人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響

Issue of Monograph Publishing in the Humanities and Its Impact on Scholarly Communication

10.6146/univj.2011.15-2.03

吳紹群(Shao-Chun Wu)；陳雪華(Hsueh-Hua Chen)

學術出版 ； 學術傳播 ； 專書 ； 人文學 ； 圖書 ； Scholarly publishing ； Scholarly communication ； Monograph ； Humanities ； Books

大學圖書館

15卷2期（2011 / 09 / 01）

39 - 61

繁體中文

近年來圖書館界十分重視期刊漲價議題，對於期刊出版問題在學術傳播上造成的威脅亦十分關心，Open Access等新的期刊出版模式也常被討論。但是，對於學術出版的另一重要板塊─專書（學術圖書）則缺乏同等的重視，多數文獻僅提及期刊漲價已對圖書館購買專書的預算造成排擠，至於專書本身的出版問題及其對學術傳播的影響，則鮮少有人探討。本文由學術傳播概念出發，以倚賴專書最深的人文學領域為例，探討專書出版問題的成因，並討論專書出版問題對學術傳播系統可能會造成哪些影響。

During recent years, libraries have paid extra attention to the increased price of periodicals and the serious implications it might have on scholarly communication. New modes of periodical publication such as Open Access have also been widely discussed. However, much less attention has been paid to another important sector of scholarly publishing - monographs (scholarly books). Most literatures only mention the low budget for monographs in libraries rather than the problems related to the publishing of monographs and its influences on scholarly communication. This paper focuses on scholarly communication, and takes as its example the field of humanism which greatly relies on monographs, to discuss the causes of problems related to monograph publishing and analyze the influences of these problems on scholarly communication systems.

