题名

協作還是控制?當性別化的暖照顧遇上冷科技

并列篇名

Collaboration or Control? When Gendered Warm Care Meets Cold Technology

DOI

10.6255/JWGS.202212_(51).03

作者

周宇翔(Yu-Hsiang Chou);王舒芸(Shu-Yung Brenda Wang)

关键词

照顧科技 ; 長期照顧 ; 勞動控制 ; 性別 ; 照顧工作 ; care technology ; long-term care ; labor control ; gender ; care work

期刊名称

女學學誌:婦女與性別研究

卷期/出版年月

51期(2022 / 12 / 01)

页次

109 - 149

内容语文

繁體中文;英文

中文摘要

本文旨在探討長照機構引進照顧科技後,對以女性為主的長照服務人員,所形成的勞動過程影響與變化。本研究採質性研究,運用訪談法、立意取樣13位長照機構人員、2位科技業者以及1位實務專家。研究發現,照顧科技與照顧工作之間,具有協作與控制共存的雙元關係。一方面,照顧科技可成為女性照顧服務員身體工作「去性化」的策略,避免性騷擾,以及讓照顧工作擺脫低價值與去專業化的困境,同時亦可與長照服務人員共譜勞心與勞力的分工協作。不過,不同於中上層管理階層對管理效益的期待,基層勞動者被迫處於照顧科技無所不在的監測環境中,面對官僚與技術等不同型態的勞動控制。換言之,本研究看見不同勞動位階的女性長照服務人員對照顧科技的聲音並非一致,存在階層化的利益衝突。面對這些困境,本文認為Tronto(2013)提出的「照顧民主化」是一個可能解方,有賴國家建立機制,引入關於照顧反思的民主審議機制。

