〈七姬權厝志〉考

The Stuy of Qi Ji's Epitaph

賈繼用(Ji-Yong Jia)

張羽 ； 宋克 ； Qijiquancuozhi (Qiji's epitaph, 七姬權厝志) ； Zhang yu ； Song Ke

逢甲人文社會學報

27期（2013 / 12 / 01）

49 - 71

繁體中文

本文旨在論述元末張羽〈七姬權厝志〉所記載的歷史事件及文學藝術成就。本文指出，七姬虽在元末戰亂之中集體自縊而死，當時和後世人多認為七姬死於節概，是元末一樁奇事。然考諸史實，七姬當是被迫而死，所謂死於節概之說，乃是荒唐謬悠之言。本文表明，張羽此文雖不能直書其事，揭露潘元紹之穢跡，然猶欲不虛美，不隱惡，是元末的一篇奇文。本文最後論述了作爲書法作品的〈七姬權厝志〉，體現了書寫者宋克小楷獨特的範式和個性，以及對趙氏（趙孟頫）書風一統天下的突圍，在元明書法史上具有重要的典範意義。〈七姬權厝志〉也因此成為元末吳中乃至整個時代最具創意最具魅力和奇異風格的劃時代的作品，是傳世的「奇書」。本文認爲，〈七姬權厝志〉之所以流傳於世，並獲得廣泛的讚譽，是因為其事奇，其文奇，其書法更奇。

Qijiquancuozhi (七姬權厝志), is an epitaph of Pan Yuanshao's seven concubines in the late Yuan Dynasty, it was praised as a best literary and calligraphy work. Qi ji hanged themselves together during the war between Zhu Yuanzhang and Zhang Shicheng. It is thought as an unusual phenomenon that they died of moral integrity, but in fact, Qi ji were driven to death throughout studying the history, the so-called death of moral integrity is very absurd. Zhang yu, the epitaph's author, did not directly revealed the fact and Pan Yuanshao's evils, but he did not cloak Pan's sin in the epitaph, so the epitaph was thought as a remarkable literary work. The epitaph, writed for the stone inscription by Song Ke, showed song's unique paradigm and character of calligraphy of Xiaokai (小楷regular script in small characters) and his breakthrough in the powerful influential writing style created by Zhao Mengfu (赵孟頫), so it is thought as a model in the calligraphy history of Yuan-Ming Dynasty; and it is praused as a epoch-making calligraphy work which is the most creative, most attractive, and most singular in Wuzhong (吳中), and at that time.The reason that the epitaph is handed down from generation to generation and well appreciated is its unusual event, its remarkable literary work and its unique calligraphy style.

1. 續修四庫全書。
2. 張羽，《張來儀先生文集》，豫章叢書本
3. (2004)。宋克〈七姬志〉二種。北京:人民美術出版社。
4. 貝墉，《七姬詠林》，吳中文獻小叢書之五，江蘇省立蘇州圖書館，1939-1943 年。
5. (1991)。明代傳記叢刊。臺北:臺北明文書局。
6. 文淵閣四庫全書。
7. 支偉成，《吳王張士誠載記》，民國二十一年鉛印本。
8. 王壯弘(2008)。藝林雜談。上海:上海書店出版社。
9. 王鎮遠(2009)。中國書法理論史。上海:上海古籍出版社。
10. 朱天曙(2012)。元末明初宋克的書法藝術。中國書畫，2012(10)
11. 朱天曙(2003)。南京藝術學院。
12. 沈律(2002)。翁方綱年譜。臺北:臺北中央研究院中國文史哲研究所。
13. 谷應泰(1977)。明史紀事本末。北京:中華書局。
14. 姚淦銘(1991)。明代吳門書派研究。鐵道師院學報，1991(1)
15. 馬宗霍(1984)。書林藻鑒。北京:文物出版社。
16. 高啟(1985)。高青丘集。上海:上海古籍出版社。
17. 張廷玉(1974)。明史。北京:中華書局。
18. 曹昭、王佐補(1987)。新增格古要論。北京:中國書店。
19. 陶宗儀(1958)。輟耕錄。北京:中華書局。
20. 楊士奇(1998)。東里文集。北京:中華書局。
21. 葉昌熾、韓銳校注(1995)。語石校注。北京:今日中國出版社。

1. 劉萱萱(2016)。久保天隨《澎湖遊草》的歷史與風土敘述。靜宜中文學報，10，77-107。