以教育學三角關係模型進行博物館學習理論與科普實務整合一同類型機構與異類型機構合作案例分析

Integration Museum Learning Theory into the Practice for Popularization of Science by Didactic Triangle: analytic case study for hetero- style institutions cooperation

葉蓉樺(Jung-Hua Yeh)

理論融入實務模式 ； 科學博物館 ； 非制式科學教育 ； The module of theory integrated in practice ； science museum ； informal setting science learning

科技博物

20卷1期（2016 / 03 / 01）

95 - 115

繁體中文

本文提到的科學普及工作，定義為活動規劃。在本文中，規劃工作是為了辦理促進民眾應用科學知識及思辨方式，對生活中與科學、科技應用相關的議題進行反思及價值判斷之活動。首先由博物館學關於博物館學習的論著、科學教育國際學刊裡關於博物館情境科學學習理論，論述非制式情境科學學習相關的理論於不同博物館實務中的適用性，再以教育學三角關係架構將指引實務的理論與實務整合關係進行說明。接著以國立自然科學博物館在2010 年至2013 年期間進行的能源教育規劃實務為例，說明在教育規劃實務中如何應用理論融入實務模式進行教育活動規劃，並且在執行時與不同類型的機構，進行跨機構資源整合：例如展示主題不同的博物館、專業學術研究機構（大學的物理學系所、環境科學系所及跨領域能源科技研究團隊）、師資培育機構（大學的中等教育學程或國民教育學程）、各級的學校（國小、國中及高中）等不同類型的合作對象。並且由理論融入實務的行動者三角關係架構為基礎，檢視各案例中合作與溝通是否朝原規劃方向進行。並就進行教育規劃工作實務經驗，歸納出科學博物館內進行科學普及工作活動規劃模式。最後經由修正成果評量工具、活動對基礎理論的詮釋對應或提供穩定的博物館科學教育品質。文末由案例分析結果，提出對科普活動規劃跨領域合作的實務執行建議。

The work of popularization of science referred in this article is defined as activities programming. The programming made activities with the functions below: 1. promption the publics thinking and reasoning by science; 2. aware of the science related social issue and making reflective thinking for it. First part of this study reviewed several museum learning theories to build the argumentation for the adaption of these theories in different styles of museum education practice. Then, to adapt the argumentation for museum learning theory into the didactic triangle which presented the situation under informal setting science learning. Finally, drawing this framework to analysis the energy education project of National Museum of Natural Science during 2010 to 2013, which indicated how the curator adapting museum learning theory in activity programming and the different considerations while multi- institutions cooperation. At the end, to provide several suggestions for popularization science activity programming and interdisciplinary institutions cooperation was according on the analysis of the case study.

1. Ambrose, T.,Paine, C.(2006).Museum basics.London:Routledge.
2. Beck, L.,Cable, T.(1998).Interpretation for the 21st century: fifteen guiding principles for interpreting nature.NewYork:Sagamore.
3. Bell, Philip(ed.),Lewenstein, Bruce(ed.),Shouse, Andrew W.(ed.),Feder, Michael A.(ed.).Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
4. Brownlee, J.,Berthelsen, D.(2006).Personal Epistemology and Relational Pedagogy in Early Childhood Teacher Education Programs.Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development,26(1),17-29.
5. Chang, C. Y.,Chen, C. Y.,Huang, Y. C.(2012).The impact of a science museum invoked learning environment (SMiLE) on students.Journal of Baltic Science Education,11(4),357-366.
6. Falk, J. H.(1983).Time and behavior as predicators of learning.Science Education,67,267-76.
7. Falk, J.H.,Osborne, J.F.,Dierking, L.D.,Dawson, E.,Wenger, M.,Wong, B.(2012).,London:Wellcome Trust.
8. Falk. J. H.,Dierking. L.D.(2000).Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning.Walnut Creek. CA:AltaMira.Press.
9. Fisher, A.,Rush, L.(2008).Conceptions of learning and pedagogy: developing trainee teachers' epistemological understandings.Curriculum Journal,19(3),227-238.
10. Gilbert, J. K.(1995).Learning in museums: Objects, models and text.Journal of Education in Museum,16,19-21.
11. Hein, G. E.(1998).Learning in the museum.New York:Routledge.
12. Hofstein, A.,Rosenfeld, S.(1996).Bridging the gap between formal and informal science learning.Studies in Science Education,28,87-112.
13. Linhardt, G.(ed.),Crowley, K.(ed.),Knutson, K.(ed.)(2002).Learning Conversations in museums.London:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. McCallie, E.,Bell, L.,Lohwater, T.,Falk, J. H.,Lehr, J. L.,Lewenstein, B. V.,Needham, C.,Wiehe, B.(2009).A CAISE Inquiry Group ReportA CAISE Inquiry Group Report,Washington, D.C.:Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education=CAISE.
15. National Research Council(2009).Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits.Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments.
16. Pearce, S.(ed.)(1996).Exploring science in museums.London:Athlone.
17. Stocklmayer, S.(2002).New experiences and old knowledge: Towards a model for the personal aware of science and technology.International Journal of Science Education,24,835-858.
18. Tiberghien, A.,Vice, J.,Gaidioz, P.(2009).Design-based research:case of a teaching sequence on mechanics.International Journal of Science Education,31(17),2275-2314.
19. Uyen Tran, L.(2007).Teaching science in museums: the pedagogy and goals of museum educators.Science Education,91,278-297.
20. Yeh, J. H.,Ku, C.H.(2011).The Impact of Counting Carbon-footprint During the Energy Education Teacher Seminar: Cognition, Attitudes and Motivation toward Energy Conservation Actions.2011 International Forum for a Low Carbon Vision,Taipei City:

1. 劉佳儒,張美珍,王裕宏(2020)。輔導偏鄉國中學生學習飛行科學知識之成效分析：以培訓參與競賽活動為策略。科學教育學刊，28(4)，327-351。
2. 劉佳儒、張美珍、王裕宏(2017)。以結構方程模式檢驗大學生參與創意競賽之動機因素。科技博物，21(2)，27-50。