性暴力連續犯危險因子分析研究

High Risk Factors of Sexually Violent Predators in Taiwan

10.6255/JWGS.2002.13.1

陳若璋(Roda Chen)；劉志如(Chih-Ju Liu)；王家駿(Jia-Jun Wang)

性暴力連續犯 ； 性罪犯 ； 鑑別因子 ； SVP: Sexually violent predator ； sex offenders ； risk factor

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

13期（2002 / 05 / 01）

1 - 46

繁體中文

本研究的目的在探索性暴力連續犯（Sexually violent predator，SVP）之特質及其危險因子，以提供未來診斷、鑑識、治療、監管及刑事法律上的參考。本研究結果有以下之重要發現： 性暴力連續犯之突顯特質如下：相對於一次犯，其成長過程中曾遭受性侵害、性猥褻的經驗較多，侵害者包括連續犯的親人及非親人；他們有更多的早發性犯罪史；情緒穩定度也較低；表達溝通能力較差。在生活習性上，連續犯較常更換工作；平日有性幻想習慣者較多；犯罪前此群體看A 片及犯案時模仿A 片的比率較多，且在犯案前有預先準備的也比一次犯更多。 在犯案時行為上，連續犯較一次犯，作案時多帶有武器；犯案當中有勃起的亦多，同時會反綁遮眼及拿走被害人物品以當作紀念；且有較高比率會毆打受害人；而犯案持續的時間較長；在犯案後亦多會恐嚇受害人。 當使用羅吉斯迴歸分析以尋找最適模式時，發現有六個變項為最具預測力的鑑別因子：在早期曾被猥褻過、犯案時會模仿A 片情節、案前有預備作案、案發時有偏差之性行為、第一次犯性侵害行為被發現的年齡小於十八歲、犯案時毆打受害者。

The purpose of this study is to identify high risk factors for Sexually violent predators (SVP) offenders in Taiwan. The sample for this study was taken from 544 sex offenders incarcerated in prisons in the North and the South of Taiwan. The subjects were asked to fill out a “High risk questionnaire” which was developed by the researchers. Data was analyzed usingχ2 T test analysis and logistic regression analysis. The results were summarized as follows: Compared to one-time sex offenders, 114 SVP offenders tend to grow up in a family with a history of violence; first offense is often discovered before the age of 14; the subject changes jobs frequently; has a more deviant sexual fantasy than the norm; is exposed frequently to rated movies, and plans his/her actions carefully. During the crime, SVP offenders tend to make use of a weapon; beat their victims; the offense is often of longer duration; verbal threats are made to victims; after the crime objects are taken from victim as souvenirs. The most important and predictable variables that can be used to Identify SVP offenders are: -Imitating the behavior from an -Rated movie during the offense. -Prior to committing the offense, their actions are carefully planned and rehearsed. -History of sexual-abuse as a child. -Taking of object(s) from victim as a souvenir after the crime. -First offense is often discovered before the age of 14. -Use of force (beating of victim) during the offense.

