Dervin與Weick意義建構理論之分析與比較

Analysis and Comparison of Two Theories: Dervin's Sense-Making and Weick's Sensemaking

10.6146/univj.18-1.05

何瑞萍(Jui-Ping Ho)

意義建構 ； 意義建構理論 ； 引用文獻內容分析 ； Sense-Making ； sensemaking ； citation content analysis

大學圖書館

18卷1期（2014 / 03 / 01）

83 - 105

繁體中文

本研究採用內容分析法，分析與比較Dervin與Weick二位學者各自提出的意義建構理論之異同，並論述其他學者對此二種理論的評論，以及探討在圖書資訊學者的實徵研究中，其所應用理論中的概念、採用的研究方法與探究的議題。文末提出數點研究建議，提供有興趣研究意義建構議題的學者參考，期待未來有更多相關的實徵研究，以增進意義建構相關的知識，並對資訊行為研究有所啟發。

Employing the method of content analysis, this research has three purposes. First, it focuses on analyzing the similarities and differences between Brenda Dervin's theory of Sense-Making and Karl Weick's theory of sensemaking. Secondly, it discusses other scholars' comments on these two theories. Third, it sorts out articles which cite the two theories in Library and Information Science Literature to clarify what concepts, research topics, and methods have been explored.

1. 林奇秀(2010)。中立式提問法：以意義建構理論為基礎的參考晤談技巧。圖書與資訊學刊，2(1)，1-15。
   連結：
2. 林珊如(2010)。從意義建構取向探討國立中央圖書館臺灣分館之視障服務。教育資料與圖書館學，47(3)，283-318。
   連結：
3. Anderson, M. H.(2006).How can we know what we think until we see what we said?: A citation and citation context analysis of Karl Weick's the social psychology of organizing.Organization Studies,27(11),1675-1692.
4. Anderson, M. H.,Sun, P. Y. T.(2010).What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson(1991)? a citation context study.Management Learning,41(2),131-145.
5. Case, D. O.(2002).Looking for information.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
6. Chatman, E. A.(1991).Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit.Academy of Management Review,14(3),333-349.
7. Chatman, E. A.(2000).Framing social life in theory and research.The New Review of Information Behaviour Research,1,3-17.
8. Chatman, E. A.(1999).A theory of life in the round.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(3),207-217.
9. Chatman, E. A.(1996).The impoverished life-world of outsiders.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,47(3),193-206.
10. Chatman, E. A.(1987).The information world of low skilled workers.Library and Information Science Research,9(4),265-283.
11. Choo, C. W.(2001).Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning.Information research,7(1)
12. Daft, R. L.,Weick, K. E.(1984).Toward a model of organizations as interpretive systems.The Academy of Management Review,9(2),284-295.
13. Dalrymple, P. W.(2001).A Quarter century of user-centered study: The impact of Zweizig and Dervin on LIS research.Library and Information Science Research,23(2),155-165.
14. Dervin, B.(1999).On studying information seeking methodologically: The implications of connecting metatheory to method.Information processing and management,35,727-750.
15. Dervin, B.(Ed.),Voigt, M. J.(Ed.)(1982).Progress in communication science.Norwood, NJ:Ablex.
16. Dervin, B.,Dewdney, P.(1986).Neutral questioning: A new approach to the reference interview.RQ,25(4),506-513.
17. Ericson, T.(2001).Sensemaking in organizations-towards a conceptual framework for understanding strategic change.Scandinavian Journal of Management,17,109-131.
18. Fisher, K. E.(Ed.),Erdelez, S.(Ed.),McKechnie, L.(Ed.)(2005).Theories of information behavior.Medford, NJ:Information Today.
19. Fligstein, N.(2001).Social skill and the theory of fields.Sociological Theory,19,105-125.
20. Geigle, S. L.(1997).Washington, D.C.,The George Washington University.
21. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
22. Glazier, J. D.(Ed.),Powell, R. R.(Ed.)(1992).Qualitative research in information management.Englewood, CO:Libraries Unlimited.
23. Jacobson, Robert(Ed.)(1999).Information design.Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press.
24. Jensen, T. B.,Kjaergaard, A.,Svejvig, P.(2009).Using institutional theory with sensemaking theory: A case study of information system implementation in healthcare.Journal of Information Technology,24,343-353.
25. Olsson, M. R.(2010).The play's the thing: Theater professionals make sense of Shakespeare.Library & Information Science Research,32,272-280.
26. Pettigrew, K. E.,Fidel, R.,Bruce, H.(2001).Conceptual frameworks in information behavior.Annual Review of Information Science and Technology,35,43-78.
27. Rice, R. E.(Ed.),Atkin, C. K.(Ed.)(2001).Public communication campaigns.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
28. Rosenbaum, H.(1996).New York,Syracuse University.
29. Salancik, G. R.,Pfeffer, J.(1978).A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design.Administrative Science Quarterly,23,224-253.
30. Savolainen, R.(2007).Information behavior and information practice: Reviewing the "umbrella concepts" of information-seeking studies.Library Quarterly,77(2),109-132.
31. Savolainen, R.(1993).The sense-making theory: Reviewing the interests of a user-centered approach to information seeking and use.Information Processing & Management,29(1),13-28.
32. Savolainen, R.(1992).The sense-making theory: an alternative to intermediary-centred approach in library and information science.Proceedings of the International Conference held for the celebration of Twentieth Anniversary of the Department of Information Studies,London:
33. Savolainen, R.(2006).Information use as gap-bridging: The viewpoint of sense-making methodology.Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology,57(8),1116-1125.
34. Smellser, Neil J.(1985).Sociology.Boston:Allyn & Bacon.
35. Solomon, P.(1997).Discovering information behavior in sense making. II.The social.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,48,1109-1126.
36. Solomon, P.(1997).Discovering information behavior in sense making. I. Time and timing.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,48,1097-1108.
37. Talja, S.,Tuominen, K.,Savolainen, R.(2005)."Isms" in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism.Journal of Documentation,61(1),79-101.
38. Taylor, J. R.,Van Every, E. J.(2000).The emergent organization: Communication as its site and surface.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Tuominen, K.(1994).The individual as an information seeker: sense-making theory and the information seeking process.Library Science and Information,13(3),64-75.
40. Weber, K.,Glynn, M. A.(2006).Making sense with institutions: Context, thought and action in Karl Weick's theory.Organization Studies,27(11),1639-1660.
41. Weick, Karl E.(2001).Making sense of the organization.MA:Blackwell.
42. Weick, Karl E.(1995).Sensemaking in organizations.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
43. Weick, Karl E.,Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.,Obstfeld, David.(2005).Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking.Organization Science,16(4),409-421.
44. Wilson, T. D.(2000).Human information behavior.Informing Science,3(2),49-56.
45. Yu, L. Z.(2011).The divided views of the information and digital divides.Journal of Information Science,37(6),660-679.
46. 林珊如(2007)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:臺灣大學圖書資訊學系暨研究所。
47. 舒茲、盧嵐蘭譯(1991)。社會世界的現象學。臺北市:桂冠。
48. 菲弗、塞蘭尼克、俞慧芸譯(2007)。組織的外部控制：資源依賴觀點。臺北市:聯經。
49. 葉乃靜(2011)。日常生活中的資訊人。臺北市:文華。
50. 蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市:華泰。
51. 蔡明月(2006)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,臺北市:國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所。

1. 陳珮華(2016)。公部門資訊組織整合之實務研究與意義建構歷程。國立臺灣大學資訊管理學系學位論文。2016。1-155。