Are Problems of Underrecognition and Devaluation of Care Work Being Resolved?: Japanese Policy Experience and Prospects for Securing the Long-term Care Workforce

10.6265/TJSW.2014.12(1)2

Mie Morikawa

Long-term care ； Long-Term Care Insurance System ； Workforce ； Care work ； Policy ； Japan

臺灣社會福利學刊

12卷1期（2014 / 12 / 01）

35 - 64

英文

The purpose of this article is to analyze whether Japan's long-term care (LTC) policy measures for securing the LTC workforce have contributed in the past, and are likely to contribute in the future, to resolution of the problems of underrecognition and devaluation of care work. Almost all aging or aged societies, including Japan, have many unresolved problems with regard to recruiting and retaining a good-quality LTC workforce. Since the launch of the Long-Term Care Insurance System (LTCIS) in 2000, securing human resources and improving the working conditions of care workers has become a crucial policy issue. In presenting the Japanese LTC policy experience and discussing prospects for securing the LTC workforce, the author first examines the following questions: What has been the main approach of the LTCIS in securing a quality LTC workforce? What kind of problems/issues have policymakers faced? What prospects does the newly introduced scheme have? Second, the author describes the ongoing reforms in the LTCIS aimed at establishing the Community-Based Integrated Care System, while paying attention to how reform affects the recognition and valuation of care work. Finally, the author critically analyzes the implications for Japan's policy development for resolving or not resolving the problems of underrecognition and devaluation of care work.

