题名

印尼國營石油公司(Pertanima)的轉型:政治經濟的觀點

并列篇名

Pertanima and Indonesia's Political Economy

DOI

10.30087/APEMR.201209.0004

作者

戴萬平

关键词

石油資源 ; 印尼國營石油公司 ; 資源災難 ; 荷蘭病 ; 政治經濟分析 ; Petroleum Resource ; Pertanima ; Resource Curse ; Dutch Disease ; Political Economic Analysis

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

16卷1期(2012 / 09 / 01)

页次

55 - 77

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

在國際油價高漲的時代有關石油資源豐富的國家如何管理國家石油資源的問題受到矚目。由於發展中國家缺乏良好的治理(governance)能力,使得擁有豐富資源的發展中國家資源並沒帶來政治經濟發展,反而形成「資源災難」。印尼以石油盈餘作為財政歲收主要來源,是東南亞唯一的OPEC成員,理應是個富足的國家,但是石油收益對經濟發展並未有顯著的助益,資源災難的出現與該國「國營石油公司」長期掌控石油資源長達40年的角色有莫大關係。在1998年民主化後印尼首要的經濟改革反倒是要將國營石油公司進行制度化的轉型。本文主要從石油資源的政治經濟學討論印尼國營石油公司對印尼政治經濟的影響與轉型歷程。首先,本文闡釋印尼印尼國營石油公司掌控石油與天然氣資源的政經背景。其次,分析國營石油公司受到非市場機制的掌控,解釋資源並未為印尼帶來發展矛盾。最後討論1998年民主轉型後國營石油公司改革的「制度變遷」,並在結論做出評論。

