题名

埔里新住民的社會復原力:以921地震為例

并列篇名

Social Resilience of Female Migrant Spouses in Puli: Case Study of the 921 Earthquake

DOI

10.6265/TJSW.201906_15(1).02

作者

黃彥宜(Yen-Yi Huang);王櫻芬(Ying-Fen Wang);陳昭榮(Jun-Rong Chen)

关键词

新住民 ; 921地震 ; 社會復原力 ; Female Migrant Spouses ; The 921 Earthquake ; Social Resilience

期刊名称

臺灣社會福利學刊

卷期/出版年月

15卷1期(2019 / 06 / 01)

页次

87 - 124

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

性別、族群與災難議題在國內與國際社群逐漸受到重視,但針對921地震的新住民研究仍極為有限。本文主要從社會復原力的觀點,探討921地震時,埔里新住民所面臨的問題和需求,及當時她們所處生活環境是否有因應的資源與支持,以協助她們從災難中復原,並降低結構不均對災難所帶來的加乘負面影響。社會復原力不似傳統復原力的論述著重人格特質的討論,而關注個人和環境的交互,但更重視社會如何支持個人。本文採用半結構訪談法,訪談11位曾經歷921地震之埔里新住民,從個人的能動性、正式非正式支持體系、生態環境和文化及信仰等面向探討不同的系統當如何相互支援補足,成為新住民個人和家庭受到衝擊時的備援並增進面對災難的復原力。

