题名

「個人助理是居服的補充包」？地方政府執行身心障礙者自立生活支持／個助服務的迷思與困境

并列篇名

＂Is Personal Assistance a Supplement to Homecare?＂ Myths and Barriers Related to the Provision of Personal Assistance by Local Authorities to People with Disabilities

DOI

10.6265/TJSW.201912_15(2).01

作者

周月清(Yueh-Ching Chou)；陳伯偉(Bo-Wei Chen)；張家寧(Chia-Ning Chang)

关键词

自立生活 ； 個人協助 ； 個人助理 ； 居家服務 ； CRPD ； Independent Living ； Personal Assistance ； Personal Assistant ； Home Care ； Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

期刊名称

臺灣社會福利學刊

卷期/出版年月

15卷2期（2019 / 12 / 01）

页次

1 - 56

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

聯合國《身心障礙者權利公約》（CRPD）第19條指出個人協助（personal assistance，以下簡稱個助）是障礙者自立生活與社區融入重要條件。自2011年地方政府須依法提供個助服務。以非結構性訪談大綱，深度訪談11位來自十個地方政府相關人員，探討其提供個助看法及執行。發現：對自立生活及個助概念不清楚；個助與居服難釐清；執行困境。認知迷思：使用個助要擬定自立生活計畫書、個助和居服不能重疊、常態性服務是居服不是自立生活、個助不能協助障礙者執行社會角色、個助訓練時數不足欠專業度。個助與居服難釐清：個助與居服競合、個助為居服補充包、個助是另一形式的居服。主要困境為經費不足。建議：依CRPD第五號一般性建議速修條文／辦法，個助和居服區隔極待釐清並編公務預算。
英文摘要

