＂To be or not to be＂: The Terror (Un-)Masked and the Dialectics of Form and Content in Bertolt Brecht's ＂The Measures Taken＂

Hsin-Fa Wu

Brecht ； Zizek ； The Measures Taken ； dialectics ； form and content ； body ； mask ； terror ； role-playing

intergrams

14卷1期（2013 / 09 / 01）

e1 - 22

英文

The dramatic form of Bertolt Brecht's ＂The Measures Taken＂ as a learning play and its thematic content of advocating the absolute priority of the collective at the price of the individual have long received much attention from critics, but the dialectical relationship between its form and content, between its extensive use of mask and the agitators' bodily enactment, still remains unexplored. It is thus the purpose of this paper to offer a detailed account of such a dialectical relation between the two in the light of Hegelian assertion that in works of art these seeming extremes have their absolute correlation and reverse into one another. In ＂The Measures Taken＂ as a whole, the thematic content, the ABC of Communism, is furiously called into question and finally subverted by its dramatic form, which turns out to be the ＂precipitated content＂ of the play proper. The ideological demand of the individual's sacrifice, like the erasure of the body by the mask, naturally evokes a perturbed feeling of uncanniness and terror. Put in the light of Hegelian ＂reconciliation,＂ we may well infer that, if the mask's concealing the body is a negation and denial of the individual in favour of the collective, then the Brechtian Gestus of the Young Comrade's death in the form of the agitator-actor's tearing off the mask and then becoming a voice without the body certainly manifests itself as a negation of negation, which, according to Zizek, would affirm the differences between rather than the identity of the mask and the body. What is to be learned, so to speak, is neither the Young Comrade's revolutionary passion to sacrifice himself nor the priority of ＂the teachings of the classics,＂ but the four agitator-actors' aloofness in their role-playing, the indispensable necessity of the mask for the sake of bodily survival both onstage and offstage.

1. (1967).Gesammelte Werke.Frankfurt on Main:Suhrkamp Verlag.
2. Adorno, Theodor W.,Lenhardt, C.(Trans.)(1972).Aesthetic Theory.London:Routledge & Kegan Paul.
3. Barthes, Roland,Howard, Richard(Trans.)(1983).On Racine.New York:Performing Arts Journal Publications.
4. Baxandall, Lee(trans.)(1960).Baden Lehrstück.TDR,4(4),118-133.
5. Benjamin, Walter,Osborne, John(Trans.)(1977).The Origin of German Tragic Drama.London:NLB.
6. Bennett, Benjamin(1979).Modern Drama and German Classicism: Renaissance from Lessing to Brecht.Ithaca:Cornell UP.
7. Bishop, Philip E.(1986).Brecht, Hegel, Lacan: Brecht's Theory of Gest and the Problem of the Subject.Studies in Twentieth Century Literature,10(2),267-288.
8. Blau, Herbert(1982).Blooded Thought: Occasions of Theatre.New York:Performing Arts Journal Publications.
9. Boal, Augusto,Leal McBride, Charles A.(Trans.),Leal McBride, Maria-Odilia(Trans.)(1979).Theater of the Oppressed.New York:Urizen Books.
10. Calio, Joy H.(2008).Brecht at Opera.Berkeley:U of California P.
11. Cohn, Ruby(1969).Currents in Contemporary Drama.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
12. Craig, Edward Gordon,Walton, J. Michael(Ed.)(1983).Craig on Theatre.London:Methuen.
13. Eliot, T. S.(1958).The Complete Poems and Plays 1909-1950.New York:Harcourt, Brace and Company.
14. Foucault, Michel,Bouchard, Donald F.(Ed.),Bouchard, Donald F.(Trans.),Simon, Sherry(Trans.)(1977).Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews.Ithaca:Cornell UP.
15. Foucault, Michel,Smith, A. M. Sheridan(Trans.)(1972).The Archaeology of Knowledge and "The Discourse on Language".New York:Pantheon Books.
16. Fuegi, John(1994).Brecht and Company: Sex, Politics, and the Making of the Modern Drama.New York:Grove Press.
17. Gray, Ronald(1976).Brecht: The Dramatist.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
18. Huyssen, Andreas(1986).After the Great Divide: Modernism, Mass Culture, Postmodernism.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
19. Jameson, Fredric(2000).Brecht and Method.London:Verso.
20. Lyons, Charles R.(1968).Bertolt Brecht: The Despair and the Polemics.Carbondale:Southern Illinois UP.
21. McDonald, David(1977).Derrida and Pirandello: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of Six Characters in Search of an Author.Modern Drama,20(4),421-436.
22. Muller, Carl R.(Trans.)(1977).The Measures Taken and Other Lehrstücke.London:Methuen.
23. Mumford, Meg(2009).Bertolt Brecht.London:Routledge.
24. Orr, John(Ed.),Klaic, Dragan(Ed.)(1990).Terrorism and Modern Drama.Edinburgh:Edinburgh UP.
25. Ostrander, Greg(1987).Foucault's Disappearing Body.Canadian Journal of Political and Social Theory,9(1-2),120-133.
26. Pirandello, Luigi,Bentley, Eric(Ed.)(1952).Naked Masks: Five Plays by Luigi Pirandello.New York:E. P. Dutton.
27. Shakespeare, William,Jenkins, Harold(Ed.)(1982).Hamlet.London:Methuen.
28. Speirs, Ronald(1982).Brecht's Early Plays.Atlantic Highlands, N. J.:Humanities Press.
29. Steinweg, Reiner(1972).Die Maßnahme. Kritische Ausgabe mit einer Spielanleitung.Berlin:Suhrkamp Verlag.
30. Suvin, Darko(1984).To Brecht and Beyond: Soundings in Modern Dramaturgy.Brighton:Harvester.
31. Szondi, Peter,Hays, Michael(Ed. trans.)(1987).The Theory of Modern Drama.Cambridge:Polity Press.
32. Thomson, Peter(ed.),Sacks, Glendyr(ed.)(2006).The Cambridge Companion to Brecht.Cambridge:Cambridge UP.
33. White, Hayden(1989).The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation.Baltimore:Johns Hopkins UP.
34. Willett, John(Ed. trans.)(1964).Brecht on Theatre.London:Methuen.
35. Williams, Raymond(1973).Drama from Ibsen to Brecht: A Critical Account and Revaluation.Harmondsworth:Penguin.
36. Wilshire, Bruce(1982).Role Playing and Identity: The Limits of Theatre as Metaphor.Bloomington:Indiana UP.
37. Wright, Elizabeth(1989).Postmodern Brecht: A Re-Presentation.London:Routledge.
38. Wulburn, Julian H.(1971).Brecht and Ionesco: Commitment in Context.Urbana:U of Illinois P.
39. Žižek, Slavoj(2012).Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism.London:Verso.
40. Žižek, Slavoj(1989).The Sublime Object of Ideology.London:Verso.
41. Žižek, Slavoj,Gunjević, Boris(2012).God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse.New York:Seven Stories Press.
42. Žižek, Slavoj,Park, Yong-june(Ed.)(2013).Demanding the Impossible.Cambridge:Polity Press.