核心期刊館藏支援教師研究需求的評估：以中興大學圖書館為例

Assessment of Core Journal Collections in its Support to Faculty Research: A Case Study at the National Chung Hsing University Library

10.6146/univj.18-2.05

黃俊升(Chun-Sheng Huang)；周惠婷(Hui-Ting Chou)

核心期刊 ； 大學圖書館 ； 館藏支援 ； 引文分析 ； core journals ； academic libraries ； collection support ； citation analysis

大學圖書館

18卷2期（2014 / 09 / 01）

95 - 118

繁體中文

支援全校師生的教學與研究需求向來是大學圖書館責無旁貸的任務，然而綜觀國內外各大學圖書館紛紛面臨經費逐年遞減的窘境，嚴重侵蝕圖書館書刊經費的採購以及整體的經營與發展。因此為了將有限經費用在刀口上，評估並檢視現有的館藏資源強弱與缺失已是迫在眉睫的重要任務。本文作者以中興大學2012年自然及工程等相關學科的師生投稿SCI期刊論文所引用的參考書目文獻為研究標的，分析中興大學圖書館核心期刊支援全校師生教學研究的程度。研究結果發現：一、核心期刊館藏的使用率高於非核心期刊館藏；二、核心期刊館藏在支援本校師生的教學研究程度遠高於非核心期刊館藏。核心期刊的使用率以及支援校內師生研究程度均高於非核心期刊，顯示現階段核心館藏發展策略符合使用者需求。

Supporting faculty research is one of the most crucial commitments of an academic library. However, public funding for higher education continues to decrease, seriously eroding the libraries' purchasing power, as well as its general operation and development. Therefore, the evaluation of current resources and collections becomes an urgently important issue. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the core journal collections of the library effectively support research for the National Chung Hsing University (NCHU) faculty. A citation analysis of journal papers published by science and engineering faculty in 2012 was used to assess the question. Our finding reveals that firstly, the usage of core-journals is much higher than non-core-journals. Secondly, it indicates that core-journals support faculty research more effectively than non-core-journals in the cited references for articles published by NCHU faculty.

1. 黃慕萱(2004)。從研究產出探討人文社會學者學術評鑑之特性。圖書資訊學刊，2(3/4)，1-19。
   連結：
2. Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E.M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, New Series, 66 (1713), 385-389. doi:10.1126/science.66.1713.385
3. Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London : Grosby Lockwood & Son
4. Bradford, S. C. (1934). Source of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85-86
5. Black, S.(2001).Using citation analysis to pursue a core collection of journals for communication disorders.Library Resources & Technical Services,45(1),3-9.
6. Broadus, R. N.(1987).Early approaches to bibliometrics.Journal of the American Society of Information Science,38,127-129.
7. Budd, J.(1988).A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature.Research in Higher Education,28(2),180-190.
8. Crawford, G. A.(2013).A citation analysis of the classical philology literature: Implications for collection development.Library and Information Practice,8(2)
9. Garfield, E.(1972).Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation.Science,178(4060),471-479.
10. Hall, B. H.(1985).Collection assessment manual for college and university libraries.Phoenix, AZ.:The Oryx Press.
11. Kaczor, S.(2014).A citation analysis of doctoral dissertations in atmospheric science at the University at Albany.Science & Technology Libraries,33(1),89-98.
12. Kayongo, J.,Helm, C.(2012).Relevance of library collections for graduate student research: A citation analysis study of doctoral dissertations at Notre Dame.College & Research Libraries,73(1),47-67.
13. Keenan, S.,Johnston, C.(2000).Concise dictionary of Library and Information Science.Berlin:De Gruyter Saur.
14. Kellsey, C.,Knievel, J.(2012).Overlap between humanities faculty citation and library monograph collections, 2004-2009.College & Research Libraries,73(6),569-583.
15. Knievel, J. E.,Kellsey, C.(2005).Citation analysis for collection development: A comparative study of eight humanities fields.Library Quarterly,75(2),142-168.
16. Kushkowski, J. D.,Parsons, K. A.,Wiese, W. H.(2003).Master's and doctoral thesis citations: Analysis and trends of a longitudinal study.Portal: Libraries and the Academy,3(3),459-479.
17. Lawani, S. M.(1981).Bibliometrics: Its theoretical foundations, methods and applications.Libri,31(4),294-315.
18. Nisonger, T. E.(1993).A ranking of political science journals based on citation data.Serials Review,19(4),7-15.
19. Rolinson, J.,Al-Shanbari, H.,Meadows, A. J.(1996).Information usage by biological researchers.Journal of Information Science,22(1),47-53.
20. Smith, E. T.(2003).Assessing collection usefulness: An investigation of library ownership of the resources graduate students use.College and Research Libraries,64(5),344-355.
21. Stankus, T.(2010).Scientists who work with insects: How do arts and sciences and agriculture school faculty differ in where they publish?.Science & Technology Libraries,29(1/2),16-33.
22. 余培果(1995)。論引文分析方法的發展。圖書情報工作，4(1)，9。
23. 吳明德(1989)。館藏發展。臺北市:漢美。
24. 吳英美(1998)。我國三所師範大學圖書館教育類西文期刊館藏之研究（上）。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館，5(1)，60。
25. 李淑娟(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所。
26. 李德竹編(2012)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北市:漢美。
27. 李德竹編(1995)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北市:漢美。
28. 林秀娟、羅靜純(2003)。成功大學圖書館核心期刊建置。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，12，1。
29. 楊美華(1991)。核心期刊館藏之建立。教育資料與圖書館學，28(2)，210。
30. 葉繼元(1995)。核心期刊概論。南京市:南京大學出版社。
31. 劉君玉(1998)。引文分析的評價。情報理論與實踐，21(2)，87。
32. 蘇蓉波(2003)。從博士學位論文引用文獻探討成功大學圖書館館藏支援程度。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，12，53-69。

1. 簡素真,陳俐卉(2020)。以引文分析探討期刊館藏之學術研究支援度：以國立成功大學圖書館為例。國立成功大學圖書館館刊，29，59-87。