英文摘要

The relation between Natural Resource and Political Economic Growth is a famous issue to discuss by scholars. By the Neo-liberalism theory suppose: a developing country has abundant resources, it would become a well-developed industrial country. But this point of issue was challenged by others school in 1980s.These scholars think: ”Resources didn't bring the well-developed in the developing country, on the contrary became a ”Resource Curse”.In Indonesia case, petroleum was the major of Indonesia's fiscal income , but the performance of petroleum resource’s income did not have a great help for Indonesia's economic development. One can find the cause of this condition, the allocation of petroleum in Indonesia is not only an economic but also a political issue. The petroleum resource and uneven economic growth are closed related to the role of Pertanima. Base on this background, one will focus on the petroleum resource for the effect of political economy in country's development. And one will try to proof that, Pertanima is a tool for governor to integrate politics and economy in a new order period, and it become the abundant petroleum resource cannot bring a well development but a ”Resource Curse” to Indonesia.In structure of this project, one will set up the research structure by literature review in the beginning. And then one will discuss that, why Indonesia which has abundant petroleum resource in the control of Pertanima emerges ”Resource Curse”, by the dimension of Political Economy. After the discussion about the Pertanima and ”Resource Curse” in Indonesia, one will use the ”New institutional Economy theory” to discuss the changing of institute on process of democratization in Pertanima and the allocation of petroleum resource. And one will get a conclusion at last. One considers that, if Indonesia want to close to the fifth BRICs in the future, it has to pursue the higher economic growth and reduce the gap between itself and developed countries, so it must reform the allocation of petroleum resource as soon as possible. Only transfer ”Comparable Advantage of Resource” to ”Competitive Advantage of Resource,” it would be a better strategy for state's development.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. The Jakarta Post, “Government Told to Seek Options Other than Raising Fuel Prices,” The Jakarta Post, 26 July, 2005.
  2. Embassy of the United States of America, “Natural Gas Changes in Indonesia,” Energy News, Jakarta: Embassy of the United States of America, 2004.
  3. Asanuma, S., “Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Development: A Curse? Or A Blessing? Lessons from Indonesia's Experience,” Preliminary Draft for Discussion, June 25, 2008, pp. 1-15..
  4. Sachs, J. D. and Warner A. M., Natural Resource Abundance and Economic Growth, Harvard - Institute for International Development Papers 517a, 1995.
  5. The Jakarta Post, “IMF Welcomes RI's ‘Courageous' Decision to Cut Fuel Subsidies,” 6 Nov, 2005.
  6. Hofman, B., Indonesia: Rapid Growth, Weak Institutions, D.C: The World Bank Working Paper, 2004.
  7. Arief, S.(1997).Financial Analysis of the Indonesian Petroleum Industry.Jakarta:Sritua Arief Associates.
  8. Bannon, Ian(ed.),Collier, Paul(ed.)(2003).Natural Resources and Violent Conflict: Options and Actions.Washington, DC.:World Bank.
  9. Barnes, P.(1995).Indonesia: The Political Economy of Energy.Oxford:Oxford Institute for Energy Resources.
  10. Bartlett, A. G.(1972).Pertanima: Indonesian National Oil.Jakarta:Amerasian Ltd.
  11. Bates, H. R.(2008).When Things Fall Apart.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  12. Bersnan, J.(1993).Managing Indonesia.New York:Columbia University Press.
  13. Booth, A.(1992).Can Indonesia Survive as a Unitary State.Indonesia Circle,58(1),32-47.
  14. Booth, Ann(ed.)(1992).The Oil Boom and After: Indonesian Economic Policy and Performance in the Soeharto Era.Singapore:Oxford University Press.
  15. Bresman, John(1993).Managing Indonesia: The Modern Political Economy.New York:Columbia University Press.
  16. Collier, P.,Hoeffler, A.,Soderbom, M.(2004).On the Duration of Civil War.Journal of Peace Research,41(3),253-73.
  17. David, C. T.(1995).Madison WI,University of Wisconsin.
  18. Hertzmark, D. I.(2007).,Japan Petroleum Energy Center.
  19. IEA(2008).Energy Policy Review of Indonesia.Paris:International Energy Agency.
  20. Karl, T. L.(1997).The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-States.Berkeley CA:University of California Press.
  21. Kobonbaev, M.(2006).The Case of Corruption in Pertamina.Washington, DC:World Bank.
  22. Kuncoro, A.,Resosudarmo, B. P.(2004).report for the Understanding Reforms Projectreport for the Understanding Reforms Project,New Delhi:Global Development Network.
  23. Lindenthal, R.(2004).The Challenge of Social Protection for All: Policy Options for Indonesia.Jakarta:UNSFIR.
  24. Machmud, T. N.(2000).The Indonesian Production Sharing Contract: An Investor's Perspective.The Hague:Kluwer Law International.
  25. McCawley, P.(1978).Some Consequences of the Pertamina Crisis in Indonesia.Journal of Southeast Asian Studies,9(1),1-27.
  26. McVey, Ruth(ed)(1992).Southeast Asian Capitalists.Ithaca NY:SEAP, Cornell University.
  27. Mohamad, I.(2001).Deregulasi Ekonomi, Kemiskinan, dan Distribusi Pendapatan.one Day Conference on Domestic Trade, Decentralization, and Globalization,Jakarta:
  28. Pallone, S.(2009).Indonesia's Oil Crisis: How Indonesia Became a Net Oil Importer.The Journal of International Policy Solutions,10(1),1-11.
  29. Pass, C.,Lowes, B.,Davies, L.(1998).Economics: Harper Collins Dictionary.London:Harper Collins.
  30. Pertamina(1985).Hands across the Sea: The Story of Indonesian LNG.Jakarta:Peramnia.
  31. Prawiro, R.(1998).Indonesia's Struggle for Economic Development: Pragmatism in Action.Kuala Lumpur:Oxford University Press.
  32. Robison, R.(1986).Indonesia: The Rise of Capital.North Sydney:Allen & Unwin.
  33. Ross, M. L.(2008).Blood Barrels: Why Oil Wealth Fuels Conflict.Foreign Affairs,87(3),2-9.
  34. Ross, M. L.(1999).The Political Economy of the Resource Curse.World Politics,51(2),297-322.
  35. Ross, M. L.(2001).Does Oil Hinder Democracy.World Politics,53(1),325-361.
  36. Rosser, A.(2004).Why Did Indonesia Overcome the Resource Curse?.Brighton:IDS.
  37. Rosser, A.(2006).Escaping the Resource Curse.New Political Economy,11(4),557-570.
  38. Sachs, J. D.,Warner, A. M.(1999).The Big Push, Natural Resource Booms and Growth.Journal of Development Economics,59(1),43-76.
  39. Sangkoyo, H.(2003).Indonesia: The Coming Decline of a Ludicrous Carbocracy.the Workshop on Human Rights and Oil in Southeast Asia and Africa
  40. Seda, F. S. S. E.(2005).Petroleum Paradox: The Politics of Oil and Gas.The Politics and Economics of Indonesia's Natural Resources,Singapore:
  41. Skocpol, T.(1982).Rentier State and Shi'a Islam in the Iranian Revolution.Theory and Society,11,265-83.
  42. Smith, Anthony L.(ed.)(1999).Gur Dur and the Indonesia Economy.Singapore:ISEAS.
  43. Steele, A.(2008).Refining the Future: Oil and Gas in Indonesia.Global Asian,3(2),90-97.
  44. Tadjoeddin, M. Z.,Widjajanti, I. S.,Satish, M.(2001).Regional Disparity and Vertical Conflict in Indonesia.Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,6(3),283-304.
  45. Tadjoeddin, Z.,Murshed, M.(2007).Socioeconomic Determinants of Everyday Violence in Indonesia: An Empirical Investigation of Javanese Districts 1994-2003.Journal of Peace Research,44(6),689-709.
  46. Tempo(2012).Restricted Subsidized Fuel.Tempo,2012(January),62-67.
  47. Tempo(2012).Pact with a Past: What is behind the Pe-Humpuss Tanker Deal?.Tempo,2012(January),16-28.
  48. Tempo(2005).Special Report: The Energy Crisis.Tempo,25,16-21.
  49. Tempo(2005).Why the Gas Shortages.Tempo,2005(July),21-26.
  50. Tsalik, S.(ed.),Schiffrin, A.(ed.)(2005).Covering Oil: A Reporter's Guide to Energy and Development.New York:Open Society Institute.
  51. 宋鎮照(2009)。崛起的印尼─邁向金磚第五國。國際商情,278
  52. 宋鎮照(1996)。東協國家政經發展。台北:五南圖書出版。
  53. 商業週刊(2005)。油價缺口難補,印尼再陷金融危機。商業週刊,2005(9月),148-150。
  54. 賀桂分(2005)。美林投顧預言,印尼明年翻身。商業週刊,2005(10月),148-150。
  55. 辜樹仁(2012)。金磚退燒VIP崛起。天下雜誌,490,62-82。