Curriculum Integration: A Many-Headed Monster?

10.6357/CCES.200304.0021

David Bridges

中正教育研究

1卷1期（2002 / 04 / 01）

21 - 47

英文

本論文首先提及此刻正在中華民國實施的一些教育政策的改革，明顯的愈來愈需要課程的統整及連貫性。接下來，作者論及四種檢視「課程統整」概念的原則：統合效率與效用的課程，知識連貫性的課程、學生中心課程、社會統整的課程；作者最後又加上第五原則：課程統整是權力重新分配。作者引用了許多英國在課程統整上的經驗及理論，以期能點出可能潛藏在課程發展的不種形式中的問題。

This paper starts with several references to educational policy in the Republic of China which calls for greater integration of the school curriculum. It observes four different ways in which the notion of curriculum integration has been used as a principle of curriculum organisation: • the co-ordinated curriculum-driven by a desire for educational efficiency and effectiveness and cross curricular planning; • the unified curriculum-driven by epistemological commitments to do with the essential unity of knowledge; • the student centred curriculum-driven in particular by a commitment to constructivist psychology and learning theories; • socially integrated curriculum-driven by a desire to connect school learning to the world outside; and then adds a fifth set of considerations to do with; • curriculum integration as a re-distribution of power-not necessarily an intended consequence, but one, nevertheless which the curriculum reformer will be wise to recognise. The paper draws on theoretical writing and in particular experience of these forms of curriculum integration in the United Kingdom as a resource to identify some of the potential problems and possibilities inherent in these forms of curriculum development.

