题名

提升糖尿病共同照護網收案率之改善專案

并列篇名

Increase the Participation Rate of Diabetes Shared Care Network

DOI

10.6692/KJN.202408_41(2).0004

作者

羅尹淨(Yin-Ching Lo);林怡貞(Yi-Chen Lin);侯盈豪(Ying-Hao Hou);林怡菁(Yi-Ching Lin);梁維麗(Wei-Li Liang)

关键词

糖尿病 ; 共同照護網 ; 收案率 ; diabetes ; shared care network ; participation rate

期刊名称

高雄護理雜誌

卷期/出版年月

41卷2期(2024 / 08 / 01)

页次

34 - 46

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

背景:本院2018年糖尿病共同照護網收案率54.8%,低於健保署區域醫院指標值,故引發專案改善動機。目的:提升糖尿病共同照護網收案率。方法:專案期間為2019/5/1-2020/1/31,調查導因歸類出病人方面:等門診太久不想再花時間被衛教、不知道要接受糖尿病收案衛教;醫護人員方面:單位未定期宣導糖尿病收案流程;環境設備方面:電腦點選收案操作複雜、收案無相關提示、糖尿病衛教室位置偏遠且標示不清,透過運用宣導、修訂糖尿病收案流程、增設糖尿病衛教室及標示指引、改善電腦點選步驟等對策進行改善。結果:糖尿病共同照護網收案率由54.8%提升至68.3%。結論:本專案運用團隊合作與對策實施,達到收案率提升,顯示成效良好,可平行推展至他科。

英文摘要

Background: In 2018, the participation rate of the Diabetes Shared Care Network in our hospital was 54.8%, which was lower than the performance evaluation indicator among the regional hospital of the National Health Insurance Administration. Therefore, motivation of project improvement is proposed. Purpose: Increase the participation rate of Diabetes Shared Care Network. Methods: The duration of this project was from May, 2019 to January, 2020. The investigation attributed to multiple aspects. Patients aspect: Patients wait for a long period of time at the outpatient clinic and hence, they don't want to spend more time on health education. In addition, some patients did not receive the proper information that they need to receive health education for their diabetes; Medical staff aspect: The unit does not regularly publicize the process of accepting patients to the Diabetes Shared Care Network ; Equipment aspect: The operation of computer selecting and accepting suitable cases into the system is complicated, and there are no applicable reminder to notify the medical staffs to enroll the cases. The location of the diabetic education room is distant, and the sign is unclear. As a result, we advocate standard procedures and revise the process to enroll patients to the Diabetes Shared Care Network, increase clear signs that can guide to the diabetic education room and improve our computer clicks and selection procedures to improve our overall participation rates. Results: The participation rate of the Diabetes Shared Care Network increased from 54.8% to 68.3%. Conclusions: The use of team cooperation in this project has indeed achieved an increased number of percentages of the participation rate, showing that our measures are effective and can be extended to other departments in parallel.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. 酒小蕙(2016).門診病人就醫資訊需求及滿意度探討.健康與建築雜誌,3(3),61-67。https://doi.org/10.6299/JHA.2016.3.3.R6.61
    連結:
  2. 陳淑娟、黃美娟、鍾明憲、陳榮福(2018).門診強化照護對血糖控制成效之初探.領導護理,19(4),41-56。https://doi.org/10.29494/LN.201812_19(4).0004
    連結:
  3. 黃中研、陳嘉惠、楊雅晴、鍾美鈴、鍾淑蘭、許曉芳、鄭瑞楠、王紫惟(2021)‧提升糖尿病人加入糖尿病共同照護網比率及照護品質之專案,台灣醫學,25(5),661-668。 https://doi.org/10.6320/FJM.202109_25(5).0011
    連結:
  4. 劉聿芬、陳盈均、翁林仲、廖國盟、葉豪、鄭筆聳、侯冠廷、張家萍、陳春森(2019).臺北市立聯合醫院的糖尿病整合照護之成效.北市醫學雜誌,16(附冊),1-9。https://doi.org/10.6200/TCMJ.201910/SP_16.0001
    連結:
  5. 蔣玉滿、郭美玲、王淑惠、黃珊、李易蓁(2016).門診跟診人員工作壓力事件困擾程度、生理數值與生活品質之相關性.護理雜誌,63(1),68-77。https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.63.1.68
    連結:
  6. Asmat, K., Dhamani, K., Gul, R., Froelicher, E. S., (2022). The effectiveness of patient-centered care vs. usual care in type 2 diabetes self-management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health,10, 994766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.994766
    連結:
  7. Cho, N. H., Shaw, J. E., Karuranga, S., Huang, Y., da Rocha Fernandes, J. D., Ohlrogge, A. W., & Malanda, B. (2018). IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 138, 271‐281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023
    連結:
  8. Gunggu, A., Thon, C. C., & Whye Lian, C. (2016). Predictors of diabetes self-management among type 2 diabetes patients. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2016, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9158943 Peprah.A. (2014). Determinant of patient’s satisfaction at Sunyani regional hospital, Ghana. International Journal of Business and Research ,4(1), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.18533/IJBSR.V4I1.359
    連結:
  9. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendation. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
    連結:
  10. Rouleau, G., Gagnon, M. P., Côté, J., Payne-Gagnon, J., Hudson, E., & Dubois, C. A. (2017). Impact of information and communication technologies on nursing care: Results of an overview of systematic reviews. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(4), e122. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6686
    連結:
  11. 黃怡詔、紀佳秀(2018).醫療院所門診醫囑組套建置之研究.醫療資訊雜誌,27(3),1-24。
  12. 衛生福利部中央健康保險署(2019,5月)‧全民健康保險醫療品質公開資訊網-糖尿病醫療品質資訊。https://med.nhi.gov.tw/ihqe0000/pep001.html
  13. 衛生福利部統計處(2022,6月30日).110年國人死因統計結果。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-70314-1.html
  14. 衛生福利部國民健康署(2017).糖尿病共同照護工作指引手冊.台北市:衛生福利部國民健康署。
  15. 詹紹華、蔡明燕、邱智鈴、林為森(2018).糖尿病共同照護於第二型糖尿病病人健康促進行為與糖化血色素控制之成效.澄清醫護理雜誌,14(2),50-57。