题名

非常規性實踐的性別化態度:男「性」特權、性別分工和婚家體制的角色

并列篇名

Gendered Attitudes Toward Non-Conforming Sexual Practices in Taiwan: The Impacts of Male Sexual Privileges, Sexual Division of Labor, and Familism

DOI

10.6255/JWGS.2017.40.53

作者

王維邦(Wei-Pang Wang);陳美華(Mei-Hua Chen)

关键词

非常規性實踐 ; 異性戀常規性 ; 同居 ; 同性戀 ; 婚外性 ; 性別 ; non-conforming sexual practices ; heteronormativity ; cohabitation ; homosexual ; extramarital sex ; gender

期刊名称

女學學誌:婦女與性別研究

卷期/出版年月

40期(2017 / 06 / 01)

页次

53 - 105

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

台灣民眾是否對婚外性、同居、同性戀等非常規性實踐抱持不同態度?其中是否蘊涵性別差異?又與哪些因素有關?本文運用「2012台灣社會變遷調查:六期三次性別組」來回答前述問題,並發現:國人對非常規性實踐的開放度,由高至低是同居、同性戀和婚外性。其中,男女對同居的態度無顯著差異,但男性的婚外性開放度顯著高於女性,女性的同性戀開放度則顯著高於男性。接著,男「性」特權、傳統性別分工以及傳統婚家體制等三組假設皆部分說明非常規性實踐的性別化態度。在婚外性開放度上,男「性」特權假設獲得廣泛支持,傳統性別分工和傳統婚家體制假設的支持相對有限。在同性戀開放度上,三套假設皆獲得驗證。由於男「性」特權有效說明婚外性的性別化態度,加以男性較低的同性戀開放度,因此,如何鬆動異性戀常規性成為促進台灣性/別多元的關鍵。

