题名

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Caring Scale for Institutionalized Elders

并列篇名

機構老人關懷量表之發展與測試

DOI

10.1097/jnr.0000000000000147

作者

黃慧莉(Huei-Lih Hwang);凃金堂(Chin-Tang Tu);王秀紅(Hsiu-Hung Wang)

关键词

caring ; long-term care ; older adults ; scale development ; 關懷 ; 長期照護 ; 老人 ; 量表發展

期刊名称

The Journal of Nursing Research

卷期/出版年月

25卷2期(2017 / 04 / 01)

页次

140 - 148

内容语文

英文

中文摘要

Background: A scale that measures the efficacy of care from the perspectives of institutionalized older adults is needed to meet the growing need for better caring knowledge and skills among nurses and caretakers working in long-term care facilities. The currently available tools are insufficient for measuring the caring-related interactions of caretakers with institutionalized older adults. Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and explore the psychometric structure of a caring scale for institutionalized older adults. Methods: The scale development process took place in two stages. In the first stage, a 34-item Caring Scale for Institutionalized Elders was generated using literature reviews and interviews with institutionalized older adults. Twenty-nine items were retained after item analysis and content validity testing, and then 19 items were retained after an exploratory factor analysis of 300 institution-dwelling older adults. The factor structure and reliability were further tested in 216 older adults using confirmatory factor analysis. The second stage provided evidence of the validity and reliability of the developed scale. This study was conducted between 2011 and 2013 in Taiwan. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that a 12-item scale with a two-factor structure best fits the data (X^2 =106.990, df = 53, p G .001, X^2/df ratio = 2.019, goodness-of-fit index = .926, comparative fit index = .958, Tucker-Lewis index = .948, root mean square error of approximation = .069). This scale had acceptable Cronbach's α values (range = .827-.907). Conclusions: This scale has satisfactory validity and reliability for measuring the efficacy of care that is provided to institutionalized older adults. Further studies are necessary to test the applicability of this scale to other populations.

英文摘要

背景 為提供長期照護機構護理及照服人員對關懷技能的認知,有需要從機構老年住民的關懷感受開始。目前關懷量表未能充分測量專業照護者與老年住民間的關懷互動。目的 發展與探討機構老人關懷感受量表的心理計量結構。方法 本量表發展過程包含兩個研究,第一個研究是透過文獻查閱及質性訪談,草擬34個題項的機構老人關懷感受量表,透過內容效度測試及項目分析篩選29個題項,透過探索性因素分析取得19個題項,再經由驗證性因素分析驗證12個題項的量表之因素結構。第二個研究是測試量表的信度與效度。本文也透過標準的回覆翻譯流程發展英文版的量表。結果 驗證性因素分析顯示,以12個題項兩個因素結構是最合適本研究的樣本(X^2 =106.990,df = 53, p < .001, X^2/df ratio = 2.019, goodness-of-fit index [GFI] = .926, comparative fit index[CFI] = .958, Tucker-Lewis index [TLI] = .948, root mean square error of approximation [RMSEA] = .069)。此量表擁有可接受程度的Cronbach's α係數(.827~.907)。結論 本量表符合信度及效度的測試,未來有需要對華人機構之老年住民進行本量表之測試。

