埔里反空污行動：綠社工的觀點

Anti-Air Pollution Action in Puli: A Green Social Work Perspective

10.6265/TJSW.202206_18(1).01

黃彥宜(Yen-Yi Huang)；黃資媛(Tzu-Yuan Huang)

綠社工 ； 環境正義 ； 空氣污染 ； 不均 ； 社區工作 ； Green Social Work ； Environmental Justice ； Air Pollution ； Inequality ； Community Work

臺灣社會福利學刊

18卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

1 - 47

繁體中文

細懸浮微粒（簡稱PM_(2.5)）對人體健康危害是目前全世界最熱門的議題之一，相關研究也指出埔里是臺灣PM_(2.5)問題最嚴重的區域之一。2014年「埔里PM_(2.5)空污減量自救會」由一群關心空污問題的婦女所成立，她們與國立暨南國際大學合作，為清淨空氣投入各種努力。本文運用綠社工之「跨學門合作」、「不均和環境正義」與「社區工作的重要性」等核心概念，分析自救會自2016年迄今的反空污行動，並針對社會工作的傳統論述提出省思。爰引綠社工的論述作為理論架構，目的不在用西方理論框架在地經驗，而是在尋求不同國家經驗間相互學習和對話，希冀能啟發臺灣社會工作對環境議題的關注。研究發現，自救會著重從個人生活中減少空污，並運用科技以證據說服埔里居民相信空污的嚴重性，及引介藝術媒介將複雜的科學知識轉譯成居民可以理解的語言以認識PM_(2.5)的危害，繼而促發集體行動。面對日益惡化的環境和空污問題，社會工作者有一個機會可以扮演更積極的角色，發展新的論述和實施領域。

Particulate matter _(2.5) (PM_(2.5)) is a serious threat to human health globally. The town of Puli in Taiwan is one of the areas that is most severely affected by PM_(2.5) pollution. In 2014, the Puli PM_(2.5) Reduction Association was founded by a group of townswomen who were concerned about the increase in air pollution in the area. These women collaborated with National Chi Nan University to devise and implement a variety of clean air initiatives. This article discusses the efforts of the Puli PM_(2.5) Reduction Association undertaken from 2016 to the present from the perspective of green social work. The issues of transdisciplinary collaboration, inequality, and environmental justice are analyzed, with an emphasis on the importance of community work; the traditional discourses on social work are also discussed. The application of green social work as the theoretical framework does not reflect an intention to apply Western theories to this local experience; rather, the intention is to establish mutual learning and dialogue between countries and to inspire the social work community of Taiwan to pay attention to environmental issues. The Puli PM_(2.5) Reduction Association promotes the reduction of air pollution attributable to the activities of daily life. They use technology to provide the residents with evidence of the severity of air pollution in Puli and use art to convey complex scientific information through comprehensible language; this helps the residents understand the threats posed by PM_(2.5) to the environment and human health and inspires collective action. Social workers can play a more active role in developing alternative discourses and practical approaches for dealing with the worsening environmental and air pollution problems.

