與青少年「搏」性別：戲劇課堂中的性／性別動力與教學實踐

Struggling with Youth Sexuality: Gender and Sexual Dynamics in Drama Classes

10.6255/JWGS.2012.30.47

林昱瑄(Yu-Hsuan Lin)

戲劇教育 ； 被壓迫者劇場 ； 性／性別文化 ； 性別教育 ； 批判教育學 ； drama education ； theater of the oppressed ； sexuality/gender culture ； gender education ； critical pedagogy

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

30期（2012 / 06 / 01）

47 - 82

繁體中文

當代的性別與學校教育研究都相當重視學生的性／性別（sexuality/gender）文化，因為只有從學生文化的角度，瞭解青少年性／性別學習與認同的建構，才能從事對學生而言有意義的性／性別教育。不過，如何讓學生們能在安全、溫暖的氛圍下自在地展現自己的性／性別認同，同時又挑戰他們的霸權性認同，這是女性主義教師必須面臨的一大挑戰。本研究以台北市一所私立高職某班做為研究田野，研究期間為一學年（2009年月－2010年6月）。我們同時採取學生個別訪談、戲劇教育和教室觀察等研究方法，以瞭解學生的生活世界和想法。戲劇教育在本研究的作用，既是一種用來探究青少年複雜的認同與生活世界的研究方法，也是一種解放性的課程實踐。本文將呈現戲劇課中與學生性／性別認同有關的兩個片段，討論學生在其中呈現的性／性別認同，以及教師如何進行解放性的教學實踐。在第一個場景中，學生集體創作出一封給AV女優的信，信中大量投射了學生自身對性的慾望和想像，本文將藉這份文本討論青少年與色情媒介間的關係，以及具有女性主義意識的教師可以如何回應、面對青少年真實的性慾望。另一個場景則是關於女學生間的隱性霸凌，這個段落將透過一樁班上正在進行的霸凌事件，探討女孩間的性別文化，並呈現教師可以如何透過戲劇教育處理類似的隱性霸凌。

Contemporary research on gender and education frequently emphasizes the culture of sexuality/gender among students. This is because educators can make sexuality/gender education more meaningful for students only by understanding young people's sexuality/gender learning and identity from the perspective of students' culture. However, how to make students feel comfortable expressing their sexuality/gender identity in a safe and benevolent environment, on the one hand, and challenging their hegemonic identity, on the other hand, is a challenge feminist teachers must confront. This study takes a class at a private vocational high school in Taipei as its research field. The research period spans one academic year (September 2009-June 2010). The methods in this study include interviews, drama education, and classroom observations. In this study, drama education is both a research method used to investigate students' complicated identity and life world and as an emancipatory curriculum. The article will present two situations in drama class, showing of the sexuality/gender identity students present, and discussing how teachers can engage in a more emancipatory pedagogical practice. In the first situation, students produce a letter to an adult video actress, and they project their sexuality and desire in the letter. The paper will discuss how youth perceive pornography through the letter and how teachers can respond. The second situation reveals hidden bullying among female students. I will examine these girls' gender culture and provide some pedagogical suggestions for teachers.

1. 張盈堃、陳伯璋(2008)。日常生活的紮根美學：劇場作為批判教育學的實行地點。教育與社會研究，16，1-31。
   連結：
2. Boal, A.,Jackson, Adrian(Trans.)(2002).Games for actors and non-actors.New York:Routledge.
3. Brown, L. M.,Gilligan, C.(1993).Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls' development.Feminism and Psychology,3,11-35.
4. Conrad, D.(2004).Exploring risky youth experiences: Popular theatre as a participatory, performative research method.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,3(1),12-25.
5. Epstein, D.,Johnson, R.(1998).Schooling sexualities.Buckingham:Open University Press.
6. Frith, H.(2004).The best of friends: The politics of girls' friendships.Feminism and Psychology,14,357-360.
7. Gallagher, K.(2000).Drama education in the lives of girls: Imaging possibilities.Toronto:University of Toronto Press.
8. Kehily, M. J.(2002).Sexuality, gender and schooling: Shifting agendas in school learning.London:Routledge.
9. Kehily, M. J.,Mac An Ghaill, M.,Epstein, D.,Redman, P.(2002).Private girls and public worlds: Producing femininities in the primary school.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,23(2),167-177.
10. McLeod, J.(2002).Working out intimacy: Young people and friendship and an age of reflexivity.Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,23(2),211-226.
11. Norris, J.(2000).Drama as research: Realizing the potential of drama in education as a research ethodology.Youth Theatre Journal,14(1),40-51.
12. Renold, E.(2005).Girls, boys and junior sexualities: Exploring children's gender and sexual relations in the primary school.New York:RoutledgeFalmer.
13. Thiessen, D.(Ed.),Cook-Sather, A.(Ed.)(2007).International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school.Netherlands:Springer Publishing.
14. Underwood, M. K.(2004).Glares of contempt, eye rolls of disgust and turning away to exclude: Non-verbal forms of social aggression among girls.Feminism and Psychology,14(3),371-375.
15. 方永泉譯、Freire, P.(2003)。被壓迫者教育學。台北:巨流。
16. 李錦旭編、王慧蘭編(2006)。批判教育學：臺灣的探索。心理。
17. 林芳玫(2006)。色情研究。台北:臺灣商務印書館。
18. 林昱瑄、吳美枝(2006)。想像、跨越與改變：戲劇教學的無限可能。性別平等教育季刊，35，46-51。
19. 柯宜呈(2008)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄師範大學性別教育研究所。
20. 曾如瑩譯、Simmons, R.(2003)。怪女孩出列：揭開女孩間的隱性攻擊文化。台北:商周。
21. 游美惠(2006)。反霸凌與性別平等教育。台北市終身學習網通訊，32，2-6。
22. 楊幸真(2010)。校園生活與性別：性別學習與教學實踐。台北:巨流。
23. 蔡奇璋編、許瑞芳編(2001)。在那湧動的潮音中：教習劇場TIE。台北:揚智。
24. 蕭昭君譯、陳巨擘譯、McLaren, P.(2003)。校園生活─批判教育學導論。台北:巨流。
25. 賴淑雅(2003)。遊戲‧劇場‧性別教育。性別平等教育季刊，24，53-62。
26. 賴淑雅譯、Boal, A.(2000)。被壓迫者劇場。台北:揚智。