點；第三部份則綜合前一章所分析的各種Open Access資訊組織方式和檢索管道，由各角度探討其特性；最後則針對圖書館在Open Access資訊組織方式和檢索服務上的重要性作綜合性的探討，並對國書館未來在改善Open Access文獻的資訊組織及取用上及未來的研究方向上提出若干建議。

Open Access has received much attention in the recent year, but related discussions often concentrate on publication type, author attitude, and cost analysis only. There is scanty research concerning how the library provides information organization and access means on Open Access. This paper first introduces the development and types of literatures in Open Access, and analyzes the current information organization and access means on Open Access and the advantages and disadvantages. The third part summarizes the information organization and access means on Open Access analyzed in the previous chapter, and then discusses their characteristics from different perspectives. Lastly, composite discussion is made on the significance of information organization and access means on Open Access, in order to provide suggestions for libraries on improving the information organization of Open Access and for future research.

1. 林信成、康佩薰(2005)。Metadata與OAI-PMH在新聞數位典藏之整合應用。教育資料與圖書館，43(1)，49-68。
   連結：
2. 林雯瑤(2003)。電子預行本與學術傳播。圖書資訊學刊，1(2)，29-80。
   連結：
3. 張陳基(2005)。開放取用期刊經營模式之探討。大學圖書館，9(2)，92-104。
   連結：
4. 陳亞寧(2004)。開放式資訊取用之現況發展分析。圖書與資訊學刊，51，89-108。
   連結：
5. 陳亞寧(2006)。開放式資訊取用對館藏發展與服務的衝擊。圖書與資訊學刊，57，61-73。
   連結：
6. 楊美華(2006)。數位時代的學術傳播和館藏發展。大學圖書館，10(1)，140-156。
   連結：
7. The Eprints Application Profile: a FRBR Approach to Modelling Repository Metadata
8. Awre, C.(2003).Open Access and the Impact on publishing and purchasing.Serials,16(2),205-208.
9. Bell, S.,Foster, N. F.,Gibbons, S.(2005).Reference Librarians and the Success of Institutional Repositories.Reference Services Review,33(3),283-290.
10. The Dilemma of Access: Describing Open Access Journals with MARC and [Other] Metadata Schemes
11. Identifying and Providing Access to Free and Open Access Journals
12. Caldwell, T.(2005).Gateway to Your Soul.Information World Review,212,23-24.
13. CDLINFO Newsletter
14. Canadian Journal of Communication
15. Dawson, A.(2005).Optimising Publication for Google Users.Internet Reference Services Quarterly,10(3/4),177-194.
16. Drake, M. A.(2007).Academic Libraries arc Alive and Thriving.Searcher,15(1),8-12.
17. The Journal of Electronic Publishing
18. Gardner, S.,Eng, S.(2005).Gaga over Google? Scholar in the Social Sciences.Library Hi Tech News,8,42-45.
19. Goodman, D.(2004).The Criteria for Open Access.Serials Review,30(4),258-270.
20. Goodman, D.,Foster, C.(2004).Special Focus on Open Access: Issues, Ideas, and Impact.Serials Review,30(4),257.
21. Guedon, J.(2004).The "Green" and "Gold" Roads to Open Access: The Case for Mixing and Matching.Serials Review,30(4),315-328.
22. Open Access Journals: Collection Development and Technical Services Issues
23. Complexity Digest
24. ARL Bimonthly Report
25. Hood, A.,Howard, M.(2006).Adding Value to the Catalog in an Open Access World.The Serials Librarian,50(3/4),249-252.
26. IPO(2005).OpenDOAR or Directory of Open Access Repositories.Information Services &Use,25,109-111.
27. Jacso, P.(2005).Google Scholar: The Pros and the Cons.Online Information Review,29(2),208-214.
28. Jenkins, B.,Breakstone, E.,Hixson, C.(2005).Content in, Content out: the Dual Roles of the Reference Librarian in Institutional Repositories.Reference Services Review,33(3),312-324.
29. Kesselman, M.(2005).Google Scholar and Libraries: Point/Counterpoint.Reference Services Review,33(4),380-387.
30. Koehler, A. E. C.(2006).Some Thoughts on the Meaning of Open Access for University Library Technical Services.Serials Review,32(1),17-21.
31. Leathem, C. A.(2005).Choices in Cataloging Electronic Journals.The Acquisitions Librarian,33/34,73-83.
32. Morrison, H. G.(2006).The Dramatic Growth of Open Access: Implications and Opportunities for Resource Sharing.Journal of Interlibrary Loan, Document Delivery & Electronic Reserve,16(3),95-107.
33. Neuhaus, C.,Neuhaus, E.,Asher, A.,Wrede, C.(2006).The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study.Protal: Library and the Academy,6(2),127-141.
34. Noruzi, A.(2005).Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes.Libri,55,17-180.
35. Notess, G. R.(2005).Scholarly Web Searching: Google Scholar and Scirus.Online,29(4),39-41.
36. Organ, M.(2006).Download Statistics-What Do They Tell Us?.D-Lib Magazine,12(11)
37. Orsdel, L. C. V.,Born, K.(2005).Choosing Sides.Library Journal,130(7),43-48.
38. Pelizzari, E.(2005).Harvesting for Disseminating: Open Archives and the Role of Academic Libraries.The Acquisitions Librarian,33/34,35-51.
39. Rhyno, A.(2005).Google Goes Scholarly?.Feliciter,1,9-10.
40. Re: Cataloguing Open Access
41. International Researcher's Charter
42. Open Access Overview: Focus on Open Access to peer-reviewed Research Articles and their preprint
43. A Very Brief Introduction to Open Access
44. Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education
45. Willinsky, J.(2003).The Nine Flavours of Open Access Publishing.E-Medicine,49(3),263-267.
46. 邱炯友、蔣欣樺(2005)。學術出版傳播之Open Access模式。中華民國圖書館學會會報，74，165-183。
47. 張慧銖(2004)。圖書館目錄發展研究。台北市:文華。
48. 陳淑君、淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系編(2007)。書目記錄功能需求(FRBR)模型－應用在線上目錄之研究。現代圖書館回顧與前瞻學術研討會論文集，台北市:
49. 陳雪華(1996)。圖書館與網路資源。台北市:文華。

1. (2019)。開放取用與傳統付費期刊之被引用差異：跨領域比較研究。圖書資訊學研究，14(1)，133-168。