1. Care worker Support Center Foundation (2012) “2011 Japan Long-term Care Working-condition Survey,” Tokyo: Care worker Support Center Foundation.（介護労働安定センター（2012）「介護労働の現状について 平成23年度介護労働実態調査」.）[Written in Japanese]
2. Subcommittee of Long-Term Care Benefit, Social Security Council (2014) Materials 1-3 for the 99th Meeting of the Subcommittee of Long-Term Care Benefit, Social Security Council. Tokyo: MHLW; 2014 March27.（社会保障制度審議会介護給付費分科会(2014)　社会保障審議会介護給付費分科会 第99回（2014.3.27）資料1-3.）[Written in Japanese]
3. Long-Term Care Insurance Committee of Social Security Council (2013) Material 4 for the 45th Meeting of the Long-term Care Insurance Committee of the Social Security Council. Tokyo: MHLW; 2013 June6.（社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会（2013）社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会 第45回（2013年6月6日）資料4.）[Written in Japanese]。
4. MHLW (2014) “Revision of preventive benefit and improvement of daily support services ” Tokyo: MHLW; 2014 April25.（厚生労働省（2014）「予防給付の見直しと生活支援サービスの充実」2014年4月25日.) [cited 2014 5 May]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2014/01/dl/tp0120-09-03d.pdf [Written in Japanese].
5. Care worker Support Center Foundation (2013) “Statistic tables of 2012 Japan Long-term Care Working-condition Survey,” Tokyo: Care worker Support Center Foundation.（介護労働安定センター（2013）「介護労働者調査の統計表」.）[cited 2014 26April] Available from: http://www.kaigo-center.or.jp/report/pdf/h24_chousa_roudousha_toukeihyou.pdf [Written in Japanese]
6. Cabinet Office (2012). National Strategy and Professional Test: Long-term Care Professional Career Qualification System Is Starting from 2012.Tokyo: Cabinet Office.（内閣府（2012）「平成24年度から介護プロフェッショナルのキャリア段位制度～国家戦略・プロフェッショナル検定～がはじまります」.）Available from http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai1/jissen-cu/jissen-cu.html (Cited 2013 8 November). [Written in Japanese]
7. Long-Term Care Insurance Committee of Social Security Council (2013)Materials for the 42nd Meeting of the Long-term Care Insurance Committee of the Social Security Council. Tokyo: MHLW; 2013 January 22.（社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会（2013）社会保障制度審議会介護保険部会 第42回（2014年1月22日）.）[cited 2013 8 June]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r9852000002tbl1.html. [Written in Japanese].
8. Community-Based Integrated Care Research Committee (2009) “Fiscal year 2008 report by the Community-Based Integrated Care Research Committee: organizing points of controversy for the future reviews, fiscal year 2008 MHLW project on the Public Health Services and Health Promotion Services for the Elderly,” Tokyo: Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting.（地域包括ケア研究会(2009)『平成20年度地域包括ケア研究会報告書：今後の検討のための論点整理』 (平成20年度老人保健健康増進等事業　報告書),三菱ＵＦＪリサーチ＆コンサルティング株式会社.） [cited 2012 31August]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/houdou/2009/05/h0522-1.html. [Written in Japanese].
9. Care worker Support Center Foundation (2013) “2012 Japan Long-term Care Working-condition Survey,” Tokyo: Care worker Support Center Foundation.（介護労働安定センター（2013）「介護労働の現状について 平成24年度介護労働実態調査」.）[cited 2014 26April] Available from: http://www.kaigo-center.or.jp/report/pdf/h24_roudou_genjyou.pdf [Written in Japanese]
10. Subcommittee of Long-Term Care Benefit, Social Security Council (2014)Materials 1-1 for the 99th Meeting of the Subcommittee of Long-Term Care Benefit, Social Security Council. Tokyo: MHLW; 2014 March27.（社会保障制度審議会介護給付費分科会(2014)　社会保障審議会介護給付費分科会 第99回（2014.3.27）資料1-1.）[Written in Japanese]
11. Health and Welfare Bureau for the Elderly, MHLW (2012) “Current conditions and policy measures for recruiting and retaining long-term care workforce,” Tokyo: MHLW.（厚生労働省老健局（2012）「介護職員をめぐる現状と人材の確保等の対策について」.）[cited 2014 26April] Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/shingi/2r9852000002ae5j-att/2r9852000002aej7.pdf [Written in Japanese]
12. Japanese Association of Home Helpers (2013) ‘’Demanding paper in relation to the reform of LTCI and the change of LTC fee schedule” August 8, 2013.（日本ホームヘルパー協会（2013）「介護保険改定、介護報酬改定に関する要望書」2013年8月8日.）[Written in Japanese]。
13. Atkinson, Carol,Lucas, Rosemary(2013).Policy and gender in adult social care work.Public Administration,91(1),159-173.
14. Boddy(ed.)(2006).Care Work.Oxford:Routledge.
15. Findlay, Patricia,Findlay, Jeanette,Stewart, Robert(2009).The consequences of caring: skills, regulation and reward among early years workers.Work, employment and society,23(3),422-441.
16. Himmelweit, Susan(1999).Caring Labor.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,561(1),27-38.
17. Hobson, Barbara(ed.),Lewis, Jane(ed.),Siim, Birte(ed.)(2002).Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics.Cheltenham:Edward Elger.
18. Morikawa, Mie(2014).Toward community-based integrated care: trends and issues in Japan's long-term care policy.International Journal of Integrated Care,14
19. Morikawa, Mie(2014).Problematic Issues Concerning Social Investment Strategy in Elderly Care: Implications from the Case of Japan's Long-Term Care Policy.Social Policy and Labor Studies,5(3),113-25.
20. OECD(2013).A Good life in Old Age.Paris:OECD.
21. OECD(2011).Help wanted?.Paris:OECD.
22. OECD(1998).The Future of Female-Dominated Occupations.Paris:OECD.
23. Steinberg, Ronnie J.(1999).Emotional Labor in Job Evaluation: Redesigning Compensation Practices.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,561(1),143-157.
24. Ungerson, Clare(1997).Social Politics and the Commodification of Care.Social Politics,3(4),362-381.
25. 井口克郎(2013)。介護の質の把握と改善のための基本視角：介護サービスと労働や介護保障制度の関係性に着目して。日本医療経済学会会報，30(1)，1-27。
26. 向井通郎(2013)。熟練ケアワーカーの臨床能力の評価：語りからみたケアワーク実践の分析を通して。老年社会科学，34(4)，471-481。
27. 地域包括ケア研究会(2010)。平成21年度老人保健健康増進等事業報告書平成21年度老人保健健康増進等事業報告書,Tokyo:三菱ＵＦＪリサーチ＆コンサルティング株式会社=Mitsubishi UFJ Research and Consulting。
28. 森川美絵(2014)。社会政策におけるケアの労働としての可視化。社会政策，5(3)，25-37。
29. 森川美絵(2012)。『介護労働の低評価』再考：日本の介護保険制度における介護労働評価の枠組み。社会政策，3(3)，78-89。
30. 鈴木聖子(2010)。介護ケアの質の評価に関する研究：介護ケアの質を構成する評価指標の開発。介護福祉，80，25-38。