應用IPA模式評估台北當代藝術館之服務品質

Using Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) to Assess the Quality of Services at the Museum of Contemporary Art, Taipei

廖婉柔(Wan-Rou Liao)

台北當代藝術館 ； 服務品質 ； 重要－表現程度分析法 ； 觀眾需求 ； The Museum of Contemporary Art ； Taipei ； quality of service ； Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) ； audience's needs

科技博物

17卷1期（2013 / 03 / 01）

5 - 26

繁體中文

博物館過去所呈現的學術化、藝術化、菁英化的形象，已因人民知識水準提升及休閒時代來臨，代之而起的經營型態，是站在瞭解觀眾、順應觀眾、符合民眾需求的服務型態；本研究以台北當代藝術館作為研究範圍，探討前往台北當代藝術館之觀眾特性，並進一步深究觀眾對於服務品質現況之意見，利用簡易的管理工具－重要表現程度分析法（IPA）瞭解觀眾期望與實際表現之落差結果，以提供台北當代藝術館加強改善經營管理之參考依據。本研究問卷抽樣地點為台北當代藝術館，抽樣方式採隨機抽樣，有效問卷為200份，回收率為90.5%。研究結果顯示觀眾多以20－30歲學生族群為主，極需改善之服務屬性有「票價是否合理」、「導覽人員的導覽能力」、「交通的便利性」、「開放時間」、「環境舒適整潔而安全」以及「完善的展覽說明資料」；而供給過度之項目為「服務人員能提供詳細的展覽資訊」、「網路資訊取得方便性」，顯示已能夠滿足觀眾需求但較不受觀眾重視，故宜不需再過度強調。依據研究結果，本研究建議台北當代藝術館：增強服務環境的機能、調整現有的門票價格與開放時間、提供多元學習的服務；期望透過本研究，對台北當代藝術館現況發展有所助益，以符合觀眾期待，並使具備文化觀光功能的潛力。

With the improvement of people's knowledge level and the coming of leisure era, the academic, artistic and elite image presented by museums in the past has been replaced by the service type that understands visitors, complies with and meets their needs. This research studied the Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei to discuss its visitors' characteristics and further explored their comments on the service quality. It used Important-Performance Analysis (IPA), a simple management tool, to learn about the gap between visitors' expectation and the actual performance so as to provide a reference for the Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei to strengthen and improve its operation and management. This research conducted a questionnaire survey at the Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei through random sampling. There were 200 valid questionnaires, with 90.5% returned. The research result showed that the majority of the visitors were students aged between 20 and 30 and the services in urgent need of improvement were ”whether the ticket price is reasonable”, ”the guiding ability of the tour guides”, ”convenient transportation”, ”opening hours”, ”comfortable, clean and safe environment” and ”complete exhibition information”. ”Service personnel can provide detailed exhibition information” and ”accessibility of network information” which had been oversupplied showed that they can meet visitors' demand, but they were less valued. Therefore, they should not be emphasized any further. According to the research result, this research suggested that the Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei should enhance functions of the service environment, adjust the existing ticket prices and opening hours, provide diverse learning services, hoping this can help the Museum of Contemporary Art Taipei meet visitors' expectation and be equipped with the potential of cultural tourism.