1. 徐美苓(2019)。風險感知、價值觀、議題傳播及空污防制行為意向。新聞學研究，138，25-73。
   連結：
2. 黃之棟,黃瑞祺(2009)。正義的繼受：我們與美國人講的到底是不是同樣的「環境正義」？。國家發展研究，9(1)，85-143。
   連結：
3. 黃彥宜(2014)。環境議題在社會工作觀點的移轉：對社會工作教育的意含。社會政策與社會工作學刊，18(2)，1-35。
   連結：
4. Berger, R.,Kelly, J.(1993).Social Work in the Ecological Crisis.Social Work,38(5),521-526.
5. Bhaiseni, B.(2017).Poverty as a Threat to Environmental Sustainability: Implications for Social Work Practice in Zimbabwe.African Journal of Social Work,7(2),25-29.
6. Blair, E.(2015).A Reflexive Exploration of Two Qualitative Data Coding Techniques.Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences,6(1),14-29.
7. Brugge, D.,Patton, A. P.,Bob, A.,Reisner, E.,Lowe, L.(2015).Developing Community-Level Policy and Practice to Reduce Traffic-Related Air Pollution Exposure.Environmental Justice,8(3),95-104.
8. Cannan, C.(2000).The Environmental Crisis, Greens and Community Development.Community Development Journal,35(4),365-376.
9. Chauvin, B.,Hermand, D.,Mullet, E.(2008).New Age Beliefs and Societal Risk Perception.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,38,2056-2071.
10. Chenail, R. J.(1995).Presenting Qualitative Data.The Qualitative Report,2(3),1-8.
11. Deguen, S.,Zmirou-Navier, D.(2010).Social Inequalities Resulting from Health Risks Related to Ambient Air Quality-A European Review.European Journal of Public Health,20(1),27-35.
12. Dominelli, L.(2013).Environmental Justice at the Heart of Social Work Practice: Greening the Profession.International Journal of Social Welfare,22(4),431-439.
13. Dominelli, L.(2014).Promoting Environmental Justice Through Green Social Work Practice: A Key Challenge for Practitioners and Educators.International Social Work,57(4),338-345.
14. Dominelli, L.(2012).Green Social Work: From Environmental Crises to Environmental Justice.Cambridge:Polity Press.
15. Dominelli, L.(ed.),Nikku, B. R.(ed.),Ku, H. B.(ed.)(2018).The Routledge Handbook of Green Social Work.London:Routledge.
16. Farmer, A.(2017).Tackling Pollution is Essential for Meeting SDG Poverty Objectives.Perspective,27,1-8.
17. Glaser, B.(1992).Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing.Mill Valley:Sociology Press.
18. Gray, M.,Coates, J.,Hetherington, T.(2012).Environmental Social Work.London:Routledge.
19. Hall, R., Z. Brent, J. Franco, M. Isaacs, & T. Shegro (2017). A Toolkit for Participatory Action Research. Retrieved March 1, 2021, from http://repository.uwc.ac.za/xmlui/handle/10566/4112 .
20. Helme, N.,Davis, S.,Reed, S.,Helme, N. G.,Levinson, M.,Wooley, D.(2017).,未出版
21. Hoffmann-Riem, H.,Klemm, S. B.,Mansuy, W. G.,Hadorn, G. H.,Joye, D.,Pohl, C.,Wiesmann, U.,Zemp, E.(2008).Idea of the Handbook.Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research,Berlin:
22. Hunt, F.,Thornsbury, S.(2014).Facilitating Transdisciplinary Research in an Evolving Approach to Science.Open Journal of Social Sciences,2(4),340-351.
23. Jager, J.(2008).Foreword.Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research,Berliny:
24. Jones, P.(2010).Responding to the Ecological Crisis: Transformative Pathways for Social Work Education.Journal of Social Work Education,46(1),67-84.
25. Jones, P.(2012).Green Social Work: From Environmental Crises to Environmental Justice.British Journal of Social Work,42(8),1636-1637.
26. Kauffman, S.(1994).Citizen Participation in Environmental Decisions: Policy, Reality, and Considerations for Community Organizing.The Global Environmental Crisis: Implications for Social Welfare and Social Work,Aldershot:
27. Klein, J. T.(ed.),Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W.(ed.),Häberli, R.(ed.),Bill, A.(ed.)(2001).Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way for Managing Complexity.Basel:Birkhauser Verlag.
