運動與學術雙向結合－台灣性別研究發展之跨學門比較

Mutual Engagement of Social Activism and Academic Research: A Comparative Analysis of Gender Studies in Three Disciplines

10.6255/JWGS.2011.29.173

黃淑玲(Shu-Ling Hwang)；謝小芩(Hsiao-Chin Hsieh)

婦女研究 ； 性別研究 ； 女性主義 ； 婦女運動 ； women's studies ； gender studies ； feminist scholarship ； women's movement

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

29期（2011 / 12 / 01）

173 - 231

繁體中文

本研究檢視1990年至2007年間，台灣的西方文學／文化研究、社會學及教育學等三學門主流學術期刊的性別研究論文，考察其出版數量、理論觀點、研究方法與研究主題，藉以評估性別研究在這三種學門中的主流化程度。本文提出一個包括兩組因素─學科特質與研究社群的女性主義認同─的分析架構，來解釋性別研究在三種學門不同的主流化程度與女性主義理論的影響力。本研究有兩項主要發現：第一，在此三學門中，性別研究都被視為「女性的」學術領域，處於被邊緣化、區隔化的位置；由此可見，女性主義並未成為此三學門的主流理論典範。第二，三種學門性別研究的發展步伐不一：西方文學／文化研究勇於接受新興思潮，性別研究發展最早，但2000年後卻急速萎縮；我們認為主因之一是該學門的研究社群對女性主義的認同及婦運實踐都偏低。在教育學門，雖然婦運學者推動性別平等教育的立法，但主流教育學者吸收女性主義思想的速度相對較慢，且性別研究學者亦較少在主流期刊發表研究成果，致使性別研究主流化程度顯得最低。社會學門部分，作者群的婦運實踐力最強，女性主義理論亦已成為社會學性別研究的主流範式。本文的結論是，雖然婦運與學術雙向結合是啟動與持續台灣性別研究發展之動力引擎，但這項獨特的學科特質只有在社會學門表現最亮眼。

This study examines the incorporation of gender and feminist scholarship into Taiwan's mainstream scholarship, with a focus on three fields: Western literature and culture studies, sociology, and education. The current work proposes an analytical framework consisting of two sets of factors to explain the level of integration of feminist scholarship into the mainstream. These factors include the distinctive features of each discipline and the researcher's identification with feminism.To assess how well feminist scholarship has been accepted and how well the field of gender studies has made its way into the academic mainstream, this study investigates the number of women's and gender studies articles published in core journals of these three fields from 1990 to 2007 and explores the theoretical perspectives, research themes, and methods of these articles. The findings indicate that gender studies is identified as a ”women's field” and has been marginalized and segregated in the mainstream academics. The number and percentage of feminist articles in core journals of the three disciplines also vary. In the field of western literature and culture studies, the number of articles peaked in the 1990s, but rapidly decreased in the new millennium. In education, both figures are the lowest, compared to the other two disciplines. Only in the sociology core journals have feminist articles taken a relatively significant position. These findings are discussed with our analytical framework. In conclusion, we suggest that the mutual engagement of social activism and academic research have been the engine driving the expansion of gender studies across all three disciplines. However, only feminist scholars in sociology have embodied a commitment to this unique facet of gender studies.

