题名

協力夥伴之動機類型、運籌機制與夥伴績效之研究

并列篇名

Motivation of Collaborative Partnership、Joint Action and the Outcomes: The Case of Non-Governmental Organization in Taiwan

作者

曾政勇

关键词

非政府組織 ； 協力夥伴 ； 救災 ； 運籌機制 ； 信法動員 ； Non-government Organization ； Collaborative Partnership ； Disaster Relief ； Operative Mechanism ； Trust-legal-mobilization ； MJO Model

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

19卷1期（2015 / 09 / 01）

页次

55 - 72

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

由於災害救援需在極短時間與艱困環境中，進行大量物資的整合調度，因此非政府組織與政府組織救災協力夥伴的關係是重要的。然而，在台灣救災現場及互動過程當中，發現兩大組織間似乎缺乏有效的對話機制及運作機制，因而導致救災資源與相關應變措施的重複與浪費。換言之，非政府組織與政府組織救災協力夥伴的關係仍待建立，以促進制度化的協調與整合。本研究應用問卷資料進行迴歸分析，研究焦點非政府組織與政府組織救災協力夥伴關係的相關因素及其影響性。本研究也嘗試以協力夥伴模式的研究結果，對非政府組織與政府組織之救災協力夥伴提出建議。以「協力夥伴的動機類型、運籌機制與夥伴績效」模式，本研究發現互動學習、信法動員及分享整合動機類型中，信法動員動機因素對夥伴績效具有正向且直接效果。此因素與運籌機制對協力夥伴之夥伴績效具有直接與間接的效果。研究證據也顯示信法動員動機因素可以藉由建立有效的運籌機制進而提升夥伴績效。因此，運籌機制的建立對於救災協力夥伴關係是重要的。本研究也發現信法動員動機因素，加上運籌機制如聯合行動及運作過程，以及不斷的網絡互動、溝通及協調與信任等，更有助於救災及救援目標之達成。
英文摘要

