题名

訊息基礎下的擠兌理論與擠兌防護存款契約

并列篇名

Information-based Bank Runs and a Run-proof Deposit Contract

作者

蔡淵禮;王瑜琳

关键词

訊息擠兌 ; 擠兌臨界值 ; 擠兌防護存款契約 ; Information-based Bank Runs ; Threshold Rate of Bank Runs ; Run-proof Deposit Contract

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

23卷1&2期(2020 / 03 / 01)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文結合Jacklin and Bhattachy(1988)訊息擠兌概念與Diamond and Dybvig(1983)模型之背景與假設,建構訊息擠兌模型,引發擠兌的因素不再是太陽黑子等隨機變數,而是風險性投資的不利訊息。文中仿效Jacklin and Bhattachrya(1988)利用特定效用函數,計算出一個主觀機率擠兌臨界值。當低報酬的事後機率值超過此臨界值時,銀行會發生擠兌;反之則不會發生擠兌。該臨界值隨著報酬變異數與相對風險趨避係數的增加而下降,可解釋銀行逾放比率高、擔保品價值波動大、超額貸款以及存款者趨於保守,相對風險趨避係數提高時,都會降低擠兌臨界值,提高擠兌發生機率。本文提出擠兌防護契約,並比較其與一般存款契約的福利大小。

英文摘要

This paper develops an information-based model by incorporating concepts of information and risky investment in Jacklin and Bhattachy (1988) into the Diamond-Dybvig economy. Contrast to bank runs being due to "sunspots" in the Diamond-Dybvig model, bank runs in our model are triggered by depositors' receiving information indicating a low return on the bank's risky investments. We derive a threshold rate of bank runs in the sense that when a posterior probability of having a low return on the bank's investments exceeds this threshold rate, bank runs could be triggered. This threshold rate is shown to be inversely related to the variances of the investment returns and to the attitude of risk aversion. In practice, the threshold rate will be lower and the probability of bank runs will be higher when a bank's non-performing loans ratio increases, the value of collateral decreases, excess bank lending increases, or depositors are more risk averse. We propose a run-proof deposit contract and compare the magnitudes of depositors' expected utilities under a run-proof deposit contract and a deposit contract with runs.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. Alonso, I.(1996).On avoiding Bank Runs.Journal of Monetary Economics,37,73-87.
  2. Andolfatto, D.,Nosal, E.,Sultanum, B.(2017).Preventing Bank Runs.Theoretical Economics,12,1003-1028.
  3. Boyd, J.H.,De. Nicolo, G.,Smith, B.D.(2004).Crises in Competitive versus Monopolistic Banking System.Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,36,487-506.
  4. Chari, V.V.,Jagannathan, R.(1988).Banking Panics, Information, and Rational Expectations Equilibrium.Journal of Finance,43,749-763.
  5. Chen, Y.(1999).Banking Panics: The Role of the First-Come, First-Served Rule and Information Externalities.Journal of Political Economy,107,946-968.
  6. Cooper, R.,Ross, T.W.(2002).Bank Runs: Deposit Insurance and Capital Requirements.International Economic Review,43,55-72.
  7. Diamond, D.W.,Dybvig, P.H.(1983).Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity.Journal of Political Economy,91,401-419.
  8. Dijk, O.(2017).Bank Run Psychology.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,144,87-96.
  9. Ennis, H.M.,Keister, T.(2004).Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working PaperFederal Reserve Bank of Richmond Working Paper,未出版
  10. Ennis, H.M.,Keister, T.(2003).Economic Growth, Liquidity, and Bank Runs.Journal of Economic Theory,109,220-245.
  11. Goldstein I. and A. Pauzner, “Demand Deposit Contracts and the Probability of Bank Runs”, Duke University, The Fuqua School of Business, Working paper, 2002.
  12. Jacklin, C.J.,Bhattacharya, S.(1988).Distinguishing Panics and Information-Based Bank Runs: Welfare and Policy Implications.Journal of Political Economy,96,568-592.
  13. Kiss. H.J.,Rodriguez-Lara, I.,Rosa-Garcia, A.(2018).Panic Bank Runs.Economics letters,162,146-149.
  14. Matsuoka, T.(2013).Sunspot Bank Runs in Competitive versus Monopolistic Banking Systems.Economics Letters,118,247-249.
  15. Peck, J.,Shell, K.(2003).Equilibrium Bank Runs.Journal of Political Economy,111,103-123.
  16. 蔡淵文(2003)。國立中正大學國際經濟研究所。