親師互動之微觀政治分析：教師專業主義vs.家長彰權益能

Micropolitical Analysis of Parent-Teacher Interaction: Teacher Professionalism vs. Parent Empowerment

10.6357/CCES.200912.0035

陳玉玫(Yu-Mei Chen)

親師互動 ； 專業主義 ； 彰權益能 ； 意識型態 ； 微觀政治 ； parent-teacher interaction ； professionalism ； micropolitics ； empowerment ； ideology

中正教育研究

8卷2期（2009 / 12 / 01）

35 - 74

繁體中文

本研究主要以微觀政治學觀點，探討教師專業主義面對家長彰權益能，在親師互動中之意識型態與微觀政治策略。研究者採質性探究方式，深度訪談6位一般市區之國小級任教師。研究結果發現，親師互動存在著意識型態衝突與各種政治策略。其獲致以下結論：教師普遍知覺到家長的彰權益能，但對其法源依據並不清楚；教師秉持著專業主義，對家長參與有一定的容忍範圍；家長彰權益能有其正用效果，亦常有誤用之衝突；教師發展出各種政治策略，以應付家長的彰權益能；教師公開透明的策略掌握制勝先機，太過順從可能損及教師專業。

This study investigates the ideologies between parent empowerment and teacher professionalism, and the micropolitical strategies of parent-teacher interaction through the micropolitical lens. The researcher examines teachers' perceptions of the implications of prarents' empowerment for teacher-parent relations and teachers' means to manage with parent empowerment. In-depth interviews with six homeroom teachers in north town elementary school reveals that teacher favor parents' involvement but also feel vulnerable to the increasing influence of parents. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: Firstly, teachers have the perceptions of parent empowerment, but most of them don't know the parents' right of law. Secondly, parents' participation is limited to zones of tolerance that teacher professionalism would allow. Thirdly, parent empowerment has positive effects, but it may also be misused and result conflicts. fourthly, teachers use various kinds of political means to cope with parent empowerment. Finally, the strategies of open communication and transparency can always be successful, and too much complying may undermine teachers' professional position.