1. 陳明莉(2003)。臺灣學術場域的知識生產、傳播與消費：人文社會科學的學術出版分析。教育與社會研究，5，1-46。
   連結：
2. Hitchcock, J. (1997, September 12). Reaching specialized audiences: The publisher' s conundrum. Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pub/specscholmono/Hitchcock.shtml
3. 政大出版社（2010）。關於我們：成立緣起及宗旨。上網日期：2011年7月21日。網址：http://nccupress.nccu.edu.tw/about/about.php
4. Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Erickson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004, May).Rethinking Scholarly Communication. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). Retrieved August 25, 2011, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html
5. Wasserman, M. (1997, September 12). How much does it cost to publish a monograph and why. Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/wasserman.shtml
6. Day, C. (1997, September 12). Digital alternatives: Solving the problem or shifting the costs? Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/day.shtml
7. 臺大出版中心（2010）。中心簡介。取自http://www.press.ntu.edu.tw/ntu_nube/news/intro_index.asp
8. Thatcher, S. G. (1997, September 12). Thinking systematically about the crisis in scholarly communication. Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/thatcher.shtml
9. Wissoker, K. (2002, September 18). An emerging crisis: Scholarly publishing & the Humanities. Retrieved October 19, 2007, from http://www.jhfc.duke.edu/fhi/events/scholarlhy_pub/2002 kenwissoker.php
10. Chodorow, S. (1997, September 12). The once and future monograph. Retrieved July 21st,2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/chodorow. Html
11. Association of Research Libraries. (1997, September 12). The specialized scholarly monograph in crisis: Or how can I get tenure if you won' t publish my book. Retrieved July 19, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/
12. Freitag, S. (1997, September 12). The AHA/ARL proposal on the endangered monograph.Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/Freitag.shtml
13. D' Arms, J. H. (1997, September 12). Advancing humanistic scholarship in the pretenure Years. Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pubs/specscholmono/DArms.shtml
14. Proseer, D. (2004, January 23). Open access–The future of scholarly communication?Retrieved May 12, 2007, from http://www.lib.cam.ac.uk/Future/SPARC_Cambridge_Humanities.ppt
15. Humphreys, R. S. (1997, September 12). Why do we write stuff that even our colleagues don' t want to read? Retrieved July 21st, 2011, from http://www.arl.org/resources/pub/specscholmono/humphreys.shtml
16. Abel, R. E.(ed.),Lyman, W. N.(ed.)(2002).Scholarly publishing: Book, journal, publishers, and libraries in the twentieth century.New York:Wiley.
17. Borgman, C. L.(Ed.)(1990).Scholarly communication and bibliometrics.Newbury Park:Sage.
18. Chronicle of Higher Education(2003).Can scholarly publishing be save?.Chronicle of Higher Education,50(9),B17.
19. Collier, B.(1999).Preserving the central role of the monograph.Chronicle of Higher Education,45(22),A56.
20. Cronin, B.,La Barre, K.(2004).Mickey Mouse and Milton: Book publishing in the humanities.Learned Publishing,17(2),85-98.
21. Dalton, M. S.(2006).A system destabilized: Scholarly books today.Journal of Scholarly Publishing,37(4),251-269.
22. Gorman, G.E.(ed.)(2006).Scholarly publishing in an electronic era: International yearbook of library and information management 2004/2005.London:Facet Publishing.
23. Gorman, G.E.(ed.),Miller, R. H.(ed.)(1997).Collections Management for the 21st Century: A handbook for librarians.Westport:Greenwood.
24. Heller, S.(1999).Writing long: Some scholars still have a lot to say.Chronicle of Higher Education,45(22),A16.
25. Heller, S.(1999).The shrinking scholarly book.Chronicle of Higher Education,45(25),A15.
26. Henon, A. L.(1990).Publish and perish.The Serials Librarian,17(3/4),35-41.
27. Hopkin, R. H.(1990).The scholarly communication process in the Humanities: The role of the editor.The Serials Librarian,17(3/4),25-32.
28. Jordan, P.(1998).The academic library and its user.London:Gower.
29. Joshi, S.(2004).Hippo meets dissertator on forked path in academic jungle.Journal of Scholarly Publishing,36(1),25-27.
30. Parsons, P. F.(1987).University of Tennessee.
31. Reynolds, V.(1955).Refuge of the scholar: The university press.Nation,180(18),366-367.
32. Schuster, J. H.(1990).The context of scholarly communication.The Serials Librarian,17(3/4),15-23.
33. Strosnider, K.(1997).Historians seek funds for key documents.Chronicle of Higher Education,43(37),A33.
34. Thompson, J. B.(2005).Books in the digital age.Cambridge, England:Polity.
35. Thompson, J. W.(2002).The death of the scholarly monograph in the Humanities? Citation patterns in literary scholarship.Libri,52,121-136.
36. Thorp, R.(2006).Publishing on Art: A crisis?.The Art Book,13(1),27-28.
37. Walker, P. V.(1996).Publishers fear impact of Arts and Humanities budget cuts.Chronicle of Higher Education,42(17),A37.
38. Waters, L.(2001).The tyranny of the monograph and the plight of the publisher.Publishing Research Quarterly,17(3),19-25.
39. 王梅玲(2003)。從學術出版的變遷探討學者、出版者與圖書館的角色。國家圖書館館刊，1，67-93。
40. 吳明德(1987)。國科會專題研究計畫成果報告國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立臺灣大學圖書館學系暨研究所。
41. 吳栢青(2006)。見證歷史‧閱覽尋根。文訊，245，96-100。
42. 吳栢青(2006)。舊學商量加邃密，知培養轉深沉。文訊，252，106-115。
43. 吳栢青(2005)。名山風雨礪志業，書林誰與共令名。文訊，239，159-164。
44. 邱炯友(2006)。學術傳播與期刊出版。臺北市:遠流。
45. 邱炯友編(2003)。大學出版社與學術出版。臺北縣:淡江大學出版中心。
46. 邱炯友、林串良(2002)。大學出版社與學術社群電子出版之研究。資訊傳播與圖書館學，9(2)，11-25。
47. 傅雅秀(1999)。從圖書資訊學的觀點探討科學傳播。臺北市:漢美。
48. 萬麗慧(2004)。海峽兩岸大學出版社暨學術出版的現況與未來。出版界，70，10-15。
49. 經濟部工業局編(2007)。2006 臺灣文化創意產業發展年報。臺北市:經濟部工業局。
50. 蔡明月(1999)。學術傳播與書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學，35(1)，38-57。
51. 魏念怡(2003)。國科會補助出版人文學與社會科學專書及論文集作業要點修正及實施。人文與社會科學簡訊，4(4)，43-46。
52. 蘇諼(2002)。電子資訊資源、電子出版、學術傳播。圖書與資訊學刊，40，18-28。

1. 陳雅琦、陳光華(2014)。探索人文社會學者研究產出之總合軌跡：以臺灣大學人文社會高等研究院為例。圖書資訊學刊，12(2)，81-116。
2. (2024).Mapping the Trajectory of Literary Preprints and Their Publishing Landscape.教育資料與圖書館學,61(2),127-160.