The Role of Civil Society for the Development of the Nordic Welfare States-history, Experiences and Challenges

10.6265/TJSW.2008.7(1)1

Stein Kuhnle

臺灣社會福利學刊

7卷1期（2008 / 08 / 01）

1 - 28

英文

The paper discusses the role of civil society for the development of the Nordic welfare states. It begins with a definition of the welfare state and outlines the characteristics of the so-called 'Nordic' or 'Scandinavian welfare model' and tries to assess in what sense it can be described or understood as a success. The historical role of civil society for the present characteristics of the Nordic (welfare) model is-in the form of a general overview-briefly spelled out, and the implications of the historically developed relationships between civil society and the state for the functioning of the welfare states are assessed. The paper ends with some comments on changes in civil society and to what extent the Nordic welfare model may thus be challenged. The paper sets out to show that the Nordic countries are examples-historically and currently-of consensual democracies and 'the politics of compromise' in which the comparatively efficient and successful tri-partite relations between civil society (in particular the organizations in the labour market), business and the state have been crucial for the development of the 'Nordic type' of welfare state. The normative commitment to a comprehensive welfare state is-in general-persistently strong among parties, organizations and voters. 'Corporatist' arrangements, in which civil society plays an important role, have been conducive to mutual trust-building, and conducive to high levels of consensus on economic policy-making and welfare state development and reforms. Economic structural change, demographic change and globalization in all its aspects are factors which (also) in the Nordic countries may inspire new forms of organizations appearing and new forms of cooperation between civil society, the state and the market, within and beyond nations. So far, the Nordic (welfare) model has been resilient, and it is more likely than not that it will remain resilient and, given its characteristics, be capable of adapting to new challenges arising in a more globalized world.

1. (2006).The Economist.The World in 2007.
2. Beveridge, W. H.(1942).Social Insurance and Allied Services.London:Cmd., HMSO.
3. Campbell, J. L.,O. K. Pedersen(2007).The Varieties of Capitalism and Hybrid Success: Denmark in the Global Economy.Comparative Political Studies,40(3),307-332.
4. Childs, M.(1936).Sweden: The Middle Way.New Haven:Yale University Press.
5. Elder, N.,A. H.Thomas,D. Arter(1982).The Consensual Democracies? The State and Politics of the Scandinavian States.Oxford:Martin Robertson.
6. Erikson, R.,E. J. Hansen,S. Ringen,H. Uusitalo (eds.)(1987).The Scandinavian Model: Welfare States and Welfare Research.Armonk, N.Y.:M. E. Sharpe.
7. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990).The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism.Cambridge:Polity Press.
8. Giddens, A.(1998).The Renewal of Social Democracy.Cambridge:Polity Press.
9. Gjems-Onstad, O.(1996).The Legal Framework and Taxation of Scandinavian Non-profit Organizations.Voluntas,7(2),195-212.
10. Hall, P.,D. Soskice (eds.)(2001).Varieties of Capitalism.New York:Oxford University Press.
11. Hort, S. E. O.,S. Kuhnle(2000).The Coming of East and South-East Asian Welfare States.Journal of European Social Policy,10(2),162-184.
12. Kildal, N.,S. Kuhnle (eds.)(2005).Normative Foundations of the Welfare State: The Nordic Experience.London:Routledge.
13. Klausen, K. K.,P. Selle(1996).The Third Sector in Scandinavia.Voluntas,7(2),99-122.
14. Kuhnle, S.(1991).Das Skandinavische Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Modell im Zeitalter der Europäischen Einigung.Zeitschrift für Sozialreform,37(10),606-619.
15. Kuhnle, S.,A. Hatland,S. Hort,Marshall, K.,O. Butzbach (eds.)(2003).New Social Policy Agendas for Europe and America.Washington D. C.:The World Bank.
16. Kuhnle, S.,Hovdum, A. R.,L. Stokke (eds.)(1990).Visjoner Om Velferdssamfunnet.Bergen:Alma Mater.
17. Kuhnle, S.,P. Selle,Gidron, B.,R. M. Kramer,L. M. Salamon (eds.)(1992).Government and the Third Sector.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
18. Lindbom, A.(2001).Dismantling the Social Democratic Welfare Model?.Scandinavian Political Studies,24(3),171-193.
19. Listhaug, O.,K. Ringdal(2007).Trust in Political Institutions: The Nordic Countries Compared with Europe.Paper prepared at the Norwegian Political Science Meeting,Trondheim:
20. Mishra, R.,S. Kuhnle,N. Gilbert,K.Chung (eds.)(2004).Modernizing the Korean Welfare State.New Brunswick, N.J.:Transaction.
21. Molina, O.,R. Rhodes(2002).Corporatism: The Past, Present and Future of a Concept.Annual Review of Political Science,5,305-331.
22. Myrdal Alva,Myrdal Gunnar(1934).Kris i befolkningsfrågan?.Umeå:Borea.
23. NOU(2003).Makt og demokrati.Oslo:NOU.
24. OECD(2006).OECD Factbook.Paris:OECD.
25. Olsson, S. E.(1990).Social Policy and Welfare State in Sweden
26. Perrin, G.(1969).Reflections on Fifty Years of Social Security.International Labour Review,99(3),249-292.
27. Petersson, O.(1998).Nordisk politik.Stockholm:Nordstedts Juridik AB.
28. Rothstein, B.,L. Westerhäll (eds.)(2005).Bortom den starka statens politik?.Stockholm:SBS.
29. Rustow, D.(1955).A Study of Parties and Cabinet State in Sweden.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
30. Schmitter, P. C.,G. Lembruch (eds.)(1979).Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation.Beverly Hills:Sage.
31. Selle, P.,B. Öymyr(1995).Frivillig organisering og demokrat.Oslo:Samlaget.
32. Streeck, W.,L. Kenworthy,Janoski, T. (ed.)(2005).The Handbook of Political Sociology.Cambridge:Cambridge Univ. Press.
33. Therborn, G.,Kettunen, P. (ed.)(1986).Det nordiska i den nordiska arbetarrörelsen.Helsinki:Finnish Society for Labour History.
34. Global Competitiveness Report