後工業社會下的兒童照顧策略：以瑞典與西班牙為例

Child Care Strategies in Postindustrial Societies: A Case Study of Sweden and Spain

10.6265/TJSW.201912_15(2).03

黃曉薇(Hsiao-Wei Huang)

兒童照顧 ； 政黨 ； 性別平等 ； 全球照顧鏈 ； 外籍幫傭 ； Child Care ； Political Parties ； Gender Equality ； Global Care Chain ； Foreign Helpers

臺灣社會福利學刊

15卷2期（2019 / 12 / 01）

109 - 152

繁體中文

隨著女性就業與彈性工作的增加、離婚與同居率的提高、結婚與生育率的下降，在後工業社會下的家庭面臨更多的新風險、不穩定，福利國家適逢少子化與高齡化的挑戰，如何因應新風險與福利政策的永續經營是值得探討的議題。本文以瑞典與西班牙兩個不同路徑發展的國家為例，討論兩國如何回應新風險以及兒童照顧體系是如何受到制度脈絡與政治行動者的影響。研究結果發現瑞典早在1970年代末期就規劃了完善的兒童照顧體系，包括津貼、公共的兒童照顧服務與親職假等方案，期間社會民主政黨與國家女性主義者對政策的推動扮演至關重要的角色，即便在1990年代受到新自由主義的影響，仍維持舊有的政策基礎，並繼續以達到性別平等為目標，以及鼓勵父親回到家庭參與共享照顧工作。而西班牙在1975年後才逐漸邁向民主化，在政治上為了避免落入佛朗哥威權時代的窠臼，各政黨對於家庭相關政策並不重視，政策規劃較傾向擴大就業提升女性就業率；女性主義者也受到新自由主義的影響，認為國家不需要過度介入家庭，政策的規劃反而會加重女性的負擔。因此，我們可以看到西班牙女性在缺乏國家支持的情況下，只好尋求私人資源而形成一種新的照顧替代方案－外籍幫傭與祖母的照顧服務，產生新的性別、階級與種族關係的不平等。

With the increase in the employment of women and their resilience, increases in divorce and cohabitation rates, and the decline in marriage and fertility rates, families in postindustrial society are facing new risks and instability. An emerging challenge, namely how to respond to new risks and the sustainable management of welfare policies, is worth exploring. This paper uses the development of different paths in Sweden and Spain examples to discuss how these countries respond to new risks and how their child care systems are influenced by institutional contexts and political actors. The study revealed that the Swedish government planned to introduce a comprehensive child care system as early as the late 1970s, which would include subsidies, public child care services, and parental leave. Social democratic parties and national feminists played a crucial role in promoting this system. This role, even if influenced by neoliberalism in the 1990s, maintained an old policy base, continues to target gender equality, and encourages fathers to participate in shared care. Spain gradually began to democratize itself after 1975. With the main focus being on avoiding the pitfalls of Franco's authoritarian era, political parties did not pay much attention to family-related policies. Policy planning tends to expand employment and increase the female employment rate. Women theists are also influenced by neoliberalism. They believe that the state should not intervene in family affairs and that related policy planning increases the burden on women. Therefore, it can be observed that Spanish women, in the absence of state support, must seek private resources to form a new alternative to care, such as foreign domestic helpers and grandmother care services, thus creating new gender, class, and ethnic inequalities.

