题名

從性別角度探討偏遠地區學童的網頁製作

并列篇名

Learning to Design a Homepage in a Remote Elementary School: A Case Study of Elementary School Pupils from a Gender Perspective

DOI

10.6255/JWGS.2005.19.105

作者

林宇玲(Yu-Ling Lin)

关键词

兒童 ; 族群 ; 電腦識讀 ; 網頁製作 ; 自我再現 ; 性別建構 ; childhood ; ethnicity ; computer literacy ; homepage-building ; gender construction ; self-representation

期刊名称

女學學誌:婦女與性別研究

卷期/出版年月

19期(2005 / 06 / 01)

页次

105 - 156

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究採用後結構女性主義取向,深入調查台北縣烏來地區24位國小五年級學童在學校的網頁製作與實踐,結果發現教室脈絡、電腦識讀、網頁建構及性別認同之間有密切的關係:(一)學校文化、教室氣氛、師生互動、同儕團體、性別偏見以及軟體的商業文化,會影響與限制學童的網頁製作與學習;(二)學童受到性別知識與經驗的影響,傾向以性別化的方式學習網頁製作;(三)網頁的「編織」特性,鼓勵女孩以超連結編造自己的文本;(四)缺乏性別與族群考量的電腦課程,無法幫助原住民學童利用新科技去破除性別刻板印象、以及縮短數位落差;(五)性別交錯著其他社會力(如:族群、階級等)共同影響學童的網頁製作與學習。