Due to urgent time and difficult environments accompanied by emergent disaster relief, together with integrating a substantial amount of resources, the efficiency of collaboration and interactions concerning disaster relief between NGO and the governmental organizations is critical. However, it is suggested that disaster relief from the two organizations seems to lack efficient dialogues and operative mechanisms, which have led to repeats and waste of rescue resources and relevant measurements. Therefore, drawing on data from questionnaires and using regression analysis, this study aims, from a NGOs’ perspective, to explore the relevant factors and the influences of collaboration and interactions concerning disaster relief between NGOs and the governmental organizations, with an attempt of proposing suggestions to the collaborative disaster relief between the two organizations. The results show that based on Motivation Factors, Joint partnership, Performances Model (MJP), among the three drivers of collaborative partnership including the interaction-learning, the trust-legal-mobilization, and the share-integration, the trust-legal-mobilization factor has a positive and direct effect on the collaborative outcomes. The research evidence also shows that by establishing the effectiveness of operative mechanism, the trust-legal-mobilization driver of collaborative partnership can enhance the outcomes of collaborative partnership. The results indicate that, compared to the disaster relief from the Government, the disaster relief provided by the NGOs have their professional specificity, and that the involvement of the NGOs seems to more sincere. Therefore, the establishment of the operative mechanism is significant to the collaborative partnership model. In addition, the research provides evidence that the trust-legal-mobilization factor of the drivers, coupled with to operate the operative mechanism such as the processes, procedure of joint actions, continued network interactions, communications coordination as well as trust, will benefit to succeed in disaster relief and aid goals.
主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 呂朝賢(2008)。集集地震中志願服務初探。台大社工學刊，17，131-168。
    連結：
  2. 林淑馨(2011)。民間參與公共建設的迷思與現實：日本公立醫院PFI 之啓示。公共行政學報，39，1-35。
    連結：
  3. 唐雲明(2010)。各國災害緊急通訊機制之研究。中華民國危機管理學刊，7(1)，1-13。
    連結：
  4. 楊永年(2009)。八八水災救災體系之研究。公共行政學報，32，143-169。
    連結：
  5. 詹雪蘭、李文瑞(2004)。溝通對策略聯盟與夥伴間長期合作意願之研究。企業管理學報，60，61-84。
    連結：
  6. 邱恬琳，「慈濟典範」，中國時報，1999 年9 月30 日
  7. Austin, E. J.(2000).Strategic Collaboration between Nonprofits and Business.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,29,69-97.
  8. Batson, C. D.(1991).The Altruistic Question: Toward a Social-psychological Answer.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
  9. Breekler, S. J.(1990).Application of Covariance Structure Modeling in Psychology: Cause for Concern?.Psychological Bulletin,107,260-273.
  10. Cialdini, R. B.,Baumann, D. J.,Kenrick, D. T.(1981).Insights from Sadness: A Three-step Model of the Development of Altruism as Hedonism.Development Review,1(3),207-223.
  11. Coleman, J. S.(1988).Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.American Journal of Sociology,94,95-120.
  12. Derthick, M.(2007).Where Federalism Didn't Fail.Public Administrative Review,67,36-47.
  13. Dinneen, G. P.(1988).R&D Consortia: Are They Working?.Research and Development,62-66.
  14. Dombrowsky, W.(1983).Solidarity during Snow-disasters.International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters,1,189-205.
  15. Dow, K.,Cutter, S. L.(1998).Crying Wolf: Repeat Responses to Hurricane Evacuation Orders.Coastal Management,26,237-252.
  16. Dyer, J. H.,Chu, W.(2000).The Determinants of Trust in Supplier-automaker Relationships in the US, Japan, and Korea.Journal of International Business Studies,31(2),259-285.
  17. Fischer, L. R.,Schaffer, K. B.(1993).Older Volunteers: A Guide to Research and Practice.Newbury Park, California:Sage Publications.
  18. Gidron, Benjamin(ed.),Hasenfeld, Yeheskel(ed.)(2012).Social enterprises: An Organizational Perspective.New York:Palgrave MacMillan.