1. 許雅惠(2000)。家庭政策之兩難─從傳統意識型態出發。社會政策與社會工作學刊，4(1)，237-289。
   連結：
2. 黃志隆(2012)。臺灣家庭政策的形成：家計承擔與兒童照顧的整合。人文及社會科學集刊，24(3)，331-366。
   連結：
3. 黃曉薇,劉一龍(2009)。生育、女性就業與兒童照顧支持方案─以南歐模式為例。臺灣社會福利學刊，8(1)，149-194。
   連結：
4. Spain-principal tax rates (2007). Income Tax Rate, Retrieved October 20, 2007, from http://www.siddalls.net/Portals/0/Tax%20Rates%20for%20Spain%2005_09_07.pdf
5. Abbott, P.,Wallace, C.,俞智敏（譯）(1995).女性主義觀點的社會學.臺北:巨流圖書公司.
6. Bernardi, F.(2005).Public Policies and Low Fertility: Relations for Public Intervention and a Diagnosis for the Spanish Case.Journal of European Social Policy,15(2),123-138.
7. Boje, T. P.(ed.),Leira, A.(ed.)(2000).Gender, Welfare State and the Market: Towards a New Division of Labour.UK:Routledge.
8. Carrasco, C.,Rodríquez, A.(2000).Women, Families, and Work in Spain: Structural Changes and New Demands.Feminist Economics,6(1),45-57.
9. Ellingsæter, A. L.,Leira, A.(2006).Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States,UK:
10. Esping-Andersen, G.(2009).The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles.Cambridge:Polity Press.
11. Esping-Andersen, G.(1990).The Three World of Welfare Capitalism.Oxford:Polity Press.
12. Esping-Andersen, G.(1999).Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies.US:Oxford University Press.
13. European Commission, MISSOC(2007).European Commission, MISSOC (2007). Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland Part2: Germany, Estonia and Spain. EU: Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities..
14. Eurostat (2018). Total Feterity Rate. Retrieved February 9, 2019, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=tps00199&plugin=1
15. Gornick, J. C.,Meyers, M. K.(2003).Families That Work: Policies for Reconciling Parenthood and Employment.USA:Russell Sage Foundation.
16. Haas, L.(1981).Domestic Role Sharing in Sweden.Journal of Marriage and the Family,43(4),957-967.
17. Hakim, C.(2000).Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century.UK:Oxford University Press.
18. Hantrais, L.(ed.)(2000).Gendered Policies in Europe: Reconciling Employment and Family Life.UK:Macmillan Press.
19. Hernes, H. M.(1987).Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism.Norwegian University Press.
20. Hiilamo, H.(2006).Women-Friendliness and Economic Depression: Finland and Sweden in the 1990s.Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States,UK:
21. Immergut, E.(1998).The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.Politics and Society,26(1),5-34.
22. Kaufmann, F. X.(ed.)(2002).Family Life and Family Policies in Europe (V.2): Problems and Issues in Comparative Perspective.UK:Oxford University Press.
23. Korpi, B. M.(2000).Early Childhood Education and Care Policy in Sweden.International OECD Conference of Lifelong Learning as an Affordable Investment,Ottawa, Canada:
24. Leira, A.(2006).Parenthood Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia, 1970s-2000s.Politicising Parenthood in Scandinavia: Gender Relations in Welfare States,UK:
25. Leira, A.(2002).Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
26. Leitner, S.(2003).Varieties of Familialism. The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative Perspective.European Societies,5(4),353-375.
27. Lewis, J.(1992).Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.Journal of European Social Policy,2(3),159-173.
28. Lewis, J.(ed.)(1993).Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State.UK:Edward Elgar.
29. Mazur, A.(2002).Theorizing Feminist Policy.UK:Oxford University Press.
30. Michel, S.(ed.),Mahon, R.(ed.)(2002).Child Care Policy at the Crossroads: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring.UK:Routledge.
31. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs(2008).Ministry of Health and Social Affairs (2008). More Time for Young Children, No.7. Stockholm: Government Offices of Sweden..
32. Moen, P.,Forest, K. B.(1990).Working Parents, Workplace Supports, and Well-Being: The Swedish Experience.Social Psychology Quarterly,53(2),117-131.
33. Neyer, G.(2006).Mpidr Working PaperMpidr Working Paper,未出版
34. O’ Connor, J.,Orloff, A.,Shaver, S.(1999).States, Markets and Families, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
35. OECD (2009). Typology of Childcare and Early Education Services. OECD Family Database, Retrieved January 12, 2009, from http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm
36. Orloff, A. S.(1996).Gender in the Welfare State.Annual Review of Sociology,22,51-78.
37. Orloff, A. S.(1993).Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.American Sociological Review,58,303-328.
38. Ostner, L.(ed.),Schmitt, C.(ed.)(2008).Family Policies in the Context of Family Change - The Nordic Countries in Comparative Perspective.Netherlands:VS Verlag für sozialwissenschaften.
39. Peterson, E.(2007).The Invisible Carers: Framing Domestic Work (ers) in Gender Equality Policies in Spain.European Journal of Women’s Studies,14(3),265-280.
40. Sainsbury, D.(ed.)(1994).Gendering Welfare States.London:SAGE Publications.
41. Scharpf F. W.(ed.),Schmidt, V. A.(ed.)(2000).Welfare and Work in the Open Economy (Vol.2).USA:Oxford University Press.
42. Social Security (2008). Social Security Programs Throughout the World: Europe, 2008. Research, Statistics & Policy Analysis. Retrieved February 5, 2019, from https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/progdesc/ssptw/2008-2009/europe/index.html
43. Tobío, C.(2001).Women’s Strategies and the Family-Employment Relationship in Spain.State Feminism, Women’s Movements, and Job Training: Making Democracies Work in the Global Economy,UK:
44. Tobío, C.,Gorfinkiel, M. D.(2007).The Work-Life Balance I-New Gendered Relationship in Spain: ‘the other’ in the Care Triangle.International Journal of Iberian Studies,20(1),41-63.
45. Valiente, C.(1996).The Rejection of Authoritarian Policy Legacies: Family Policy in Spain (1975-1995).South European Society and Politics,1(1),95-114.
46. Vidal, I.,Valls, C.(2002).National Report SpainNational Report Spain,European:Research Nework.
47. 中華民國內政部統計處（2019）。〈性別統計專區─婚姻與家庭〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年2 月15 日。網址：https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/node.aspx?cate_sn=&belong_sn=5138&sn=6826。
48. 中華民國統計資訊網（2019）。〈主計總處統計專區─就業、失業統計：性別統計指標〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年2 月11 日。網址：https://www.stat.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=37200&ctNode=517&mp=4
49. 內政部(2007)。《人口政策白皮書及實施計畫之研究》子計畫《人口政策白皮書及實施計畫之研究》子計畫,臺北:內政部。
50. 王舒芸(2007)。向左走？向右走？兒童照顧政策之「去」或「再」家庭化初探。《家庭與工作：變遷現象與多元想像》研討會
51. 簡文吟(2004)。臺灣已婚婦女勞動再參與行為的變遷。人口學刊，28，1-47。