1. Abel, G.,Mittelman, M.,Rathner, J.,Becker, J.(1988).Predicting child molesters’ response to treatment.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,528,223-234.
2. Beckett, R. C.(1994).Community-based treament for sex offenders: An evaluationof seven treatment programmes.
3. Bureau of Justice Statistics(1989).Report to the nation on crime and justice.
4. Burt, M. R.(1980).Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality of Social Psychology,38,217-230.
5. Cumming, G.(1997).Supervision of the sex offender.
6. Dougher, M.(1995).The sex offender: Correntions, treatment and legal practice.
7. Epperson, D. L.,Kaul, J. D.,Hout, S. J.,Hesselton, D.,Alexander, W. N.,Goldman, R. F.(2000).Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised.
8. Groth, N.(1980).Men who rape: The psychology of the offender.
9. Hanson, R. K.(2000).The sex offender need assessment rating（SONAR）: A method for measuring change in risk levels.
10. Hanson, R. K.(1997).The development of a brief actuarial risk scale for sexual offense recidivism.
11. Hanson, R. K.(1996).Predictors of sexual offender recidivism: A meta-analysis.
12. Hanson, R. K.,Bussiere, M. T.(1998).Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,66(2),348-362.
13. Harris, A. J. A.(1998).Dynamic predictors of sexual recidivism.
14. Knopp,. F. H.(1984).Retraining adult sex offenders: Models and methods.
15. Lanning, K. U.(1986).Child molesters: A behavioral analysis for law enforcement officers investigating cases of child sexual exploitation.
16. Longdo, R. E.(1982).Sexual learning and experiences among adolescent sexual offenders.International Journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology,26,235-241.
17. Marshall, W. L.,Barbaree, H. E.,Barbaree, H. E.(1991).Early onset and deviant sexuality in child molesters.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,6,323-336.
18. McGrath, R. J.(1991).Sex offender risk assessment and disposition planning: A review of empirical and clinical findings.International Journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology,35(4),328-350.
19. McGrath, R. J.(1994).Annual Conference for Virginia Sex Offender Treatment Providers.
20. McGrath, R. J.(1992).Assessing sex offender risk.American probation and parole association: Perspectives,16(3),6-9.
21. McGrath, R. J.(2000)。侵害加害人鑑定、評估及治療方案研討會。
22. Murphy, W. D.,Coleman, E. M.,Haynes, M. R.(1986).Factors related to coercive sexual behavior in a nonclinical sample of males.Violence and victims,1(4),255-278.
23. Overholster, C.,Beck, S.(1986).Multimethod assessment of rapists, child molesters and three control groups on behavioral and psychological measures.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,54,682-687.
24. Pithers, W.,Beal, L.,Petty, J.,Armstrong, J.(1989).Relapse prevention with sex offenders.
25. Quinsey, V. L.,Lalumiere, M. L.,Rice, M. E.,Harris, G. T.(1995).Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offender, batterers, and child abusers.
26. Schwartz, B. K.(1995).The sex offender: Correntions, treatment and legal practice.
27. Thornton, D.(1999).Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders.
28. Warren, J. I.(1991).Prediction of rapist type and violence form verbal, physical and sexual scales.Journal of Interpersonal Violence,6(1),55-67.
29. Wolf, S. C.(1984).Third International Conference on Victimiology.
30. Wright, R. C.,Schneider, S.(1995).The sex offender: New insights, treatment innovations and legal develpoments.
31. 內政部警政署刑事警察局(1999)。臺灣刑案統計。
32. 林清山(1992)。心理與教育統計學。
33. 陳若璋(1998)。陳進興訪談。
34. 黃軍義(1997)。強姦犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。
35. 黃軍義(1997)。強姦犯罪成因及相關問題之研究。
36. 楊士隆(1999)。臺灣地區強姦犯罪之成因與處遇對策之研究。
37. 楊國樞(1991)。中國人的心理。

1. 陳慧女、林明傑(2007)。臺灣近二十年來性侵害研究之脈絡與趨勢。臺大社會工作學刊，14，211-259。
2. 陳若璋(2007)。性罪犯團體治療十年研究之回顧暨展望。中華團體心理治療，13(2)，3-27。
3. 陳若璋(2007)。性罪犯團體治療十年研究之回顧暨展望。中華團體心理治療，13(2)，3-27。
4. 黃健、郭文正(2004)。探討性犯罪加害者團體治療中的利他性與人際互動。中華團體心理治療，10(2)，11-18。
5. 林明傑、沈勝昂(2007)。變與不變：性侵害再犯「穩定動態危險因子」與「急性動態危險因子」的關係。犯罪學期刊，10(2)，1-27。
6. 劉志如、陳若璋、林烘煜(2007)。以多元評估方式對兩類成癮犯的生心理特質描繪。中華心理學刊，49(1)，87-103。
7. 葉在庭、林芃萱(2014)。犯罪者在心智推理的表現探討—以性侵害加害人為例。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，10(1)，23-51。
8. (2003)。性侵害犯罪加害人之處遇－較佳方案及三個爭議方案。月旦法學雜誌，96，160-185。
9. (2006)。預防再犯團體模式對性罪犯之療效評估與影響。教育與心理研究，29(2)，369-398。