英文摘要

Gender, ethnicity, and disaster have become high-profile issues in Taiwan and international academic communities; however, research on the experiences of female migrant spouses during the 921 earthquake has been scant. This paper uses the perspectives of social resilience to explore the problems and needs of female migrant spouses in Puli during and after the 921 earthquake. The paper examines whether the community in which female migrant spouses lived provided the resources and support to help them recover from the disaster when the earthquake stroke and reduced the negative impact of structural inequality. Traditionally, the concept of resilience focuses on personality traits, whereas social resilience emphasizes the interaction of individuals with the environment and the support individuals receive from their society. In this study, a semi-structured interview was used to gather information from 11 female migrant spouses who had experienced the 921 earthquake. The aimis to explore how an individual's strength, formal and informal support systems, ecological environment, and cultural factors and beliefs supplement each other to form redundancy and reinforced resilience during the disaster.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 王永慈,游進裕,林碧亮(2013)。淹水對沿海地層下陷區之貧窮家庭的社會影響─以臺灣西海岸漁村為例。臺灣社會工作學刊,11,81-114。
    連結:
  2. 王翊涵(2011)。「我很辛苦,可是我不可憐!」東南亞新移民女性在臺生活的優勢觀點分析。臺大社會工作學刊,23,93-136。
    連結:
  3. 張宜君,林宗弘(2012)。不平等的災難:921大地震下的受災風險與社會階層化。人文與社會研究集刊,24(2),193-231。
    連結:
  4. 黃彥宜,林冠惟(2014)。社區基層行政與服務人員對新移民與其家人的描繪:反壓迫實施的觀點。臺灣社會工作學刊,13,1-38。
    連結:
  5. 葉高華(2013)。社會脆弱性可解釋九二一地震死亡率分布嗎?。思與言,51(1),135-153。
    連結:
  6. Adger, W. N.(2000).Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They Related?.Progress in Human Geography,24(3),347-364.
  7. Alston, M.,Kent, J.(2008).The Big Dry: The Link between Rural Masculinities and Poor Health Outcomes for Farming Men.Journal of Sociology,44(2),133-147.
  8. Belnky, M. F.,Clinchy, B. M.,Goldberger, N. R.,Tarule, J. M.(1986).Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind.New York:Basic Books.
  9. Cardona, O. D.(2004).The Need for Rethinking the Concepts of Vulnerability and Risk from a Holistic Perspective: A Necessary Review and Criticism for Effective Risk Management.Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People,London:
  10. Chenail, R. J.(1995).Presenting Qualitative Data.The Qualitative Report,2(3),1-9.
  11. Chodorow, N.(1978).The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender.Berkeley:University of California Press.
  12. Chung, K.,Hong, E.,Newbold, B.(2013).Resilience Among Single Adult FemaleRefugees in Hamilton, Ontario.Refuge,29(1),65-74.
  13. Clarke, D. J.,Hill, R. V.(2013).IFPRI Discussion PaperIFPRI Discussion Paper,Washington:IFPRI.
  14. Cuadra, B. C.(2015).The Nordic Welfare Watch Working PaperThe Nordic Welfare Watch Working Paper,Iceland:The Nordic Welfare Watch.
  15. Davis, L.(2004).Progress in Analysis of Social Vulnerability and Capacity.Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People,London:
  16. Delica-Willison, Z.,Willison, R.(2004).Vulnerability Reduction: A Task for theVulnerable People Themselves.Mapping Vulnerability: Disasters, Development and People,London:
  17. Dominelli, L.(2012).Green Social Work: From Environmental Crises to Environmental Justice.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  18. Dominelli, L.(2002).Feminist Social Work: Theory and Practice.London:Palgrave.
  19. Dominelli, L.(ed.)(2018).The Routledge Handbook of Green Social Work.London:Routledge.
  20. Drolet, J.(ed.).Rebuilding Lives Post-Disaster.New York:Oxford University Press.
  21. Glavovic, B. C.,Scheyvens, R.,Overton,J.(2003).Waves of Adversity, Layers of Resilience: Exploring the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach.Contesting Development: Pathways to Better Practice, Proceedings of the Third Biennial Conference of the Aotearoa New Zealand,Palmerston North:
  22. Hallegatte, S.,Bangalore, M.,Bonzanigo, L.,Fay, M.,Narloch, U.,Rozenberg, J.,Vogt-Schilb, A.(2014).Policy, Research working paperPolicy, Research working paper,Washington, DC:World Bank Group.
  23. Hegney, D. G.,Buikstra, E.,Baker, P.,Rogers-Clark, C.,Pearce, S.,Ross, H.,King, C.,Watson-Luke, A.(2007).Individual Resilience in Rural People: A Queensland Study, Australia.Rural and Remote Health,7(4),620.
  24. Kagee, A.(2004).Do South African Former Detainees Experience Post-Traumatic Stress? Circumventing the Demand Characteristics of Psychological Assessment.Transcultural Psychiatry,41,323-346.
  25. Kwok, A. H.,Doyle, E. E. H.,Becker, J.,Johnston, D.,Paton, D.(2016).What is ‘Social Resilience’? Perspectives of Disaster Researchers, Emergency Management Practitioners, and Policymakers in New Zealand.International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,19,197-211.
  26. Li, M.,Xu, J.,He, Y.,Wu, Z.(2012).The Analysis of the Resilience of Adults One Year after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake.Journal of Community Psychology,40(7),860-870.
  27. Manyena, S. B.(2006).The Concept of Resilience Revisited.Disasters,30(4),433-450.
  28. Masten, A. S.,Garmezy, N.(1985).Risk, Vulnerability, and Protective Factors in Developmental Psychopathology.Advances in Clinical Child Psychology,New York:
  29. Nirupama, N.,Popper, T.,Quirke, A.(2015).Role of Social Resilience in Mitigating Disasters.International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment,6(3),363-377.
  30. Norris, F. H.,Baker, C. K.,Murphy, A.,Kaniasty, K.(2005).Social Support Mobilization and Deterioration after Mexico’s 1999 Flood: Effects of Context, Gender, and Time.American Journal of Community Psychology,36,15-28.
  31. Patil, R. R.(2015).Perspective Building for Disaster Management in India.European Scientific Journal,1,140-146.
  32. Pyles, L.(2007).Community Organizing for Post-Disaster Social Development: Locating Social Work.International Social Work,50(3),321-333.
  33. Richardson, G. E.(2002).The Metatheory of Resilience and Resiliency.Journal of Clinical Psychology,58(3),307-321.
  34. Ross, H.,Cuthill, M.,Maclean, K.,Jansen, D.,Witt, B.(2010).Understanding, Enhancing and Managing for Social Resilience at the Regional Scale: Opportunities in North Queensland.Cairns:Reef and Rainforest Research Centre Limited.
  35. Sapountzaki, K.(2007).Social Resilience to Environmental Risks: A Mechanism of Vulnerability Transfer?.Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal,18(3),274-297.
  36. Shaw, D.,Scully, J.,Hart, T.(2014).The Paradox of Social Resilience: How Cognitive Strategies and Coping Mechanisms Attenuate and Accentuate Resilience.Global Environmental Change,25,194-203.
  37. 王櫻芬(2015)。南投縣,國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所。
  38. 江大樹(編),容邵武(編)(2017).大學與地方的協力治理.南投縣:國立暨南國際大學.
  39. 何雪松(2006)。「忍」的述說─新移民婦女在香港第一年生活體驗之縱貫質性研究。香港社會科學學報,30,97-122。
  40. 余欣羽(2001)。〈災民可憐或是媒體可悲?〉。《罔市女性電子報》。資料檢索日期:2018年12月20日。網址:http://bongchhi.frontier.org.tw/archives/2091
  41. 宋麗玉(2009).優勢觀點─社會工作理論與實務.臺北:洪葉文化.
  42. 周世彬(2007)。臺北市,國立臺北科技大學土木與防災研究所。
  43. 林津如(2010)。陽剛才能救援?災難論述中(被)噤聲的女性觀點。性別平等教育季刊,51,16-19。
  44. 張麗珠(2010)。災變社會工作者的培訓與服務效率的提昇。社區發展季刊,131,84-99。
  45. 張麗珠(2009)。災害復原力:建構一個防災社區。復興崗學報,96,29-52。
  46. 許秀芬(2009)。臺北市,國立臺灣大學地理環境資源學研究所。
  47. 傅紹文(2010)。屏東縣,國立屏東科技大學技術及職業教育研究所。
  48. 劉珠利(2005)。對天然災害受災女性之社會工作─一個增強權能的角度。社區發展季刊,109,444-458。
  49. 蕭文(2000)。災難事件前的前置因素與復原力在創傷後壓力症候反應心理復健上的影響。九二一震災心理復健學術研討會
  50. 謝臥龍(2010)。文化與性別敏感度對災後重建以及災難研究之重要性。教育研究月刊,197,48-62。
被引用次数
  1. 黃騰(2022)。什麼才是他/她要的幸福?從能動性角度探討新住民子女教育的可能性。教育實踐與研究,35(1),75-111。
  2. (2024)。新住民家庭暴力經驗之保護因子研究。教育心理學報,55(4),717-744。