  19. Greene, M.,Perry, R.W.,Lindell, M. K.(1981).March, 1980 eruptions of Mt. St. "Helens: Citizen Perceptions of Volcano Hazard".Disasters,5,49-66.
  20. Hair, J. F., Jr.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(2006).Multivariate Data Analysis.N. J.:Prentice Hall International Editions.
  21. Huxham, C.,Vangen, S.(2000).Ambiguity, Complexity and Dynamics in the Membership of Collaboration.Human relations,53(6),771-806.
  22. Jao, I. Y.(1997).The Interaction-learning Effects in Cross-border Manufacturing Alliances.The First International Management Conference,Puli:
  23. Jap, S. D.(1999).Pie-expansion Efforts: Collaboration Process in Buyer-supplier Relationships.Journal of Marketing Research,36,461-475.
  24. Kale, P.,Singh, H.(1999).Warton School of Business White PaperWarton School of Business White Paper,未出版
  25. Kotler, P.,Andersen, A. R.(1991).Strategic Marketing for Nonprofit Organizations.Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.
  26. Lambert, D. M.,Margaret, A. E.,John, T. G.(1996).Developing and Implementing Supply Chain Partnership.The International Journal of Logistics Management,17(2),1-17.
  27. Lystad, M.(Ed.)(1988).Mental Health Response to Mass Emergencies.New York:Brunner/Mazel.
  28. Mixer, J. R.(1993).Principles of Professional Fundraising: Useful Foundations for Successful Practice.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  29. Moorman, C.,Zaltman, G.,Deshpande, R.(1993).Relationships between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust within and between Organizations.Journal of Marketing Research,29,314-329.
  30. National Council for Voluntary Organisations(2004).Accountability and transparency.London:NCVO.
  31. Nelson, L. D.,Dynes, R. R.(1976).The Impact of Devotionalism and Attendance on Ordinary and Emergency Helping Behavior.Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion,15(1),47-59.
  32. Nunnally, J.,Bernstein, I.(1994).Psychometric Theory.New York:McGraw-Hill.
  33. Pfeffer, J.,Salanick, G. R.(1978).A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design.Administrative Science Quarterly,23(2),224-253.
  34. Putnam, R. D.(1993).Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy.N.J.:Princeton Univ. Press.
  35. Saidel, J. R.(1989).Dimensions of Interdependence: The State and Voluntary-sector Relationship.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,18(4),335-347.
  36. Smith, J. B.,Barclay, D. W.(1997).The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.Journal of Marketing,61(1),3-21.
  37. Tripsas, M.,Schrader, S.,Sobrero, M.(1995).Discouraging Opportunistic Behavior in Collaborative R and D: A Role for Government.Research Policy,24,367-389.
  38. 方世杰(1999)。科技專案產研技術合作研發聯盟動機類型、運籌機制與績效之研究。中山管理評論，7(2)，325-356。
  39. 江明修、陳秋政(2013)。行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫,行政院國家科學委員會。
  40. 江明修、陳秋政、林煥笙、劉奕宏、朱淳妤(2012)。我國災難管理機制之運作現況與問題。台灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會年會暨國際學術研討會（TASPAA），台南:
  41. 李文瑞、曹為忠、林志豪(2000)。策略聯盟類型與績效影響因素之研究。中山管理評論，8(2)，273-302。
  42. 汪士淳、劉在武、梁玉芳、王超群(2000)。第一時間：慈濟、國軍、北市府、台積電921 危機應變實錄。台北:天下文化。
  43. 邱皓政(2003)。量化研究法（二）統計原理與分析技術。台北:雙葉出版。
  44. 范惟翔、陳正源(2008)。策略聯盟之類型、運籌機制與聯盟績效之結構化模式分析：台灣製藥廠之驗證。中華管理評論國際學報，11(2)，1-27。
  45. 高永興(2015)。非營利組織的公共性與透明化，自律或他律？。第三部門治理與責信學術研討會，台北:
  46. 曹為忠、詹雪蘭、陳郁雯(2003)。台灣中小企業策略聯盟績效影響因素之研究。產業季刊，118，84-101。
  47. 郭瑞坤、張玲瑜、張秦瑞、沈逸晴、張馨芸(2013)。捐贈者對非營利組課責行為之認同度與捐款意願之研究。非營利組織管理學刊，14，46-83。
  48. 陳律睿、李文瑞、陳世杰(2009)。中小企業聯盟關係與聯盟績效影響因素之研究。中華管理評論，12(3)，1-25。
  49. 陳政智、釋妙仁(2010)。同體共生、拔苦予樂－佛光山八八風災緊急安置作業回顧。社區發展季刊，131，269-277。
  50. 曾政勇(2014)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立高雄應用科技大學土木工程科技研究所。
  51. 湯京平、蔡允棟、黃紀(2002)。災難與政治：九二一地震中的集體行為與災變情境的治理。政治科學論叢，16，137-162。
  52. 黃忠發、曾政勇、鍾舒安(2012)。政府與非政府組織於災害防救互動關係之分析從非政府組織觀點。中華建築技術學刊，9(1)，33-48。
  53. 黃俊英(2003)。行銷學的世界。台北:天下遠見出版。
  54. 黃富順編(2012)。成人學習。台北:五南出版公司。
  55. 萬育維、吳宛育(2000)。從資源動員的角度談慈濟九二一救災作為。社區發展季刊，90，127-134。
  56. 劉復苓譯、楊國安(2001)。組織學習能力。台北:聯經出版公司。
  57. 鍾小琴(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中國文化大學企業管理研究所。
  58. 顧忠華(1998)。公民社會與非營利組織─一個理論性研究的構想。亞洲研究，26，8-23。
print cancel