28. Landrigan, P. J.,Fuller, R.,Hu, H.,Caravanos, J.,Cropper, M. L.,Hanrahan, D.,Sandilya, K.,Chiles, T. C.,Kumar, P.,Suk, W. A.(2018).Pollution and Global Health-An Agenda for Prevention.Environmental Health Perspectives,126(8),084501.
29. Lane, S. N.,Odoni, N.,Landstrom, C.,Whatmore, S. J.,Ward, N.,Bradley, S.(2011).Doing Flood Risk Science Differently: An Experiment in Radical Scientific Method.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,36(1),15-36.
30. Lang, D. J.,Wiek, A.,Bergmann, M.,Stauffacher, M.,Martens, P.,Moll, P.,Swilling, M.,Thomas, C. J.(2012).Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.Sustainability Science,7(1),25-43.
31. Lauri, M. A.(2011).Triangulation of Data Analysis Techniques.Papers on Social Representations,20(2),34.1-34.15.
32. Lo, W. C.,Shie, R. H.,Chan, C. C.,Lin, H. H.(2017).Burden of Disease Attributable to Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Exposure in Taiwan.Journal of the Formosan Medical Association,116(1),32-40.
33. Lovell, M.,Johnson, D.(1994).The Environmental Crisis and Direct Social Work Practice.The Global Environmental Crisis: Implications for Social Welfare and Social Work,Aldershot:
34. Lung, S. C. C.,Lee, C. R.,Hu, S. C.(2014).Inequality of Asian-Type Neighborhood Environmental Quality in Communities with Different Urbanization Levels.Environmental Science & Policy,38,1-10.
35. McCammon, H. J.(ed.),Taylor, V. A.(ed.),Reger, J.(ed.),Einwohner, R. L.(ed.)(2017).The Oxford Handbook of U.S. Women’s Social Movement Activism.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
36. Miller, S. E.,Hayward, R. A.,Shaw, T. V.(2012).Environmental Shifts for Social Work: A Principles Approach.International Journal of Social Welfare,21(3),270-277.
37. Moje, E. B.,Ciechanowski, K. M.,Kramer, K.,Ellis, L.,Carrillo, R.,Collazo, T.(2004).Working Toward Third Space in Content Area Literacy: An Examination of Everyday Funds of Knowledge and Discourse.Reading Research Quarterly,39(1),38-70.
38. Muldoon, A.(2006).Environmental Efforts: The Next Challenge for Social Work.Critical Social Work,7(2),61-69.
39. Nesmith, A.,Smyth, N.(2015).Environmental Justice and Social Work Education: Social Workers’ Professional Perspectives.Social Work Education: The International Journal,34(5),484-501.
40. Nicholson, H.(2005).Applied Drama: The Gift of Theatre.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
41. Pain, R., G. Whitman, D. Milledge, & L. R. Trust (2012). Participatory Action Research Toolkit: An Introduction to Using PAR as an Approach to Learning, Research and Action. Durham University/RELU/Lune Rivers Trust. Retrieved February 28, 2021, from https://www.dur.ac.uk/socialjustice/toolkits/participatoryaction/ .
42. Peeters, J.(2012).The Place of Social Work in Sustainable Development: Towards Ecosocial Practice.International Journal of Social Welfare,21(3),287-298.
43. Pillay, R.,Pretorius, E.,Canham, H.(2018).Are We Getting Socially Just Pedagogy Right? Reflections from Social Work Praxis.Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment,28(3),286-302.
44. Pyles, L.(2007).Community Organizing for Post-Disaster Social Development: Locating Social Work.International Social Work,50(3),321-333.
45. Ramsay, S.,Boddy, J.(2017).Environmental Social Work: A Concept Analysis.British Journal of Social Work,47(1),68-86.
46. Rocha, H. B.(2018).Social Work Practices and the Ecological Sustainability of Socially Vulnerable Communities.Sustainability,10(5),1312-1338.
47. Sampson, R. J.,Winter, A. S.(2018).Poisoned Development: Assessing Childhood Lead Exposure as a Cause of Crime in a Birth Cohort Followed Through Adolescence.Criminology,56(2),269-301.
48. Schechner, R.(1985).Between Theatre and Anthropology.Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania Press.
