题名

現代社會風險倫理之探析-台灣颱風、洪水災害風險管理觀點

并列篇名

A Study of Modern Society Risk Ethic-The Case of Risk Management about the Typhoon and Flood Disasters in Taiwan

DOI

10.30087/APEMR.200703.0003

作者

袁國寧

关键词

風險社會 ; 經濟理性 ; 風險理性 ; 風險溝通 ; 社會風險倫理 ; Risk Society ; Economic Rationality ; Risk Rationality ; Risk Communication ; Social Risk Ethic

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

10卷2期(2007 / 03 / 01)

页次

47 - 78

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本論文係以台灣的天然災害風險為例,包括颱風、洪水等在不同的風險分類下,就其相應的風險管理模式做比較分析。故以社會風險與風險社會中之現代社會風險作為分析的開端,進而探討由傳統的風險管理模式,走向現代社會風險之管理模式,其中涉及風險管理的動機,分別包括經濟理性與風險理性;風險認識、風險認知、風險評估、風險態度等其與風險溝通的連繫;風險管理方法的選擇,主要係指颱風、洪水保險方案;決策的執行最後引申出現代社會風險管理行為的規範,藉以建立在災害事件中個人、社會、政府與媒體之行為準則。

英文摘要

This study aims to provide some differences of risk management of Taiwan's natural disaster including typhoon and flood, from the view of traditional risk management and social risk management in ”risk society”, which was proposed by German sociologist, Ulrich Beck, after reviewing the dramatic changes that occurred during the process of industrialization has recently become the focus of academic discussion. With this study, we realize that the root and the transformation of various risk management procedure, including economic rationality; risk rationality; risk perception; risk evaluation; risk communication and the choice of risk management method etc, can be clearly identified through the introduction of a whlesome theory. We would also emphasize the importance of social risk ethic in the relationship between right-duty in the risk society and the establishment of the behavior rules for individuals; society; government and medium in the disaster perils.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. (1991)。自立早報(1991/04/26)。
  2. (2004)。蘇黎世論壇。經濟日報(2004/10/11)。
  3. Baird, I. S.,H. Thomas(1985).Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking.The Academy of Management Review,10,230-243.
  4. Beck, U.(1986).Risikogesellschaft: Auf Dem Weg in Eine Andere Moderne.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.
  5. Beck, U.(1993).Die Erfindung des Politischen Zu Einer Theorie Reflexiver Mordernisierung.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.
  6. Beck, U.(1988).Gegengifet, Die Organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.
  7. Beck, U.,Ritter M. (Translated)(1992).Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.London:Sage.
  8. Bromley, D. W. (ed.)(1992).The Social Responses to Environmental Risk: Policy Formulation In the Age of Uncertainty.Norwell, Massachusetts:Kluwer Academic.
  9. Covello, V. T.(1987).Communicating Scientific Information About Health & Environmental Risks.NY:Plenum Press.
  10. Douglas, M.(1986).Risk and Acceptability According to the Social Science.London:Routledge & Kegan Poul.
  11. Douglas, M.,A. Wildavsky(1982).Risk and Culture.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
  12. Evans, A. W.(1994).Evaluation Public Transport and Road Safety Measures.Accid Anal and Prev,26,428-441.
  13. Flin, R.,K. Mearns,R. Gordon,M. Fleming(1996).Risk Perception by Offshore Workers on UK and Oil Gas Platforms.Safety Science,22,131-145.
  14. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity & Self-Identity: Self & Society in the Late Modern Age.CA:Standford University Press.
  15. Giddens, A.(1990).The Consequences of Modernity.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  16. Giddens, A.,Beck, U.,L. Scott (Eds.)(1994).Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  17. Hadden, S. G.(1989).A Citizen`s Right to Know.CO:Westview Press.
  18. Janah, B. A.(1986).Accident Risk and Risk-Taking Behavior Among Young Drivers Accid.And Prev,118,255-271.
  19. Jonas, H.(1984).Das Prinzip Verantwortung.Frankfurt:Suhrkamp.
  20. Jones, D. K. C.,Hord, C.,Jones, D.K.C. (Eds.)(1996).Accident and Design: Contemporary Debates in Risk Management.London:UCL press.
  21. Kasperson, R. E.,P. J. M. Stallen (Eds.)(1991).Communicating Risk to the Public.Boston:Kluwer Academic.
  22. Luhmann, N.(1990).Soziologie dse Risikos.Berlin:
  23. Maslow, A.(1943).A Preface to Motivation Theory.Psychosomatic Medicine,5,85-92.
  24. North, D. C.(1984).Government and the Lost of Exchange.Journal of Economic History,44,255.
  25. Null, M. K.,Garrik, B. J.,W. C. Gekler (Eds.)(1991).The Analysis, Communication and Perception of Risk.NY:Plenum Press.
  26. Pindyck, R. S.,D. L. Rubinfeld(2001).Microeconomics.NJ:Prentice Hall.
  27. Rejda, G. E.(2001).Priciples of Risk Management and Insurance.Boston:Addison Wesley Longman.
  28. Rogers, G. O.,Covello, V. T.,B.L., Lave (Eds.)(1987).Uncertainty in Risk Assessment, Risk Management & Decision Making.NY:Plenum Press.
  29. Rothschild, M.,J. Stiglitz(1976).Equilibrium in Competitive Insurance Markets: An Essay on the Economics of Imperfect Information.Quarterly Journal of Economics,90,629-649.
  30. Schramm, W. (Ed.)(1955).The Process and Effects of Mass Communication.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
  31. Stigler, G. J.(1976).The Wealth of Nations.Chicago:Chicago University Press.
  32. Vaughan, E.(1995).Essentials of Insurance: A Risk Management Perspective.NY:John Wiley & Sons.
  33. 中國時報(2005)。中國時報(2005/01/28)。
  34. 王鳳生、袁國寧(1994)。保險代理理論與倫理。壽險季刊,93,47-57。
  35. 朱元鴻(1995)。風險知識與風險媒介的政治社會學分析。台灣社會研究季刊,19,195-220。
  36. 周金福譯、Merrill, J. C.著(2003)。新聞倫理-存在主義的觀點。台北:巨流圖書公司。
  37. 孫治本(2000)。風險抉擇與形而上倫理學。當代,154,20-35。
  38. 袁國寧(1997)。中山大學。
  39. 陳振金(2005)。危險管理與保險學精義。台北:
  40. 陳晴美譯、Kaku, M.、Trainer, T.著(1987)。核能兩面觀。台北:遠流出版社。
  41. 蔡振中譯、Mulkay, Michael.著(1991)。科學與知識社會學。台北:巨流圖書公司。
被引用次数
  1. 許耿銘(2014)。城市氣候風險治理評估指標建構之初探。思與言:人文與社會科學雜誌,52(4),203-258。
  2. 黃冠華、白仁德(2017)。軌道車站風險溝通與應變行為之探究。風險管理學報,19(1),24-42。