創新科技的展示詮釋－以「創新傷口癒合」單元為例

Exhibition and Interpretation of Innovative Technology: A Case on ＂Innovative Wound Healing＂

陳玫岑(Mei-Tsen Chen)；蘇郁涵(Yu-Han Su)；黃群雅(Chun-Ya Huang)

傷口癒合 ； 二氧化碳 ； 創新科技 ； 博物館展示 ； wound healing ； carbon dioxide ； innovative technology ； museum exhibition

科技博物

24卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

5 - 23

繁體中文

科學家以改善人類生活為目標不斷研發具獨創性的概念或技術，了解這些創新科技可以讓一般人跟上世界的脈動，而科學博物館即是展示及推廣的極佳平台。然而，這些科技研發的最終目的雖然貼近生活問題，但往往因為過高的專業知識門檻而無法被大眾理解和接受。如何有效地將這些專業的知識轉化或簡化為大眾所知悉，是博物館展示的重要課題。在創新科技的轉化過程中，必須考慮的因素包含專業資料的篩選簡化以及呈現的完整性、引發觀眾興趣等。由於轉化主題為生醫領域的「奈米粒子如何藉由釋放二氧化碳達到加速傷口癒合的效果」，過程極微觀，肉眼不可見，且實際療程無法讓觀眾在短暫的參觀時間內完全體驗，如何解決觀眾無法想像的問題，成為展示規劃設計上的著眼點。為得知觀眾對於「創新傷口癒合」單元的觀感印象、所蘊涵的核心知識的理解面向，以及對此前瞻研究的整體看法，透過觀眾參觀後的訪談資料整理結果，本研究結論如下：就科學家想解決傷口加速癒合問題的想法、博物館想讓民眾引起對科學探究的興趣來說，此單元將知識內容具象化，有助於相關核心知識的訊息傳播；從理解面向來看，觀眾參觀後多能知曉為何二氧化碳可以促進傷口癒合，但對於理解的多寡取決於概念知識的順序串連以及諸多專有名詞的障礙跨越；透過展示內容條理呈現，觀眾對於創新研究未來實際應用多頗有期待，此單元應已傳遞科學研究的重點價值，達到將科研轉化為科普展示的目標。

Scientists continually develop innovative concepts or technologies for the purpose of improving human lives. Understanding these innovative technologies enables a normal person to keep up with the world. Science museums offer an ideal platform for displaying and promoting such technologies. Although the ultimate goal of this technological research and development is to address problems in people's daily lives, the general public is often unable to understand and accept the ideas in question due to the exorbitant professional knowledge thresholds required. Methods for effectively transforming or simplifying professional knowledge to render it accessible to the general public are an important topic for a museum exhibition. During the transformation of innovative technologies, factors that require consideration include the screening and simplification of professional information, the completeness of the exhibition, and the ability to engage the audience. In the biomedical field, ＂how nanoparticles accelerate wound heal by releasing carbon dioxide＂ is a microscopic process that is invisible to the naked eye. In addition, the treatment cannot be completely witnessed by the audience within a short viewing time. Therefore, solving the problem of the audience's inability to imagine processes has become the focus of exhibition and planning design. To ascertain the audience's impressions of the ＂innovative wound healing＂ unit, their comprehension of the core knowledge conveyed, and the general opinions on the pioneering research involved, interviews were arranged with audience members after their museum visits. The conclusions of this study are as follows: For the thoughts on scientists trying to solve the problem of accelerating wound healing as well as the museum attempting to attract people's interest in scientific inquiry, this unit makes the knowledge content concrete, facilitating the propagation of relevant core knowledge. After the museum visit, most of the audience members were able to understand why carbon dioxide facilitates wound healing, but the level of comprehension depended on the concatenation order of the conceptual knowledge as well as on whether the obstacle of the extensive onomasticon was overcome. The audience had high expectations regarding the practical applications of innovative research, and this unit transmitted the key values of scientific research, succeeding in transforming scientific research into a popular science exhibition.

1. Brandi, C.,Grimaldi, L.,Nisi, G.,Brafa, A.,Campa, A.,Calabrò, M.,D’Aniello, C(2010).The role of carbon dioxide therapy in the treatment of chronic wounds.Vivo,24(2),223-226.
2. Chen, M. T.,Yen, Y. C.(2013).Bringing nanotechnology to the public through special exhibition: “The invisible scale”.13th Annual Conference of Asia Pacific Network of Science & Technology Centres (ASPAC 2013 Conference),Daejeon, Korea:
3. Li, W. P.,Su, C. H.,Wang, S. J.,Tsai, F. J.,Chang, C. T.,Liao, M. C.,Yeh, C. S.(2017).CO2 delivery to accelerate incisional wound healing following single irradiation of near-infrared lamp on the coordinated colloids.ACS Nano,11(6),5826-5835.
4. Posner, G. J.,Strike, K. A.,Hewson, P. W.,Gertzog, W. A.(1982).Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change.Science Education,66(2),211-228.
5. Sandifer, C.(2003).Technological novelty and open-endedness: Two characteristics of interactive exhibits that contribute to the holding of visitor attention in a science museum.Research in Science and Teaching,40(2),121-137.
6. The White House. (2013). Preparing a 21st century workforce－science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in the 2014 budget. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/2014_R&Dbudget_STEM.pdf
7. 郝和平(2016)。STEM 教育—美國幼教界的一個新動向。早期教育（教師版），4，4-5。
8. 張曉琪(2019)。美國跨領域教學趨勢：從 STEM 到 STEAM 的轉化。教育研究月刊，300，36-46。
9. 野中郁次郎,竹內弘高(1995).創新求勝.日本經濟新聞社.
10. 傅騫,王辭曉(2014)。當創客遇上 STEAM 教育。現代教育技術雜誌，24(10)，37-42。
11. 曾瑞蓮(2012)。從科學教具到互動展示：奇幻國展廳建置的大考驗。科技博物，16(3)，73-87。
12. 趙慧臣,陸曉婷(2016)。開展 STEAM 教育，提高學生創新能力——訪美國 STEAM 教育知名學者格雷特·亞克門教授。開放教育研究，22(5)，4-10。
13. 蔡秉宸,靳知勤(2004)。藉情境學習提升民眾科學素養：以科學博物館教育為例。博物館學季刊，18(2)，129-137。

1. 葛子祥,葉玟萱,黃群雅,陳玫岑(2022)。從科研到科普：創新生物晶片單元的轉化詮釋。科技博物，26(3)，75-105。
2. 葉玟萱,黃群雅,陳玫岑(2021)。觀衆對於iPS細胞展示的科技理解與認知。科技博物，25(2)，53-78。