讀者科普圖書決策之初探研究

An Exploratory Research on User Popular Science Books Decision-making

楊憶婷(Yi-Ting Yang)；陳育新(Yu Hsin Chen)

透鏡模式 ； 選書決策 ； 科普圖書 ； Lens Model ； Books Decision-Making ； Popular Science Books

科技博物

24卷3期（2020 / 09 / 01）

117 - 139

繁體中文

本研究以認知心理學的透鏡理論觀點，探討讀者如何進行科普圖書決策。本研究以「閱讀目的」、「資訊管道」、「熟悉感」、「選書因素」以及「信心程度」等五方面進行調查，以了解讀者決策的特性與影響。本研究透過問卷調查法，針對13歲以上讀者進行調查，共回收457份有效問卷，進行卡方檢定、獨立樣本t檢定及迴歸分析。研究結果顯示，「工作、報告或考試」為24歲以下讀者之主要需求；不同年齡層的資訊管道來源各有不同，「暢銷書排行榜」的比例為最高、「課程參考書單」則是24歲以下讀者的主要資訊來源；讀者選書信心程度會因主題「熟悉感」有所差異。另外，選書因素中「作者」、「書名」、「主題」、「設計質感」、「內容簡介」、「出版社」及「專業書評」等七項因素對「信心程度」有顯著影響，其中又以「主題」影響較大。

This study uses the lens theory of cognitive psychology to explore how readers make the popular science books decision. This research investigates five aspects of ＂reading purpose＂, ＂information sources＂, ＂familiarity＂, ＂book information cues＂ and ＂confidence level＂ to understand the characteristics and influence of readers' decision-making. A total of 457 valid questionnaires with reader over the age of 13 were analyzed by chi-square test, independent sample t test and regression analysis. The results show that ＂work, reports or exams＂ are the main purpose of readers under the age of 24; readers most often use ＂best seller list＂ when making decision; the ＂course reference list＂ is the main information source for readers under the age of 24; The confidence level vary depending on the ＂familiarity＂ of the book's theme. In addition, seven cues such as ＂author＂, ＂title＂, ＂theme＂, ＂design＂, ＂content introduction＂, ＂publisher＂ and ＂book review from expert＂ have a significant impact on ＂confidence level＂, among which the ＂theme＂ is more influential.

1. 唐牧群,吳宛青(2009)。由透鏡理論看大學圖書館讀者選書決策過程。圖書資訊學刊，7(1&2)，37-52。
   連結：
2. 謝宜瑾,唐牧群(2013)。從透鏡模式探討影響讀者尋書滿意度之因素-以 aNobii 為例。圖書資訊學刊研究，8(15)，69-119。
   連結：
3. Akhuly, A.,Gupta, M.(2014).Competency based recruitment decisions: A lens model approach.The Psychologist-Manager Journal,17(4),279-306.
4. Beach, L. R.(1997).The psychology of decision-making: People in organizations.California, USA:SAGE Publications.
5. Beach, L. R.,Connolly, T.(2005).The psychology of decision making: People in organizations.California, USA:SAGE Publications, Inc..
6. Bogers, T.,Petras, V.(2017).Supporting book search: Acomprehensive comparison of tags vs. controlled vocabulary metadata.Data and information management,1(1),17-34.
7. Brunswik, E.(1955).Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology.Psychological Review,62(3),193-217.
8. Brunswik, E.,Stewart, T. R.(2001).The essential Brunswick beginnings, explications, applications.New York:Oxford University Press.
9. Carrol, J. S.,Johnson, E. J.(1990).Decision research: A field guide.California, USA:Sage Publications.
10. Chen, Y. F.(2008).Herd behavior in purchasing books online.Computers in Human Behavior,24(5),1977-1992.
11. d'Astous, A.Colbert, F.,Mbarek, I.(2006).Factors influencing readers’ interest in new book releases: An experimental study.Poetics,34(2),134-147.
12. De Langhe, B.,Fernbach, P. M.,Lichtenstein, D. R.(2016).Navigating by the stars: Investigating the actual and perceived validity of online user ratings.Journal of Consumer Research,42(6),817-833.
13. Frangsmyr, T.(ed.)(2003).Les Prix Nobel 2002.Stockholm, Sweden:Almquist & Wiksell International.
14. Hartwig, M.,Bond, C. F., Jr.(2011).Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.Psychological Bulletin,137(4),643-659.
15. Higgins, M.(1999).Meta-information, and time: Factors in human decision making.Journal of the American Society for Information Science,50(2),132-139.
16. Hopper, R.(2005).What are teenagers reading? Adolescent fiction reading habits and reading choices.Literacy (formerly Reading),39(3),113-120.
17. Kamphuis, J.(1991).Satisfaction with books: Some empirical findings.Poetics,20(5-6),471-485.
18. Karelaia, N.,Hogarth, R. M.(2008).Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens model studies.Psychological Bulletin,134(3),404-426.
19. Keuschnigg, M.(2015).Product success in cultural markets: The mediating role of familiarity, peers, and experts.Poetics,51,17-36.
20. Koolen, M.,Kamps, J.,Kazai, G.(2012).Social book search: Comparing topical relevance judgments and book suggestions for evaluation.Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management,New York, NY, USA:
21. Kumar, R.,Bhanodai, G.,Pamula, R.(2019).Book search using social information, user profiles and query expansion with Pseudo Relevance Feedback.Applied Intelligence,49(6),2178-2200.
22. Lancaster, F. W.(2003).Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice.London, England:Facet Publishing.
23. Leemans, H.,Stokmans, M.(1991).Attributes used in choosing books.Poetics,20(5-6),487-505.
24. Li, C. Y.,Fang, Y. H.(2020).I searched, I collected, I experienced: Exploring how mobile augmented reality makes the players go.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,54
25. Maynard, S.,Mackay, S.,Smyth, F.(2008).A survey of young people’s reading in England.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,40(4),239-253.
26. Newell, B. R.,Lagnado, D. A.,Shanks, D. R.(2007).Straight choices: The psychology of decision making.New York, NY:Psychology Press.
27. Newell, B. R.,Shanks, D. R.(2014).Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,37(1),1-19.
28. Ranganathan, S. R.(1967).Prolegomena to library classification.London, England:Asia Publishing House.
29. Ranganathan, S. R. (1931). The five laws of library science. London, England: Edward Goldston.
30. Reuter, K.(2007).Assessing aesthetic relevance: Children's book selection in a digital library.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58(12),1745-1763.
31. Ross, C. S.(1999).Finding without seeking: The information encounter in the context of reading for pleasure.Information Process & Management,35(6),783-799.
32. Simon, H. A.(1955).A behavioral model of rational choice.The Quarterly Journal of Economics,69(1),99-118.
33. Taha, N.(ed.),Al-Sayyed, R.(ed.),Alqatawna, J.(ed.),Rodan, A. (ed.)(2017).Social Media Shaping e-Publishing and Academia.Berlin, Germany:Springer International Publishing.
34. Tang, M. C.(2009).A study of academic library users’ decision-making process: A Lens model approach.Journal of Documentation,65(6),938-957.
35. Ullah, I.,Khusro, S.(2020).Social book search: The impact of the social web on book retrieval and recommendation.Multimedia Tools and Applications,79(11-12),8011-8060.
36. 張淑惠(2017)。臺灣國小兒童雜誌封面視覺設計之研究。印刷設計，33(1)，40-65。
37. 歐美玲(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。