1. 王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，44(1)，173-199。
   連結：
2. 陳啟榮(2005)。家長參與學校事務議題之評析。學校行政雙月刊，36，140-147。
   連結：
3. Abbott, A.(1988).The system of professions.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
4. Addi-Raccah, A.,Arviv-Elyashiv, R.(2008).Parent empowerment and teacher professionalism-teachers' perspective.Urban Education,43(3),394-415.
5. Asli, U.(2008).Elementary preservice teachers' opinions about parental involvement in elementary children's education.Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies,24(3),807-817.
6. Bacharach, S. B.,Mundell, B. L.(1993).Organizational politics in schools: Micro, macro, and logics of action.Educational Administration Quartely,29(4),423-452.
7. Ball, S. J.(1987).The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization.London:Methuen.
8. Bauch, P. A.,Goldring, E. B.(1998).Parent-teacher participation in the context of school governance.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),15-35.
9. Blase, J.(1989).The micropolotics of the school: The everyday political perspective of teachers toward open school pricipals.Educational Administrative Quarterly,25(4),377-407.
10. Blase, J. (Ed.)(1991).The politics of life in schools: Power conflict, and cooperation.Newbury Park, CA:Corwin Press.
11. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(1995).The micropolitics of educational leadership: From control to empowerment.London:Cassell.
12. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(2002).The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(1),6-44.
13. Corbett, H. D.,J. Blase (Ed.)(1991).The politics life in school: Power, conflict and cooperation.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
14. Crowson, R. L.(1998).Community Empowerment and the public schools: Can educational professionalism survive?.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),56-68.
15. Crowson, R. L.(1998).A conversation about professionalism and community.Peabody Journal of Education,73(1),69-88.
16. Eagleton, T.(1991).Ideology.London:Verso.
17. Eilertsen, T. V.,Gustafson, N.,Salo, P.(2008).Action research and the micropolitics in schools.Educational Action Research,16(3),295-308.
18. Feir, R. E.(1985).The structureof school: Teachers and authority.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED257806
19. Fenwick, T. J.(2001).Teacher supervision through professional growth plan: Balancing contradictions and opening possibilities.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(3),401-424.
20. Foucault, M.,L. D. Kritzman (Ed.)(1988).Foucault: Polities. philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings 1977-1984.New York and London:Routledge.
21. Freidson, E.(1986).Professional power.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
22. Hargreaves, A.(2001).The emotional geographies of teaching.Teachers College Record,103(6),1056-1080.
23. Hargreaves, A.,Fullan, M.(1998).What's worth fighting for out there?.Toronto:Ontario Public School Teachers' Federation.
24. Hargreaves, A.,Goodson, I. F.,A. Hargreaves (Eds.),I. F. Goodson (Eds.)(1996).Teachers' professional lives.London:Falmer Press.
25. Hargreaves, D. H.(1994).The new professionalism: The synthesis of professional and institutional development.Teaching & Teacher Education,10(4),423-438.
26. Hess, G. A.(1992).Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists.Westport, CT:Bergin & Garvey.
27. Holye, E.(1986).The politics of school management.London:Hodder & Stroughton.
28. Johnson, B.(2004).Local school micropolitical agency: An antidote to new managerialism.Magill, Australia: Hawke Research Institute Working Paper Series No. 26..
29. Lareau, A.(2000).Home advantage.London:Rowman & Littlefield.
30. Lasky, S.(2000).The cultural and emotional politics of teacher-parent interactions.Teaching and Teacher Education,16,843-860.
31. Lawler, S. D.(1991).Parent-teacher conferencing in early childhood education.NBA Early Childhood Education Series. ERIC Document Reproducation Service No. ED 343690.
32. Lindle, J. C.(1999).What can the study of micropolitics contcibute to the practice of leadership in reforming schools?.School Leadership and Management,19(2),171-178.
33. Malen, B.,J. D. Scribner (Eds.),D. H. Layton (Eds.)(1995).The study of educational politics.Bristol, PA:Paler Press.
34. Marshall, C.,Scribner, J. D.(1991).It's all politics.Education and Urban Society,23,347-355.
35. Mawhinney, H.(1999).Reappraisal: The problems and prospects of studying the micro-politics of leadership iii reforming schools.School Leadership and Management,19(2),159-170.
36. Morgan, G.(1986).Images of organization.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
37. Pratte, R.,Rury, J. L.(1991).Teachers, professionalism, and craft.Teachers CollegeRecord,93(1),59-72.
38. Raielin, J. A.(1989).How to give your teachers autonomy without losing control.Executive Educator,11(2),19-20.
39. Shor, I.(1992).Empowering education.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
40. Vincent, C.,J. Collins (Eds.),D. Cook (Eds.)(2001).Understanding learning.London:The Open University.
41. Vincent, C.,Tomlinson, S.(1997).Home-school relationships: "The swarmin of disciplinary mechanixms"?.British Educational Research Journal,23(3),361-377.
42. Whitty, G.(2006).Teacher professionalism in a new era.Paper presented at the first General Teaching Council for Northern Ireland Annual Lecture.
43. Wolfendale, S.(1992).Empowering parents and teachers.New York:Cassell.
44. Wolfendale, S. (Ed.)(1989).Parental involvement: Developing networks between school, home and community.London:Cassell.
45. Woods, P.(1996).Researching the art of leaching: Ethnography of educational use.London:Routledge.
46. Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
47. 王文科、中正大學教育研究所主編(2005)。質的研究方法。高雄市:麗文文化。
48. 伍鴻麟(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，台北師範學院國民教育研究所。
49. 吳沐馨(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學幼兒教育研究所。
50. 吳珍梅(2007)。學校與家庭之互動：幼兒園親師衝突中性別與權力意涵之分析。台灣女性學學會、國立高雄師範大學性別教育研究所聯合舉辦之「家庭與工作：變遷現象與多元想像」學術研討會，高雄市:
51. 沈姍姍(1996)。專業主義、教師權力與教育行政體制關係：教師權力消長的動態研究。新竹師院學報，9，103-128。
52. 林君齡(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
53. 林淑芬(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。新竹市，國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所。
54. 林淑慧(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭教育研究所。
55. 洪怡芳(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北縣，私立輔仁大學兒童與家庭學系。
56. 胡石明(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
57. 張靜文(2009)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系。
58. 曹常仁(1994)。親師關係之經營。國教之聲，27(3)，8-17。
59. 曹學仁(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。
60. 陳幸仁(2007)。微觀政治學：一個學校行政的新興研究領域。教育行政與評鑑學刊，3，67-86。
61. 陳幸仁(2008)。家長參與校務決策之微觀政治分析。國民教育研究學報，21，91-114。
62. 陳春梅、林淑珍(2006)。親師互動策略之探討：教師與家長的家庭功課。台北市教育局舉辦之「台北市第七屆教育專業創新與行動研究徵件暨成果發表會」高職組成果集，台北市:
63. 趙鏡中(2007)。教師專業自主的理念、衝突與實踐。研習資訊，24(5)，113-120。
64. 劉春榮(1996)。國民小學教師專業自主知覺、教師組織功能需求與教師專業承諾研究。高雄縣:復文。
65. 蔡佳珍(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學教育學系。
66. 鄭彩鳳(2000)。評析教育基本法有關教育中立、教育權限及全民參與的理論與實務。高雄師範大學主辦之「89年教育基本法相關議題」研討會，高雄市:

1. 陳惠雪(Hui-Hsueh Chen)(2023)。國小雙語自然教師的專業認同：「衝突」－「協調」－「再生」。教育研究集刊。(69:2)。1-48。