英文摘要

This study explores the impact on and changes in the labor of long-term care staff, mainly consisting of women, due to the introduction of new technology into long-term care institutions. Qualitative research is conducted, using interview methods and purposive sampling of 13 long-term care workers, two technology industry advisors, and one experienced expert in this field. In doing so, it found a contradictory co-existing relationship of collaboration and control between technology and care work. First, technology can be deemed a strategy to "de-gender" the body of female care workers. It can prevent sexual harassment, alleviate low value and de-professionalization in care work, and complement the mental and physical efforts of the long-term care staff. However, contrary to the effects expected from the management level, workers were subjected to varying bureaucratic and technical labor control methods under technological supervision and were forced to perform in a ubiquitously monitored environment. In other words, female long-term care workers in different positions of the labor hierarchy had different opinions on technology, showing a hierarchical interest conflict. Given these difficulties, this article believes that the "caring democracy" proposed by Tronto (2013) is a possible solution, one which would rely on a national system to introduce a deliberative democracy system for reflection on and reform of long-term care.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會學
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 王品(2019)。在「照顧」上,看得見與看不見的性別差異。婦研縱橫,110,14-23。
    連結:
  2. 王淑英,張盈堃(1999)。托育工作女性化及相關政策檢視。婦女與兩性學刊,10,167-194。
    連結:
  3. 吳育仁(2011)。勞動過程與勞動主體性:地方記者職場勞動之政治經濟分析。社會政策與社會工作學刊,15(1),1-37。
    連結:
  4. 姜貞吟(2010)。國家與性別:臺灣照顧政策性別化探析。國家發展研究,10(1),1-34。
    連結:
  5. 梁莉芳(2019)。從權利觀點到女性主義關懷倫理:遷移勞動力脈絡下的照顧工作。婦研縱橫,110,24-33。
    連結:
  6. 陳正芬,王增勇(2017)。正式與非正式照顧的協作:探討家庭外籍看護工進入護理之家的現象。臺大社會工作學刊,35,137-182。
    連結:
  7. 黃綉雯,張恒豪,唐文慧(2016)。性別與專業交織的照顧工作:特殊教育助理員的建制民族誌分析。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,39,1-58。
    連結:
  8. 楊芳雅,吳柏霖,徐慧莊(2021)。薪資政策為求職吸引力的良藥嗎?以長期照顧產業為導向之研究。管理實務與理論研究,15(1),56-67。
    連結:
  9. 廖珮宏,康仕仲(2022)。隱形輔助科技創造精準照護思維與實現。護理雜誌,69(2),19-24。
    連結:
  10. 趙彥寧(2015)。餘命治理下的生死界閾照顧倫理─以老年就養榮民為研究案例。台灣社會研究季刊,100,53-90。
    連結:
  11. 趙懋武,謝嫣娉,葉怡嘉,蔡玉純,張世杰(2015)。長期照顧機構照服員生活滿意度與工作中輔具使用之關聯性探討。若瑟醫護雜誌,9(1),7-19。
    連結:
  12. 劉毓秀(2011)。北歐普及照顧與充分就業政策及其決策機制的台灣轉化。女學學誌:婦女與性別研究,29,1-77。
    連結:
  13. Baines, Donna,van den Broek, Diane(2017).Coercive care: Control and coercion in the restructured care workplace.The British Journal of Social Work,47(1),125-142.
  14. Barnard, Alan,Gerber, Rod(1999).Understanding technology in contemporary surgical nursing: A phenomenographic examination.Nursing Inquiry,6(3),157-166.
  15. Betriana, Feni,Tanioka, Tetsuya,Osaka, Kyoko,Kawai, Chihiro,Yasuhara, Yuko,Locsin, Rozzano C.(2021).Interactions between healthcare robots and older people in Japan: A qualitative descriptive analysis study.Japan Journal of Nursing Science,18(3),12409.
  16. Brown, Kenneth,Korczynski, Marek(2010).When caring and surveillance technology meet: Organizational commitment and discretionary effort in home care work.Work and Occupations,37(3),404-432.
  17. Brugère, Fabienne(2020).Caring democracy as a solution against neoliberalism and populism.Care ethics, democratic citizenship and the state,Cham:
  18. Cohen, Rachel Lara,Wolkowitz, Carol(2018).The feminization of body work.Gender, Work & Organization,25(1),42-62.
  19. Cronqvist, Agneta,Theorell, Töres,Burns, Tom,Lützén, Kim(2004).Caring about--caring for: moral obligations and work responsibilities in intensive care nursing.Nurs Ethics,11(1),63-76.
  20. Dahl, Hanne Marlene,Rasmussen, Bente(2012).Paradoxes in elderly care: The nordic model.Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning, and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective,Copenhagen:
  21. Edwards, Richard(1979).Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century.London:Heinemann.
  22. Folbre, Nancy,Gautham, Leila,Smith, Kristin(2023).Gender inequality, bargaining, and pay in care services in the United States.International Journal of Medical Informatics,76(1),86-111.
  23. Folbre, Nancy,Wright, Erik Olin(2012).Defining Care.For love and money: Care provision in the United States,New York:
  24. Frennert, Susanne(2023).Moral distress and ethical decision-making of eldercare professionals involved in digital service transformation.Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology,18(2),156-165.
  25. Hawley-Hague, Helen,Boulton, Elisabeth,Hall, Alex,Pfeiffer, Klaus,Todd, Chris(2014).Older adults’ perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: A systematic review.Int J Med Inform,83(6),416-426.
  26. Hvid, Helge Søndergaard,Kamp, Annette(2012).The future of elderly care: beyond New Public Management?.Elderly care in transition: Management, meaning and identity at work. A Scandinavian perspective,Copenhagen:
