Making Community Work：社會資本與社區參與關聯性之研究

Making the Community Work: The Correlation between Social Capital and Community Participation

10.6265/TJSW.2012.10(2)3

林信廷(Xin-Ting Lin)；莊俐昕(Li-Hsin Chuang)；劉素珍(Su-Jen Liu)；黃源協(Yuan-Shie Hwang)

社會資本 ； 社區參與 ； 結合型社會資本 ； 橋接型社會資本 ； 連結型社會資本 ； Social capital ； Community participation ； Bonding social capital ； Bridging social capital ； Linking social capital

臺灣社會福利學刊

10卷2期（2012 / 06 / 01）

161 - 210

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討社會資本與社區參與之間的相關性，樣本係採PPS抽樣方法，針對設籍於臺中市和南投縣30個社區內的居民進行結構式問卷訪談，有效樣本共計534位。研究結果顯示，社會資本對社區參與有正向的解釋力，其中以「橋接型社會資本」對社區參與的解釋力最為顯著；「網絡」係三項社會資本要素中為最重要的解釋變項，橋接型與連結型網絡對社區參與有正面的影響，但結合型網絡的影響卻為負向的。另一方面，社區參與的過程亦有助於社會資本存量的累積，各社區參與程度中則是以最低的「告知」層次及最高的「決策與倡導」層次對社會資本有顯著的影響。在對於研究結果進行討論與分析後，本研究分別提出可供後續促進社區參與之政策、實務及學術研究之相關建議。

This study explored the correlation between social capital and community participation. A total of 534 samples were selected from 30 communities of Taichung City and Nantou County by using proportional to population size sampling (PPS) and were investigated by administering a structured questionnaire. The findings show that social capital has positive impacts on community participation, and bridging social capital is the most significant influence. Among all of the social capital factors, ”networks” play the most vital role in community participation. Networks of bridging and linking social capital have positive influences on community participation, but networks of bonding social capital have a negative impact on community participation. Nevertheless, community participation has promoted the stock of community social capital as well. At all of the community participation levels, the lowest level, named ”notification”, and the highest level, named ”decision making and initiative”, both have significant influences on social capital. Based on analysis, the author proposes to promote community participation as a vital means of promoting social capital in community.