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Shwu-Jiuan, L.(2004).What caring means to geriatric nurses.The Journal of Nursing Research,12(2),143-152.
    連結:
  2. National Midwife Council. (2010). Standards for pre-registration education. Specific knowledge and skills. Retrieved form http://eoe.hee.nhs.uk/files/2014/04/NMC-Educational-Standards-16-sept-Standards-for-pre-registration-nursing-education-20100816.pdf
  3. Ministry of Interior, Department of Statistics. (2015). Overview of Long-term care and facilities for the elderly in Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.gov.tw/cht/DOS/Statistic.aspx?f_list_no=312&fod_list_no=4181
  4. Chao, S. Y.,Roth, P.(2005).Dimensions of quality in longterm care facilities in Taiwan.Journal of Advanced Nursing,52(6),609-618.
  5. Cossette, S.,Pepin, J.,Côté, J. K.,de Courval, F. P.(2008).The multidimensionality of caring: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Caring NurseYPatient Interaction Short Scale.Journal of Advanced Nursing,61(6),699-710.
  6. Costello, A. B.,Osborne, J. W.(2005).Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,10(7),1-9.
  7. DeFrino, D. T.(2009).A theory of the relational work of nurses.Research and Theory for Nursing Practice,23(4),294-311.
  8. Duffy, J. R.,Hoskins, L.,Seifert, R. F.(2007).Dimensions of caring: Psychometric evaluation of the caring assessment tool.Advances in Nursing Science,30(3),235-245.
  9. Edwards, D. J.(2002).Fighting elder depression: A battle that can be won.Nursing Homes: Long Term Care Management,51(6),38-40.
  10. Fossey, J.,Ballard, C.,Juszczak, E.,James, I.,Alder, N.,Jacoby, R.,Howard, R.(2006).Effect of enhanced psychosocial care on antipsychotic use in nursing home residents with severe dementia: Cluster randomised trial.British Medical Journal,332(7544),756-761.
  11. Haugan, G.,Hanssen, B.,Moksnes, U. K.(2013).Selftranscendence, nurseYpatient interaction and the outcome of multidimensional well-being in cognitively intact nursing home patients.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,27(4),882-893.
  12. Hwang, H. L.,Hsieh, P. F.,Wang, H. H.(2013).Taiwanese long-term care facility residents' experiences of caring: A qualitative study.Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,27(3),695-703.
  13. Hwang, H. L.,Tu, C. T.,Chen, S.,Wang, H. H.(2012).Caring behaviors perceived by elderly residents of long-term care facilities: Scale development and psychometric assessment.International Journal of Nursing Studies,49(2),183-190.
  14. Liu, J. K.,Dai, Z. D.,Lin, R. T.,Chen, Y. F.,Lai, C. L.(1996).The short portable mental status questionnaire for the elderly norm.Fifth Republic Geriatrics Society Third General Assembly and Symposium Conference Proceedings,Taipei City, Taiwan, ROC.:
  15. Mahoney, F. I.,Barthel, D. W.(1965).Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index.Maryland State Medical Journal,14,61-65.
  16. McGilton, K. S.,Pringle, D. M.,O'Brien-Pallas, L. L.,Wynn, F.,Streiner, D.(2005).Development and psychometric testing of the Relational Care Scale.Journal of Nursing Measurement,13(1),51-64.
  17. Noar, S. M.(2003).The role of structural equation modeling in scale development.Structural Equation Modeling,10(4),622-647.
  18. Papastavrou, E.,Efstathiou, G.,Charalambous, A.(2011).Nurses' and patients' perceptions of caring behaviours: Quantitative systematic review of comparative studies.Journal of Advanced Nursing,67(6),1191-1205.
  19. Polit, D. F.,Beck, C. T.,Owen, S. V.(2007).Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations.Research in Nursing & Health,30(4),459-467.
  20. Rakov, T.,Widaman, K. F.(1995).Issues in applied structural equations modeling research.Structural Equation Modeling,2(4),289-318.
  21. Streiner, D. L.,Norman, G. R.(2008).Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
  22. Swanson, K. M.(1993).Nursing as informed caring for the well-being of others.Image,25(4),352-357.
  23. Tabachnick, B.G.,Fidell, L. S.(2013).Using multivariate statistics.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
  24. The WHOQOL-Taiwan Group(2000).Introduction to the Development of the WHOQOL-Taiwan Version.Chinese Journal of Public Health,19(4),315-324.
  25. Tuckett, A.,Hughes, K.,Gilmour, J.,Hegney, D.,Huntington, A.,Turner, C.(2009).Caring in residential aged-care. Qualitative findings from an e-cohort sub-study.Journal of Clinical Nursing,18(18),2604-2612.
  26. Wasserman, I. C.,McNamee, S.(2010).Promoting compassionate care with the older people: A relational imperative.International Journal of Older People Nursing,5(4),309-316.
  27. Watson, J.(2005).Caring science as sacred science.Philadelphia, PA:F.A. Davis.
  28. Wolf, Z. R.,Zuzelo, P. R.,Goldberg, E.,Crothers, R.,Jacobson, N.(2006).The Caring Behaviors Inventory for Elders: Development and psychometric characteristics.International Journal for Human Caring,10(1),49-59.
  29. Woodward, V. M.(1997).Professional caring: A contradiction in terms?.Journal of Advanced Nursing,26(5),999-1004.