  27. Ishiguro, Nobu(2018).Care robots in Japanese elderly care: Cultural values in focus.The Routledge handbook of social care work around the world,London:
  28. Kress, Lea, Aysha Siddika, and Marie Huntley Andersen (2018/12/18). Current realities and future trends in elderly care: The case of Danish care professionals. Retrieved from https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/63751536/Complete_project_final.pdf.
  29. Leira, Arnlaug,Saraceno, Chiara(2002).Care: Actors, relationships and contexts.Contested concepts in gender and social politics,Cheltenham:
  30. Milligan, Christine,Mort, Maggie,Roberts, Celia(2010).Cracks in the door? Technology and the shifting topology of care.New technologies and emerging spaces of care dwelling: Bodies, technologies and home,Surrey:
  31. Milligan, Christine,Wiles, Janine(2010).Landscapes of care.Progress in Human Geography,34(6),736-754.
  32. Noon, Mike,Blyton, Paul(2007).The realities of work: Experiencing work and employment in contemporary society.New York:Palgrave.
  33. Parks, Jennifer A.(2010).Lifting the burden of women’s care work: Should robots replace the “Human Touch”?.Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy,25(1),100-120.
  34. Pol, Margriet,van Nes, Fenna,van Hartingsveldt, Margo,Buurman, Bianca,de Rooij, Sophia,Kröse, Ben(2016).Older people’s perspectives regarding the use of sensor monitoring in their home.The Gerontologist,56(3),485-493.
  35. Pols, Jeannette(2012).Care at a distance: On the closeness of technology.Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press.
  36. Pols, Jeannette,Moser, Ingunn(2009).Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies.Alter,3(2),159-178.
  37. Rieland, Randy (2017/3/27). How will artificial intelligence help the aging? The key, researchers say, is finding the right roles for machines. Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/how-will-artificialintelligence-help-aging-180962682/.
  38. Roberts, Celia,Mort, Maggie,Milligan, Christine(2013).Care work and new technologies of care for older people living at home.The SAGE handbook of aging, work and society,London:
  39. Rosen, Rachel(2019).Care as ethic, care as labor.Theorizing feminist ethics of care in early childhood practice: Possibilities and dangers,London:
  40. São José, José de(2016).What are we talking about when we talk about care? A conceptual review of the literature.Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas,81,57-74.
  41. Shulzhenko, Elena,Holmgren, Jens(2020).Gains from resistance: Rejection of a new digital technology in a healthcare sector workplace.New Technology, Work and Employment,35(3),276-296.
  42. Stensöta, Helena O.(2020).Democratic care ‘for all’ and trade-offs: The public solution, civil society and the market.International Journal of Care and Caring,4(1),75-89.
  43. Stone, Deborah(2000).Caring by the book.Care work: Gender, labor, and the welfare state,New York:
  44. Strauss, Anselm,Corbin, Juliet,徐宗國(譯)(1990).質性研究概論.台北:巨流.
  45. Thygesen, Hilde(2009).Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture (TIK), University of Oslo.
  46. Tronto, Joan C.(2010).Creating caring institutions: Politics, plurality, and purpose.Ethics and Social Welfare,4(2),158-171.
  47. Tronto, Joan C.(2013).Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice.New York:New York University Press.
  48. Tronto, Joan C.(2011).A feminist democratic ethics of care and global care workers: Citizenship and responsibility.Feminist ethics and social policy: Towards a new global political economy of care,Vancouver:
  49. Williams, Fiona(2018).Care: Intersections of scales, inequalities and crises.Current Sociology,66(4),547-561.
  50. Wright, James(2018).Tactile care, mechanical Hugs: Japanese caregivers and robotic lifting devices.Asian Anthropology,17(1),24-39.
  51. Wright, James(2019).Robots vs migrants? Reconfiguring the future of Japanese institutional eldercare.Critical Asian Studies,51(3),331-354.
  52. Zwijsen, Sandra A,F I A Depla, Marja,Niemeijer, Alistair R,Francke, Anneke L,Hertogh, Cees M P M(2012).Surveillance technology: An alternative to physical restraints? A qualitative study among professionals working in nursing homes for people with dementia.International Journal of Nursing Studies,49(2),212-219.
  53. 王潔媛(2019)。「沒有她們、我們關門」:外籍看護工在小型長照機構的勞動實踐。工作的身體性:服務與文化產業的性別與勞動展演,高雄:
  54. 行政院性別平等會(2023 年 1 月 3 日),〈指標名稱/老人長期照護、養護及安養機構工作人員數〉,《重要性別統計資料庫》。取自 https://www.gender.ey.gov.tw/gecdb/Stat_Statistics_DetailData.aspx?sn=PsKAvsFoXLFcIub5I5r!GA%40%40&d=m9ww9odNZAz2Rc5Ooj%24wIQ%40%40。
  55. 明勇(2017)。論照顧服務員未來專業職能發展的可能性。臺灣老人保健學刊,13(1&2),64-74。
  56. 林秋芬(2015)。性別觀點下的長期照護議題。醫療品質雜誌,9(6),94-97。
  57. 林綠紅(2020)。性別觀點下的長期照顧。醫療品質雜誌,14(1),64-66。
  58. 張晉芬(2013).勞動社會學.台北:政大出版社.
  59. 郭俊巖,李綉梅,胡慧嫈,蔡盈修,周文蕊,賴秦瑩(2015)。臺灣老人長期照顧體系下居家照顧服務員職場風險之研究。台灣社區工作與社區研究學刊,5(1),129-169。
  60. 楊培珊(2000)。女性居家照顧服務員工作中遭受性騷擾之經驗探討。臺大社會工作學刊,2,97-149。
  61. 葉怡廷(2019)。「每個人的身體都不一樣」:居家照顧服務中的身體工作。工作的身體性:服務與文化產業的性別與勞動展演,高雄: