英文摘要
|
Military dependents' villages are important historical and cultural heritages in Taiwan, with deep cultural significance and educational value. It's a milestone of historical development in Taiwan. Its unique culture has already crossed the bamboo fences, integrated into our lives, and shown evidence of including the cultural diversity of Taiwanese society. However, there are many difficulties in promoting military dependents' village cultural parks in reality, such as the lack of legal, financial, staffing, and professional management resources, which the cultural conservation work has to overcome. After becoming a museum, military dependents' villages not only have the responsibility to conservation and continuation of the culture but also respond to the needs and trends of society. Visitor studies are the best way to communicate with visitors. The purposes of this paper are: reviewing the development difficulties encountered by military dependents' village museums, and how the functions of visitor studies could cope with; analyzing what issues are the visitor studies of military dependents' village museums mainly discussing, what are the characteristics, and what issues are still open to discussion. The study found, in addition to the above difficulties in the development, representation of military dependents' village culture also presents features of textual oversimplification and idealization. It also lacks the authenticity and representative of the real-life experience of the past residents. Besides, some stores in the cultural parks are not conformant with the military dependents' village culture, making it difficult to make a connection with visitors experiences and difficulty gaining a deeper understanding of the culture. Moreover, the work plan for the military dependents' village reforming will be set to end in 2022. The relevant laws will be examined at that time, but there are still few discussions on the issues in the visitor studies of military dependents' village museums. This study attempts to serve as a feasible reference for future cultural conservation practices for military dependents' villages.
|
参考文献
|
-
李如菁(2019)。展示更新與展示評量--以科工館「烹調的科學」常設廳局部更新策略探討為例。科技博物,23(3),5-26。
連結:
-
林寬裕,李慶華(2018)。行動博物館之探討:以新北市博物館為例。科技博物,22(4),5-42。
連結:
-
邱比特(2017)。眷村再現的困境:從新竹市眷村博物館談起。文史臺灣學報,11,317-339。
連結:
-
黃正宜,王麗卿(2020)。觀眾對於地方文化空間地方感之研究-以臺中市眷村文物館為例。文化創意產業研究學報,10(3),11-19。
連結:
-
黃鼎倫,王玉霞,李虹叡(2015)。以眷村文化保存觀點探討屏東勝利新村活化策略。高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊,1(2),47-60。
連結:
-
劉婉珍(2008)。觀眾研究與博物館的營運發展。博物館學季刊,22(3),21-37。
連結:
-
Chelsea, D. (2018). A museum’s transformation: Cleveland museum of art goes deep for inclusion. Nonprofit Quarterly. Retrieved October 28, 2021 from https://nonprofitquarterly.org/a-museums-transformation-cleveland-museum-of-art-goes-deep-for-inclusion/
-
Loomis, R. J.(1993).Planning for the visitor: The challenge of visitor studies.Museum visitor studies in the 90s,London:
-
Pattison, S.(2011).Access Algebra staff facilitation: A formative evaluation report.Oregon:Oregon Museum of Science and Industry.
-
Screven, C. G.(1990).Use of evaluation before, during, and after exhibit evaluation.ILVS Review,1(2),36-66.
-
Screven, C. G.(1993).United States: A science in the making.Museum International,178,6-12.
-
The Cleveland Museum of Art. (2018). For the benefit of all: The CMA’s diversity, equity and inclusion plan. Retrieved October 28, 2021 from https://www.clevelandart.org/sites/default/files/documents/other/Diversity%2C%20Equity%20and%20Inclusion%20Plan.pdf
-
The Cleveland Museum of Art. (2017). A strategic framework for our second century. Retrieved October 28, 2021 from https://www.clevelandart.org/sites/default/files/documents/other/CMA_Strategic_Plan_2018-2027_complete.pdf
-
丁瑋(1996)。眷村與眷村文化。歷史文物,6(4),70-75。
-
文化部文化資產局(2021)。國家文化資產網。取自 https://nchdb.boch.gov.tw/(瀏覽日期:2021/10/18)
-
王啟祥(2004)。國內博物館觀眾研究知多少。博物館學季刊,18(2),95-104。
-
江濡因(2011)。眷村、博物館與性別:論龜山眷村故事館之性別展演。博物館與文化,2,53-88。
-
李佩霖(2019).臺灣的後眷村時代:離散經驗與社會想像的重構.臺北市:翰蘆圖書.
-
李宜潔(2007)。臺南市,國立成功大學。
-
李廣均(2019).眷村保存與多元文化的社會學分析.桃園市:國立中央大學出版中心.
-
李廣均(2016)。差異、平等與多元文化:眷村保存的個案研究。社會分析,12,1-40。
-
李廣均(2015)。臺灣「眷村」的歷史形成與社會差異:列管眷村與自力眷村的比較。臺灣社會學刊,57,129-172。
-
林夙瑩(2018)。臺南市,國立臺南藝術大學。
-
林維真(2020)。博物館觀眾研究。臺大校友雙月刊,132,9-13。
-
徐唯宸(2013)。臺北市,國立臺北藝術大學。
-
張智凱(2014)。新竹市,中華大學。
-
張譽騰(1994)。博物館觀眾研究的目的、範疇與方法。臺灣博物季刊,14(1),16-20。
-
許功明,劉幸真(1996)。「臺灣南島民族展示」觀眾研究-大學生篇。博物館學季刊,10(4),79-89。
-
郭冠麟(編)(2005).從竹籬笆到高樓大廈:國軍眷村發展史.臺北市:國防部史政編譯室.
-
陳國寧(2020)。由當代博物館的社會作用再思考博物館的定義。臺灣博物季刊,39(4),6-13。
-
劉子瑄(2013)。臺北市,國立臺北科技大學。
-
鄭郁芬(2018)。高雄市,國立中山大學。
-
謝旻澔(2017)。新竹市,中華大學。
-
蘇俐尹(2020)。新北市,輔仁大學。
-
蘇素霞(2006)。臺南市,國立臺南藝術大學。
|