1. 林聰吉、楊湘齡(2008)。臺灣社會資本的分布及其民主效果。東吳政治學報，26(2)，39-81。
   連結：
2. 黃源協、蕭文高、劉素珍(2009)。從「社區發展」到「永續社區」─臺灣社區工作的檢視與省思。臺大社工學刊，19，87-132。
   連結：
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2002). Social Capital and Social Well Being (Discussion Paper). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics
4. 行政院主計處（2004）。《中華民國九十二年臺灣地區社會發展趨勢調查報告》。臺北：行政院主計處
5. Arnstein, S. R.(1969).A Ladder of Citizen Participation.Journal of the American Institute of Planner,35,216-224.
6. Babb, P.(2005).Measurement of Social Capital in the UK.London:Office for National Statistics.
7. Baron, S.(ed.),Field, J.(ed.),Schuller, T.(ed.)(2000).Social Capital: Critical Perspectives.New York:Oxford University Press.
8. Brehm, J.,Rahn, W.(1997).Individual-level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital.American Journal of Political Science,41(3),999-1023.
9. Burns, D.,Taylor, M.(2000).Auditing Community Participation: An Assessment Handbook.Bristol:Policy Press & Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
10. Claibourn, M. P.,Martin, P. S.(2000).Trusting and Joining? An Empirical Test of the Reciprocal Nature of Social Capital.Political Behavior,22(4),267-291.
11. Coleman, J.(1988).Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.American Journal of Sociology,94,S95-120.
12. Côté, S.(2001).The Contribution of Human and Social Capital.Canadian Journal of Policy Research,2(1),29-36.
13. Gilchrist, A.(2004).The Well-connected Community: A Networking Approach to Community Development.Bristol:Policy Press.
14. Gittell, R.,Vidal, A.(1998).Community Organizing: Building Social Capital as a Development Strategy.California:Sage.
15. Granovetter, M. S.(1983).The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.Sociological Theory,1,201-233.
16. Granovetter, M. S.(1973).The Strength of Weak Ties.The American Journal,78(6),1360-1380.
17. Green, G. P.,Haines, A.(2008).Asset Building and Community Development.California:Sage.
18. Grootaert, C.(1998).Social Capital: The Missing Link?.Washington, D.C.:Social Capital Initiative, The World Bank.
19. Halpern, D.(2005).Social Capital.Cambridge:Polity Press.
20. Harell, A.,Stolle, D.,Quintelier, E.(2007).Network Diversity and Political Participation: A Complication or an Asset?.meeting of the European Consortium for Political Research Annual Meet,Pisa, Italy:
21. Herreros, F.(2004).The Problem of Forming Social Capital: Why Trust?.New York:Palgrave Macmillian.
22. Kay, A.(2006).Social Capital, the Social Economy and Community Development.Community Development Journal,41(2),160-173.
23. Kay, A.,Pearce, J.,Evans, M.(2004).,Middlesex:Institute of Social Science Research, School of Social Science. Middlesex University.
24. Kretzmann, J.,McKnight, J.(1996).Assets-based Community Development.National Civic Review,85(4),23-29.
25. Lochner, K.,Kawachi, I.,Kennedy, B. P.(1999).Social Capital: A Guide to Its Measurement.Health and Place,5,259-270.
26. Mattessich, P. W.,Monsey, B.(1997).Community Building: What Makes It Work? A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building.Minnesota:Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
27. Midgley, J.(1986).Community Participation, Social Development and the State.New York:Methuen and Co. Ltd.
28. Narayan, D.(1999).Bonds and Bridges: Social Capital and Poverty.Washington D.C.:The World Bank.
29. OECD(2001).The Well-being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital.Paris:Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, OECD.
30. Office for National Statistics(2001).Social Capital: A Review of the Literature.London:Social Analysis and Reporting Division, Office for National Statistics.
31. Paul, S.(1987).Community Participation in Development Project: The World Bank Experience.Washington D.C.:The World Bank.
32. Plummer, J.,Taylor, J. G.(2004).Community Participation in China: Issues and Processes for Capacity Building.London:Earthscan.
33. Portes, A.(1998).Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology.Annual Review of Sociology,24,1-24.
34. Purdue, D.(2001).Neighbourhood Governance: Leadership, Trust and Social Capital.Urban Studies,38(12),2211-2224.
35. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.Princeton:Princeton University Press.
36. Putnam, R. D.(1995).Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital.Journal of Democracy,61,65-78.
37. Putnam, R. D.(1995).Tuning in, Tuning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.Political Science and Politics,28(4),664-683.
38. Putnam, R. D.(2000).Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community.New York:Touchstone.
39. Putnam, R. D.(1993).The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life.The American Prospect,4(13),1-11.
40. Richardson, J. G.(ed.)(1986).Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education.Connaticat:Greenwood Press.
41. Teorell, J.(2003).Linking Social Capital to Political Participation.Scandinavian Political Studies,26(1),49-66.
42. Woolcock, M.(2001).The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcome.The Contribution of Human and Social Capital to Sustained Economic Growth and Well-being: International Symposium Report,Québec City:
43. 王春勝(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市，國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。
44. 丘昌泰、洪鴻智、陳金貴(2002)。建立市民導向的社區參與制度，北市經驗之評析。行政暨政策學報，35，1-44。
45. 江天健(2003)。社區工作與社區總體營造。國教世紀，204，13-20。
46. 法蘭西斯‧福山、李宛蓉譯(1998)。誠信，社會德行與繁榮的創造。臺北:立緒。
47. 許道然(2001)。組織信任之研究，一個整合性觀點。空大行政學報，11，253-295。
48. 郭瑞坤、汪夢怡、邱鴻遠(2006)。影響大學教師參與社區公共事務因素之研究。公共事務評論，7(2)，135-165。
49. 黃源協(2004)。社區工作何去何從，社區發展？社區營造？。社區發展季刊，107，78-87。
50. 黃源協(2006)。社會資本、社區發展與社區營造。「新公民力量，社會資本的詮釋與再現」國際研討會，南投縣國立暨南國際大學:
51. 蔡吉源(1995)。論臺灣地區社會資本、社區意識與社區社會之重建。臺灣經濟，228，1-12。
52. 羅秀華(2004)。社區自主與政策的對話。社區發展季刊，107，46-160。

1. 曾稚尹、汪志忠(2016)。地方產業永續轉型的社會資本與政府效能：屏東縣養水種電個案分析。政治科學論叢，67，91-132。
2. 黃淑玲、伍維婷(2016)。當婦運衝撞國家：婦權會推動性別主流化的合縱連橫策略。台灣社會學，32，1-55。
3. 黃怡臻、王光旭(2018)。社區人際網絡與社區意識及參與關聯性之研究：不同營造經驗社區的比較。調查研究：方法與應用，40，63-125。
4. 劉素珍、黃源協、莊俐晰(2015)。社區能力與社區生活品質之研究：對社區治理與社區發展的意涵。公共行政學報，49，1-35。
5. 蘇侰寧,梁亞文,唐婷菱,王佑芸(2021)。老人社會資本對健康生活品質的影響：以台中市老人為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌，40(3)，256-267。
6. (2022)。社區心理衛生中心網絡合作困境之探討。社區發展季刊，177，233-239。