協議目標設定與動作觀察對網球發球技能學習效果之研究

The Research on Goal-setting Agreement and Movement Observation toward Learning Tennis Service

10.29697/JPE.200405.0010

游進達(Chin-Da Yu)；洪惠娟(Hui-Chuan Hung)；廖南凱(Nan-Kai Liao)

目標設定 ； 動作觀察 ； 網球發球 ； goal-setting ； movement-observation ； tennis service

輔仁大學體育學刊

3期（2004 / 05 / 31）

99 - 115

繁體中文

本研究為驗證協議目標設定與動作觀察兩種方法在網球發球技能教學上之可行性，乃以90位五專男生為實驗對象，將之隨機抽樣平均分配於協議目標設定練習組與控制組內，再各分成三個不同動作觀察組（自觀、他觀與綜合）內，共計六個小組，每組15人，接受為期六週，每週兩小時之網球發球技能之教學，並於教學前、後，以及介入三週之休息後，均舉行測驗，所得資料用以探討各實驗處理組網球技能的學習效果與保留效果；並進一步比較之。本研究經討論分析獲致下列結論： 一、本研究各實驗處理組學生其網球發球技能的學習效果均顯著。 二、協議目標組學生的網球發球技能學習效果均顯著優於控制組。 三、綜合組的網球發球技能學習效果均顯著優於自觀組與他觀組。 四、目標設定與動作觀察均不是影響網球發球技能保留效果之因素。

The purpose of this research was to study a possibility of teaching tennis service in two different ways: goal-setting agreement and movement observation. Subjects were ninety five-year junior college male students, averagely divided into ”goal-setting agreement practicing” and ”controlling” groups at random; and then into three groups of ”movement observation” (self-observation, others-observation, and composition). A six-week (two hours/week) teaching program about tennis service was designed for these six groups (fifteen students/team); furthermore, tests were given at the time before and after teaching and within three-week rest. The effect of learning and maintaining tennis skill for every team can be proved and compared from the data. The results under discussion and analysis were shown as follows: (1) The effect for students of every group to learn tennis service is generally evident. (2) The students of ”goal-setting agreement practicing” learn tennis service far better than those of ”controlling”. (3) The students of ”composition” learn tennis service far better than those of ”self-observation” and ”others-observation”. (4) Neither ”goal-setting” nor ”movement-observation” can influence the maintaining effect in learning tennis service.

1. Avery C. A.,Richardson P.A.,Jackson A.W.(1976).Apractical tennis serve test: Measurement of skill under simulated game conditions.Research Quarterly,50,555-564.
2. Burtio. D.(1989).The impace of goal specificity and task complexity on basketball skill development.The Sport Psychologist,3,34-47.
3. Burtion, D.(1983).Unpublished doctoral cissertation.University of Illinois.
4. Hall, H.,Byrne. T.(1988).Goal setting in spoil: Clarifying recent anomalies.Journal of Sport Psychology,10,184-198.
5. Locke, E.A.,Latham, G.P.(1984).Goal setting.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
6. Locke, E.A.,Latham, G.P.(1985).The appoication of goal setting to spoils.Journal of Sport Psychology,7,205-222.
7. Singer, R.N.(1980).Motor learning and human performance.New York:Mac-millam.
8. Singer, R.N.(1972).The psychomotor domain.Philadelphia:Lea & Fabiger co.
9. Singer, Robert N.(1968).Motor learning and human performance.London:Mcamilliam Company.
10. Stallings, L.M.(1982).Motor Learning from Theory to practice.ST. Lonis:The C.V. Mosby Company.
11. Weinberg, R.,Bruya, L.,Jackson. A.(1990).Goal setting and competition: A reaction to Hall and Byrne.Journal of sport & exercise psychology,12,92-97.
12. Weinberg, R.,Bruya, L.,Jackson. A.,Garland, H.(1987).Goal difficulty and endurance performance: A challenge to the goal attaingability assumption.Journal of Sport Behavior,10,82-92.
13. Weinberg, R.,Bruya, L.,Jackson. A.,Garland. H.(1986).Goal difficulty and endurance performance: A challenge to the goal attainability assumption.Journal of sport behavior,10(2),282-292.
14. Weinberg, R.S.,Weigand, D.(1993).Goal setting in sport and exercise: A reaction to Locke.Journal of Sport & Exercise psychology,15,88-96.
15. 吳萬福(1984)。體育還動心理實驗指引。台灣學生。
16. 卓俊伶(1987)。目標設定的方法。中華體育，4
17. 林清山(1981)。心理與教育統計學。東華。
18. 洪惠娟(1995)。協議與指定目標設定在五專男生網球對牆連續正手擊球學上之驗證研究。立宇。
19. 洪惠娟(1994)。協議目標與指定目標設定方式在網球對牆連續正手擊球教學效果之差異比較。立宇。
20. 張宗昌(1994)。不同標設定方式對運動技能學習自我表現之影響。中華民國大專院校八十二年度體育學術研討會
21. 張宗昌(1991)。目標設定法在運動訓練之應用。中華體育，20，61-70。
22. 張春興(1976)。心理學。東華。
23. 張春興、林清山(1974)。教育心理學。文景。
24. 陳益祥(1993)。明確目標與漸進目標對動作表現的影響。體育學報，16，423-436。

1. 賴世烱、林詠晴(2013)。目標設定與規律瑜珈運動對更年期婦女肌力之影響。運動與健康研究，3(1)，43-56。