Article 19 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) outlines the equal rights of all persons with disabilities to live in the community; these rights extend to social inclusion and participation. According to this convention, access to personal assistance (PA) is crucial for preventing social isolation or community segregation. In Taiwan, since 2011, people with disabilities have been granted access to PA services by local authorities. Drawing upon in-depth interviews with 11 staff members from 10 local authorities, this paper explores how current PA services were implemented and operationalized at the regional level. Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) having no straightforward understanding of independent living and PA services; (2) confusion between PA and homecare; and (3) having difficulties in PA implementation. The questionable practices of local authorities in providing PA services include requiring an independent living plan to use a PA, stipulating that the services provided by a personal assistant and those provided by a homecare worker cannot be the same, not allowing personal assistants to provide regular or daily services (e.g., assistance in eating and dressing), and not allowing personal assistants to help service users engage in their social roles (e.g., motherhood). Furthermore, against the spirit of IL movement and CRPD, personal assistants are required to receive a certain number of hours of regulated training, and PA is viewed as a supplement to homecare in Taiwan. Currently, budget shortages are the main barrier to implementing PA. Following the General Comments section of Article 19 of the CRPD, the Taiwan Disability Act and Individual Care Regulation should be amended, the concepts of PA and homecare should be better clarified, and an official national budget for PA must be established.
主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 王增勇(2004)。透視專家權力：以臺北市居家服務為場域的行動研究。應用心理研究，23，51-77。
    連結：
  2. 呂寶靜,陳正芬(2009)。我國居家照顧服務員職業證照與培訓制度之探究：從英國和日本的作法反思臺灣。社會政策與社會工作學刊，13(1)，185-233。
    連結：
  3. 周月清,張恒豪(2017)。新制身心障礙鑑定與需求評估（ICF）執行之探討：身心障礙服務使用者觀點。東吳大學社會工作學報，32，1-34。
    連結：
  4. Askheim, O. P.(2005).Personal Assistance - Direct Payments or Alternative Public Service. Does it Matter for the Promotion of User Control?.Disability & Society,20(3),247-260.
  5. Askheim, O. P.(1999).Personal Assistance for Disabled People – The Norwegian Experience.International Journal of Social Welfare,8(2),111-119.
  6. Askheim, O. P.,Andersen, J.,Guldvik, I.,Johansen, V.(2013).Personal Assistance: What Happens to the Arrangement When the Number of Users Increases and New User Groups Are Included?.Disability & Society,28(3),353-366.
  7. Askheim, O. P.,Bengtsson, H.,Bjelke, B. R.(2014).Personal Assistance in a Scandinavian Context: Similarities, Differences and Developmental Traits.Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research,16,3-18.
  8. Brennan, C.,Traustadóttir, R.,Rice, J.,Anderberg, P.(2016).Negotiating Independence, Choice and Autonomy: Experiences of Parents Who Coordinate Personal Assistance on Behalf of Their Adult Son or Daughter.Disability & Society,31(5),604-621.
  9. Chou, Y. C.,Schalock, R. L.(2007).Trends in Residential Policies and Services for People with Intellectual Disabilities in Taiwan.Journal of Intellectual Disability Research,51(2),135-141.
  10. Christensen, K.(2016).Personal Assistance as Part of Changing Welfare Politics - Possibilities and Challenges.Finnish Conference on Disability Studies,Helsinki:
  11. Christensen, K.(2009).In(ter)dependent Lives.Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research,11,117-130.
  12. Christensen, K.,Guldvik, I.,Larsson, M.(2014).Active Social Citizenship: the Case of Disabled Peoples’ Rights to Personal Assistance.Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research,16,19-33.
  13. Christensen, K.,Pilling, D.(2014).Policies of Personalisation in Norway and England: On the Impact of Political Context.Journal of Social Policy,43(3),479-496.
  14. Esping-Andersen, G.(ed.)(1996).Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies.London:SAGE.
  15. European Network on Independent Living [ENIL] (2016). ENIL Submission for the Day of General Discussion on the Right of Persons with Disabilities to Live Independently and Be Included in the Community. Retrieved March 3, 2016, from http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/CallDGDtoliveindependently.aspx
  16. European Network on Independent Living[ENIL] (2015). Personal Assistant Survey: Sweden. Retrieved October 1, 2018, from http://enil.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/18.-PA-table_Sweden.pdf .
  17. Finer, C. J.(ed.)(2001).Comparing the Social Policy Experience of Britain and Taiwan.Aldershot, England:Ashgate.
  18. Geurts, J.(2011).Social System and Disability Policy in Sweden.Conference: De-institutionalisation and Stimulation of Entrepreneurship in the Provision of Social Services for People with Disabilities,Poland:
  19. Gibson, B. E.,Brooks, D.,DeMatteo, D.,King, A.(2009).Consumer Directed Personal Assistance and ‘Care’: Perspectives of Workers and Ventilator Users.Disability & Society,24(3),317-330.
  20. Graham, K.(2015).Cash Payments in Context: (self-) Regulation in the New Social Relations of Assistance.Disability & Society,30(4),597-613.
