题名

從使用者角度評估大學圖書館之服務品質:以臺大圖書館為例

并列篇名

Assessing the Service Quality of the University Library from the Perspective of Users: A Survey at the National Taiwan University Library

DOI

10.6146/univj.2009-13-2.06

作者

張慈玲(Tze-Ling Chang);韓竹平(Chu-Ping Han)

关键词

大學圖書館 ; 服務品質 ; 評量 ; 使用者滿意度 ; LibQUAL+ ; University libraries ; Service quality ; Assessment ; User satisfaction ; LibQUAL+

期刊名称

大學圖書館

卷期/出版年月

13卷2期(2009 / 09 / 01)

页次

136 - 163

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

國立臺灣大學圖書館為瞭解讀者對圖書館服務品質的滿意程度,於民國98年5月25日至6月8日實施圖書館服務品質問卷調查計畫,採用LibQUAL+量表,調查讀者對圖書館館藏資源、空間設備及館員服務三大面向共22個題目之需求期望與實際感受。另並以4個總體服務題目以瞭解讀者對圖書館之實際滿意感受。各項期望值以1至9分評等程度。本調查報告針對5,948份有效問卷,除基本資料分析外,並就前述22項個別服務品質項目最低期望值、實際感受值、最高期望值、合格度與理想度列表及國示分析;以及總體服務品質實際感受值分析。至於調查結論與建議將作為圖書館整體發展政策及各相關業務單位發展規畫之依據。

英文摘要

In order to understand users' opinions regarding the quality of service at the National Taiwan University Library, a survey was conducted through questionnaires distributed from May 25(superscript th) to June 8(superscript th) in 2009. Using the survey tool, LibQUAL+, respondents were asked 22 questions about their needs, expectations and actual experiences relating to the library's collections and resources, the physical environment and library facilities, and the quality of services. Furthermore, another four questions that focused on the satisfaction level of the overall quality were also asked. The evaluations were rated on a scale of 1 to 9. There were 5, 948 valid questionnaires in total. In addition to analyses on basic information, the responses to all 22 questions were analyzed. The results were presented in tables and graphs to show scores for minimum expectation, satisfaction, maximum expectation, acceptability, and flawlessness. The conclusion and suggestions made based on the survey will serve as guidelines for future management and development of the NTU library.

主题分类 人文學 > 圖書資訊學
参考文献
  1. Thompson, Bruce (2010). The Origins/Birth of LibQUAL+®. Retrieved Sep 17, 2010, from: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/birth_lq
  2. LibQUAL+® (2010). History of LibQUAL+®. Retrieved Sep 17, 2010, from: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/history_lq
  3. LibQUAL+® (2010). General FAQs. Retrieved Sep 17, 2010, from: http://www.libqual.org/about/about_lq/general_faq
  4. Calvert, P.,Hernon, P.(1997).Surveying service quality within university libraries.Journal of Academic Librarianship,23(5),408-415.
  5. Cook, C.,Heath, F.,Thompson, B.,Thompson, R.(2001).LibQUAL+: service quality assessment in research libraries.IFLA JOURNAL,27(4),264-268.
  6. Heinrichs, J. H.,Sharkey, T. W.,Lim, J. S.(2006).Research investigation of information access methods.Journal of Academic Librarianship,32(2),183-191.
  7. Hernon, P.,Altman, E.(2010).Assessing service quality: satisfying the expectations of library customers.Chicago, IL:ALA.
  8. Hernon, P.,Calvert, P.(1996).Methods for measuring service quality in university libraries in New Zealand.Journal of Academic Librarianship,22(5),387-391.
  9. Hiller, S.(2004).Another tool in the assessment toolbox: integrating LibQUAL+(™) into the University of Washington libraries assessment program.Journal of Library Administration,40(3/4),121-137.
  10. Knapp, A. E.(2004).We asked them what they thought, now what do we do: the use of LibQUAL+(™) data to redesign public services at the University of Pittsburgh.Journal of Library Administration,40(3/4),157-171.
  11. Nitecki, D. A.(1998).Assessment of service quality in academic libraries: focus on the applicability of the SERVQUAL.Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria international conference on performance measurement in libraries and information services,Newcastle upon Tyne, England:
  12. Nitecki, D. A.,Hernon, P.(2000).Measuring service quality at Yale University libraries.Journal of Academic Librarianship,26(4),259-273.
  13. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1988).SERVQUAL: a multipleitem scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing,64(spring),12-40.
  14. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1985).A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research.The Journal of Marketing,49(Autumn),41-50.
  15. Shedlock, J.,Walton, L.(2004).An academic medical library using LibQUAL+(™): the experience of the Galter health sciences library, Northwestern University.Journal of Library Administration,40(3/4),99-110.
  16. Stein, J.(1998).Feedback from a captive audience: reflections on the results of a SERVQUAL survey of interlibrary loan services at Carnegie Mellon University Library.Proceedings of the 2nd Northumbria international conference on performance measurement in libraries and information services,Newcastle upon Tyne, England:
  17. 王梅玲(2001)。大學圖書館服務品質管理。中國圖書館學會會報,67,73-92。
  18. 林育云(2009)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  19. 林鈺雯(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市,國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  20. 陳汎瑩(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  21. 賀蘭芳、王發文、曹克玲(2010)。利用LibQUAL+®進行圖書館服務質量評價:以雲南農業大學圖書館為例。科技情報開發與經濟,20(7),30-32。
  22. 溫琳琳(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市,國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  23. 蔡佳霖(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣,輔仁大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  24. 謝春枝(2009)。LibQUAL+®圖書館服務質量調查的實證分析:以武漢大學圖書館為例。大學圖書館學報,2009(5),24-28+109。
被引用次数
  1. 李函儒、王梅玲(2015)。大學圖書館電子資源服務品質模式與應用研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,41(2),77-105。
  2. 張艾琦,王梅玲(2019)。數位學習碩士在職專班研究生線上學習、圖書館使用與學生自評學習成效之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,45(1),36-64。
  3. (2019)。大學圖書館內部服務品質因素與館員工作滿意度之研究。圖書資訊學研究,14(1),95-132。