题名

工會與公營事業民營化

并列篇名

The Labor Unions with Bargaining Wages and Privatization

作者

許竹筌;郭彥君

关键词

工會 ; 協商工資 ; 民營化 ; Labor Union ; Bargaining Wages ; Privatization

期刊名称

亞太經濟管理評論

卷期/出版年月

25卷1&2期(2022 / 03 / 01)

页次

53 - 66

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本文利用三階段賽局的設計,討論工會成立與民營化政策的相關議題,本文獲得以下幾項分析結果,1.在公營廠商沒有工會、工資與民營廠商掛勾下,當公民營廠商生產力差距較小時,民營化程度應降低;當公民營廠商生產力差距較大時,民營化程度應提高。一旦公營廠商成立工會協商工資後,保持完全公營為社會福利最大考量。2.政府在極大社會福利考量下,應禁止公營事業成立工會協商工資。3.公營事業工會設立與民營化政策具有互斥性。

英文摘要

This paper uses a three-stage game to discuss the establishment of labor union and privatization policy of the public firm. This paper finds that: 1. When public firm has no labor union, and wages are linked to private firm, if the productivity gap between public and private firms is small, the degree of privatization should be reduced; the degree of privatization should increase when the productivity gap is large. Once the public firm sets up labor union to negotiate wages, a completely public firm will enhance the social welfare. 2. In the view of social welfare, the government should prohibit public firm to establish a union to negotiate wages. 3. The establishment of public labor union and privatization policy are mutually exclusive.

主题分类 社會科學 > 經濟學
参考文献
  1. 王鳳生,許竹筌(2012)。部分持股、預算限制與公營事業民營化。亞太經濟管理評論,16(1),45-54。
    連結:
  2. 江莉莉,蕭家鈺(2006)。公營事業民營化之福利分析:一個結合 Nash 協商的民營化模型。經濟論文叢刊,34(1),27-51。
    連結:
  3. 邱俊榮,黃鴻(2006)。公營廠商民營化的最適釋股比例分析。經濟論文叢刊,34(2),245-259。
    連結:
  4. 翁永和,羅鈺珊,劉碧珍(2003)。市場結構與最適民營化政策。經濟論文,31,149-169。
    連結:
  5. 劉楚俊,盧立峰(2007)。混合寡占下工會議價與民營化。亞太經濟管理評論,10(2),1-22。
    連結:
  6. Bastos, P.,Monteiro, N.P.,Straume, O.R.(2009).Firm Heterogeneity and Wages in Unionised Labour Markets: Theory and Evidence.Labour Economics,16,440-450.
  7. Choi, K.(2011).Strategic Budget Constraints in a Unionized Mixed Oligopoly.Japanese Economic Review,62,504-516.
  8. Choi, K.(2011).Unions, Government’s Preference, and Privatization.Economic Modelling,28,2502-2508.
  9. Cremer, H.,Marchand, M.,Thisse, J.(1989).The Public Firm as an Instrument for Regulating an Oligopolistic Market.Oxford Economic Papers,41,283-301.
  10. De Fraja, G.,Delbono, F.(1989).Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly.Oxford Economic Papers,41,302-311.
  11. Fjell, K.,Heywood, J.S.(2004).Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization and the Order of Firm’s Moves: the Relevance of Privatization.Economics Letters,83,411-416.
  12. Fjell, K.,Pal, D.(1996).A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms.Canadian Journal of Economics,29,737-743.
  13. George, K.,La Manna, M.(1996).Mixed Duopoly, Inefficiency, and Public Ownership.Review of Industrial Organization,11,853-860.
  14. Han, L.,Ogawa, H.(2007).,Economic Research Center, Nagoya University.
  15. Han, L.,Ogawa, H.(2008).Strategic Privatization in an International Mixed Oligopoly.FinanzArchiv,64,352-363.
  16. Hashimzade, N.,Khodavaisi, H.,Myles, G.(2007).An Irrelevance Result with Differentiated Goods.Economics Bulletin,8,1-7.
  17. Haucap, J.,Wey, C.(2004).Unionisation Structures and Innovation Incentives.Economic Journal,114,149-165.
  18. Hsu, C.C.(2016).Partial Privatization in Upstream Mixed Oligopoly with Free Entry.Modern Economy,7,1444-1454.
  19. Huang, C.S.,Lee, J.Y.,Chen, S.S.(2006).The Optimal Government Shareholding Strategy and the Cost Structure.Seoul Journal of Economics,19,251-273.
  20. Ishida, J.,Matsushima, N.(2009).Should Civil Servants Be Restricted in Wage Bargaining? A Mixed-Duopoly Approach.Journal of Public Economics,93,634-646.
  21. Kato, K.(2006).Can allowing to trade permits enhance welfare in mixed oligopoly?.Journal of Economics,88,263-283.
  22. Kato, K.,Tomaru, Y.(2007).Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, Subsidization and the Order of Firms’ Moves: Several Types of Objectives.Economics Letters,96,287-292.
  23. Leahy, D.,Montagna, C.(2000).Unionisation and Foreign Direct Investment: Challenging Conventional Wisdom?.Economic Journal,110,80-92.
  24. Lommerud, K.E.,Meland, F.,Sorgard, L.(2003).Unionised Oligopoly, Trade Liberalisation and Location Choice.Economic Journal,113,782-800.
  25. Lu, Y.,Poddar, S.(2007).Firm ownership, product differentiation and welfare.The Manchester School,75,210-217.
  26. Matsumura, T.(1998).Partial Privatization in Mixed Duopoly.Journal of Public Economics,70,473-483.
  27. Matsumura, T.,Kanda, O.(2005).Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets.Journal of Economics,84,27-48.
  28. Mujumdar, S.,Pal, D.(1998).Effects of Indirect Taxation in a Mixed Oligopoly.Economics Letters,58,199-204.
  29. Pal, D.,White, M. D.(1998).Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization, and Strategic Trade Policy.Southern Economic Journal,65,264-281.
  30. Poyago-Theotoky, J.(2001).Mixed Oligopoly, Subsidization, and the Order of Firm’s Moves: An Irrelevance Result.Economics Bulletin,12,1-5.
  31. Tomaru, Y.(2006).Mixed Oligopoly, Partial Privatization and Subsidization.Economics Bulletin,12,1-6.
  32. Tomaru, Y.,Saito, M.(2010).Mixed Duopoly, Privatization and Subsidization in an Endogenous Timing Framework.The Manchester School,78,41-59.
  33. Wang, L.F.S.,Chen, T.L.(2010).Do Cost Efficiency Gap and Foreign Competitors Matter Concerning Optimal Privatization Policy at the Free Entry Market?.Journal of Economics,100,33-49.