  21. Independent Institute (2019). Act Concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://www.independentliving.org/docs3/englss.html
  22. Jansson, E.(2015).Assistansersättning Efter 65 - Utvärdering Av De Nya Reglerna.Stockholm:Riksförsäkringsverket.
  23. Jolly, D. (2009). Personal Assistance and Independent Living: Article 19 of the UN CRPD. Retrieved February 20, 2016, from http://www.enil.eu/reports/
  24. Morris, J.(1993).Independent Lives? Community Care and Disabled People.Basingstoke:Macmillan.
  25. Morris, J.(1994).Community Care or Independent Living?.Critical Social Policy,14(40),24-45.
  26. Novick, G.(2008).Is There a Bias Against Telephone Interviews in Qualitative Research?.Research in Nursing & Health,31(4),391-398.
  27. Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights, United Nations Human Rights[OHCHR] (2018). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, General Comment No. 5 (2017) on Living Independently and Being Included in the Community (CRPD/C/GC/5). Retrieved March 20, 2018, from https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CRPD/C/GC/5&Lang=en
  28. Oliver, M.(1990).The Politics of Disablement.London:Macmillan.
  29. Ratzka, A.(2017).What is Personal Assistance, How Can it Influence Our Lives?.International Conference on Independent Living and Personal Assistance: Self-Determination and User Control,Taipei, Taiwan:
  30. Ratzka, A. (1996). Introduction to Direct Payments for Personal Assistance. Retrieved October 2, 2018, from: //www.independentliving.org/docs4/directpay.html
  31. Ratzka, A. (2013). Independent Living for People with Disabilities: From Patient to Citizen to Customer. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2016, from https://www.independentliving.org/docs7/Ratzka-patient-citizen-customer.html
  32. Ratzka, A. (2015). Self-determination Through Direct Payments and Personal Assistance Cooperatives. Retrieved Feb. 10, 2016, from https://www.independentliving.org/docs7/direct-payments-personal-assistance-cooperatives.html
  33. Ratzka, A. (ed.) (2004). Model National Assistance Policy. Retrieved May 20, 2016, from https://www.independentliving.org/docs6/ratzka200410a.html
  34. Rubin, R.,Babbie, E. R.(2013).Essential Research Methods for Social Work.Belmont, CA:Brooks-Cole.
  35. Shakespeare, T.(2006).Disability Rights and Wrong?.London:Routledge.
  36. Shakespeare, T.,Stöckl, A.,Porter, T.(2018).Metaphors to Work by: the Meaning of Personal Assistance in England.International Journal of Care and Caring,2(2),169-179.
  37. The national board of Health and welfare (2009). Swedish Disability Policies: Service and care for people with functional impairments. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/8407/2009-126-188_2009126188.pdf
  38. Tossebro J.(ed.),Gustavsson, A.(ed.),Dyrendahl, G.(ed.)(1996).Intellectual Disabilities in The Nordic Welfare States: Policies and Everyday Life.Norway:Norwegian Academic Press.
  39. Ungerson, C.,Yeandle, S.(2007).Cash for Care in Developed Welfare States.UK:Palgrave Macmillan.
  40. United Nations General Assembly (2014). Thematic Study on the Right of Persons with Disabilities to Live Independently and Be Included in the Community. A/HRC/28/37. Retrieved September 20, 2019, from https://enil.eu/news/un-ohchr-publishes-thematic-study-on-independent-living/
  41. 台北市新活力自立生活協會（2017）。〈身心障礙者個人助理服務〉。資料檢索日期：2017 年12 月1 日。網址：http://www.ciltp.artcom.tw/ap/cust_view.aspx?bid=2057&sn=aed40eb1-3eb3-4293-8ef3-ceff186012b6
  42. 台北市新活力自立生活協會（2018）。〈臺灣自立生活服務（運動）推展〉。資料檢索日期：2018 年10 月2 日。網址： http://www.ciltp.artcom.tw/ap/cust_view.aspx?bid=35
  43. 吳淑瓊,莊坤洋(2001)。在地老化：臺灣二十一世紀長期照護的政策方向。台灣公共衛生雜誌，20(3)，192-201。
  44. 周月清（2017a）。〈長照2.0 外一章：我要在社區自主生活的選擇是什麼？一天只能換兩次尿片；別人每天都可以洗澡，我不行〉。《巷口社會學》。資料檢索日期：2017 年12 月1 日。網址：https://twstreetcorner.org/2017/03/21/chou-yueh-ching/
  45. 周月清(2008)。2006 身心障礙者權利公約。社區發展季刊，123，79-105。
  46. 周月清(2005)。北歐智障者搬出「教養院」到社區居住與生活改革進程。臺灣社會福利學刊，4(1)，131-168。
  47. 周月清(2017)。去機構教養化與解放研究：身心障礙者服務及障礙研究。臺灣社會學會通訊，87，11-21。
  48. 周月清(2018)。個人助理服務：障礙者自立生活與身權公約實踐。社區發展季刊，164，50-66。
  49. 周月清(2017)。從聯合國身心障礙者權利公約（CRPD）檢視我國身心障礙者自立生活與社區融入。社區發展季刊，158，187-207。
  50. 周月清(2004)。障礙者獨立生活運動緣起與意涵─美英加文獻探討。社區發展季刊，106，331-344。
  51. 林萬億(1994).福利國家─歷史比較的分析.臺北:五南.
  52. 邵靄如,曾妙慧(2011)。內政部委託研究報告內政部委託研究報告,臺北:內政部。
  53. 財團法人平安社會福利慈善事業基金會（2016）。《各縣市自立生活支持服務現況》。未出版書面資料。
  54. 高雅郁(2013)。臺北市，國立陽明大學衛生福利所。
  55. 國際審查委員會（IRC）（2017）。〈2017 年11 月3 日就中華民國（臺灣）施行身心障礙者權利公約（CRPD）首次報告之結論性意見〉（Concluding Observations of the initial report of the Republic of China （Taiwan） on the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities （CRPD） adopted by the International Review Committee （IRC） on 3 November 2017）。資料檢索日期：2018 年3 月20 日。網址：https://crpd.sfaa.gov.tw/BulletinCtrl?func=getBulletin&p=b_2&c=D&bulletinId=261
  56. 張世雄(1996).社會福利的理念與社會安全制度.臺北:唐山.
  57. 衛生福利部（2018）。〈長照2.0 ─居家照顧服務篇（2018.12 修正版）〉。資料檢索日期：2018 年12 月1 日。網址：https://1966.gov.tw/LTC/cp-4215-44995-201.html
  58. 衛生福利部(2016)。衛生福利部（2016）。《衛生福利部衛生福利人員訓練中心：105 年度身心障礙者自立生活支持服務研習班課程配當表及相關講義》。未出版研習資料。
被引用次数
  1. 陳伯偉,林君潔,周月清(2023)。「我們」的選擇、「我們」自己決定：肢體障礙者機構居住與自立生活。臺大社會工作學刊，48，69-114。
  2. (2023)。從「玉姐案」談個人助理（制度）納入《身心障礙者權益保障法》的重要性。社區發展季刊，184，279-287。
  3. (2023)。日本與韓國個人協助（個人助理服務）暨臺灣修法建議──使用者觀點。社區發展季刊，184，288-315。
print cancel