英文摘要

This study investigates whether Taiwanese men and women demonstrate different attitudes toward non-conforming sexual practices such as extramarital sex permissiveness (EMS), cohabitation and homosexuality, and examines the mechanisms that shape these gendered attitudes. Using the 2012 Taiwan Social Change Survey, this study presents the following major findings. First, cohabitation is the most accepted non- conforming sex in Taiwan, then homosexuality, and EMS as the least accepted. Furthermore, men and women share a similar attitude toward cohabitation; however, they display opposite attitudes toward EMS and homosexuality; i e. Taiwanese men are more approving of EMS and disapproving of homosexuality, and vice versa for women. Finally, the gendered attitudes toward non-conforming sex are partially resulted from male sexual privileges, sexual division of labor, and familism. Male sexual privileges are the strong links between sex and EMS permissiveness. In addition, gendered attitudes toward homosexuality are substantially explained by male sexual privileges, sexual division of labor, and familism. As male sexual privileges underline men's acceptance of EMS, and men are less likely to accept homosexuality, changing heteronormativity is an essential approach to achieve gender equality.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 朱偉誠(1998)。台灣同志運動的後殖民思考:論「現身」問題。台灣社會研究季刊,30,35-62。
    連結:
  2. 張晉芬、李奕慧(2007)。「女人的家事」、「男人的家事」:家事分工性別化的持續與解釋。人文及社會科學集刊,19(2),203-229。
    連結:
  3. 畢恆達(2003)。男性性別意識之形成。應用心理研究,17,51-84。
    連結:
  4. 畢恆達(2003)。男同性戀與父母:現身的考量、策略、時機與後果。女學學誌,15,37-78。
    連結:
  5. 陳昭如(2010)。婚姻作為法律上的異性戀父權與特權。女學學誌,27,113-199。
    連結:
  6. 彭莉惠(2004)。女性婚外情慾的處境與蘊含。女學學誌,18,39-107。
    連結:
  7. 黃長玲(2001)。從婦女保障名額到性別比例原則:兩性共治的理論與實踐。問題與研究,40(3),69-82。
    連結:
  8. 黃淑玲(2003)。男子性與喝花酒文化:以Bourdieu 的性別支配理論為分析架構。台灣社會學,5,72-132。
    連結:
  9. 黃淑玲、李思賢、趙運植(2012)。台灣人性態度與性價值觀分析:性別、世代與三種集群的差異。台灣性學學刊,18(1),83-114。
    連結:
  10. 楊文山、李怡芳(2016)。步入成人初期之台灣年輕人性傾向之研究。調查研究,35,47-79。
    連結:
  11. Abelove, Henry(Ed.),Barale, Michele Aina(Ed.),Halperin, David M.(Ed.)(1993).The lesbian and gay studies reader.New York:Routledge.
  12. Adamczyk, Amy,Cheng, Yen-hsin Alice(2015).Explaining attitudes about homosexuality in Confucian and non-Confucian nations: Is there a "cultural" influence?.Social Science Research,51,276-289.
  13. Aneshensel, Carol S.(Ed.),Phelan, Jo C.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of the sociology of mental health.New York:Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers.
  14. Bengtson, Vern L.(Ed.),Acock, Alan C.(Ed.),Allen, Katherine R.(Ed.),Dilworth-Anderson, Peggye(Ed.),Klein, David M.(Ed.)(2005).Sourcebook of family theory and research.Thousand Oaks:Sage.
  15. Cheng, Yen-hsin Alice,Wu, Fen-chieh Felice,Adamczyk, Amy(2016).Changing attitudes toward homosexuality in Taiwan, 1995-2012.Chinese Sociological Review,48(4),317-349.
  16. Cherlin, Andrew J.(2004).The deinstitutionalization of American marriage.Journal of Marriage and Family,66(4),848-861.
  17. Christopher, F. Scott,Sprecher, Susan(2000).Sexuality in marriage, dating, and other relationships: A decade review.Journal of Marriage and Family,62(4),999-1017.
  18. Connell, Raewyn(1995).Masculinities.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  19. Connell, Raewyn(2002).Gender.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  20. De Stefano, Jack,Oala, Monica(2008).Extramarital affairs: Basic considerations and essential tasks in clinical work.The Family Journal,16(13),13-19.
  21. Fuss, Diana(1991).Inside/out: Lesbian theories, gay theories.New York:Routledge.
  22. Gagnon, John H.,Simon, William(1973).Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality.Chicago:Aldine.
  23. Giddens, Anthony(1992).The transformation of intimacy.Cambridge:Polity Press.
  24. Glass, Shirley P.,Wright, Thomas L.(1977).The relationship of extramarital sex, length of marriage, and sex differences on marital satisfaction and romanticism: Athanasiou's data reanalyzed.Journal of Marriage and Family,39(4),691-703.
  25. Glass, Shirley P.,Wright, Thomas L.(1992).Justifications for extramarital relationships: The association between attitudes, behaviors, and gender.The Journal of Sex Research,29(3),361-387.
  26. Herek, Gregory M.(2000).The psychology of sexual prejudice.Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(1),19-22.
  27. Herek, Gregory M.(2002).Gender gap in public opinion about lesbians and gay men.The Public Opinion Quarterly,66(1),40-66.
  28. Hochschild, Arlie,Machung, Anne(2003).The second shift.New York:Penguin Books.
  29. Ingraham, Chrys(1994).The heterosexual imaginary: Feminist sociology and theories of gender.Sociological Theory,12(2),203-219.
  30. Jackson, Stevi(1999).Heterosexuality in question.London:Sage.
  31. Jackson, Stevi,Scott, Sue(2010).Theorizing sexuality.Berkshire:Open University Press.
  32. Jamieson, Lynn(1999).Intimacy transformed?.Sociology,33(3),477-494.
  33. Kerns, John G.,Fine, Mark A.(1994).The relation between gender and negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: Do gender role attitudes mediate this relation?.Sex Roles,31,297-307.