英文摘要

While employing feminist poststructuralist theoretical framework, this study focuses on twenty-four fifth-grade students from an elementary school in Wulai District, Taipei County, to illustrate how pupils' computer learning and homepage design skills can be intimately interconnected with the school's regulations and gendered self-perception of the students. This study shows that the pupils' experiences in homepage design, and learning to use the Internet, can be influenced and limited by some of the following factors: school culture, classroom atmosphere, teacher-student rapport, forming of peer groups, gender bias, and the commercial culture spread through accessible software. Second, we show that in learning how to design a homepage the pupils rely on their gender-related experiences and knowledge, and that they generally adopt specific gendered approaches. Third, we demonstrate that the ”weaving-like” character of the Internet encourages female pupils to employ hyperlinks in creating their own hypertexts. Fourth, this study argues that if computer courses must utilize gender-and ethnicity-insensitive curriculum, not even the indigenous students' learning to work with modern technology can contribute to eliminating gender stereotypes and narrowing of digital gaps. Finally, we show that the process of pupils' learning and homepage design is influenced by an interrelated array of social forces, such as gender, class, and ethnicity.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 林宇玲(2004)。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究
    連結:
  2. Alliance for Childhood(2004).Tech tonic: Towards a new literacy of technology.
  3. Arnold, J.,Miller, H.(2003).Towards cyber psychology: Mind, cognitions and society in the internet age.
  4. Barlett, L.(2000).E-racing and engendering representation in student homepages.
  5. Buckingham, D.(2002).Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs.
  6. Chandler, D.(1998).Personal homepages and the construction of identies on the web.
  7. Chandler, D.,Roberts-Young, D.(1998).The construction of identity in the personal homepages of adolescents.
  8. Corbell, S.(1996).ACAL Conference, The Literacy Equation: Competence.
  9. Doherty, D.(2002).Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.
  10. Dominick, J. R.(1999).Jounalism and mass communication quarterly.
  11. Dorer, J.(2002).Women and Everyday uses of the internet: Agency and identity.
  12. Dyson, L. E.(2002).Winds of change in the sea of learning: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE).
  13. Dyson, L. E.(2003).New paradigms in organizations, markets and society: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Information System (ECIS).
  14. Fox, S.(2000).Communities of practice, Foucault and actor-network theory.The Journal of Management Studies,37(6),853-867.
  15. Francis, B.(2000).Boys, girls and achievement.
  16. Francis, B.(1998).Power plays: Primary school children‘s constructions of gender power and adult work.
  17. Francis, B.(1997).British Journal of Education and Work.
  18. Gerrard, L.(1999).Feminist cyberspaces: Mapping gendered academic spaces.
  19. Goffman, E.(1969).The presentation of self in everyday life.
  20. Gorski, P. C.(2002).Multicultural education.
  21. Gorski, P.,Clark, C..Multicultural perspectives.
  22. Herring、 Susan C., S. C.(2000).Gender differences in CMC: Findings and implications.
  23. Iseke-Barnes, J. M.(2002).Aboriginal and indigenous people‘s resistance, the internet, and education.Race ethnicity and education,5(2),171-198.
  24. Kapitzke, C.,Boritini, S.,MacNeill, G.,Mayer, D.,Muihead, B.,Renshaw, P.,Chen, M.(2001).Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.
  25. Kerka, S.(2000).New Directions for adult and continuing education.
  26. Kolko, B. E.(2000).Race in cyberspace.
  27. Leander, K.,Johnson, K.(2002).Tracing the everyday ‘sitings’ of adolescents on the internet: A strategies adaptation of ethnography across online and offline space.
  28. Lee, H.(2003).Different individuals, different approaches to L2 literacy practices.
  29. Livingstone, S. M.(2003).Children‘s use of the internet: reflections on the emerging research agenda.New Media and Society,5(2),147-166.
  30. MacNaughton, G.(2000).Rethinking gender in early childhood education.
  31. Marshall, C. C.,Furuta, R.(1995).Genre as reflection of technology in the world-wide web.
  32. Mather, R. B.,Miller, H.(1998).The presentation of self in WWW homepages.
  33. Montelaro, J. J.(1999).Breaking the cycle: Gender, literacy and learning.
  34. Nakamura, L.(2002).Cybertypes: Race, ethnicity, and identity on the internet.
  35. Nakamura, L.(2004).Society online: The internet in context.
  36. Orr Vered, K.(1998).Doctoral consortium.
  37. Paasonen, S.(2002).Women and Everyday uses of the internet: Agency and identity.
  38. Paechter, Carrie(1998).Educating the other: Gender, power and schooling.
  39. Plant, S.(1995).Body and Society.
  40. Rowan, L.(2001).Boys, literacies and schooling: The dangerous territories of gender-based literacy reform.
  41. Rutter, J.,Bryce, J.(2003).Leisure studies.
  42. Shade, L. R.(2004).Society online: The internet in context.
  43. Skelton, C.(2001).Schooling the boys: Masculinities and primary education.
  44. Sterne, J.(2000).Race in cyberspace.
  45. Street, B. V.(1995).Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education.
  46. Taku, S.(1999).Three critical "gaps": Successes and failures of computer literacy in Japanese education.
  47. Valentine, Gill,Holloway, S. L.(2000).Sociology.
  48. Valentine, Gill,Holloway, S. L.(2001)."It's only as stupid as you are": Children's and adult’ negotiation of ICT competence at home and at school.Social and cultural geography,2(1),25-42.
  49. Volman, M.,van Eck, E.(2001).Review of Educational Research.
  50. Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
  51. Williams, K.(2003).Journal of literacy and technology.
  52. Wynn, E.,Kate, J. E.(1997).The information society, An international journal.
  53. 呂淑怡(2003)。訂定一個他─交友網站的個人網頁自我形象分析
  54. 林宇玲(2002)。網路與性別
  55. 林宇玲(2004)。「性別、媒體與文化研究」學術研討會
  56. 林宗立(2004)。性別與網頁設計之訴求─以第五屆立法委員網站為例
  57. 研考會(2004)。電子化政府入口網
  58. 浦忠勇(2001)。資訊社會與數位落差研討會彙編
  59. 陳詩蘋(2001)。政治人物網站呈現及其回饋機制之研究─以第四屆立法委員網站為例
  60. 傅麗玉、張志立(2002)。2002年清大網路與社會研討會
被引用次数
  1. 林宇玲(2007)。批判的電腦識讀與學童的網路實踐—以台北縣某偏遠國小的暑假電腦營為例。教育實踐與研究,20(1),1-35。
  2. 林宇玲(2007)。偏遠地區學童的電玩實踐與性別建構—以台北縣烏來地區某國小六年級學童為例。新聞學研究,90,43-99。