1. 方念萱(2009)。我如是研究、如是研究我。中華傳播學刊，16，25-34。
   連結：
2. 林芳玫(2008)。政府與婦女團體的關係及其轉變：以台灣為例探討婦女運動與性別主流化。國家與社會，5，159-203。
   連結：
3. 張珏、吳燕秋(2002)。台灣各大學婦女研究與兩性平等教育。應用心理研究，13，73-107。
   連結：
4. 楊婉瑩(2004)。婦權會到性別平等委員會的轉變：一個國家女性主義的比較觀點分析。政治科學論叢，21，117-48。
   連結：
5. 潘慧玲、梁文蓁、陳宜宣(2000)。台灣近十年教育領導碩博士論文分析：女性主義的觀點。婦女與兩性學刊，11，151-190。
   連結：
6. 顧燕翎(1996)。從移植到生根：婦女研究在台灣（1985-1995）。近代中國婦女史研究，4，241-268。
   連結：
7. Acker, J.(2006).Introduction: 'The missing revolution' symposium.Social Problems,53(4),444-47.
8. Albelda, R.(1995).The impact of feminism in economics: Beyond the pale? A discussion and survey results.The Journal of Economic Education,26(3),253-273.
9. Angelique, H. L.,Culley, M. R.(2003).Feminism found: An examination of gender consciousness in community psychology.Journal of Community Psychology,31(3),189-209.
10. Blaxter, L.,Hughes, C.,Preston, R.,Martin, J.(2000).Editorial.Gender and Education,12(4),413-418.
11. Brown, W.(1997).The impossibility of women's studies.Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies,9(3),79.
12. Burawoy, M.(1996).The power of feminism.Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter,18(3),4-7.
13. Burawoy, M.(2005).2004 presidential address: For public sociology.American Sociological Review,70(1),4-28.
14. Calhoun, Craig J(2007).Sociology in America: A history.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
15. Chafetz, J. S.(1997).Feminist theory and sociology: Underutilized contributions for mainstream theory.Annual Review of Sociology,23,97-120.
16. DuBois, E.C.,Kelly, G.,Kennedy, E.,Korsmeyer, C.,Robinsho, L.(1985).Feminist scholarship: Kindling in the groves of academe.Urbana:University of Illinois Press.
17. Eisenstein, H.(1996).Inside agitators: Australian femocrats and the state.Philadelphia, PA:Temple University Press.
18. Elfman, L.(2009).A 'second wave of feminism': as women's studies programs mature, they are incorporating issues of race and sexuality.Diverse Issues in Higher Education,26(2),10-11.
19. Hart, J.(2006).Women and feminism in higher education scholarship: An analysis of three core journals.The Journal of Higher Education,77(1),40-61.
20. Hayes, E.(1992).The impact of feminism on adult education publications: An analysis of British and American journals.International Journal of Lifelong Education,11(2),125-138.
21. Ingraham, C.(1996).You've come a long way baby... or the revolution will not be televised.Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter,18(3),8-10.
22. Liu, Liang-ya(2005).Queer theory and politics in Taiwan: The cultural translation and (re)production of queerness in and beyond Taiwan lesbian/gay/queer activism.NTY Studies in Language and Literature,14,123-153.
23. Messer-Davidow, E.(2002).Disciplining feminism: From social activism to academic discourse.Durham:Duke University Press.
24. Orr, C.,Lichtenstein, D.(2004).The politics of feminist locations: A materialist analysis of women's studies.NWSA Journal,16(3),1-17.
25. Outshorm, J.(Ed.),Kantola, J.(Ed.)(2007).Changing state feminism.New York:Palgrave Macmillan.
26. Ray, R.(2006).Is the revolution missing or are we looking in the wrong places?.Social Problems,53(4),459-465.
27. Rosenberg, K.,Howard, J. A.(2008).Finding feminist sociology: A review essay.Signs,33(3),675-696.
28. Rupp, L. J.(2006).Is the feminist revolution still missing? Reflections from women's history author(s): Source.Social Problems,53(4),466-472.
29. Scott, J.(Ed.)(2008).Women's studies on the edge.Durham:Duke University Press.
30. Stacey, J.(2006).Feminism and sociology in 2005: What are we missing?.Social Problems,53(4),479-482.
31. Stacey, J.,Thorne, B.(1985).The missing feminist revolution in sociology.Social Problems,32(4),301-316.
32. Stacey, J.,Thorne, B.(1996).Is sociology still missing its feminist revolution?.Perspectives: The ASA Theory Section Newsletter,18(3),1-3.
33. Tetrault, M. K. T.(1985).Feminist phase theory: An experience-driven evaluation model.Journal of Higher Education,56(4),363-384.
34. Thompson, L.,Walker, A. J.(1995).The place of feminism in family studies.Journal of Marriage and the Family,57(4),847-865.
35. Thorne, B.(2006).How can feminist sociology sustain its critical edge?.Social Problems,53(4),473-478.
36. Townsend, B. K.(1993).Feminist thought in core higher education journals.The Review of Higher Education,Fall,21-41.
37. Waller, D. V.,Dunn, D.,Watson, J.(1998).The incorporation of gender scholarship into sociology.The American Sociologist,29(3),43-58.
38. West, C.,Zimmerman, D.(1987).Doing gender.Gender & Society,1(2),125-151.
39. Wiegman, R.(Ed.)(2002).Women's studies on its own: A next wave reader in institutional change.Durham, NC:Duke University Press.
40. Wiegman, R.(Ed.)(2002).Women' studies on its own.Durham, NC:Duke University.
41. Williams, C.(2006).Still missing? Comments on the twentieth anniversary of the missing feminist revolution in sociology.Social Problems,53(4),454-458.
42. Wolf, D.(Ed.)(1996).Feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. Boulder.CO:Westview.
43. 子宛玉編(1988)。風起雲湧的女性主義批評。台北:谷風出版社。
44. 王雅各(1999)。台灣婦女解放運動史。台北:巨流。
45. 林昱瑄(2009)。國內性別研究前瞻與熱門議題─教育學期刊。婦研縱橫，91，81-86。
46. 張小虹(1996)。國科會報告國科會報告,國科會。
47. 張小虹(1998)。性／別研究讀本。台北:麥田。
48. 張苙雲、林萬億、曾嬿芬、傅仰止、鍾蔚文(2007)。,未出版
49. 張晉芬(1999)。社會學的性別研究。婦女與兩性研究通訊，50，1-4。
50. 陳佩英(2004)。意識與行動─婦女與性／別研究建制化歷程之探討。通識教育季刊，11(3,4)，37-70。
51. 游美惠、黃馨慧、潘慧玲、謝小芩(2004)。從性別盲到性別敏感的教育研究：以婦女成人教育與性教育研究的文獻回顧為例。通識教育季刊，1(1)，1-13。
52. 黃長玲(2007)。彼此鑲嵌，互相形構：轉變中的國家與社會關係。自由主義與新世紀台灣，台北:
53. 黃淑玲(2008)。性別主流化─台灣經驗與國際的對話。研考雙月刊，32(4)，3-12。
54. 楊芳枝(2009)。國內性別研究前瞻與熱門議題─傳播／文化研究／文學類期刊。婦研縱橫，90，41-54。
55. 謝小芩(2004)。台灣的婦女運動與婦女／性別研究發展。「百年中國女權思潮研究─紀念《女界鐘》發表100 週年」國際學術研討會
56. 謝小芩、楊佳羚(1999)。教育研究中的性別論述：解嚴以來台灣性別與教育的文獻回顧。「跨世紀的台灣社會與社會學」學術研討會
57. 謝國雄編(2008)。群學爭鳴：台灣社會學發展史1945-2005。台北:群學。
58. 鍾慧玲編(1997)。女性主義與中國文學。台北:里仁書局。
59. 蘇芊玲(2002)。創造草根與體制的雙贏策略。應用心理研究，14，30-33。

1. 王秀雲(2019)。「不男不女」：台灣「長髮」男性的治理及其性別政治，1960s－1970s。台灣社會研究季刊，112，99-146。