49. Schlosberg, D.(2007).Defning Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements and Nature.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
50. Sendall, M. C.,McCosker, L. K.,Brodie, A.,Hill, M.,Crane, P.(2018).Participatory Action Research, Mixed Methods, and Research Teams: Learning from Philosophically Juxtaposed Methodologies for Optimal Research Outcomes.BMC Medical Research Methodology,18(1),167-172.
51. Shaw, T. V.(2011).Is Social Work a Green Profession? An Examination of Environmental Beliefs.Journal of Social Work,13(1),3-29.
52. Stern, P. C.,Dietz, T.,Guagnano, A.(1995).The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context.Environment and Behavior,27(6),723-743.
53. Stern, P. C.,Kalof, L.,Dietz, T.,Guagnano, G. A.(1995).Values, Beliefs, and Proenvironmental Action: Attitude Formation Toward Emergent Attitude Objects.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,25(18),1611-1636.
54. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J. M.(1998).Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.London:Sage.
55. Stretesky, P. B.,Lynch, M. J.(2004).The Relationship Between Lead and Crime.Journal of Health and Social Behavior,45(2),214-229.
56. Taylor, M. P.,Forbes, M. K.,Opeskin, B.,Parr, N.,Lanphear, B. P.(2016).The Relationship Between Atmospheric Lead Emissions and Aggressive Crime: An Ecological Study.Environmental Health,15(23),23-32.
57. Teixeira, S.,Krings, A.(2015).Sustainable Social Work: An Environmental Justice Framework for Social Work Education.Social Work Education: The International Journal,34(5),513-527.
58. Todd, S.(ed.),Drolet, J.(ed.)(2020).Community Practice and Social Development in Social Work.Singapore:Springer.
59. United States Agency for International Development [USAID] (2019). USAID Clean Air Green Cities. Retrieved February 7, 2022, from https://www.usaid.gov/vietnam/documents/fs-cleanair-greencities-oct2019-eng
60. Velasco, X. C. (2013). Participatory Action Research (PAR) for Sustainable Community Development. Retrieved February 26, 2021, from http://postgrowth.org/participatory-action-research-par-for-sustainable-community--development-25971b43b8c4
61. 江大樹（編）,容邵武（編）(2017).大學與地方的協力治理.南投:國立暨南國際大學.
62. 李根政（2017）。〈大富豪與貧窮縣：回顧臺塑鋼廠的環評歷程〉。《地球公民基金會》。資料檢索日期：2019 年07 月05 日。網址：https://www.cet-taiwan.org/node/2515。
63. 沈意婷(2018)。南投縣，國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所。
64. 佟振國、張協昇（2017）。〈埔里空氣糟透抗議臺中電廠污染〉。《自由電子報》。資料檢索日期：2021 年03 月07 日。網址：https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/1150796。
65. 周桂田,杜文苓,王瑞庚(2018).臺灣空氣品質治理展望.臺北:臺灣大學風險社會與政策研究中心.
66. 柏原祥（2013）。〈埔里空氣比臺北差！？生態學會空污解密〉。《大埔里報》。資料檢索日期：2021 年03 月07 日。網址：http://pulilife.com/news/%E5%9F%94%E9%87%8C%E7%A9%BA%E6%B0%A3%E6%AF%94%E5%8F%B0%E5%8C%97%E5%B7%AE%EF%BC%81%EF%BC%9F%E3%80%80%E7%94%9F%E6%85%8B%E5%AD%B8%E6%9C%83%E7%A9%BA%E6%B1%A1%E8%A7%A3%E5%AF%86/。
67. 洪俊智,王瑞庚(2017)。,風險社會與政策研究中心。
68. 國家衛生研究院國家環境毒物研究中心(2013).細懸浮微粒（PM2.5）對人體健康危害之預防策略研究公聽會會議實錄.苗栗:國家衛生研究院國家環境毒物研究中心.
69. 黃郁揚,黃麗煌(2018).黃郁揚、黃麗煌（2018）.《戰勝 PM2.5 ！：越來越多的疾病可能與空污有關》.臺北：行政院環境保護署..臺北:行政院環境保護署.
70. 劉怡亭（2019）。〈埔里婆婆媽媽的逆襲：由下而上翻轉空汙，自己的社區自己顧／《日常生活的能源革命》〉。《多多益善》。資料檢索日期：2021 年03 月07 日。 網址：https://rightplus.org/2019/07/03/pollution/ 。
71. 環境資訊中心（2018d）。〈環境不公愈窮吸入愈多空氣污染物元朗社會剝奪指數最高〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年07 月05 日。網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/209763。
72. 環境資訊中心（2018a）。〈空污「貧富差距」惡化全球95% 人都呼吸有毒空氣〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年07 月05 日。網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/211122。
73. 環境資訊中心（2018c）。〈空污是「新菸害」 WHO ：全球90% 兒童呼吸有毒空氣〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年07 月05 日。網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/214727。
74. 環境資訊中心（2018b）。〈空污致死數字驚人世衛：90% 發生在貧窮國家〉。資料檢索日期：2019 年07 月05 日。網址：https://e-info.org.tw/node/211500。

1. 黃彥宜(2022)。埔里「PM2.5街頭偶巷劇」對參與者的影響：第三空間的觀點。藝術學報，110，47-70。