题名

技術授權策略與政府研發補貼政策

并列篇名

Licensing Strategy and R&D Subsidy

DOI

10.30087/APEMR.201103.0004

作者

李仁耀

关键词

技術授權 ； 研究發展 ； 專利權 ； Licensing ； R&D ； Patent

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

14卷2期（2011 / 03 / 01）

页次

71 - 82

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

In this paper, we analyses the optimal licensing strategies and R&D subsidy in an endogenous R&D model. Two conclusions are: (1) When the R&D efficiency is high, the fixed-fee is the optimal licensing strategy; otherwise, the royalty is the optimal licensing strategy. (2) When 5/3＜γ＜1.90, the fixed-fee is social optimal and the patentee's optimal strategy; when 1.98＜γ＜3.93, the royalty is social optimal and the patentee's optimal strategy. Our results are different from the finding of Wang (1998, 2002) and Muto (1993).
英文摘要

In this paper, we analyses the optimal licensing strategies and R&D subsidy in an endogenous R&D model. Two conclusions are: (1) When the R&D efficiency is high, the fixed-fee is the optimal licensing strategy; otherwise, the royalty is the optimal licensing strategy. (2) When 5/3＜γ＜1.90, the fixed-fee is social optimal and the patentee's optimal strategy; when 1.98＜γ＜3.93, the royalty is social optimal and the patentee's optimal strategy. Our results are different from the finding of Wang (1998, 2002) and Muto (1993).
主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Schumpeter, J., Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. London: Unwin University Books, 1943.
  2. Wong, S. K., "Optimal Industrial Policy and Technology Licensing", Working paper, 2008.
  3. 行政院國科會，「科學技術統計要覽」，2005 年版。
  4. Arrow, K.(1962).Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.The Rate and Direction of Incentive Activity
  5. D''Aspremont, C.,Jacquemin, A.(1988).Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers.American Economic Review,78,1133-1137.
  6. Hsu, J.,Wang, X. H.(2004).On the Licensing of Innovations under Strategic Delegation.Economics Bulletin,12,1-10.
  7. Kamien, M. I.,Schwartz, N.(1982).Market Structure and Innovation.Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kamien, M. I.,Tauman, Y.(1984).The Private Value of Patent：A Game Theoretic Analysis.Journal of Economics (Supplement),4,93-118.
  9. Kamien, M. I.,Tauman, Y.(1986).Fees versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent.Quarterly Journal of Economics,101,471-491.
  10. Katz, M.,Shapiro, C.(1985).On the Licensing of Innovations.The RAND Journal of Economics,16,504-520.
  11. Lee, J. Y.,Lu, C. M.,Tsai, C. S.,Huang, C. S.(2009).Fee versus Royalty Licensing in an Endogenous R&D Model.2009 IEEE 16th International conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM),Beijing:
  12. Muto, S.(1993).On Licensing Policy in Bertrand Competition.Game and Economic Behavior,5,257-267.
  13. Sen, D.,Tauman, Y.(2007).General Licensing Schemes for a Cost-reducing Innovation.Games and Economic Behavior,59,163-186.
  14. Vishwasrao, S.(2007).Royalties vs. Fee: How Do Firms Pay for Foreign Technology.International Journal of Industrial Organization,25,741-759.
  15. Wang, X. H.(2002).Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Differentiated Cournot Duopoly.Journal of Economics and Business,54,253-266.
  16. Wang, X. H.(1998).Fee versus Royalty Licensing in a Cournot Duopoly Model.Economics Letters,60,55-62.
  17. Wang, X. H.,Yang, B. Z.(2004).On Technology Licensing in a Stackelberg Duopoly.Australian Economic Papers,43,448-458.
print cancel