  34. Kiernan, Kathleen(2004).Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe.Law and Policy,26(1),33-55.
  35. Kimmel, Michael S.(Ed.),Messner, Michael A.(Ed.)(1995).Men's lives.London:Allyn and Bacon.
  36. LaMar, Lisa,Kite, Mary(1998).Sex differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: A multidimensional perspective.The Journal of Sex Research,35(2),189-196.
  37. Laner, Mary Riege,Laner, Roy H.,Palmer, C. Eddie(1978).Permissive attitudes toward sexual behaviors: A clarification of theoretical explanations.The Journal of Sex Research,14(3),137-144.
  38. Laumann, Edward O.,Gagnon, John H.,Michael, Robert T.,Michaels, Stuart(2000).The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States.London:University of Chicago Press.
  39. Lawson, Annette,Samson, Colin(1988).Age, gender and adultery.The British Journal of Sociology,39(3),409-440.
  40. Lehr, Valerie(1999).Queer family values: Debunking the myth of the nuclear family.Philadelphia:Temple University Press.
  41. Loftus, Jeni(2001).America's liberalization in attitudes toward homosexuality, 1973 to 1998.American Sociological Review,66(5),762-782.
  42. MacKinnon, Catharine A.(1989).Toward a feminist theory of state.Cambridge:Harvard University Press.
  43. McLelland, Mark(Ed.),Mackie, Vera(Ed.)(2014).Routledge handbook of sexuality studies in East Asia.London:Routledge.
  44. Pateman, Carole(1988).The sexual contract.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
  45. Reiss, Ira L.,Anderson, Ronald E.,Sponaugle, G. C.(1980).A multivariate model of the determinants of extramarital sexual permissiveness.Journal of Marriage and Family,42(2),395-411.
  46. Rich, Adrienne(1980).Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence.Journal of Women's History,15(3),11-48.
  47. Richardson, Diane(Ed.),Seidman, Steven(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of lesbian and gay studies.London:Sage.
  48. Richardson, Laurel(1988).Secrecy and status: The social construction of forbidden relationships.American Sociological Review,53(2),209-219.
  49. Sakalli, Nuray(2002).Application of the attribution-value model of prejudice to homosexuality.The Journal of Social Psychology,142(2),264-271.
  50. Scott, Jacqueline(1998).Changing attitudes to sexual morality: A cross-nation comparison.Sociology,32(4),815-845.
  51. Seidman, Steven(2003).The social construction of sexuality.New York:Norton.
  52. Shen, Hsiu-Hua(2005)."The first Taiwanese wives" and "the Chinese mistresses": The international division of labour in familial and intimate relations across the Taiwan strait.Global Networks,5(4),419-437.
  53. Smart, Carol(Ed.),Smart, Barry(Ed.)(1978).Women, sexuality and social control.London:Routledge and Kaegan Paul.
  54. Solstad, Kim,Mucic, Davor(1999).Extramarital sexual relationships of middle-aged Danish men: Attitudes and behavior.Maturitas,32,51-59.
  55. Stacey, Judith(2011).Unhitched: Love, marriage, and family values from west Hollywood to western China.New York:New York University Press.
  56. Thompson, Anthony P.(1983).Extramarital sex: A review of the research literature.The Journal of Sex Research,19(1),1-22.
  57. Thronton, Arland,Young-DeMarco, Linda(2001).Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: 1960s through the 1990s.Journal of Marriage of Family,63(4),1009-1037.
  58. Tiefer, Leonore(1986).In pursuit of the perfect penis: The medicalization of male sexuality.American Behavioral Scientist,29,579-599.
  59. Treas, Judith,Giesen, Deirdre(2000).Sexual infidelity among married and cohabiting.Journal of Marriage and Family,62(1),48-60.
  60. Weeks, Jeffrey(2003).Sexuality.London:Routlege.
  61. Weeks, Jeffrey,Heaphy, Brian,Donovan, Catherine(2001).Same sex intimacies: Families of choices and other life experiments.London:Routlege.
  62. Widmer, Eric D.,Treas, Judith,Newcomb, Robert(1998).Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries.The Journal of Sex Research,35(4),349-358.
  63. 女性學學會編(1995)。台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995 年。台北:時報。
  64. 伊慶春(2014)。台灣家庭代間關係的持續與改變:資源與規範的交互作用。社會學研究,3,189-215。
  65. 何春蕤(1994)。豪爽女人。台北:皇冠。
  66. 吳明燁、伊慶春(2003)。婚姻不只是婚姻:家庭因素對於婚姻滿意度的影響。人口學刊,26,71-95。
  67. 張娟芬(1998)。看不見的同志:檢視民法的同性戀歧視。第三屆全國婦女國是會議論文集
  68. 陳瑤華編(2014)。台灣婦女處境白皮書:2014年。台北:女書。
  69. 黃榮堅(1994)。論通姦罪的除罪化。律師通訊,182,51-56。
  70. 楊靜利(2004)。同居的生育意涵與同居人數估計。台灣社會學刊,32,189-213。
  71. 楊靜利、陳寬政、李大正(2012)。近二十年來的家庭結構變遷。台灣的社會變遷 1985-2005:家庭與婚姻,台北:
  72. 劉兆佳編、尹寶珊編、李明堃編、黃紹倫編(1998)。華人社會的變貌:社會指標的分析。香港:香港中文大學香港亞太研究所。
  73. 蕭英玲(2005)。台灣的家務分工:經濟依賴與性別的影響。台灣社會學刊,34,115-145。
被引用次数
  1. 陳昭如(2020)。通姦無罪,婚姻萬歲-從司法院釋字第七九一號解釋論大法官的新婚姻制度保障論。婦研縱橫,113,36-59。
  2. 黃金蘭,林瑋芳,李怡青(2021)。婚姻平權議題之支持方與反對方的心理特性差異:以字詞分析為取向。教育心理學報,53(1),109-126。
  3. 陸洛,張婷婷,高旭繁(2021)。生理性別、性別角色取向在職家互動的作用:三階調節效果的檢驗。臺大管理論叢,31(3),1-46。
  4. 謝文宜,曾秀雲(2020)。伴侶不忠的信任危機處理歷程。家庭教育與諮商學刊,23,1-37。
  5. 謝文宜,曾秀雲(2021)。婚姻關係的信任修復與重建。教育心理學報,52(3),619-642。
  6. (2018)。未婚同居異性親密關係暴力與女性倖存者。社區發展季刊,164,429-443。
  7. (2023)。家庭經驗、社群互動以及學校對國中生性別平等觀念之影響。教育研究學報,57(2),27-42。