大學院校橄欖球選手訓練滿意度之研究

A Study on Levels of Training Satisfaction in College Rugby Athletes

10.29697/JPE.200805.0026

林昌國(Chang-Kuo Lin)

橄欖球 ； 大學院校選手 ； 訓練滿意度 ； Rugby ； College Athletes ； Levels of Training Satisfaction

輔仁大學體育學刊

7期（2008 / 05 / 31）

304 - 325

繁體中文

The purpose of this research was to understand the college rugby athletes' satisfaction in their training. The study subjects were the 274 athletes who participated in Leagues A and B of the College Rugby Tournament in 2006. The tools of research were the questionnaires of ”Measurement Scale for Training Satisfaction of College Rugby Athletes”. Factor analysis of the questionnaires resulted in several conclusions as below: First, overall satisfaction in training reached upper medium level, and the athletes scored the highest in factor ”team rapport”, and the lowest in ”personal performance.” Second, Comparing the different background variables for the athletes with respect to their overall satisfaction, it was found that there was significant variance (p＜.05) in year grade, league, game age, and weekly practice days. Third, Comparing the different background variables for athletes on different factors, it was found that the athletes of different year grades displayed significant variance in three factors namely ”coach's competence in instruction”, ”personal performance” and ”training feedback”. The athletes of different leagues showed significant variance in ”personal performance” and ”training feedback”. The athletes of different game age only showed significant variance in ”personal performance”. The athletes who had been selected to the highest level showed significant variance in both ”coach's competence in instruction” and ”team rapport”. Athletes with different practice days per week showed significant variance in all four factors of ”training plan and facilities”, ”team rapport”, ”overall feeling on training” and ”training feedback”.

The purpose of this research was to understand the college rugby athletes' satisfaction in their training. The study subjects were the 274 athletes who participated in Leagues A and B of the College Rugby Tournament in 2006. The tools of research were the questionnaires of ”Measurement Scale for Training Satisfaction of College Rugby Athletes”. Factor analysis of the questionnaires resulted in several conclusions as below: First, overall satisfaction in training reached upper medium level, and the athletes scored the highest in factor ”team rapport”, and the lowest in ”personal performance.” Second, Comparing the different background variables for the athletes with respect to their overall satisfaction, it was found that there was significant variance (p＜.05) in year grade, league, game age, and weekly practice days. Third, Comparing the different background variables for athletes on different factors, it was found that the athletes of different year grades displayed significant variance in three factors namely ”coach's competence in instruction”, ”personal performance” and ”training feedback”. The athletes of different leagues showed significant variance in ”personal performance” and ”training feedback”. The athletes of different game age only showed significant variance in ”personal performance”. The athletes who had been selected to the highest level showed significant variance in both ”coach's competence in instruction” and ”team rapport”. Athletes with different practice days per week showed significant variance in all four factors of ”training plan and facilities”, ”team rapport”, ”overall feeling on training” and ”training feedback”.

1. 涂志賢(2000)。運動教練領導風格對選手成績表現與滿意度之影響。體育學報，28，45-58。
   連結：
2. 陳寶億、曹校章、林昌國(2007)。高中（職）橄欖球代表隊教練領導行爲與球員團隊凝聚力之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，6，87-100。
   連結：
3. Bompa, T.O.(1999).Periodization: Theory and Method of Training.Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
4. Chelladurai, P.,Riemer, H. A.(1997).A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction.Journal of Sport Management,11,133-159.
5. 王文科(1999)。教育研究法。台北市:五南圖書公司。
6. 李建平、施致平(2003)。大專網球優秀選手訓練滿意度之研究。體育學報，34，149-160。
7. 許義雄(1988)。社會變遷與體育發展。台北市:文景出版社。
8. 陳顯宗(2002)。我國合球運動員參與合球運動之動機、期望與滿意度之調查研究。台中市:信樺文化事業有限公司。
9. 黃士魁(2000)。台北市，私立中國文化大學教練研究所。
10. 黃寶雀(2001)。桃園縣，國立體育學院體育研究所。
11. 葛樹人(1991)。心理測驗學。台北市:桂冠圖書公司。
12. 劉雅燕、鄭俊傑、洪敦賓(2006)。大學院校橄欖球隊教練領導行爲與選手滿意度之研究。淡江體育，9，114-127。
13. 鄭松益(2001)。台北市，台北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。
14. 盧立仁(2003)。台北市，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。

1. 陳寶億、林昌國、陳寶億、林昌國(2010)。高中橄欖球選手訓練滿意度之研究。中華人文社會學報，12，68-82。
2. 林昌國(2011)。橄欖球運動教練專業能力之研究。輔仁大學體育學刊，10，193-211。