景觀設計專家與一般民眾對於景觀的概念比較－以水體景觀為例

Comparing Experts with General Public in the Concept of Landscape-a Case Study of Waterscape

10.7047/JLM.201012.0025

李素馨(Su-Hsin Lee)；雷祖強(Tsu-Chiang Lei)；吳仕傑(Shih-Chieh Wu)

水體景觀偏好 ； 隱喻誘引法 ； 凱利方格法 ； Waterscape preference ； Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique ZMET ； Kelly repertory grid technology KRGT

運籌與管理學刊

9卷2期（2010 / 12 / 01）

25 - 35

繁體中文

人類可藉由視覺系統辨認出環境中景物的位置、形狀、色彩等等景觀元素，更進一步的喚起高層次的認知與情感。對於景觀設計實務而言，景觀設計專家依據理論所提供的設計範本，與一般民眾在使用上的真正需求是否一致，會直接的影響此作品的成功與否。因此，本研究個別訪談18名專家以及16名一般民眾，以ZMET圖像誘引的半結構訪談方式，萃取出受訪者更多更深層的概念。爲了能更進一步瞭解兩群組的概念異同，本研究結合KRGT的方格比較分析，對於景觀設計專家與一般民眾的相同性與差異性做一比較分析。結果顯示，在景觀設計專家與一般民眾的概念系統中，除了共同提及的部分外，專家較著重於設計的「過程」，而民眾較注意的是設計的「結果」。而在方格比較上，可明顯的看出景觀設計專家與一般民眾對彼此概念分布的差異性。此結果可與景觀設計實務結合，或許可以對於人們對於環境的感知有更進一步的瞭解。

Human can identify location, feature, shape, color and other landscape elements via visual system. In landscape design practice, however, do the theoretical-based landscape design which experts provided is the same as the needs by public can directly affects the success of a work. Therefore, this study has collected data from 18 experts and 16 public which ZMET semi-structured interview is used to extract a deeper concept. In order to find out the common and difference of landscape design concepts from these groups, a comparative analysis is studied by using ZMET and KRGT. Results showed that experts have focused on the ”process” of a design, while public have paid more attention to the ”results” of a design. Hence, the concept of distribution is clearly differentiated between these groups via using grid analysis. In conclusion, the result of the study not only can be used as a reference in landscape design, but provides an understanding of environment perception to the public.

1. Coulter, R. H.,Zaltman, G.(1994).Using the Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique to Understand Brand Image.Advances in Consumer Research,21(1),501-507.
2. Fisher, S.(1972).A 'Distraction Effect' of Noise Bursts.Perception,1(2),223-236.
3. Gwendolyn, Catchings-Castello(2000).The ZMET Alternative.Marketing Research,12(2),6-12.
4. Kaplan, R.,Kaplan, S.(1989).The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective.NY:Cambridge University Press.
5. Kaplan, S.(1995).The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework.Journal of Environmental Psychology,15(3),169-182.
6. Kaplan, S.,Kaplan, R.(1989).Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World.Ann Arbor, MI:Ulrich's.
7. Pink, D. H.(1998).Metaphor Marketing.Fast Company,14,214.
8. Van den Berg, A. E.,Koole, S. L.,Van der Wulp, N. Y.(2003).Environmental Preference Andrestoration: (How) Are They Related?.Journal of Environmental Psychology,23(2),135-146.
9. Yang, B. E.,Brown, T. J.(1992).A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Preference for Landscape Styles and Landscape Elements.Environment and Behavior,24(4),471-507.
10. Zaltman, G.(1997).Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In.Journal of Marketing Research,34(4),424-437.
11. Zaltman, G.(2003).How Customers Think: Essential Insights Into the Mind of the Market.Boston, MA:Harvard Business School Press.
12. Zaltman, G.,Coulter(1995).Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-based Advertising Research.Journal of Advertising Research,35(4),35-51.
13. 高博詮(2002)。教育研究法：焦點團體訪談法。教育學術新知，103，101-110。
14. 張俊彥、洪佳君(2001)。景觀元素與生心理反應之研究。造園學報，9(2)，107-120。
15. 曾慈慧、凌德麟、毛慧芬(2002)。景觀環境的偏好、心理效益認知與生心理反應之研究。造園學報，8(2)，25-44。
16. 鄭斐娟(1999)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所。

1. 黃綉涵、高育芸、侯錦雄(2013)。場所拼貼：澎湖居民與遊客的意象地圖。造園景觀學報，19(2)，17-37。
2. 謝宗恒、郭彰仁、林尚鷁(2016)。視覺與非視覺環境偏好對景觀偏好與注意力恢復之影響。建築學報，97，99-118。
3. 鍾龍德,曾榮梅,陳逸平,陳淑英,陳金花,張芳滿,邱莉婷,林東成,吳毓純(2016)。應用ZMET建構研究生對論文題目選定之共識地圖。東方學報，36，169-182。