男女廁之外的「其他」－世新大學「無性別廁所」之經驗評估與省思

"Other" than Men's and Women's Toilets: Reflection on the Unisex Restroom Experience of Shih Hsin University

10.6255/JWGS.2013.32.43

彭渰雯(Yen-Wen Peng)；林書伃(Shu-Yu Lin)；畢恆達(Herng-Dar Bih)

無性別廁所 ； 女廁 ； 跨性別者 ； 變性慾者 ； 性別與空間 ； unisex restroom ； women's restroom ； transgender ； transsexual ； gender and space

女學學誌：婦女與性別研究

32期（2013 / 06 / 01）

43 - 96

繁體中文

世新大學於2011年將兩間既有男廁改建為無分性別的「性別友善」廁所，以回應多元性別平等的趨勢，受到各界注意。但是從使用者角度來看，此一設施所得到的評價為何，則值得深入探究，以進一步思考無性別廁所的定位與功能。本研究同時採問卷調查、觀察與訪談等方法，瞭解世新大學師生與職員對性別友善廁所的認知、態度和使用經驗。其中問卷調查部分一共蒐集到340份世新師生、職員的意見，訪談則是特別針對5位跨性別的學生與職員，瞭解其想法。不論從問卷統計或是訪談結果，都可發現無性別廁所出現「叫好不叫座」的現象，例如有81.6 %受訪者支持學校設置更多無性別廁所，但是曾使用無性別廁所的人僅有65.7 %，其中女性更僅有26.6 %。透過觀察記錄也發現無性別廁所仍多被當成男廁使用。許多（特別是女性）受訪者對如廁隱私界線的態度與使用行為，仍延續原有性別角色養成的偏好。即使是5位跨性別特質的受訪者，雖都支持無性別廁所的理念，但也不一定想親身使用。本文認為「叫好不叫座」是可以預期的反應，也正好讓我們深思廁所空間的性別改革是否只有「去除男女二分」一途。為此，本文呼應學者Jerry Kogan的主張：未來的公廁在男廁、女廁之外，另外增加一處「其他」（Other）廁所空間，一方面讓不同的性別認同和如廁需要，皆可在公廁空間內得到包容與回應，另一方面也可能鬆動性別二元主義下的空間想像，讓民眾對廁所、身體、隱私的感受與認知，能因為「其他」選擇的存在而有機會改變。至於這個「其他」空間的提案，是性別解放運動的階段性策略，還是值得所有性別化空間改革參考的典範，實與整體社會在多元性別平等議題上的辯證思考息息相關，有待更多時間、實踐與研究來回答。

Shih Hsin University in Taipei launched a pioneering project to promote a gender-friendly campus by reconstructing two existing men's restrooms into unisex restrooms in 2011, which drew public attention. How do the potential and actual users evaluate this new facility, however, needs more exploration, so as to allow further reflection on the function and role of unisex restrooms. This study applied multiple methods, including surveys, observation, and interviews, to explore the student, faculty and staff's recognition, attitudes, and experiences on/with the unisex toilets. There were 340 questionnaires collected in the survey, and five transgender students and staff were interviewed.The surveys result showed that 92.0% of the respondents knew about the existence of the two unisex toilets in the campus, and 81.6 % endorsed the idea of installing them. Those who had used the unisex toilets, however, were only 65.7 % on average, with only 26.6 % of female respondents ever using them. The survey also found significant differences in terms of the psychological burdens and uneasiness regarding using unisex restrooms between male and female respondents. How to react to these worries and habits is a challenge that should be dealt with in promoting unisex restrooms.The interviews further revealed that the perceptions of unisex restrooms among transgender users are heterogeneous as a result of their different urinary experiences as well as different gender identities. In conclusion, the authors echo Jerry Kogan's argument for an extra toilet space termed ”Other” in addition to the existing ”Men” and ”Women” spaces. This should be an inclusive and flexible approach to accommodate all users with different gender identities and urinary needs, and at the same time still challenge the traditional, dichotomous approach of segregated restrooms.

1. 何春蕤(2002)。認同的「體」現：打造跨性別。台灣社會研究季刊，46，1-44。
   連結：
2. 陸文（2012）〈佔領男廁所〉。〔online〕. 2012/3/25. Available: http://www.isunaffairs.com/?p=3948
3. 世新大學性別平等教育中心（2011）〈世新大學性別友善廁所專案報告〉（報告人：羅燦煐主任）。世新大學性別平等教育中心、世新大學總務處主辦「世新大學性別友善廁所公聽會」，5 月 26 日。
4. Banks, T. L.(1991).Toilets as a feminist issue: A true story.Berkeley Women's Law Journal,6(part 2),263-89.
5. Browne, K.(2004).Genderism and the bathroom problem: (Re)materialising sexed sites, (re)creating sexed bodies.Gender, Place and Culture,11(3),331-46.
6. Cavanagh, S.,Ware, V.(1990).Less convenient for women.Built Environment,16(4),279-87.
7. George, R.(2008).The big necessity: Adventures in the world of human waste.London:Portobello Books.
8. Greed, C. H.(2003).Inclusive urban design: Public toilets.New York:Architectural Press.
9. Greed, C. H.(1995).Public toilet provision for women in Britain: An investigation of discrimination against urination.Women's Studies International Forum,18(5/6),573-584.
10. Griffin, C. J.(2009).Workplace restroom policies in light of New Jersey's gender identity protection.Rutgers Law Review,61,409-36.
11. Kogan, T. S.(2007).Sex-separation in public restrooms: Law, architecture, and gender.Michigan Journal of Gender and Law,14(1),1-57.
12. Kogan, T. S.(1996).Transsexuals and critical gender theory: The possibility of a restroom labeled "Other".Hastings Law Journal,48,1223-55.
13. Molotch, H.(Ed.),Noren, L.(Ed.)(2010).Toilet: Public restrooms and the politics of sharing.New York:New York University Press.
14. Overall, C.(2007).Public toilets: Sex segregation revisited.Ethics & the Environment,12(2),71-91.
15. Rothblatt, M.(1995).The apartheid of sex: A Manifesto on the freedom of gender.New York:Rivers Oram Press.
16. 世新大學性別平等教育中心(2011)。,未出版
17. 畢恆達(2004)。空間就是性別。台北:心靈工坊。
18. 彭渰雯(2005)。從女廁運動到無性別廁所：一個參與者的反省。性別與空間之研究、教學與政策十年回顧與前瞻，台北:
19. 彭渰雯(1996)。記錄五四新女廁運動。空間，83，33-35。