1. 林玟伶、林詠能(2008)。台北市立美術館夜間觀眾參觀動機研究。科技博物，12(3)，5-23。
   連結：
2. 林玟伶、林詠能(2007)。收費或不收費？國立博物館門票政策探究。博物館學季刊，22(3)，55-68。
   連結：
3. 林詠能、田潔菁(2009)。邁向卓越：我國博物館評量指標建置計畫。科技博物，13(3)，39-44。
   連結：
4. Nichols, K., et al. (1998). Definition of the differentiated services field (DS Field) in the IPv4 and IPv6 Headers. RFC 2474..
5. Beard,Ragheb(1980).Measuring leisure satisfaction.Journal of Leisure Research,1,20-33.
6. Bolton, R. N.,Drew, J. H.(1991).A multistage model of customers' assessments of service quality and value.Journal of Consumer Research,17(5),75-84.
7. Burcaw, G. E.、張譽騰譯(2000)。博物館這一行。台北:五觀藝術公司。
8. Chapman, R. G.(1993).Brand performance comparatives.Journal of Products & Brand Management,2(1),42-50.
9. Cheron, E. J.,McTavish, R.,Perrien, J.(1989).Segmentation of bank commercial markets.International Journal of Bank Marketing,7(6),25-30.
10. Chu, R. K. S.,Choi, T.(2000).An importance-performance analysis of hotel selection factors in the Hong Kong hotel industry: A comparison of business and leisure travelers.Tourism Management,21,363-377.
11. Cronin,Taylor(1992).Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension.Journal of Marketing,56,55-68.
12. Deng, W.J.,Kuo, Y. F.,Chen, W. C.(2008).Revised importance-performance analysis: Three-factor theory and benchmarking.The Service Industries Journal,28(1),37-51.
13. Falk, J. H.(1998).A framework for diversifying museum audience.Museum News,77(5),36-39.
14. Hemmasi, M.,Strong, K. C.,Taylor, S.A.(1994).Measuring service quality for strategies planning and analysis in service firms.Journal of Applied Business Research,10(4),24-34.
15. Hollenhorst, S.,Olson, D.,Fortney, R.(1992).Use of importance performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: The case of the West Virginia State Park System.Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,10,1-11.
16. Kolter, N.(1999).Delivering experience: Marketing the museum's full range of assets.Museum News,May/June,33.
17. Kolter, N.,Kotler, P.(1998).Museum strategy and marketing: Designing missions, building audiences, generating revenues and resources.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
18. Kozak, M.,Nield, K.(1998).Importance-performance analysis and cultural perspectives in Romanian Black Sea resorts.Anatolia International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research,9(2),99-116.
19. Loomis, R. J.(1993).Planning for the visitor: The challenge of visitor studies.Museum visitor studies in the 90s',London:
20. Martilla, J. A.,James, J. C.(1977).Importance-performance analysis.Journal of Marketing,41(1),77-79.
21. Ostom, A.,Iacobucii, D.(1995).Consumer trade-offs and the evaluation of services.Journal of Marketing,59(January),17-30.
22. O''Sullivan, E. L.(1991).Marketing for parks, recreation, and leisure.State College, PA:Vemture Publishing.
23. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V. A.,Berry, L. L.(1988).SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality.Journal of Retailing,64(1),12-40.
24. Parasuraman, A.,Zeithaml, V.A.,Berry, L. L.(1985).A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research.Journal of Marketing,49(Fall),41-50.
25. Rowley, J.(1999).Measuring total customer experience in museums, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.Journal of Marketing,11(6),303.
26. Sampson, S. E.,Showalter, M. J.(1999).The performance-importance response function: Observations and implications.The Service Industries Journal,19,1-25.
27. Savage, G.(1996).The power of the audience.Museum Australia 1996 Conference, Power and Empowerment, Preparing for the new millennium,Sydney, Australia:
28. Singh, J.(1991).Understanding the structure of consumers' satisfaction evaluation of service Delivery.Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,19(3),223-234.
29. Weil, S. E.、張譽騰譯(2011)。博物館重要的事。台北:五觀藝術公司。
30. 李婓瑩(1999)。觀眾研究與二十一世紀博物館。美育，109，20-26。
31. 張譽騰(2003)。博物館大勢觀察。台北:五觀藝術公司。
32. 郭璞真(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台南市，台南藝術大學博物館學研究所。
33. 陳永裕(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台中市，朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系。
34. 曾希文(2006)。台北當代藝術館委外經營困境與蛻變。社教雙月刊，131，45-49。
35. 曾瑀曦(2011)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台灣師範大學美術研究所藝術行政暨管理碩士班。
36. 黃光男(2002)。新世紀的博物館營運。台北市:歷史博物館。
37. 黃琇凌(2006)。人約黃昏後，藝術不打烊？─談博物館夜間開放之可行性。故宮文物月刊，24(7)，90-101。
38. 劉育維(2010)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，中國文化大學觀光事業研究所。
39. 潘婉茹(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。彰化市，國立彰化師範大學行銷與流通管理研究所。

1. 陳思妤,宋祚忠(2020)。應用IPA模式於探討國立海洋科技博物館觀衆對服務品質滿意度之研究。科技博物，24(3)，5-32。
2. 黃惠婷,陳相仲,浦青青(2018)。整合Kano模式與重要-表現程度分析法檢視博物館服務品質關鍵因素：以國立科學工藝博物館為例。科技博物，22(2)，5-35。
3. 浦青青(2014)。博物館服務品質之研究：以國立科學工藝博物館為例。科技博物，18(2)，39-65。