1. 王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，44(1)，173-199。
   連結：
2. 陳啟榮(2005)。家長參與學校事務議題之評析。學校行政雙月刊，36，140-147。
   連結：
3. Abbott, A.(1988).The system of professions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
4. Addi-Raccah, A.,Arviv-Elyashiv, R.(2008).Parent empowerment and teacher professionalism-teachers' perspective.Urban Education,43(3),394-415.
5. Asli, U.(2008).Elementary preservice teachers' opinions about parental involvement in elementary children's education.Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies,24(3),807-817.
6. Bacharach, S. B.,Mundell, B. L.(1993).Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action.Educational Administration Quartely,29(4),423-452.
7. Ball, S. J.(1987).The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization.London:Methuen.
8. Bauch, P. A.,Goldring, E. B.(1998).Parent-teacher participation in the context of school governance.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),15-35.
9. Blase, J.(1989).The micropolotics of the school: The everyday political perspective of teachers toward open school pricipals.Educational Administrative Quarterly,25(4),377-407.
10. Blase, J. (Ed.)(1991).The politics of life in schools: Power conflict, and cooperation.Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press.
11. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(1995).The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment.London:Cassell.
12. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(2002).The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),6-44.
13. Corbett, H. D.,J. Blase (Ed.)(1991).The politics life in school: Power, conflict and cooperation.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
14. Crowson, R. L.(1998).A conversation about professionalism and community.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),69-88.
15. Crowson, R. L.(1998).Community Empowerment and the public schools: Can educational professionalism survive?.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),56-68.
16. Eagleton, T.(1991).Ideology.London:Verso.
17. Eilertsen, T. V.,Gustafson, N.,Salo, P.(2008).Action research and the micropolitics in schools.Educational Action Research,16(3),295-308.
18. Feir, R. E.(1985).The structureof school: Teachers and authority.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED257806
19. Fenwick, T. J.(2001).Teacher supervision through professional growth plan: Balancing contradictions and opening possibilities.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(3),401-424.
20. Foucault, M.,L. D. Kritzman (Ed.)(1988).Foucault: Polities. philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings 1977-1984.New York and London:Routledge.
21. Freidson, E.(1986).Professional power.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
22. Hargreaves, A.(2001).The emotional geographies of teaching.Teachers College Record,103(6),1056-1080.
23. Hargreaves, A.,Fullan, M.(1998).What's worth fighting for out there?.Toronto:Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
24. Hargreaves, A.,Goodson, I. F.,A. Hargreaves (Eds.),I. F. Goodson (Eds.)(1996).Teachers' professional lives.London:Falmer Press.
25. Hargreaves, D. H.(1994).The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development.Teaching & Teacher Education,10(4),423-438.
26. Hess, G. A.(1992).Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists.Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvey.
27. Holye, E.(1986).The politics of school management.London:Hodder & Stroughton.
28. Johnson, B.(2004).Local school micropolitical agency: An antidote to new managerialism.Magill, Australia: Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 26..
29. Lareau, A.(2000).Home advantage.London:Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Lasky, S.(2000).The cultural and emotional politics of teacher-parent interactions.Teaching and Teacher Education,16,843-860.
31. Lawler, S. D.(1991).Parent-teacher conferencing in early childhood education.NBA Early Childhood Education Series. ERIC Document Reproducation Service No. ED 343690.
32. Lindle, J. C.(1999).What can the study of micropolitics contcibute to the practice of leadership in reforming schools?.School Leadership and Management,19(2),171-178.
33. Malen, B.,J. D. Scribner (Eds.),D. H. Layton (Eds.)(1995).The study of educational politics.Bristol, PA:Paler Press.
34. Marshall, C.,Scribner, J. D.(1991).It's all politics.Education and Urban Society,23,347-355.
35. Mawhinney, H.(1999).Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micro-politics of leadership iii reforming schools.School Leadership and Management,19(2),159-170.
36. Morgan, G.(1986).Images of organization.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
37. Pratte, R.,Rury, J. L.(1991).Teachers, professionalism, and craft.Teachers CollegeRecord,93(1),59-72.
38. Raielin, J. A.(1989).How to give your teachers autonomy without losing control.Executive Educator,11(2),19-20.
39. Shor, I.(1992).Empowering education.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
40. Vincent, C.,J. Collins (Eds.),D. Cook (Eds.)(2001).Understanding learning.London:The Open University.
41. Vincent, C.,Tomlinson, S.(1997).Home-school relationships: "The swarmin of disciplinary mechanixms"?.British Educational Research Journal,23(3),361-377.
42. Whitty, G.(2006).Teacher professionalism in a new era.Paper presented at the first General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland Annual Lecture.
43. Wolfendale, S.(1992).Empowering parents and teachers.New York:Cassell.
44. Wolfendale, S. (Ed.)(1989).Parental involvement: Developing networks between school, home and community.London:Cassell.
45. Woods, P.(1996).Researching the art of leaching: Ethnography of educational use.London:Routledge.
46. Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
47. 王文科、中正大學教育研究所主編(2005)。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文文化。
48. 伍鴻麟(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
49. 吳沐馨(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所。
50. 吳珍梅(2007)。學校與家庭之互動：幼兒園親師衝突中性別與權力意涵之分析。台灣女性學學會、國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所聯合舉辦之「家庭與工作：變遷現象與多元想像」學術研討會，高雄市:
51. 沈姍姍(1996)。專業主義、教師權力與教育行政體制關係：教師權力消長的動態研究。新竹師院學報，9，103-128。
52. 林君齡(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
53. 林淑芬(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所。
54. 林淑慧(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭教育研究所。
55. 洪怡芳(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣，私立輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系。
56. 胡石明(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
57. 張靜文(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系。
58. 曹常仁(1994)。親師關係之經營。國教之聲，27(3)，8-17。
59. 曹學仁(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
60. 陳幸仁(2008)。家長參與校務決策之微觀政治分析。國民教育研究學報，21，91-114。
61. 陳幸仁(2007)。微觀政治學：一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊，3，67-86。
62. 陳春梅、林淑珍(2006)。親師互動策略之探討：教師與家長的家庭功課。台北市教育局舉辦之「台北市第七屆教育專業創新與行動研究徵件暨成果發表會」高職組成果集，台北市:
63. 趙鏡中(2007)。教師專業自主的理念、衝突與實踐。研習資訊，24(5)，113-120。
64. 劉春榮(1996)。國民小學教師專業自主知覺、教師組織功能需求與教師專業承諾研究。高雄縣:復文。
65. 蔡佳珍(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
66. 鄭彩鳳(2000)。評析教育基本法有關教育中立、教育權限及全民參與的理論與實務。高雄師範大學主辦之「89年教育基本法相關議題」研討會，高雄市: